ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
School Profile · Simi Valley

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa posts 27% meeting the standard and 12.2% exceeding it, against 43% and 21.3% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

50 Moreland Road, 93065 (opens in new tab)·Maricopa Unified·Simi Valley·Grades K-12·1,286 students·78% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(805) 581-0202·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
Scope Score
36
🤝 Culture First · Developing
ranked #3,550 statewide · #3 of 4 in Maricopa Unified

California Virtual Academy at Maricopa scores 36 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 38th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

Most rating sites would stop at “27% proficient” and call it done. California Virtual Academy at Maricopa deserves a closer read. The school sits in Simi Valley, where three in four students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, California Virtual Academy at Maricopa enrolls by application, not address — the score reads the same, the enrollment path doesn't.

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

17%
11%
72%
Grade 3 · 28% proficient
22%
12%
66%
Grade 4 · 34% proficient
10%
15%
75%
Grade 5 · 25% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 7.1pp across grades; the floor slips 3.3pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
12.2%
State 21.3%
9.1pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
26.5%
State 42.7%
16.1pp below state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-10.1pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Chronic absenteeism
10.4%
State 17.9%
7.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.1%
State 1.6%
1.5pp below state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
Elementary
California Virtual Academ…
36
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.

The community around it

Community Profile
Context — not part of the Scope Score

Student demographics

Hispanic54.1%
White26.6%
Asian4.3%
Black9.3%
Other5.7%
GenderFemale 54.8%Male 45.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 77.7% (14pp above CA avg)
Resources & Access
Enrollment
1,286
Near CA avg (~1,200)
Transitional Kindergarten
TK status unconfirmed
No TK enrollment is on file with the state for this school — that isn't the same as “no TK.” Confirm directly with the district.
Student-Teacher Ratio
25:1
4 more students per teacher than CA avg
Per-Pupil Spending
$19,796
CA avg: $14,815 · District avg · NCES F-33
At California Virtual Academy at Maricopa in Simi Valley, 35.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 23.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. California Virtual Academy at Maricopa outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 561 students tested.
Equity Gaps
ELA · English Learner−22.9pp
12.7% vs 35.6% overall · n=39
3 more gaps by subject
ELA Exceeded · Black−13.4pp
0.0% vs 13.4% overall · n=16
Math · Black−6.9pp
25.0% vs 31.9% overall · n=16
Math Exceeded · Black−3.8pp
12.5% vs 16.3% overall · n=16

Subgroups with fewer than 15 students are excluded for privacy. Gaps of less than 3 percentage points are not shown.

Subgroup Proficiency
Low-Income562 tested
ELA 35.6%·Math 31.1%· +11.8pp vs district
Hispanic395 tested
ELA 34.3%·Math 34.9%· +15.4pp vs district
White202 tested
ELA 40.2%·Math 31.7%· -9.8pp vs district

Weighted average across tested grades. Subgroups with fewer than 15 students excluded. Data: CDE CAASPP 2024-25.

Subgroup Growth by Grade
Change in proficiency from lowest tested grade. Shows which groups are gaining ground.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 5.0pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.3pp.

Subgroups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Funding Breakdown
Instruction 58%Support 39%Other 3%

Source: NCES F-33 (2019–2020) · Full district breakdown →

Neighborhood Context
Median Income
$121K
$36K above CA median
Median Home Value
$829K
$170K above CA median
Bachelor's+
40%
5pp above CA avg
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Whole Child
Teacher experience, college/career readiness, and more. Context only — never part of the Scope Score.
Teacher Experience
10.1 years avg experience
403 teachers · 2% first-year · 4% second-year
Teacher Credentials
97% fully credentialed

Source: CDE SARC, 2024-25

Community Profile provides context about who attends this school and the resources available. These factors are never part of the Scope Score. Learn why →
For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 43%
12.2%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 41th pctile
Met or exceeded · 22%
26.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 38th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 15%
-10.1pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 47th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 10%
10.4%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · 62th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
0.1%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 63th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 37217%11%22%50%28%−16
Grade 46722%12%12%54%34%−10
Grade 59410%15%19%56%24%−23
Grade 610210%23%26%41%32%−14
Grade 71279%30%18%43%39%−9
Grade 81627%28%29%35%36%−10
Grade 1110721%35%32%13%55%+8
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3727%24%24%46%31%−15
Grade 46713%15%31%40%28%−13
Grade 5954%9%25%61%14%−22
Grade 610213%17%17%54%29%−6
Grade 712924%9%25%42%33%−1
Grade 816126%13%21%40%39%+7
Grade 1110925%23%17%35%48%+24
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/1136910%23%50%16%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged56135.6%+12−3
Hispanic/Latino39534.3%+15−5
White20040.2%−10−22
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
California Virtual Academy at Maricopa ←3612.2%26.5%−10.10.1%
Hollow Hills Elementary2.4 mi6140.3%68.9%+0.43.1%
California Virtual Academy San Mateo0 mi4326.7%44.8%−17.80.2%
Insight @ San Diego0 mi4212.3%31.5%0.6%
California average4321.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Scope Score history
20%36%'19'22'23'24'25
2019 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024 · 2025 · no testing 2020–21 (COVID) · rank #5291 → #3442 → #3763 → #4881 → #3550
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

Frequently asked questions

Is California Virtual Academy at Maricopa a good elementary school?
California Virtual Academy at Maricopa has a Scope Score of 36 out of 100, placing it in the 38th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #3,550 statewide. 12.2% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 9.1 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights six dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (43%), met or exceeded (22%), grade 3-to-5 growth (15%), chronic absenteeism (10%), ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%), and suspension rate (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are California Virtual Academy at Maricopa's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 26.5% of students at California Virtual Academy at Maricopa met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 12.2% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 12.2% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 467 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does California Virtual Academy at Maricopa rank in California?
California Virtual Academy at Maricopa ranks #3,550 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 38th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
Is California Virtual Academy at Maricopa getting better or worse?
Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at California Virtual Academy at Maricopa decreases by 10.1 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.
What is the attendance and school culture like at California Virtual Academy at Maricopa?
10.4% of students at California Virtual Academy at Maricopa are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does California Virtual Academy at Maricopa compare to other schools in Simi Valley?
California Virtual Academy at Maricopa scores 36/100 (38th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,286 students. Use the schools in Simi Valley page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.
How does California Virtual Academy at Maricopa serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At California Virtual Academy at Maricopa in Simi Valley, 35.6% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 23.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. California Virtual Academy at Maricopa outperforms its district average for low-income students by 11.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (31.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (34.3% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 22.9 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 561 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.