ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Double Peak · San Marcos

Double Peak: The score is strong. The trajectory is stronger.

Double Peak pairs 73% proficiency with gains that hold up when the same students are tracked two years apart — the rare school that posts both.

111 San Elijo Road, 92078 (opens in new tab)·San Marcos Unified·San Marcos·Grades TK-8·1,171 students·21% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(760) 290-2340·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7345
% Exceeded47%21%
% Met+73%43%
Growth+5.3-2.9
Absence13.3%17.9%
Suspension0.9%1.6%
Scope Score
73
🚀 Growth Engine · Strong
ranked #374 statewide · #2 of 12 in San Marcos Unified

Double Peak scores 73 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.

Most rating sites would stop at “73% proficient” and call it done. Double Peak deserves a closer read. It sits at the 93rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The headline number: 46.6% of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has held the 93rd-percentile line every tested year since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathGreen(Increased)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 73% meet the standard today, versus 78% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 377%64%70%68%70%
Grade 478%64%65%75%74%
Grade 581%68%66%72%79%
Grade 681%67%67%74%73%
Grade 781%73%72%71%73%
Grade 890%70%69%67%66%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 376%75%77%72%72%
Grade 484%70%73%82%72%
Grade 574%68%62%69%73%
Grade 666%49%60%63%68%
Grade 763%65%69%72%70%
Grade 856%37%50%57%55%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

46%
23%
31%
Grade 3 · 69% proficient
46%
28%
26%
Grade 4 · 74% proficient
48%
31%
21%
Grade 5 · 79% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 1.5pp across grades; the floor rises 9.4pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
46.6%
State 21.3%
25.2pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
+5.3pp
State -2.9pp
Scores improve across grades
Met or exceeded
73.4%
State 42.7%
30.7pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
13.3%
State 17.9%
4.6pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.9%
State 1.6%
0.7pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
43.2%
State 18.0%
25.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what changed — new curriculum, new principal, new program. Momentum has a cause, and a visit will find it.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Double Peak in San Marcos, 47.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Double Peak outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.5% Math proficient); White students (75.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 174 students tested.

All students at this school: 70% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 70%, district —, state 43%70%
MaleMale: this school 66%, district 50%, state 42%66% · −4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 74%, district 66%, state 56%74% · +4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 74%, district 54%, state 44%74% · +4 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 53%, district 34%, state 32%53% · −17 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 46%, district 31%, state 32%46% · −24 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 29%, district 19%, state 15%29% · −41 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 88%, district 81%, state 72%88% · +18 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 72%, district 65%, state 56%72% · +2 vs school

7 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 13.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +8.2pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 13.3%, district 16.2%, state 17.9%13.3% · −4.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.9%, district —, state 1.6%0.9% · −0.7pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (19.4% vs 12.3%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–613.1%
Grades 7–812.3%
TK/K19.4%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Double Peak
73/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 23:1, district 24:123:1
Teaching staff52 teachers
Avg. experience12.8 years
Fully credentialed96%
First-year teachers2%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,139 – $124,763
Principal salary$157,825 – $188,091
Superintendent salary$333,925

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,238, CA average $14,815$17,238 · spent at this school
Federal share$259 per student

$259 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,110 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction63%
Instruction support10%
Student services10%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,048 per pupil
2019$12,040 per pupil
2018$11,775 per pupil
2017$11,157 per pupil
2016$10,669 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White49.2%
District 36.6% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic23.9%
District 46.1% · CA 56.1%
Other14.5%
District 10.3% · CA 9.0%
Asian10.7%
District 6.0% · CA 10.2%
Black1.7%
District 1.0% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 21.0% (43pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$120K · CA $85K
Median home value$942K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+49% · CA 35%
ZIP population53,605
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 1,171 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 53% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Double Peak a good elementary school?

Double Peak has a Scope Score of 73 out of 100, placing it in the 93rd percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #374 statewide. 46.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 25.2 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Double Peak's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 73.4% of students at Double Peak met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 46.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 26.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 46.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 709 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Double Peak rank in California?

Double Peak ranks #374 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 93rd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Double Peak getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Double Peak increases by 5.3 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This upward trajectory suggests the school is adding measurable value — students leave with higher proficiency rates than they entered with. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Double Peak?

13.3% of students at Double Peak are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.9%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Double Peak compare to other schools in San Marcos?

Double Peak scores 73/100 (93rd percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,171 students. Use the schools in San Marcos page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Double Peak serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Double Peak in San Marcos, 47.7% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 37.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Double Peak outperforms its district average for low-income students by 10.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (44.5% Math proficient); White students (75.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 45.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 174 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
46.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 74th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
+5.3pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp · 64th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
73.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 73th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
13.3%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 58th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.9%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 56th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
43.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 86th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312546%23%19%11%70%+26
Grade 411246%28%12%14%74%+29
Grade 511948%31%10%11%79%+31
Grade 614936%38%13%13%73%+27
Grade 714637%36%14%13%73%+25
Grade 815029%37%18%16%66%+20
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312541%31%13%15%72%+26
Grade 410944%28%17%11%72%+31
Grade 511954%19%18%8%73%+38
Grade 614744%24%16%16%68%+33
Grade 714546%24%19%11%70%+36
Grade 814836%20%24%20%55%+23
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1126824%29%42%4%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17447.7%+11+9
White38975.0%+4+13
Hispanic/Latino18856.4%+16+18
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Double Peak ←7346.6%73.4%+5.30.9%
Discovery Elementary2.1 mi7554.4%79.1%+6.20.8%
San Elijo Elementary1.8 mi6342.2%72.0%−1.70.5%
High Tech Elementary North County2.8 mi4211.2%30.1%−14.92.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20197494#34450.9%78.4%4.0%0.7%+0.7pp
20225886#81438.6%68.1%25.6%1.1%-1.4pp
20236084#89539.6%68.8%16.8%0.6%-9.6pp
20246890#57444.3%73.0%11.5%0.8%+0.4pp
20257393#37446.6%73.4%13.3%0.9%+5.3pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female3.7%11.6%+7.9pp
Male4.3%14.5%+10.2pp
Asian2.1%8.5%+6.4pp
Black/African American7.5%38.1%+30.6pp
White4.5%7.3%+2.8pp
Hispanic/Latino8.6%13.7%+5.1pp
American Indian/Alaska Native15.8%
Pacific Islander0.0%
Students with Disabilities8.2%19.9%+11.7pp
English Learners8.3%21.3%+13.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged13.5%25.3%+11.8pp
All Students4.0%13.1%+9.1pp
Two or More Races12.4%
Homeless13.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction