Center Elementary: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.
Center posts 36% meeting the standard and 11.5% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 38 | 12% | 36% | -0.5 | 15.8% | 3.4% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Center Elementary scores 38 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 37th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “36% proficient” and call it done. Center deserves a closer read. The school sits in Fairfield, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 30.9% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
The seven-year arc
Slipped from the 69th to the 37th percentile since 2019.
This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 36% meet the standard today, versus 53% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53% | 40% | 34% | 37% | 30% |
| Grade 4 | 56% | 46% | 39% | 36% | 42% |
| Grade 5 | 59% | 42% | 51% | 29% | 38% |
| Grade 6 | 60% | 55% | 48% | 54% | 38% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 52% | 41% | 28% | 51% | 36% |
| Grade 4 | 53% | 46% | 37% | 26% | 40% |
| Grade 5 | 44% | 37% | 22% | 25% | 27% |
| Grade 6 | 45% | 36% | 31% | 43% | 33% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding rises 3.9pp across grades; the floor rises 7.7pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Center Elementary in Fairfield, 26.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 38.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Center Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 12.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (28.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (24.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 19.0 percentage points for black students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 188 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 5.8pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +13.6pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (26.6% vs 11.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 23% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Center Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Center Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Center Elementary rank in California?
Is Center Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Center Elementary?
How does Center Elementary compare to other schools in Fairfield?
How does Center Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 46
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 89 | 10% | 20% | 27% | 43% | 30% | −13 |
| Grade 4 | 90 | 16% | 27% | 21% | 37% | 42% | −3 |
| Grade 5 | 100 | 14% | 24% | 23% | 39% | 38% | −10 |
| Grade 6 | 100 | 9% | 29% | 32% | 30% | 38% | −9 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 89 | 12% | 24% | 27% | 37% | 36% | −10 |
| Grade 4 | 89 | 9% | 31% | 31% | 28% | 40% | −1 |
| Grade 5 | 99 | 8% | 19% | 30% | 42% | 27% | −8 |
| Grade 6 | 100 | 16% | 17% | 25% | 42% | 33% | −2 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 100 | 7% | 16% | 64% | 13% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 188 | 26.1% | −13 | −12 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 112 | 24.1% | −17 | −15 |
| Filipino | 82 | 62.2% | −2 | −10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center Elementary ← | — | 38 | 11.5% | 35.7% | −0.5 | 3.4% |
| Scandia Elementary | 0.8 mi | 52 | 16.7% | 40.9% | +14.2 | 2.8% |
| Travis Elementary | 1.2 mi | 52 | 26.6% | 54.5% | −2.4 | 0.7% |
| Dan O. Root Elementary | 3.1 mi | 33 | 12.5% | 31.6% | +9.2 | 5.3% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 52 | 69 | #1719 | 25.5% | 52.8% | 7.8% | 1.1% | -1.3pp |
| 2022 | 41 | 62 | #2157 | 20.2% | 42.0% | 29.8% | 1.2% | -1.4pp |
| 2023 | 37 | 45 | #3122 | 13.3% | 35.4% | 23.0% | 4.1% | +5.5pp |
| 2024 | 27 | 13 | #5000 | 11.8% | 34.0% | 15.5% | 3.0% | -16.8pp |
| 2025 | 38 | 37 | #3627 | 11.5% | 35.7% | 15.8% | 3.4% | -0.5pp |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 7.9% | 13.7% | +5.8pp |
| Male | 7.6% | 17.6% | +10.0pp |
| Asian | 11.4% | 12.1% | +0.7pp |
| Black/African American | 12.2% | 26.4% | +14.2pp |
| White | 4.9% | 4.0% | -0.9pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 7.5% | 21.4% | +13.9pp |
| Two or More Races | 9.1% | 9.3% | +0.2pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 12.5% | 17.6% | +5.1pp |
| English Learners | 7.4% | 22.9% | +15.5pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17.5% | 23.4% | +5.9pp |
| All Students | 7.8% | 15.7% | +7.9pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction