ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Ethan B. Allen Elementary · Fountain Valley

Ethan B. Allen Elementary: High scores, healthy climate, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Ethan B. Allen posts 66.4% exceeding the standard — versus 21.3% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

16200 Bushard Street, 92708 (opens in new tab)·Garden Grove Unified·Fountain Valley·Grades TK-6·637 students·51% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(714) 663-6228·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope8045
% Exceeded66%21%
% Met+88%43%
Growth-1.0-2.9
Absence4.1%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
80
⭐ High Ceiling · Strong
ranked #130 statewide · #1 of 44 in Garden Grove Unified

Ethan B. Allen Elementary scores 80 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 98th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “88% proficient” and call it done. Ethan B. Allen deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fountain Valley, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Ethan B. Allen's low-income kids hit 89.0% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 98th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased Significantly)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 88% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 383%86%90%81%90%
Grade 494%89%87%90%86%
Grade 591%93%84%91%93%
Grade 694%91%93%96%94%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 386%92%94%88%90%
Grade 495%87%89%89%86%
Grade 588%86%77%85%85%
Grade 695%83%94%92%93%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

73%
17%
10%
Grade 3 · 90% proficient
70%
17%
13%
Grade 4 · 87% proficient
66%
26%
8%
Grade 5 · 92% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.4pp across grades; the floor rises 2.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

89.0%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Ethan B. Allen's most underrated number

89.0% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Ethan B. Allen low-income: 89.0%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
66.4%
State 21.3%
45.1pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-1.0pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
88.5%
State 42.7%
45.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
4.1%
State 17.9%
13.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.1pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
45.4%
State 18.0%
27.4pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Ethan B. Allen Elementary in Fountain Valley, 89.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ethan B. Allen Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 33.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (87.8% Math proficient); Asian students (92.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.2 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested.

All students at this school: 90% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 90%, district —, state 43%90%
AsianAsian: this school 92%, district 78%, state 72%92% · +2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 88%, district 50%, state 32%88% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 90%, district 55%, state 42%90% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 90%, district 56%, state 44%90% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 85%, district 38%, state 32%85% · −5 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 64%, district 21%, state 15%64% · −26 vs school

7 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.4pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.0pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 4.1%, district 14.5%, state 17.9%4.1% · −13.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.1pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly three times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (8.6% vs 1.6%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–61.6%
TK/K8.6%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 23:125:1
Teaching staff31 teachers
Avg. experience19.7 years
Fully credentialed100%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$72,504 – $141,634
Principal salary$181,381 – $218,095
Superintendent salary$370,605

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,773, CA average $14,815$17,773 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$169 per student

$169 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$22,744 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support11%
Student services11%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance9%
Other3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,737 per pupil
2019$13,697 per pupil
2018$13,564 per pupil
2017$12,765 per pupil
2016$11,487 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Asian76.9%
District 35.5% · CA 10.2%
Hispanic10.1%
District 53.2% · CA 56.1%
Other9.1%
District 4.8% · CA 9.0%
White3.9%
District 6.0% · CA 19.9%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 51.5% (12pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$115K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.07M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+46% · CA 35%
ZIP population56,258
Median age44 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 76% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Ethan B. Allen Elementary a good elementary school?

Ethan B. Allen Elementary has a Scope Score of 80 out of 100, placing it in the 98th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #130 statewide. 66.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 45.1 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Ethan B. Allen Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 88.5% of students at Ethan B. Allen Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 66.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 66.4% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 581 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Ethan B. Allen Elementary rank in California?

Ethan B. Allen Elementary ranks #130 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 98th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Ethan B. Allen Elementary getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Ethan B. Allen Elementary decreases by 1.0 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Ethan B. Allen Elementary?

4.1% of students at Ethan B. Allen Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Ethan B. Allen Elementary compare to other schools in Fountain Valley?

Ethan B. Allen Elementary scores 80/100 (98th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 637 students. Use the schools in Fountain Valley page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Ethan B. Allen Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Ethan B. Allen Elementary in Fountain Valley, 89.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 55.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Ethan B. Allen Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 33.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (87.8% Math proficient); Asian students (92.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 12.2 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 227 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
66.4%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 94th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-1.0pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 45th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
88.5%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 85th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
4.1%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 72th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
45.4%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 89th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 39973%17%7%3%90%+47
Grade 49670%17%8%5%86%+42
Grade 59566%26%3%4%93%+45
Grade 612277%17%4%2%94%+48
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 310067%23%6%4%90%+44
Grade 49659%27%9%4%86%+45
Grade 59563%22%11%4%85%+50
Grade 612583%10%4%3%93%+58
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/119540%36%21%3%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22789.0%+34+51
Asian32592.9%+13+19
Hispanic/Latino2989.7%+44+51
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Ethan B. Allen Elementary ←8066.4%88.5%−1.00.6%
Plavan (Urbain H.) Elementary0.8 mi8557.7%81.0%+8.40.5%
Gisler (Robert) Elementary2.6 mi7852.2%79.2%−10.21.2%
A. G. Cook Elementary2.5 mi7557.0%80.4%−12.10.4%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20199099#2269.2%89.3%1.3%0.1%+5.1pp
20228299#6466.7%88.6%9.8%0.8%+0.2pp
20237796#21667.2%86.9%10.9%0.5%-11.2pp
20248599#5667.5%87.4%6.6%0.5%+3.4pp
20258098#13066.4%88.5%4.1%0.6%-1.0pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female1.4%3.4%+2.0pp
Male1.1%3.5%+2.4pp
Asian0.7%2.4%+1.7pp
Filipino0.0%16.7%+16.7pp
Hispanic/Latino8.3%3.0%-5.3pp
Two or More Races0.0%7.9%+7.9pp
Students with Disabilities0.0%3.7%+3.7pp
English Learners2.3%4.5%+2.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1.8%3.2%+1.4pp
All Students1.2%3.4%+2.2pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction