ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Lake Forest Elementary · Lake Forest

Lake Forest Elementary: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

Lake Forest posts 47% meeting the standard against 43% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

21801 Pittsford Drive, 92630 (opens in new tab)·Saddleback Valley Unified·Lake Forest·Grades TK-6·640 students·55% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(949) 830-9945
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope5445
% Exceeded25%21%
% Met+47%43%
Growth+1.0-2.9
Absence14.0%17.9%
Suspension0.5%1.6%
Scope Score
54
🤝 Culture First · Solid
ranked #1,490 statewide · #12 of 21 in Saddleback Valley Unified

Lake Forest Elementary scores 54 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 74th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🤝 Culture First — Ask whether the low absenteeism and suspension numbers come from what the school does or from the community it serves — both can produce the same numbers, and only a visit tells you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “47% proficient” and call it done. Lake Forest deserves a closer read. The school sits in Lake Forest, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 82nd to the 74th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathYellow(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 47% meet the standard today, versus 56% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 346%40%40%33%49%
Grade 458%63%54%53%44%
Grade 571%53%56%58%52%
Grade 653%45%49%52%57%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 352%47%47%47%46%
Grade 453%57%45%52%43%
Grade 552%54%46%45%45%
Grade 637%39%44%46%44%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

29%
20%
51%
Grade 3 · 49% proficient
25%
20%
55%
Grade 4 · 45% proficient
19%
33%
48%
Grade 5 · 52% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 10.1pp across grades; the floor rises 2.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
24.5%
State 21.3%
3.2pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+1.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
46.6%
State 42.7%
3.9pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.0%
State 17.9%
4.0pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.5%
State 1.6%
1.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
14.6%
State 18.0%
3.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Lake Forest Elementary in Lake Forest, 37.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lake Forest Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 200 students tested.

All students at this school: 48% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 48%, district —, state 43%48%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 34%, district 38%, state 32%34% · −14 vs school
MaleMale: this school 47%, district 55%, state 42%47% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 32%, district 36%, state 32%32% · −16 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 49%, district 56%, state 44%49% · +1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 60%, district 65%, state 56%60% · +13 vs school
HomelessHomeless: this school 25%, district 26%, state 22%25% · −22 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 8%, state 11%9% · −39 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 4%, district 23%, state 15%4% · −44 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 50%, district 82%, state 72%50% · +2 vs school

6 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 3.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.1pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.0%, district 16.0%, state 17.9%14.0% · −4.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.5%, district —, state 1.6%0.5% · −1.2pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (21.0% vs 13.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.9%
TK/K21.0%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Lake Forest Elementary
54/100
This school

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 24:123:1
Teaching staff35 teachers
Avg. experience17.4 years
Fully credentialed100%
First-year teachers14%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$30,000 – $133,169
Principal salary$162,720 – $187,915
Superintendent salary$356,227

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,290, CA average $14,815$27,290 · spent at this school
Federal share$191 per student

$191 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,633 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction65%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,689 per pupil
2019$11,164 per pupil
2018$11,797 per pupil
2017$10,660 per pupil
2016$10,377 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic49.8%
District 39.4% · CA 56.1%
White22.2%
District 36.6% · CA 19.9%
Other17.0%
District 13.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian8.6%
District 9.7% · CA 10.2%
Black2.3%
District 1.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 55.3% (8pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$126K · CA $85K
Median home value$910K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+47% · CA 35%
ZIP population67,152
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 35% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Lake Forest Elementary a good elementary school?

Lake Forest Elementary has a Scope Score of 54 out of 100, placing it in the 74th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #1,490 statewide. 24.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.2 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Lake Forest Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 46.6% of students at Lake Forest Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 24.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 24.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 481 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Lake Forest Elementary rank in California?

Lake Forest Elementary ranks #1,490 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 74th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Lake Forest Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Lake Forest Elementary increases by 1.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Lake Forest Elementary?

14.0% of students at Lake Forest Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.5%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Lake Forest Elementary compare to other schools in Lake Forest?

Lake Forest Elementary scores 54/100 (74th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 640 students. Use the schools in Lake Forest page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Lake Forest Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Lake Forest Elementary in Lake Forest, 37.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 42.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lake Forest Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (30.5% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 47.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 200 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
24.5%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 53th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+1.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 66th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
46.6%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 53th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.0%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 56th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.5%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 60th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
14.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37929%20%19%32%49%+6
Grade 48125%20%16%40%44%−0
Grade 57919%33%20%28%52%+4
Grade 69630%27%16%27%57%+11
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37925%20%25%29%46%−0
Grade 48119%25%28%28%43%+2
Grade 58230%15%24%30%45%+10
Grade 69628%16%24%32%44%+9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/118215%21%46%18%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20037.5%−5−1
Hispanic/Latino17637.5%−4−1
White6860.3%−9−2
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Lake Forest Elementary ←5424.5%46.6%+1.00.5%
Philip J. Reilly Elementary3 mi7857.0%81.8%−8.00.3%
Portola Hills Elementary3.3 mi7849.4%77.8%+7.40.3%
Oxford Preparatory Academy - South Orange County1.3 mi7854.5%78.7%+13.50.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20196282#97129.6%55.6%7.7%0.1%+12.4pp
20225785#88129.9%52.4%20.9%0.5%+10.3pp
20235883#100025.8%48.2%20.2%0.5%+7.6pp
20245779#121627.3%48.0%15.3%1.4%+11.2pp
20255474#149024.5%46.6%14.0%0.5%+1.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.4%15.5%+6.1pp
Male6.0%12.0%+6.0pp
Asian4.5%20.7%+16.2pp
Black/African American7.7%11.1%+3.4pp
White0.0%2.9%+2.9pp
Hispanic/Latino10.5%16.5%+6.0pp
Two or More Races1.9%6.4%+4.5pp
Students with Disabilities12.4%22.0%+9.6pp
English Learners9.6%18.6%+9.0pp
Homeless24.4%27.4%+3.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged11.0%16.3%+5.3pp
All Students7.7%13.7%+6.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction