Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Cook (Hazel Goes) posts 38% meeting the standard and 16.6% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 48 | 17% | 38% | +13.9 | 20.5% | 3.3% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 63rd percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🚀 Growth Engine — Ask how the school tracks each kid's growth year to year, and what happens when a kid stalls instead of gaining.
Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. Cook (Hazel Goes) deserves a closer read. The school sits in Chula Vista, where two-thirds of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 29.3% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 51st to the 63rd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 600 elementary schools.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 38% meet the standard today, versus 47% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57% | 40% | 28% | 35% | 37% |
| Grade 4 | 59% | 53% | 55% | 40% | 39% |
| Grade 5 | 60% | 52% | 49% | 55% | 53% |
| Grade 6 | 59% | 60% | 61% | 62% | 70% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 47% | 29% | 37% | 24% | 33% |
| Grade 4 | 41% | 40% | 46% | 39% | 26% |
| Grade 5 | 21% | 18% | 30% | 28% | 44% |
| Grade 6 | 58% | 20% | 31% | 36% | 44% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 13.0pp across grades; the floor rises 16.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary in Chula Vista, 47.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 45.5% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (33.4% Math proficient); Hispanic students (51.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 5.3 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 137 students tested.
7 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 27.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.7pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (27.9% vs 16.8%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$947 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary rank in California?
Is Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary?
How does Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary compare to other schools in Chula Vista?
How does Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 13% | 23% | 25% | 38% | 37% | −7 |
| Grade 4 | 41 | 17% | 22% | 22% | 39% | 39% | −6 |
| Grade 5 | 53 | 26% | 26% | 28% | 19% | 53% | +5 |
| Grade 6 | 54 | 31% | 39% | 19% | 11% | 70% | +24 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52 | 10% | 23% | 31% | 37% | 33% | −13 |
| Grade 4 | 43 | 12% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 26% | −16 |
| Grade 5 | 52 | 21% | 23% | 29% | 27% | 44% | +9 |
| Grade 6 | 54 | 15% | 30% | 24% | 31% | 44% | +9 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 53 | 6% | 26% | 66% | 2% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 137 | 47.4% | +2 | +9 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 173 | 51.4% | +2 | +13 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cook (Hazel Goes) Elementary ← | — | 48 | 16.6% | 38.5% | +13.9 | 3.3% |
| Parkview Elementary | 1.7 mi | 67 | 45.3% | 68.5% | +2.1 | 0.8% |
| Allen (Ella B.) Elementary | 2.5 mi | 63 | 34.6% | 61.3% | +7.7 | 4.6% |
| Chula Vista Learning Community Charter | 1.7 mi | 60 | 23.5% | 51.1% | −5.1 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 43 | 51 | #2690 | 18.0% | 47.4% | 6.6% | 1.6% | -11.3pp |
| 2022 | 36 | 50 | #2895 | 13.0% | 38.8% | 40.1% | 0.5% | +0.3pp |
| 2023 | 40 | 52 | #2721 | 14.8% | 40.8% | 21.2% | 2.2% | +7.3pp |
| 2024 | 47 | 61 | #2217 | 14.2% | 36.7% | 17.5% | 3.0% | +11.8pp |
| 2025 | 48 | 63 | #2140 | 16.6% | 38.5% | 20.5% | 3.3% | +13.9pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.3% | 23.1% | +18.8pp |
| Male | 8.8% | 18.0% | +9.2pp |
| Black/African American | 0.0% | 30.8% | +30.8pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 6.8% | 20.5% | +13.7pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 13.6% | 19.7% | +6.1pp |
| English Learners | 5.4% | 24.7% | +19.3pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 7.3% | 24.9% | +17.6pp |
| All Students | 6.5% | 20.8% | +14.3pp |
| Two or More Races | — | 23.1% | — |
| Homeless | — | 30.0% | — |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction