Campo Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Campo posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
Campo Elementary scores 24 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 11th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
Most rating sites would stop at “24% proficient” and call it done. Campo deserves a closer read. The school sits in Campo, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
Your other options
The community around it
Student demographics
2 more gaps by subject
Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.
Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.
Subgroup Growth by Grade
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 16.6pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +9.2pp.
Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Funding Breakdown
Neighborhood Context
Whole Child
Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25
For the data nerdsEvery number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 40 | 23% | 23% | 38% | 18% | 45% | +2 |
| Grade 4 | 52 | 12% | 10% | 17% | 62% | 21% | −24 |
| Grade 5 | 46 | 7% | 20% | 26% | 48% | 26% | −22 |
| Grade 6 | 39 | 5% | 3% | 28% | 64% | 8% | −39 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 41 | 7% | 20% | 22% | 51% | 27% | −19 |
| Grade 4 | 52 | 4% | 12% | 37% | 48% | 15% | −26 |
| Grade 5 | 45 | 4% | 7% | 31% | 58% | 11% | −24 |
| Grade 6 | 39 | 0% | 5% | 21% | 74% | 5% | −30 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 45 | 2% | 18% | 53% | 27% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 96 | 21.9% | +1 | −16 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 97 | 27.8% | +8 | −11 |
| White | 30 | 33.3% | −10 | −28 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campo Elementary ← | — | 24 | 9.4% | 24.3% | −17.3 | 2.0% |
| California average | — | 43 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 16 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means