Don Julian Elementary: Scores climb 13.5 points from grade 3 to grade 5. But the zoned next school scores lower.
Don Julian holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 49 | 14% | 36% | +13.5 | 16.9% | 0.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Don Julian Elementary scores 49 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 66th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Don Julian deserves a closer read. The school sits in La Puente, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: +13.5pp separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 66th percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 36% meet the standard today, versus 48% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 48% | 26% | 30% | 38% | 31% |
| Grade 4 | 51% | 27% | 32% | 42% | 47% |
| Grade 5 | 58% | 45% | 54% | 48% | 54% |
| Grade 6 | — | 49% | 38% | 38% | 45% |
| Grade 7 | — | 40% | 45% | 44% | 45% |
| Grade 8 | — | 42% | 46% | 46% | 38% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 47% | 31% | 32% | 29% | 24% |
| Grade 4 | 49% | 25% | 34% | 30% | 35% |
| Grade 5 | 35% | 28% | 30% | 32% | 28% |
| Grade 6 | — | 30% | 22% | 23% | 23% |
| Grade 7 | — | 40% | 46% | 38% | 29% |
| Grade 8 | — | 18% | 35% | 30% | 34% |
The story this school is actually telling
separates this year's grade 3 from its grade 5. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Following the same students from 2023 G3 → 2025 G5 points the same way.
the zoned path continues to Torch Middle, which scores 16 points lower — the data can't say why.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 17.7pp across grades; the floor rises 23.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Don Julian Elementary in La Puente, 41.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 41.6% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Don Julian Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 0.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (42.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 36.3 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 311 students tested.
6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 29.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +14.2pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (23.3% vs 13.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to Torch Middle, which scores 16 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$48 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 24% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Don Julian Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Don Julian Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Don Julian Elementary rank in California?
Is Don Julian Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Don Julian Elementary?
How does Don Julian Elementary compare to other schools in La Puente?
How does Don Julian Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 52
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 65 | 9% | 22% | 28% | 42% | 31% | −13 |
| Grade 4 | 58 | 19% | 28% | 19% | 34% | 47% | +2 |
| Grade 5 | 52 | 27% | 27% | 17% | 29% | 54% | +6 |
| Grade 6 | 62 | 21% | 24% | 24% | 31% | 45% | −1 |
| Grade 7 | 51 | 22% | 24% | 22% | 33% | 45% | −3 |
| Grade 8 | 50 | 18% | 20% | 28% | 34% | 38% | −8 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 67 | 3% | 21% | 31% | 45% | 24% | −22 |
| Grade 4 | 63 | 11% | 24% | 24% | 41% | 35% | −7 |
| Grade 5 | 54 | 17% | 11% | 26% | 46% | 28% | −8 |
| Grade 6 | 64 | 13% | 11% | 27% | 50% | 23% | −12 |
| Grade 7 | 51 | 14% | 16% | 27% | 43% | 29% | −5 |
| Grade 8 | 50 | 24% | 10% | 10% | 56% | 34% | +2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 104 | 8% | 16% | 60% | 16% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 311 | 41.8% | +0 | +4 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 313 | 42.8% | +1 | +4 |
| English Learners | 43 | 9.3% | −3 | −1 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Don Julian Elementary ← | — | 49 | 14.3% | 36.3% | +13.5 | 0.3% |
| San Jose Charter Academy | 2.5 mi | 57 | 38.9% | 67.2% | −7.6 | 0.5% |
| Wallen L. Andrews | 0.9 mi | 52 | 30.8% | 58.0% | +3.5 | 1.6% |
| Maxson Elementary | 1.8 mi | 46 | 18.0% | 39.6% | −16.1 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 47 | 60 | #2180 | 20.6% | 47.9% | 6.8% | 1.4% | -0.8pp |
| 2022 | 40 | 59 | #2353 | 12.0% | 30.2% | 29.2% | 0.2% | +7.9pp |
| 2023 | 49 | 71 | #1679 | 14.7% | 35.1% | 22.2% | 0.0% | +11.0pp |
| 2024 | 50 | 68 | #1853 | 15.0% | 36.2% | 20.7% | 0.8% | +6.3pp |
| 2025 | 49 | 66 | #1944 | 14.3% | 36.3% | 16.9% | 0.3% | +13.5pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 5.2% | 16.4% | +11.2pp |
| Male | 8.4% | 17.3% | +8.9pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | 6.5% | +6.5pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 7.0% | 17.8% | +10.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 7.2% | 16.7% | +9.5pp |
| English Learners | 3.9% | 13.0% | +9.1pp |
| Foster Youth | 6.7% | — | — |
| Homeless | 10.9% | 24.6% | +13.7pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 6.7% | 17.0% | +10.3pp |
| All Students | 6.7% | 16.8% | +10.1pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction