Downtown Value: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Downtown Value posts low test scores — and suspensions run below the state rate (0.6% vs 1.6%). If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
Downtown Value scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 10th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “32% proficient” and call it done. Downtown Value deserves a closer read. The school sits in Los Angeles, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
As a charter, Downtown Value enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The 5 things our score weighs
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 66
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
The community around it
Student demographics
3 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 20.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +4.5pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
Frequently asked questions
Is Downtown Value a good elementary school?
What are Downtown Value's CAASPP test scores?
How does Downtown Value rank in California?
Is Downtown Value getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Downtown Value?
How does Downtown Value compare to other schools in Los Angeles?
How does Downtown Value serve low-income and underrepresented students?
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 40 | 23% | 30% | 43% | 5% | 53% | +9 |
| Grade 4 | 43 | 5% | 12% | 23% | 60% | 16% | −29 |
| Grade 5 | 41 | 10% | 22% | 27% | 41% | 32% | −16 |
| Grade 6 | 37 | 14% | 16% | 32% | 38% | 30% | −17 |
| Grade 7 | 60 | 2% | 23% | 22% | 53% | 25% | −23 |
| Grade 8 | 47 | 2% | 21% | 21% | 55% | 23% | −23 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 41 | 17% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 46% | +1 |
| Grade 4 | 43 | 5% | 9% | 33% | 53% | 14% | −28 |
| Grade 5 | 44 | 7% | 23% | 16% | 55% | 30% | −6 |
| Grade 6 | 37 | 11% | 16% | 24% | 49% | 27% | −8 |
| Grade 7 | 62 | 5% | 18% | 27% | 50% | 23% | −11 |
| Grade 8 | 46 | 11% | 7% | 20% | 63% | 17% | −15 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 89 | 3% | 16% | 53% | 28% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 263 | 28.5% | −12 | −10 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 263 | 28.9% | −12 | −10 |
| English Learners | 44 | 4.5% | −2 | −6 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Downtown Value ← | — | 27 | 10.9% | 31.7% | −18.8 | 0.6% |
| Girls Academic Leadership Academy, Dr. Michelle Ki | 0.4 mi | 72 | 44.5% | 76.3% | +0.3 | 0.2% |
| Charles H. Kim Elementary | 2.8 mi | 63 | 40.2% | 61.1% | +8.7 | 0.1% |
| Dr. Sammy Lee Medical and Health Science Magnet El | 2.6 mi | 62 | 34.4% | 60.8% | −9.0 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.