ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Dena Boer · Salida

Dena Boer: English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But this year's 5th graders test below its 3rd graders.

Dena Boer has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.

4801 Gold Valley Road, 95368 (opens in new tab)·Salida Union Elementary·Salida·Grades TK-5·444 students·79% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(209) 543-8163·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4145
% Exceeded21%21%
% Met+47%43%
Growth-17.8-2.9
Absence17.2%17.9%
Suspension1.4%1.6%
Scope Score
41
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #3,124 statewide · #3 of 5 in Salida Union Elementary

Dena Boer scores 41 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 46th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “47% proficient” and call it done. Dena Boer deserves a closer read. The school sits in Salida, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

The headline number: 25.9% of English learners met the ELA standard — versus 10.4% statewide.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 33rd to the 46th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELABlue(Increased Significantly)MathBlue(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 47% of students meet the standard today, above the 42% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 340%35%45%40%52%
Grade 454%54%31%42%52%
Grade 541%48%59%31%45%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 353%53%50%38%62%
Grade 440%49%29%29%36%
Grade 525%31%43%27%34%

The story this school is actually telling

The on-ramp · English learner progress
31.0%

of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.

↑ how fast newcomers reach fluency
The trajectory · grade 3→5
17.8pp

proficiency runs 57% in this year's grade 3 against 39% in its grade 5. The state average rises by +4.5pp over the same span.

↓ the part no ranking site shows you

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

23%
29%
48%
Grade 3 · 52% proficient
22%
30%
48%
Grade 4 · 52% proficient
17%
28%
55%
Grade 5 · 45% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 6.7pp across grades; the floor slips 7.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. The school's 5th graders aren't posting a wider lead than its 3rd graders. One question worth asking on a tour: are the strongest students being pushed, or coasting? A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
20.8%
State 21.3%
0.5pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-17.8pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
46.7%
State 42.7%
4.1pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
17.2%
State 17.9%
0.8pp below state avg
Suspension rate
1.4%
State 1.6%
0.2pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
31.0%
State 18.0%
13.1pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask the principal what changes between grade 3 and grade 5. Ask who teaches the older grades, and what the school does when a child starts falling behind.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Dena Boer in Salida, 43.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dena Boer outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 173 students tested.

All students at this school: 47% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 47%, district —, state 43%47%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 34%, state 32%41% · −6 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 45%, district 34%, state 32%45% · −2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 44%, district 36%, state 42%44% · −3 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 50%, district 39%, state 44%50% · +3 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 20%, district 13%, state 11%20% · −27 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 41%, district 43%, state 56%41% · −6 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 25%, district 16%, state 15%25% · −22 vs school

8 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 7.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -1.4pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 17.2%, district 12.6%, state 17.9%17.2% · −0.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.4%, district —, state 1.6%1.4% · −0.2pp vs state

TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (24.7% vs 14.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–614.7%
TK/K24.7%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Dena Boer
41/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 20:1, district 22:120:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience19.2 years
Fully credentialed92%
Intern / emergency permit4.6%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$66,291 – $128,599
Principal salary$150,509 – $0
Superintendent salary$217,152

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,133, CA average $14,815$23,133 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,626 per student

$1,626 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$21,433 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction62%
Instruction support8%
Student services12%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance7%
Other2%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$14,613 per pupil
2019$12,966 per pupil
2018$12,999 per pupil
2017$8,539 per pupil
2016$8,018 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Hispanic73.0%
District 65.2% · CA 56.1%
White16.4%
District 19.6% · CA 19.9%
Other7.9%
District 8.3% · CA 9.0%
Black1.6%
District 2.0% · CA 4.8%
Asian1.1%
District 5.1% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 79.3% (15pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$95K · CA $85K
Median home value$461K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+20% · CA 35%
ZIP population13,900
Median age35 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Dena Boer a good elementary school?

Dena Boer has a Scope Score of 41 out of 100, placing it in the 46th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,124 statewide. 20.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Dena Boer's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 46.7% of students at Dena Boer met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 20.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 25.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 20.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 437 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Dena Boer rank in California?

Dena Boer ranks #3,124 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 46th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Dena Boer getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Dena Boer decreases by 17.8 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Dena Boer?

17.2% of students at Dena Boer are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.4%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Dena Boer compare to other schools in Salida?

Dena Boer scores 41/100 (46th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 444 students. Use the schools in Salida page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Dena Boer serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Dena Boer in Salida, 43.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 39.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Dena Boer outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.9 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (39.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (47.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 26.7 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 173 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
20.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 50th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-17.8pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 34th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
46.7%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 53th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
17.2%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 51th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
1.4%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 52th pctile
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
31.0%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 68th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37723%29%22%26%52%+9
Grade 46422%30%16%33%52%+7
Grade 57817%28%17%38%45%−3
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37729%34%12%26%62%+17
Grade 46419%17%33%31%36%−6
Grade 57716%18%21%45%34%−2
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/117712%10%56%22%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17343.4%+4+5
Hispanic/Latino16547.9%+8+9
English Learners5425.9%+11+16
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Dena Boer ←4120.8%46.7%−17.81.4%
Hart-Ransom Elementary2.4 mi4620.5%51.1%+0.44.7%
Sisk Elementary1.2 mi4616.7%40.6%−9.80.8%
Hart-Ransom Academic Charter2.4 mi458.9%41.2%+17.30.2%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193633#367017.1%42.3%8.2%0.7%-13.3pp
20224162#219918.4%45.0%34.7%0.4%-4.4pp
20234461#225217.8%42.8%31.8%0.0%+3.6pp
20244250#285917.1%34.5%15.7%0.7%-10.3pp
20254146#312420.8%46.7%17.2%1.4%-17.8pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female8.7%14.5%+5.8pp
Male7.6%19.6%+12.0pp
Asian0.0%
Black/African American8.3%
Filipino18.2%
Hispanic/Latino8.1%17.7%+9.6pp
Students with Disabilities19.4%19.2%-0.2pp
English Learners3.5%14.8%+11.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged9.5%17.4%+7.9pp
All Students8.1%17.1%+9.0pp
Two or More Races0.0%
Homeless30.8%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction