Public school · Los Angeles Unified

Kentwood Elementary

Los Angeles · TK–5 · 352 students (2024–25)

96thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 5,721 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score
75 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 82% and 81% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 125
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).
How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard
64%
Met standard
18%
Below standard
18%

82% met or exceeded · 125 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaLos Angeles Unified
Exceeded64%24%23%
Met18%22%22%
Nearly met12%21%22%
Not met6%33%33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard
63%
Met standard
18%
Below standard
19%

81% met or exceeded · 125 tested

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaLos Angeles Unified
Exceeded63%21%20%
Met18%20%22%
Nearly met17%25%25%
Not met2%34%33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence
In 2025, students in grades 4–5 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 4–5 · 2025
+14 ptsEnglish · above expected+18 ptsMath · above expected
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4–5: 71
Comparison
71 students in grades 4–5 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
About 2 in 3 reached the top of the state’s four levels, about three times California’s rate in the same grades (24% and 21%).grades 3–5 · spring 2025
64%English · exceeded the standard63%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 125
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).
Low-income students here (48 tested, grades 3–5, spring 2025) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (35% and 30%).grades 3–5 · spring 2025
56%English · met or exceeded60%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2025
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 3–5: 48
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 48 students.

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school82%
California46%

Tested: 125 here · 1,232,086 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school82%
Los Angeles Unified45%

Tested: 125 here · 111,662 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 596 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaLos Angeles Unified
Exceeded64%24%23%
Met18%22%22%
Nearly met12%21%22%
Not met6%33%33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school81%
California41%

Tested: 125 here · 1,241,652 in California.

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school81%
Los Angeles Unified42%

Tested: 125 here · 112,947 in Los Angeles Unified. District public schools combined, weighted by students tested · 596 schools.

Explore the results & sources
LevelHereCaliforniaLos Angeles Unified
Exceeded63%21%20%
Met18%20%22%
Nearly met17%25%25%
Not met2%34%33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Progress over time

Are students making progress?

The state’s growth measure71 students · grades 4–5 · 2025
English+14ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)
Math+18ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 14 points above that prediction, and in math 18 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

School pattern, spring 2025High CeilingThe average Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 50%.
School pattern, spring 2025Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

9 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25
21in 100 at the average Los Angeles Unified school18in 100 at the average California elementary school

34 of 363 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school9 in 100
at the average Los Angeles Unified school21 in 100
at the average California elementary school18 in 100
0.3%of students were suspended at least once (1 of 370), 2024–25
0.2%at the average Los Angeles Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2024–25Per 100 studentsStudents
TK and kindergarten1011 of 115
Grades 1–31017 of 164
Grades 4–576 of 84

School Experience Survey, 2025–26

What students and families say

How students, families and staff at Kentwood answered LAUSD’s 2025–26 School Experience Survey, beside the same questions across LAUSD schools at the same level.

This schoolLAUSD, same levelEach track 0–100%

Students

93 of 93 students answered (100%).

Safety8 points above LAUSD“I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.85%LAUSD 77%1 question

One question, 93 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • I feel safe in this school or in online school sessions85%LAUSD 77%93 answered
Belonging12 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.80%LAUSD 68%5 questions

Average of 5 questions, 93 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learn84%LAUSD 78%93 answered
  • I am happy to be at this school77%LAUSD 74%93 answered
  • I feel like I am part of this school89%LAUSD 72%93 answered
  • I feel accepted for who I am at this school81%LAUSD 72%93 answered
  • Most kids at this school are kind to each other69%LAUSD 42%93 answered
Caring adults2 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.77%LAUSD 75%8 questions

Average of 8 questions, 91–93 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Teachers go out of their way to help students81%LAUSD 78%93 answered
  • The teachers at this school treat students fairly75%LAUSD 69%91 answered
  • Teachers care if I'm absent from school67%LAUSD 70%93 answered
  • Adults at this school treat all students with respect63%LAUSD 73%93 answered
  • There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering me74%LAUSD 71%92 answered
  • There is at least one adult at my school who supports me89%LAUSD 80%92 answered
  • Teachers at my school know me90%LAUSD 78%92 answered
  • If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help me81%LAUSD 79%91 answered
Engagement10 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.78%LAUSD 68%6 questions

Average of 6 questions, 92–93 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activities89%LAUSD 81%93 answered
  • My teachers make learning fun77%LAUSD 67%92 answered
  • Students have a voice in decision making at this school71%LAUSD 55%93 answered
  • Teachers encourage students to make decisions78%LAUSD 72%93 answered
  • There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of class82%LAUSD 74%93 answered
  • I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activities73%LAUSD 59%93 answered
High expectations6 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.90%LAUSD 84%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 93 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work better95%LAUSD 88%93 answered
  • Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I choose85%LAUSD 81%93 answered
Bullying9 points below LAUSDShare who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days. A lower share means fewer reported it.15%LAUSD 24%4 questions

Average of 4 questions, 92–93 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?17%LAUSD 31%93 answered
  • Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?19%LAUSD 30%93 answered
  • Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?14%LAUSD 25%93 answered
  • Been bullied online?9%LAUSD 12%92 answered
All 43 questions, as a table
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
I feel safe in this school or in online school sessionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%77%93
This school is a supportive and inviting place for students to learnShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%78%93
I am happy to be at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%74%93
I feel like I am part of this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%72%93
I feel accepted for who I am at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed81%72%93
Most kids at this school are kind to each otherShare who agreed or strongly agreed69%42%93
Teachers go out of their way to help studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed81%78%93
The teachers at this school treat students fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed75%69%91
Teachers care if I'm absent from schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed67%70%93
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed63%73%93
There is an adult at my school whom I trust and can talk to no matter what is bothering meShare who agreed or strongly agreed74%71%92
There is at least one adult at my school who supports meShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%80%92
Teachers at my school know meShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%78%92
If I told a teacher or other adult at this school that another student was bullying me, he or she would try to help meShare who agreed or strongly agreed81%79%91
Teachers give students a chance to take part in classroom discussions or activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%81%93
My teachers make learning funShare who agreed or strongly agreed77%67%92
Students have a voice in decision making at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed71%55%93
Teachers encourage students to make decisionsShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%72%93
There are lots of chances for students at my school to get involved in sports, clubs, or other school activities outside of classShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%74%93
I participate in extra-curricular activities offered through my school, such as school clubs or organizations, musical groups, sports teams, student government, or any other extra-curricular activitiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed73%59%93
In my classes, my teachers tell me how I can make my work betterShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%88%93
Adults at this school encourage me to work hard so I can be successful in college or at the job I chooseShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%81%93
Had mean rumors or lies spread about you?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days17%31%93
Been made fun of because of your looks or the way you talk?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days19%30%93
Been pushed, shoved, slapped, hit or kicked by someone who wasn't kidding around?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days14%25%93
Been bullied online?Share who said it happened to them 2 or more times in the past 30 days9%12%92
The teachers at this school grade me fairlyShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%82%93
Students know how they are expected to actShare who agreed or strongly agreed80%54%93
Adults at this school clearly inform students what would happen if they break school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed91%80%93
What is the highest level of education that you plan to complete?Share who answered “Four-year college degree” or “Graduate degree”——0
I can change my intelligence with hard workShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”87%78%93
I can increase my intelligence by challenging myselfShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”91%75%93
I am capable of learning anythingShare who answered “Mostly true” or “Completely true”84%74%93
I feel safe in the neighborhood around this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed82%64%93
I can do well on all my tests, even when they're difficultShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”76%61%93
I can master the hardest topics in my classesShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”63%49%93
I can meet all the learning goals my teachers setShare who answered “Mostly confident” or “Completely confident”83%65%93
I came to class preparedShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”86%72%93
I remembered and followed directionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”85%75%93
I paid attention, even when there were distractionsShare who answered “Often” or “Almost all the time”63%56%93
How well did you get along with students who are different from you?Share who answered “Got along pretty well” or “Got along extremely well”87%72%93
When others disagreed with you, how respectful were you of their views?Share who answered “Quite respectful” or “Extremely respectful”80%70%92
How carefully did you listen to other people's points of view?Share who answered “Quite carefully” or “Extremely carefully”84%78%93

Families

315 of 315 family surveys came back (100%).

Safety3 points above LAUSD“My child is safe on school grounds”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.94%LAUSD 91%1 question

One question, 304 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • My child is safe on school grounds94%LAUSD 91%304 answered
Belonging2 points below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.92%LAUSD 94%4 questions

Average of 4 questions, 305–315 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and online86%LAUSD 92%309 answered
  • Teachers treat me with respect in-person and online97%LAUSD 96%310 answered
  • I am greeted by school staff when I visit this school93%LAUSD 94%305 answered
  • I feel welcome to participate at this school93%LAUSD 94%315 answered
Caring adults1 point below LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.93%LAUSD 94%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 310 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Teachers take my concerns seriously93%LAUSD 94%310 answered
  • Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progress93%LAUSD 95%310 answered
Engagement1 point above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.92%LAUSD 91%3 questions

Average of 3 questions, 310–315 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • This school informs me about school activities in different ways95%LAUSD 94%315 answered
  • This school includes me in important decisions about my child's education83%LAUSD 89%314 answered
  • This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the school98%LAUSD 91%310 answered
Bullying taken seriously6 points below LAUSD“Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school”: share who agreed or strongly agreed.74%LAUSD 80%1 question

One question, 309 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this school74%LAUSD 80%309 answered
All 34 questions, as a table
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
My child is safe on school groundsShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%91%304
Clerical/office staff treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%92%309
Teachers treat me with respect in-person and onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%96%310
I am greeted by school staff when I visit this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%94%305
I feel welcome to participate at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%94%315
Teachers take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%94%310
Teachers at this school let me know about my child's progressShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%95%310
This school informs me about school activities in different waysShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%94%315
This school includes me in important decisions about my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed83%89%314
This school recruits and organizes parents to help and support the schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%91%310
Reports of all types of bullying are taken seriously at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed74%80%309
Clerical/office staff take my concerns seriouslyShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%89%310
Clerical/office staff respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%90%309
Teachers respond to my needs in a timely mannerShare who agreed or strongly agreed94%94%309
Offering more flexible ways to meet (online, in person, phone) would increase my engagement with my child's schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed64%85%309
I am satisfied with my school's communication about how to support my child's learningShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%91%308
This school encourages my child to explore different career choicesShare who agreed or strongly agreed61%79%315
This school provides instructional resources to help me support my child's educationShare who agreed or strongly agreed78%89%315
This school offers extra activities for my child's personal growthShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%87%313
This school provides high quality instruction to my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%92%315
I am satisfied with how much my child is learning at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed87%91%315
I attend events in person and online at my child's school, like parent-teacher conferences, assemblies, and school performancesShare who agreed or strongly agreed97%95%309
I feel comfortable supporting my child’s use of technology at home to access and complete school assignmentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%87%310
I have visited my child's school website to get information and/or access resourcesShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%88%309
This school provides me with information (verbal and written) I can understandShare who agreed or strongly agreed93%95%315
School staff provide translation and interpretation services when I need themShare who agreed or strongly agreed49%87%172
This school provides information on grade level requirements for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed89%91%302
This school informs me about activities sponsored by the parent and family centerShare who agreed or strongly agreed84%91%289
I can easily find information about parent workshops or other programs offered at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed86%91%310
This school offers extra academic support for my childShare who agreed or strongly agreed75%86%314
I have visited or received assistance from the parent and family center personnel, website or resource pages available onlineShare who agreed or strongly agreed59%83%232
I have received information about my child's progress as an English LearnerShare who agreed or strongly agreed80%88%214
My child is clearly informed about the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%92%309
Discipline is fair at this schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed74%82%309

Staff

41 of 42 staff answered (98%), 19 of them teachers.

Safety3 points above LAUSD“I feel safe on school grounds during the day”: share giving one of the two most positive answers.100%LAUSD 97%1 question

One question, 41 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • I feel safe on school grounds during the day100%LAUSD 97%41 answered
Caring adults9 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.98%LAUSD 89%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 41 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interests98%LAUSD 84%41 answered
  • Adults at this school treat all students with respect98%LAUSD 94%41 answered
High expectations5 points above LAUSDShare who agreed or strongly agreed.100%LAUSD 95%2 questions

Average of 2 questions, 39–41 answers each. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • This school sets high standards for academic performance for all students100%LAUSD 95%41 answered
  • This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to students100%LAUSD 95%39 answered
Bullying seen as minor4 points above LAUSD“Harassment or bullying among students”: share who called it a mild or insignificant problem.90%LAUSD 86%1 question

One question, 40 answers. LAUSD: the same questions at all its elementary schools.

  • Harassment or bullying among students90%LAUSD 86%40 answered
All 49 questions, as a table
QuestionHereLAUSD elementary schoolsAnswers
I feel safe on school grounds during the dayNo share published for this question100%97%41
At this school, decisions are made based on students’ needs and interestsShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%84%41
Adults at this school treat all students with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%94%41
This school sets high standards for academic performance for all studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed100%95%41
This school emphasizes teaching lessons in ways relevant to studentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed100%95%39
Harassment or bullying among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem90%86%40
I have the materials I need to do my job wellShare who agreed or strongly agreed85%84%41
Generally speaking, my technology issues are resolved within an acceptable time periodShare who agreed or strongly agreed76%84%41
I get the help I need to communicate with parentsShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%81%40
The child abuse training I receive adequately prepares me to address child abuse at my schoolShare who agreed or strongly agreed98%95%41
I feel safe in the neighborhood around my schoolNo share published for this question100%88%41
At this school, parents treat me with respect.Share who agreed or strongly agreed90%85%40
This school is a supportive and inviting place for staff to workShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%82%40
This school promotes personnel participation in decision-making that affects the school practices and policiesShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%75%40
How many adults at this school support and treat each other with respect?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”95%86%40
How many adults at this school feel a responsibility to improve this school?Share who answered “Most adults” or “Nearly all adults”92%80%39
I feel comfortable talking with the school leadership about issues and concernsShare who agreed or strongly agreed95%78%41
Students treat adults at this school with respectShare who agreed or strongly agreed88%81%40
This school clearly communicates to students the consequences of breaking school rulesShare who agreed or strongly agreed92%80%40
This school effectively handles student discipline and behavioral problemsShare who agreed or strongly agreed90%75%41
Racial/ethnic conflict among studentsShare who called it a mild or insignificant problem98%93%40
The informal observation process has increased the number of instruction-focused interactions with my school leader(s) about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—74%16
During the informal observation process, my school leader provided actionable feedback about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—85%16
The informal observation process provided the opportunity to reflect on my instructional practice about the Informal Observation process on MyPGS (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—83%16
The MyPGS informal observation process has helped me improve my teaching (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—75%16
During the past year, how often did you communicate each individual English Learner’s progress towards reclassification as Fluent English Proficient (RFEP) to parents or students?* (teachers)Share who answered “Two times this year” or “Three or more times this year”——3
I use ELPAC scores to plan instruction for my English learner students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—75%3
I know how to determine progress towards reclassification for my students who are English Learners (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—84%3
I know how to provide targeted instruction for English Learners who are not making progress towards reclassification (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—86%3
I know which of my students are long-term English learners (LTELs) (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—88%1
Observed the instruction of my colleagues to get ideas for my own instruction (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”—16%18
With my colleagues, I examined evidence of student understanding/mastery (e g , test data, student) (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”—50%18
Worked in grade-level or department-level teams to review and align grading practices (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”—59%18
How often does school leadership visit your classroom to observe you teach (teachers)Share who answered “Twice a month” or “Weekly”—41%19
How often does school leadership provide useful feedback to you based on their observations (teachers)Share who answered “Often” or “Always”—68%18
Teachers meet to examine student performance data (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”—51%19
Teachers collaborate with one another by department, SLC, or grade level about curricular or instructional issues (teachers)Share who answered “Once a week” or “Twice a week or more”—66%19
I have received training to effectively integrate technology into my instruction to address students' diverse learning styles (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—79%19
I have received professional development training on how to create a learning environment that leverages digital tools and resources (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—79%19
I integrate technology into my instructional practices to meet the needs of my students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—94%19
I feel confident integrating technology into my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—91%19
What I learn in our school professional development meetings addresses my students' needs (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—74%18
The professional development I received this year has made a positive impact on my teaching practice (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—74%18
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve students’ engagement in my class (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—71%18
The professional development I received this year has helped me improve my students' learning outcomes (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—75%17
The professional development I received this year has improved collaboration and teamwork with my colleagues (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—77%18
The professional development I received this year has helped me to understand and use data to inform my instruction (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—81%19
The professional development I received this year has helped me to develop differentiated instruction for students (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—76%19
I enjoy teaching at this school (teachers)Share who agreed or strongly agreed—88%18

Data source: Los Angeles Unified School District, School Experience Survey 2025–26 (researcher file). Students in grades 4–12 take it; some questions go only to older grades. Theme figures are our average of the questions listed under each theme, the way LAUSD averages its own topics. LAUSD publishes no minimum number of answers; we show a question only when at least 20 people answered it, and a group’s answers only when at least 10% of that group responded. Los Angeles Unified School District survey results (opens in a new tab)

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

48 tested per subject

English56% / 35%
Math60% / 30%

White

35 tested per subject · grades 3 and 4

English97% / 59%
Math97% / 59%
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Met or exceeded the standardgrades 3–5 · spring 2025
Group and subjectHerevs Los Angeles Unifiedvs California
Low-income · 48 tested
English56%+1739%+2135%
Math60%+2436%+3030%
White · 35 tested · grades 3 and 4 only
English97%+3067%+3859%
Math97%+2869%+3859%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Los Angeles Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

Hispanic or Latino students and students of two or more races: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Low-income students here did far better than the same group statewide.

Read the student-group results as sentences

At Kentwood Elementary in Los Angeles, 56.2% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 38.9% district-wide for those same grades and 35.2% statewide for those same grades. Kentwood Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (60.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (97.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 32.8 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 48 ELA grade test records.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

1. White: 36%2. Hispanic or Latino: 22%3. Black or African American: 15%4. Not reported: 13%5. Two or more races: 11%Unallocated share: 3%. 100% minus available shares; not a student group.Reported shares2024–25
  1. White36%
  2. Hispanic or Latino22%
  3. Black or African American15%
  4. Not reported13%
  5. Two or more races11%
  6. Asian—
  7. Filipino—
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native—
  9. Pacific Islander—
  10. Unallocated share3%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.
Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2024–25Here
White36%
Hispanic or Latino22%
Black or African American15%
Not reported13%
Two or more races11%
Asian—
Filipino—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

3 in 10 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (30%, 107 of 352). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers16
Average experience15 years
First-year teachers6%
87% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 86.66%: 12.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 14.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

  1. ElementaryKentwood ElementaryThis campus · grades K-5
  2. MiddleOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetHistorical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16
  3. High schoolWESM Health/Sports MedicineInferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Middle-school links

  • Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet

    Historical partial-area overlap · NCES SABS 2015–16

    24th percentile · Needs Support · middle · 2025

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

High-school links

  • WESM Health/Sports Medicine

    Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder

    32nd percentile · Developing · high · 2025

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Ask Los Angeles Unified which school serves your address.

kentwoodes.lausd.org

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗
8401 Emerson Avenue, Los Angeles 90045

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

  1. How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
  2. How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
  3. What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
  4. What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (310) 670-8977 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby elementary schoolsStatewide percentile

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2025 statewide percentile
How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 22.4–38.4% meal eligibility and 176–704 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Kentwood Elementary a good elementary school?
Kentwood Elementary is in the 96th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 75 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Kentwood Elementary was well above California in English and math: 82% and 81% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Kentwood Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2025, 82% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 81% the math standard; 64% and 63% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 125 students were tested in English and 125 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Kentwood Elementary rank in California?
Kentwood Elementary is in the 96th percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Strong, 2025). Kentwood Elementary ranks #183 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Kentwood Elementary?
CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 9.4% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 34 chronically absent of 363 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.3%; 1 unduplicated suspended students of 370 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 10.3%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.4%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Kentwood Elementary compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
Kentwood Elementary is in the 96th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 352 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Kentwood Elementary?
At Kentwood Elementary in Los Angeles, 56.2% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4 and 5, compared to 38.9% district-wide for those same grades and 35.2% statewide for those same grades. Kentwood Elementary’s rate for low-income students exceeds its district average by 17.4 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (60.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (97.1% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 32.8 percentage points: low-income students in Math. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 48 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Kentwood Elementary is ranked #183 statewide · #13 of 579 in Los Angeles Unified.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard63.2%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded80.7%42.7%23%
Chronic absenteeism10.3%17.9%5%
Suspension rate0.4%1.6%5%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)-14.8pp-2.9ppnot scored
Exceeded standard
↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 90 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 79 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 62 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 1.0pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
↓ vs CA -2.9pp

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34475%11%9%5%86%+43
Grade 45161%20%14%6%80%+36
Grade 53053%23%13%10%77%+29

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 34477%16%7%0%93%+48
Grade 45153%22%25%0%75%+33
Grade 53060%13%17%10%73%+38

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA5276.9%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA2669.2%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA3655.6%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math5278.8%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math2774.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math3652.8%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA3580.0%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA3354.5%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA2755.6%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math3582.9%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math3360.6%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math2740.7%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA4461.4%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA2751.9%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA4281.0%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math4362.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math2755.6%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math4276.2%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA4271.4%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA5576.4%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA3562.9%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math4266.7%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math5560.0%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math3522.9%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide3040%30%30%0%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4856.2%+17+21
White3597.1%+30+38
Hispanic/Latino2788.9%+50+53
Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

SchoolDistScope · percentile · bandEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Kentwood Elementary ←—7596th percentile · Strong · statewide · 202563.2%80.7%−14.8pp—0.4%
WISH Community0.3 mi6892nd percentile · Strong · statewide · 202551.6%76.0%−0.3pp—1.0%
Cowan Avenue Elementary0.6 mi5480th percentile · Strong · statewide · 202529.8%56.8%−15.9pp—1.5%
Westport Heights Elementary0.9 mi2930th percentile · Developing · statewide · 202517.1%33.1%−22.3pp—0.2%
California average—39School average · no percentile21.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders6.6%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Average elementary principal salary$154,576
Average middle school principal salary$169,556
Average high school principal salary$170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
201951/10073#1444California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
202261/10085#831California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
202360/10084#875California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
202460/10085#804California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 8.0% → 2025 · 9.4% · +1.4pp
Suspension rate2024 · 0.3% → 2025 · 0.3% · +0.0pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresExcMet+
2025 · ELA12564.0%81.6%
2025 · Math12563.2%80.8%
2024 · ELA11447.4%68.4%
2024 · Math11546.1%69.6%
2023 · ELA9540.0%64.2%
2023 · Math9541.0%63.2%
2022 · ELA11338.9%66.4%
2022 · Math11241.1%66.1%
2019 · ELA13243.2%71.2%
2019 · Math13222.7%52.3%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019———31.1%60.0%14.9%0.4%-26.2pp
2022———39.1%64.8%23.7%0.4%+16.5pp
2023———39.5%62.4%17.5%0.6%-33.3pp
2024———45.6%67.9%9.3%0.5%-23.7pp
20257596#18363.2%80.7%10.3%0.4%-14.8pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years
Group2018–192024–25Δ
Female17.4%10.3%-7.1pp
Male13.9%8.7%-5.2pp
Asian13.3%——
Black/African American22.0%14.3%-7.7pp
Hispanic/Latino18.0%11.3%-6.7pp
Two or More Races5.0%2.5%-2.5pp
White10.2%6.2%-4.0pp
Students with Disabilities25.4%24.3%-1.1pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22.8%20.0%-2.8pp
All Students15.3%9.4%-5.9pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupELAnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+1471Accelerated+1871Accelerated
English Only+1570not categorised+1870not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+3030Exceptional+2730Exceptional
White+426Average+226Average
Hispanic or Latino+618Accelerated+2218Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+6612Exceptional+6212Exceptional
Two or More Races+2411Exceptional+1311Accelerated

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

71 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, ELA: +14 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 87th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.87th pctile · +14 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

71 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

California growth model, math: +18 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 89th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.89th pctile · +18 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,180 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 460,633 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$1,434 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 352

Central federal expenditures attributed here$553 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 352

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 52%Instruction support 16%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 2%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,180 per pupil
2020$16,355 per pupil
2019$15,793 per pupil
2018$13,247 per pupil
2017$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 90045
ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 90045
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$135,032
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)63.36%
ZCTA population41,786
Median age36.4 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/kentwood-elementary-7719"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Kentwood Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Los Angeles Unified School District School Experience Survey 2025–26 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction