ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier · BerkeleyMagnet

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier: High scores, real growth, strong attendance. We looked for a catch — we didn't find one.

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier posts 55.5% exceeding the standard — versus 21.4% statewide — with climate numbers better than most. That doesn't make it perfect. It makes it worth a visit to find what numbers can't measure.

2015 Virginia Street, 94709 (opens in new tab)·Berkeley Unified·Berkeley·Grades TK-5·407 students·29% low-income·Magnet·2024–25 CAASPP·(510) 644-6225
Magnet program — district-run public school with a themed curriculum. Enrollment terms vary by program — ask this school how it enrolls.
Scope Score
75
Strong High Ceiling
ranked #172 statewide · #2 of 11 in Berkeley Unified
191 tested · 3 of 3 grades published · cohort of 64 tracked

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier scores 75 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 97th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.

Most rating sites would stop at “75% proficient” and call it done. Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier deserves a closer read. One in four of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier's low-income kids hit 62.5% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope7539
% Exceeded55%21%
% Met+75%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Strong · p90Average · p50
Absence7.6%17.9%
Suspension0.3%1.6%

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 88th to the 97th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.

ELABlue(Increased)MathBlue(Increased)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 75% of students meet the standard today, above the 72% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 370%73%77%74%79%
Grade 477%68%81%84%71%
Grade 569%81%75%86%84%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 376%69%72%72%67%
Grade 476%65%81%71%74%
Grade 561%71%65%68%77%

Where its students land

ELA
Exceeded 60%Met 18%Nearly Met 13%Not Met 9%
Math
Exceeded 51%Met 22%Nearly Met 16%Not Met 11%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California elementary schools · average21% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded

The school, grade by grade

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

54%
25%
21%
Grade 3 · 79% proficient
55%
17%
28%
Grade 4 · 72% proficient
72%
13%
15%
Grade 5 · 85% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 17.8pp across grades; the floor rises 5.7pp. The state average rises 4.6pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

62.5%
Low-income · ELA · met standard

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier's most underrated number

62.5% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier low-income: 62.5%State low-income: 38.2%

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
55.5%
State 21.4%
34.1pp above state avg
Met or exceeded
75.4%
State 42.7%
32.6pp above state avg
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
Strong
State average
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 86 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
7.6%
State 17.9%
10.3pp below state avg
Suspension rate
0.3%
State 1.6%
1.3pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
39.1%
State 18.0%
21.2pp above state avg
The returning cohort, two years on
ELA · 2023 · Grade 3
55%
exceeded standard · 77% met or exceeded
ELA · 2025 · Grade 5
72%
exceeded standard · 84% met or exceeded

Percent exceeded, ELA only. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different metric — mean scale-score change across ELA and Math; California's own matched-student model is below.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do. The two measures land in the same neighbourhood here — ours puts this school around the 90th percentile of California elementary schools, the state's around the 98th in reading and math together. Two different methods agreeing is the most you can ask of one year of test data.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measurereturning cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 90th percentile among California elementary schools.90th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +28 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 99th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.99th pctile · +28 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +27 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 97th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.97th pctile · +27 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier in Berkeley, 62.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 47.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier outperforms its district average for low-income students by 14.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (55.4% Math proficient); White students (82.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 56 students tested.

All students at this school: 75% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 75%, district —, state 43%75%
FemaleFemale: this school 74%, district 70%, state 44%74% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 84%, district 83%, state 56%84% · +8 vs school
MaleMale: this school 78%, district 68%, state 42%78% · +2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 59%, district 45%, state 32%59% · −16 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 88%, district 80%, state 56%88% · +12 vs school

8 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 18.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: -2.9pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only109 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +30 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 109 students.+30 pts · +27 vs typical
White61 studentsWhite, reading: +32 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 61 students.+32 pts · +27 vs typical
Low-income students38 studentsLow-income students, reading: +21 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 38 students.+21 pts · +21 vs typical
Math
English Only109 studentsEnglish Only, math: +30 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 109 students.+30 pts · +29 vs typical
White61 studentsWhite, math: +27 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 61 students.+27 pts · +22 vs typical
Low-income students38 studentsLow-income students, math: +20 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 38 students.+20 pts · +21 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 3 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 7.6%, district 12.4%, state 17.9%7.6% · −10.3pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.3%, district —, state 1.6%0.3% · −1.3pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–66.8%
TK/K6.1%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whitti…Magnet
75/100
This school

Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

Berkeley HighScope 74estimated path

The road from this school ends at Berkeley High, which sent 178 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 24 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach Berkeley High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 79% of Berkeley High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

178 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 24 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on Berkeley High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 19:121:1
PrincipalRene Molina
Teaching staff29 teachers
Avg. experience12.4 years
Fully credentialed95%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,370 – $119,053
Principal salary$151,577 – $196,464
Superintendent salary$302,736

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $27,709, CA average $14,491$27,709 · spent at this school
Federal share$24 per student

$24 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$26,397 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction61%
Instruction support12%
Student services9%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,919 per pupil
2019$16,909 per pupil
2018$17,280 per pupil
2017$15,081 per pupil
2016$15,042 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
White46.7%
District 40.9% · CA 19.9%
Other21.9%
District 17.2% · CA 9.0%
Hispanic14.3%
District 22.4% · CA 56.1%
Black9.1%
District 11.3% · CA 4.8%
Asian8.1%
District 8.3% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 29.2% (35pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$89K · CA $85K
Median home value$1.38M · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+80% · CA 35%
ZIP population12,146
Median age30 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 81% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier a good elementary school?

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier has a Scope Score of 75 out of 100, placing it in the 97th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #172 statewide. 55.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 34.1 percentage points above the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 75.4% of students at Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 55.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 19.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 55.5% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 382 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier rank in California?

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier ranks #172 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 97th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks strong among California elementary schools — roughly the 90th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier?

7.6% of students at Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.3%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier compare to other schools in Berkeley?

Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier scores 75/100 (97th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 407 students. Use the schools in Berkeley page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier in Berkeley, 62.5% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 47.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier outperforms its district average for low-income students by 14.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (55.4% Math proficient); White students (82.6% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 56 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
55.5%
↑ vs CA 21.4% · index 83 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded · 23%
75.4%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · index 75 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) · 20%
Strong
↑ vs CA average · 90th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
7.6%
↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 67 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▼ 3.7pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
0.3%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 61 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
▲ 0.2pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
39.1%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 79 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36154%25%15%7%79%+36
Grade 46655%17%18%11%71%+27
Grade 56472%13%5%11%84%+37
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 36148%20%20%13%67%+22
Grade 46650%24%20%6%74%+33
Grade 56455%22%9%14%77%+42

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide6442%39%13%6%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged5662.5%+15+24
White9282.6%−3+21
Two or More Races4095.0%+11+34
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier ←7555.5%75.4%+7.5pp+86 pts0.3%
Ruth Acty Elementary0.8 mi7762.7%85.6%−4.9pp0.1%
Cornell Elementary1.6 mi7049.7%75.6%+2.7pp1.4%
Rosa Parks Environmental Science1.5 mi6950.7%74.0%+3.4pp1.0%
California average3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20196688#65744.1%71.5%7.9%0.1%-8.0pp
20227092#46546.1%71.0%7.0%0.1%+4.5pp
20237494#33252.7%75.0%18.7%0.1%-4.2pp
20247295#27452.7%75.7%11.3%0.1%+4.3pp
20257597#17255.5%75.4%7.6%0.3%+7.5pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female6.5%8.4%+1.9pp
Male8.9%5.0%-3.9pp
Asian7.8%0.0%-7.8pp
Black/African American17.0%33.3%+16.3pp
Hispanic/Latino11.6%11.7%+0.1pp
Two or More Races8.5%3.8%-4.7pp
White4.1%2.6%-1.5pp
Students with Disabilities9.1%23.8%+14.7pp
English Learners12.5%3.6%-8.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged16.7%15.8%-0.9pp
All Students7.7%6.8%-0.9pp
Homeless45.5%
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+28125Exceptional+27125Exceptional
English Only+30109not categorised+30109not categorised
White+3261Exceptional+2761Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+2138Exceptional+2038Exceptional
Two or More Races+3727Exceptional+2827Exceptional
Hispanic or Latino+2319Exceptional+2419Exceptional
Students with Disabilities+516Accelerated+1216Accelerated

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/berkeley-arts-magnet-at-whittier-7729"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Berkeley Arts Magnet at Whittier — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-07methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction