ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Grant Elementary · Los Angeles

Grant Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Grant posts 40% meeting the standard and 19.0% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

1530 North Wilton Place, 90028 (opens in new tab)·Los Angeles Unified·Los Angeles·Grades TK-6·365 students·94% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(323) 469-4046·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4745
% Exceeded19%21%
% Met+40%43%
Growth+4.5-2.9
Absence22.0%17.9%
Suspension0.1%1.6%
Scope Score
47
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #2,220 statewide · #236 of 580 in Los Angeles Unified

Grant Elementary scores 47 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 61st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Grant deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 29th to the 61st percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1700 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAGreen(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 40% meet the standard today, versus 47% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 356%39%33%42%32%
Grade 456%33%39%38%46%
Grade 541%49%42%47%47%
Grade 627%52%39%31%46%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 358%35%41%46%34%
Grade 456%27%39%43%54%
Grade 517%43%24%34%28%
Grade 618%46%30%12%40%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

16%
16%
68%
Grade 3 · 32% proficient
27%
19%
54%
Grade 4 · 46% proficient
19%
28%
53%
Grade 5 · 47% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.0pp across grades; the floor rises 14.5pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
19.0%
State 21.3%
2.3pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+4.5pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
40.1%
State 42.7%
2.6pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
22.0%
State 17.9%
4.1pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
17.6%
State 18.0%
0.3pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Grant Elementary in Los Angeles, 41.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 203 students tested.

All students at this school: 41% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 41%, district —, state 43%41%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 36%, state 32%40% · −1 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 34%, district 36%, state 32%34% · −7 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 40%, district 42%, state 44%40% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 42%, district 41%, state 42%42% · +1 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 17%, district 9%, state 11%17% · −24 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 10%, district 14%, state 15%10% · −30 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 63%, district 65%, state 56%63% · +22 vs school

5 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 12.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 22.0%, district 24.5%, state 17.9%22.0% · +4.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.1%, district —, state 1.6%0.1% · −1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–621.3%
TK/K24.0%

Where the path goes

The zoned path continues to Joseph Le Conte Middle, which scores 20 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 17:1, district 20:117:1
Teaching staff21 teachers
Avg. experience14.5 years
Fully credentialed84%
First-year teachers5%
Intern / emergency permit11.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,420 – $122,706
Principal salary$154,576 – $170,030
Superintendent salary$440,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $34,412, CA average $14,815$34,412 · spent at this school
Federal share$3,291 per student

$3,291 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$29,292 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction52%
Instruction support16%
Student services12%
Administration7%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,180 per pupil
2019$16,355 per pupil
2018$15,793 per pupil
2017$13,247 per pupil
2016$13,549 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic62.5%
District 73.2% · CA 56.1%
White15.9%
District 9.9% · CA 19.9%
Black9.3%
District 7.2% · CA 4.8%
Asian6.8%
District 3.4% · CA 10.2%
Other5.5%
District 6.3% · CA 9.0%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 94.0% (30pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$61K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.04M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+51% · CA 35%
ZIP population32,883
Median age36 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 30% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Grant Elementary a good elementary school?

Grant Elementary has a Scope Score of 47 out of 100, placing it in the 61st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,220 statewide. 19.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 2.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Grant Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 40.1% of students at Grant Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 19.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 21.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 19.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 321 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Grant Elementary rank in California?

Grant Elementary ranks #2,220 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 61st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Grant Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Grant Elementary increases by 4.5 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Grant Elementary?

22.0% of students at Grant Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Grant Elementary compare to other schools in Los Angeles?

Grant Elementary scores 47/100 (61st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 365 students. Use the schools in Los Angeles page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Grant Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Grant Elementary in Los Angeles, 41.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Grant Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 1.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (37.8% Math proficient); Hispanic students (38.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 32.0 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 203 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
19.0%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 48th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+4.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 59th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
40.1%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 48th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
22.0%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 43th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
17.6%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 50th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35016%16%18%50%32%−11
Grade 44827%19%8%46%46%+1
Grade 55819%28%19%34%47%−1
Grade 66116%30%25%30%46%−1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 35311%23%26%40%34%−12
Grade 45229%25%27%19%54%+12
Grade 56012%17%37%35%28%−7
Grade 66215%26%29%31%40%+5
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11607%23%62%8%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20341.9%+1+4
Hispanic/Latino14138.3%−3−1
English Learners539.4%+2−1
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Grant Elementary ←4719.0%40.1%+4.50.1%
Third Street Elementary2.3 mi9068.3%88.9%+1.10.1%
Franklin Avenue Elementary1.7 mi7656.5%81.7%−8.10.1%
Melrose Avenue Elementary2.1 mi7147.5%71.5%+4.70.3%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193429#389123.0%47.4%20.2%0.4%-27.9pp
20224264#205717.2%38.0%43.0%0.2%+9.2pp
20233642#333316.9%36.3%26.8%0.2%-4.0pp
20244659#232819.7%41.6%24.6%0.3%-3.3pp
20254761#222019.0%40.1%22.0%0.1%+4.5pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female17.9%25.5%+7.6pp
Male22.4%19.3%-3.1pp
Asian4.8%14.3%+9.5pp
Black/African American23.3%31.6%+8.3pp
White7.1%9.1%+2.0pp
Hispanic/Latino22.6%24.4%+1.8pp
Students with Disabilities21.5%23.8%+2.3pp
English Learners20.2%17.0%-3.2pp
Homeless50.0%47.6%-2.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged20.0%22.9%+2.9pp
All Students20.4%22.4%+2.0pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction