ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
George Washington Elementary · Daly City

George Washington Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

George Washington posts 39% meeting the standard and 22.2% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

251 Whittier Street, 94014 (opens in new tab)·Jefferson Elementary·Daly City·Grades TK-5·206 students·62% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(650) 991-1236
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3645
% Exceeded22%21%
% Met+39%43%
Growth+8.6-2.9
Absence19.9%17.9%
Suspension0.2%1.6%
Scope Score
36
📈 On the Rise · Developing
ranked #3,839 statewide · #11 of 12 in Jefferson Elementary

George Washington Elementary scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 33rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

📈 On the Rise — Ask how many years the improvement has held, not just the latest one — one strong cohort and a real turnaround can look identical in a single year of data.

Most rating sites would stop at “39% proficient” and call it done. George Washington deserves a closer read. The school sits in Daly City, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 33rd percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 39% of students meet the standard today, above the 31% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 324%44%65%53%28%
Grade 440%52%45%50%44%
Grade 534%39%47%53%53%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 335%58%52%46%36%
Grade 434%55%40%31%47%
Grade 522%24%43%32%28%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

20%
8%
72%
Grade 3 · 28% proficient
25%
19%
56%
Grade 4 · 44% proficient
22%
31%
47%
Grade 5 · 53% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.9pp across grades; the floor rises 25.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
22.2%
State 21.3%
0.8pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+8.6pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
39.5%
State 42.7%
3.2pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
19.9%
State 17.9%
2.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.2%
State 1.6%
1.4pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
5.3%
State 18.0%
12.7pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At George Washington Elementary in Daly City, 42.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.3 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 63 students tested.

All students at this school: 40% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 40%, district —, state 43%40%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 40%, district 35%, state 32%40% · −1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 44%, district 41%, state 42%44% · +4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 36%, district 43%, state 44%36% · −4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 28%, state 32%28% · −12 vs school

8 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 16.1pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 19.9%, district 13.1%, state 17.9%19.9% · +2.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.2%, district —, state 1.6%0.2% · −1.4pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (28.6% vs 16.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–616.3%
TK/K28.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
George Washington Elementary
36/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 23:121:1
Teaching staff13 teachers
Avg. experience9.2 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers31%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$68,157 – $127,245
Principal salary$168,234 – $0
Superintendent salary$257,260

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $26,909, CA average $14,815$26,909 · spent at this school
Federal share$3,680 per student

$3,680 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,401 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support10%
Student services9%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance8%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2019–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,119 per pupil
2020$10,805 per pupil
2020$34,833 per pupil
2019$12,785 per pupil
2019$10,350 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic49.5%
District 41.5% · CA 56.1%
Other30.1%
District 29.7% · CA 9.0%
Asian15.1%
District 17.0% · CA 10.2%
White2.9%
District 8.9% · CA 19.9%
Black2.4%
District 2.9% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 61.6% (2pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$123K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.04M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+35% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,315
Median age43 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 206 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is George Washington Elementary a good elementary school?

George Washington Elementary has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 33rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,839 statewide. 22.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are George Washington Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 39.5% of students at George Washington Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 22.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 17.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 22.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 184 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does George Washington Elementary rank in California?

George Washington Elementary ranks #3,839 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 33rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is George Washington Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at George Washington Elementary increases by 8.6 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at George Washington Elementary?

19.9% of students at George Washington Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.2%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does George Washington Elementary compare to other schools in Daly City?

George Washington Elementary scores 36/100 (33rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 206 students. Use the schools in Daly City page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does George Washington Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At George Washington Elementary in Daly City, 42.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. George Washington Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 5.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (36.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.3 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 63 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
22.2%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 51th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+8.6pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 29th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
39.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 48th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
19.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 47th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.2%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 62th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
5.3%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 35th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32520%8%32%40%28%−15
Grade 43625%19%25%31%44%−0
Grade 53222%31%13%34%53%+5
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32524%12%20%44%36%−10
Grade 43426%21%26%26%47%+5
Grade 53216%13%25%47%28%−7
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/11329%13%53%25%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged6342.9%+5+5
Hispanic/Latino4434.1%+3−5
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
George Washington Elementary ←3622.2%39.5%+8.60.2%
Thomas Edison Elementary3 mi6131.3%61.7%−9.50.1%
Miraloma Elementary2.2 mi5744.3%69.2%−12.00.9%
Ortega (Jose) Elementary1.2 mi5637.3%59.7%+0.50.6%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193428#396010.5%31.4%8.1%0.9%-1.4pp
20223651#280419.0%45.3%24.8%0.4%-19.5pp
20234360#229021.8%48.7%22.7%0.1%-13.0pp
20244559#236521.2%44.0%21.2%0.6%-7.1pp
20253633#383922.2%39.5%19.9%0.2%+8.6pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.3%16.3%+8.0pp
Male7.8%23.5%+15.7pp
Asian1.4%3.1%+1.7pp
White5.1%23.5%+18.4pp
Hispanic/Latino10.0%22.9%+12.9pp
Students with Disabilities12.2%39.1%+26.9pp
English Learners5.6%19.2%+13.6pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.0%24.1%+15.1pp
All Students8.0%20.2%+12.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction