ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Hart-Ransom Academic Charter · Modesto

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter: The score is middle of the pack. The trajectory isn't.

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter sits mid-pack on raw proficiency — and it's climbing faster than most schools anywhere near it — and that holds when you follow the same students across grades.

Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4545
% Exceeded9%21%
% Met+41%43%
Growth+17.3-2.9
Absence2.5%17.9%
Suspension0.2%1.6%
Scope Score
45
🚀 Growth Engine · Developing
ranked #2,521 statewide

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter scores 45 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 56th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. Hart-Ransom Academic Charter deserves a closer read. It sits at the 56th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter's low-income kids hit 59.2% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

As a charter, Hart-Ransom Academic Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Slipped from the 71st to the 56th percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 41% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 336%26%51%41%29%
Grade 454%53%24%43%54%
Grade 555%59%36%61%65%
Grade 659%60%58%50%44%
Grade 774%67%50%66%55%
Grade 873%73%65%62%60%
Grade 1172%71%75%72%85%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 336%42%46%31%39%
Grade 438%26%24%38%23%
Grade 527%36%18%25%37%
Grade 641%35%50%28%26%
Grade 745%45%42%51%43%
Grade 843%42%52%38%48%
Grade 1122%33%36%48%32%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

23%
71%
Grade 3 · 29% proficient
50%
46%
Grade 4 · 54% proficient
16%
49%
35%
Grade 5 · 65% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 9.8pp across grades; the floor rises 36.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

59.2%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter's most underrated number

59.2% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter low-income: 59.2%State low-income: 38.2%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
8.9%
State 21.3%
12.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+17.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
41.2%
State 42.7%
1.5pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
2.5%
State 17.9%
15.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 1.6%
1.4pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Hart-Ransom Academic Charter in Modesto, 59.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hart-Ransom Academic Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.2% Math proficient); White students (57.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 125 students tested.

All students at this school: 47% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 47%, district —, state 43%47%
FemaleFemale: this school 46%, district 49%, state 44%46% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 47%, district 44%, state 32%47% · +0 vs school
MaleMale: this school 50%, district 47%, state 42%50% · +3 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 51%, district 51%, state 56%51% · +4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 46%, district 47%, state 32%46% · −1 vs school

9 of 15 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 28.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +21.7pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 2.5%, district 8.7%, state 17.9%2.5% · −15.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.2%, district —, state 1.6%0.2% · −1.4pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–60.0%
Grades 7–80.0%
Grades 9–120.0%
TK/K0.0%

Where the path goes

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here, with no school-to-school transitions.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience12.3 years
Fully credentialed89%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$65,846 – $131,912
Principal salary$156,635 – $0
Superintendent salary$258,640

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $10,877, CA average $14,815$10,877 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$14,884 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction68%
Instruction support8%
Student services7%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$10,877 per pupil
2019$9,908 per pupil
2018$9,945 per pupil
2017$9,322 per pupil
2016$8,468 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White42.4%
District 33.8% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic32.9%
District 56.5% · CA 56.1%
Other19.9%
District 6.1% · CA 9.0%
Asian3.0%
District 3.0% · CA 10.2%
Black1.7%
District 0.7% · CA 4.8%
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$77K · CA $85K
Median home value$432K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+15% · CA 35%
ZIP population30,469
Median age32 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 46% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Hart-Ransom Academic Charter a good elementary school?

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter has a Scope Score of 45 out of 100, placing it in the 56th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,521 statewide. 8.9% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 12.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Hart-Ransom Academic Charter's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 41.2% of students at Hart-Ransom Academic Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 8.9% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 32.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 8.9% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 200 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Hart-Ransom Academic Charter rank in California?

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter ranks #2,521 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 56th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Hart-Ransom Academic Charter getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Hart-Ransom Academic Charter increases by 17.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Hart-Ransom Academic Charter?

2.5% of students at Hart-Ransom Academic Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Hart-Ransom Academic Charter compare to other schools in Modesto?

Hart-Ransom Academic Charter scores 45/100 (56th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Modesto page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Hart-Ransom Academic Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Hart-Ransom Academic Charter in Modesto, 59.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Hart-Ransom Academic Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (35.2% Math proficient); White students (57.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.1 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 125 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
8.9%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 38th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+17.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 61th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
41.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 49th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
2.5%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 75th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3316%23%35%35%29%−14
Grade 4264%50%27%19%54%+9
Grade 54316%49%14%21%65%+17
Grade 6277%37%37%19%44%−2
Grade 74015%40%25%20%55%+7
Grade 84214%45%31%10%60%+13
Grade 113435%50%15%0%85%+38
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3316%32%26%35%39%−7
Grade 4264%19%46%31%23%−19
Grade 54316%21%37%26%37%+2
Grade 62715%11%41%33%26%−9
Grade 7408%35%30%28%43%+9
Grade 84217%31%12%40%48%+15
Grade 113418%15%38%29%32%+9
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1112721%25%52%2%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged12559.2%+6+21
White9957.6%+0−4
Hispanic/Latino4658.7%+3+20
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Hart-Ransom Academic Charter ←458.9%41.2%+17.30.2%
Mary Lou Dieterich Elementary2.6 mi4815.0%39.9%−9.60.1%
Hart-Ransom Elementary0 mi4620.5%51.1%+0.44.7%
Alberta Martone Elementary1.4 mi4516.4%34.1%+9.11.9%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20195371#161325.8%40.9%1.3%0.0%+5.2pp
20224570#175013.5%40.4%0.9%0.0%+13.2pp
20233539#346512.1%33.2%1.3%0.0%-21.4pp
20244558#239712.7%39.7%3.1%0.2%+6.7pp
20254556#25218.9%41.2%2.5%0.2%+17.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female0.5%0.0%-0.5pp
Male1.4%0.4%-1.0pp
Black/African American0.0%
White0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino0.9%0.0%-0.9pp
Two or More Races17.6%0.0%-17.6pp
Students with Disabilities0.0%0.0%+0.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4.2%0.4%-3.8pp
All Students1.0%0.2%-0.8pp
Asian0.0%
Filipino0.0%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction