Math
34%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Public high school
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High
English learners reach fluency faster than the state rate. But suspensions run 3× the state rate.
46% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 34% in math. 100.0% graduate in four years. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
Phone(707) 895-3496
DistrictAnderson Valley Unified
PrincipalHeath McNerney
Grades7-12
Enrollment192 students
English
46%Grade 11 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
192Total enrollment
Graduation
100.0%Four-year graduation rate
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grade 11 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 17% | 44% |
| 2022 | 29% | 62% |
| 2023 | 16% | 51% |
| 2024 | 21% | 52% |
| 2025 | 34% | 46% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
9%ProficientStandard Met
26%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
26%MinimalStandard Not Met
40%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
23%ProficientStandard Met
23%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
34%MinimalStandard Not Met
20%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Climbed from the 34th to the 52nd percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 high schools.
Most rating sites would stop at “40% proficient” and call it done. Anderson Valley Junior-Senior deserves a closer read. Two-thirds of its students qualify for free or reduced lunch (California: 64%) — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
The headline number: 43.2% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
90 tested · 1 of 1 grade published
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High scores 53 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 52nd percentile of 1,647 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 40% of students meet the standard today, above the 31% who did in 2019.
Percentile among 1,647 high schools statewide
ELAOrange(Maintained)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 68% | 38% | 22% | 38% | 7% |
| Grade 8 | 55% | 33% | 56% | 30% | 39% |
| Grade 11 | 44% | 62% | 51% | 52% | 46% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 35% | 14% | 11% | 17% | 15% |
| Grade 8 | 28% | 19% | 23% | 11% | 14% |
| Grade 11 | 17% | 29% | 16% | 21% | 34% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Two in five of students here meet the standard. One in ten clear it by a lot.
ELA32% met or exceeded
Exceeded 13%Met 19%Nearly Met 34%Not Met 33%
Math22% met or exceeded
Exceeded 6%Met 17%Nearly Met 21%Not Met 57%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California high schools · average20% exceeded · 43% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 53 | 16% | 40% | 100.0% | 35.7% | 30.1% | 9.0% |
| CA average · High School | 54 | 20% | 43% | 92.5% | 43.0% | 23.1% | 3.3% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope5354
% Exceeded16%20%
% Met+40%43%
Grad rate100.0%92.5%
College readiness35.7%43.0%
Absence30.1%23.1%
Suspension9.0%3.3%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model splits here — the 57th percentile in reading against the 28th in math, among high schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits a little below the middle of California high schools in reading, and the 28th in math. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California high school lands at −3 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −13 and +5 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +3 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 57th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.57th pctile · +3 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −7 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 28th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.28th pctile · −7 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
At Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High in Boonville, 27.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 24.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.4 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 68 students tested.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 10 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 27% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 27%, district —, state 43%27%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 23%, district 19%, state 32%23% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 21%, district 20%, state 32%21% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 28%, district 25%, state 44%28% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 33%, district 27%, state 42%33% · +5 vs school
6 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California high school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
Reading
Hispanic or Latino students45 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 45 students.+6 pts · +9 vs typical
Low-income students41 studentsLow-income students, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California high school, 41 students.−1 pts · +4 vs typical
Math
Hispanic or Latino students45 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California high school, 45 students.−8 pts · +5 vs typical
Low-income students41 studentsLow-income students, math: −8 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California high school, 41 students.−8 pts · +7 vs typical
this school typical California high school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted
— 5 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Where graduates go
What happens after high school?
66%
Enrolled in college within a year
Class of 2023 · 29 of 44 completers · includes community colleges
44Completers
14%
Other colleges6 completers · Outside the California community college system
52%
California community colleges23 completers · Enrolled within a year
34%
Not recorded enrolled15 completers · No college enrollment in this reporting window
Destination data describes this earlier graduating class, separately from current-year test results and graduation. Percentages are rounded.
College destinations and the full graduate record
Where graduates go · 2024–25
Where graduates go
Context — never part of the Scope Score
66%
College-going rate, class of 2023
Where they went after graduation
Of Anderson Valley Junior-Senior's class of 2023, 66% enrolled in college somewhere within a year — a CSU, a community college, a UC, or out of state.
College destination mix, class of 2023
Class of 2023: 44 completers, 66% enrolled somewhere within a year
52%
34%
University of California 3 (7%)California State University 2 (5%)California community college 23 (52%)In-state private 0 (0%)Out-of-state, 4-year 1 (2%)Out-of-state, 2-year 0 (0%)Not enrolled 15 (34%)
Percentages are computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers) from CDE-reported counts, not a CDE-native rate. Data source: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort — the newest published; National Student Clearinghouse match.
UC application funnel — one destination of six, tracked in detail because UC is the only source with 30 years of history
Applied6fall 2025, universitywide
Admitted5
Enrolled‹3
ShowHide the UC campus list
Where they landed (fall 2025)
Berkeley ‹3Davis ‹3
Campuses never sum to the universitywide figure — students apply to several.
UC is one road of many — the full destination mix for the class of 2023 is below. And who applied isn't who the school taught: the ratio between the two reflects the self-selected pool of students who chose to apply, not what happened in the classroom. By the state's 2023 count, 66% of this class's predecessors enrolled in college somewhere within a year. More of the class of 2023 enrolled at community colleges (23) than at UC (3).
Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center), fall 2025 admissions cycle · college-going rate: California Department of Education, 2023 cohort.
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
About 13 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Students per teacher13 · district 16
Teaching staff19 teachers
Avg. experience9.8 years
Fully credentialed62%
Intern / emergency permit4.6%
PrincipalHeath McNerney
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$56,585 – $97,234
Principal salary$129,409 – $125,628
Superintendent salary$163,806
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Course breadth
AP exam qualifiers5 studentsCCI, participation not authorization
CTE pathway completers10 students
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Kids here miss more school, and get suspended more, than the state average.
Grades 9–12 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (33.8% vs 20.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
30.1% of students miss a month or more of school, versus 23.1% statewide. High absence often tracks community stress — the data can't say why.
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 30.1%, district 30.7%, state 23.1%30.1% · +7.1pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 9.0%, district —, state 3.3%9.0% · +5.8pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 7–820.0%
Grades 9–1233.8%
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
It spends $23,276 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$930 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,276, CA average $14,491$23,276 · spent at this school
Federal share$930 per student
District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,191 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 57%Instruction support 12%Student services 7%Administration 13%Buildings & maintenance 10%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$18,014 per pupil
2019$16,815 per pupil
2018$17,184 per pupil
2017$17,941 per pupil
2016$17,107 per pupil
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
At 192 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 22% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino85.4% · district 81.2% · CA 56.1%
White13.5% · district 18.3% · CA 19.9%
Black1.0% · district 0.5% · CA 4.8%
Free or reduced lunch74.0% · CA 64%
Median income$45K · CA $85K
Median home value$760K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population956
Median age60 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · high schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High | Public | Solid | 16% | 40% | School being viewed |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels.
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check your address with the district
School location and nearby schools do not establish attendance eligibility. Confirm boundaries and permit requirements with Anderson Valley Unified.
District information →School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
No school established for this stage.
High school · 9–12
Source: sabs_2016. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High a good high school?
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High has a Scope Score of 53 out of 100, placing it in the 52nd percentile of California high schools and ranked #790 statewide. 15.7% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 4.1 percentage points below the California average of 19.8%. The Scope Score weights 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate (25%), exceeded standard (22%), college/career readiness (20%), met or exceeded (proficient) (18%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 40.0% of students at Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 15.7% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 24.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 15.7% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 70 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High rank in California?
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High ranks #790 among California high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 52nd percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High?
30.1% of students at Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 23.1%. The suspension rate is 9.0%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High compare to other schools in Boonville?
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High scores 53/100 (52nd percentile) among California high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 192 students. Use the schools in Boonville page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.
How does Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High in Boonville, 27.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 24.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.5 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (29.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 4.4 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 68 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
How many students from Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High go to UC?
UC masks this number for Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High — fewer than three enrollees in fall 2025 — a privacy protection for small cohorts, not a signal about the school. Data source: University of California Office of the President (UC Information Center).
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
How fast English learners gain fluency carries this score. The test levels sit close to the state's.
43.2% of English learners reached the top ELPAC level, versus 18.0% statewide.
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 100.0% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 15.7% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 35.7% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 40.0% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 30.1% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 9.0% | 3.3% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 43.2% | 18.0% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures graduation, test performance, college readiness, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High: reading the evidence
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior has real strengths and one number that complicates them. Most rating sites show you one or the other. Both belong on the same page.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High is ranked #790 statewide.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graduation rate | 100.0% | 92.5% | 25% |
| Exceeded standard | 15.7% | 19.8% | 22% |
| College readiness | 35.7% | 43.0% | 20% |
| Met or exceeded | 40.0% | 43.2% | 18% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 30.1% | 23.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 9.0% | 3.3% | 5% |
| EL proficiency (ELPAC) | 43.2% | 18.0% | 5% |
- Graduation rate
- ↑ vs CA 92.5% · index 64 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Exceeded standard
- ↓ vs CA 19.8% · index 50 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- College readiness
- ↓ vs CA 43.0% · index 51 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↓ vs CA 43.2% · index 53 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 23.1% · index 50 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 0.3pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↓ vs CA 3.3% · index 26 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▲ 0.4pp higher vs 2024
- EL proficiency (ELPAC)
- ↑ vs CA 18.0% · index 82 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 27 | 0% | 7% | 33% | 59% | 7% | −40 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 14% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 39% | −7 |
| Grade 11 | 35 | 23% | 23% | 34% | 20% | 46% | −3 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 27 | 4% | 11% | 11% | 74% | 15% | −19 |
| Grade 8 | 28 | 4% | 11% | 25% | 61% | 14% | −18 |
| Grade 11 | 35 | 9% | 26% | 26% | 40% | 34% | +11 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 88 | 5% | 17% | 61% | 17% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 68 | 27.9% | +3 | −10 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 77 | 29.9% | +5 | −9 |
03Nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High ← | — | 53 | 15.7% | 40.0% | 9.0% |
| California average | — | 54 | 19.8% | 43.2% | 3.3% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
Graduation Rate
100.0%
AP Exam Prepared
35.7%
A-G Completion
14.3%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
65.9%
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 49 | 34 | #993 | 8.3% | 30.6% | 24.1% | 4.8% |
| 2022 | 52 | 51 | #783 | 11.7% | 45.2% | 36.6% | 7.5% |
| 2023 | 49 | 38 | #1016 | 12.2% | 33.8% | 35.8% | 12.3% |
| 2024 | 53 | 51 | #800 | 19.0% | 36.2% | 30.4% | 8.6% |
| 2025 | 53 | 52 | #790 | 15.7% | 40.0% | 30.1% | 9.0% |
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 10 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 24.3% | 24.3% | +0.0pp |
| Male | 20.5% | 35.6% | +15.1pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 20.6% | 31.5% | +10.9pp |
| White | 25.0% | 16.0% | -9.0pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 35.5% | 36.0% | +0.5pp |
| English Learners | 22.9% | 31.4% | +8.5pp |
| Homeless | 35.3% | 27.3% | -8.0pp |
| Military-Connected | 19.2% | — | — |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 22.3% | 31.0% | +8.7pp |
| All Students | 22.3% | 29.5% | +7.2pp |
06UC admissions, universitywide2015–2025 · summed across CEEB codes at query time
ShowHide table 06 — UC admissions, universitywide
| Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled | GPA (applied) | GPA (admitted) | GPA (enrolled) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6 | 5 | ‹3 | 3.73 | 3.74 | — |
| 2023 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 3.72 | — | — |
| 2022 | 5 | 3 | ‹3 | 3.88 | — | — |
| 2021 | 11 | 7 | ‹3 | 3.89 | 3.98 | — |
| 2019 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3.98 | 4.13 | — |
| 2018 | 5 | 5 | ‹3 | 4.22 | 4.22 | — |
| 2017 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 3.82 | 4.03 | — |
| 2016 | 16 | 11 | 7 | 3.95 | 4.08 | 4.19 |
| 2015 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 3.95 | 4.17 | — |
‹n = UC masks counts below n · a missing year means zero or masked — never assume zero · GPA cells blank for years with more than one contributing CEEB code (a summed GPA would be fabricated math) · GPAs live here and nowhere else on this page · Applied/Admitted/Enrolled reflect who applied, not what the school taught — no admit rate is computed or implied by this table. Series shown from 2014; full record to 1994 at the UC Infocenter.
07UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file
ShowHide table 07 — UC admissions by campus
| Campus | Year | Applied | Admitted | Enrolled |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkeley | 2025 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2023 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2022 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Berkeley | 2021 | 6 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2025 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2023 | 6 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2021 | 8 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Davis | 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Los Angeles | 2021 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Santa Barbara | 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Santa Cruz | 2019 | 5 | ‹3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2025 | 6 | 5 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2023 | 7 | 4 | 3 |
| Universitywide | 2022 | 5 | 3 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2021 | 11 | 7 | ‹3 |
| Universitywide | 2019 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
Σ campuses ≠ universitywide — students apply to several campuses; the Universitywide row (muted) is its own independent count, never a sum of the rows above it.
08Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshotstructural, dated — newest published; biennial
ShowHide table 08 — Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshot
| Measure | This school |
|---|---|
| AP offered | not offered |
| AP course count | not reported |
| AP enrollment | not reported |
| IB participation | not offered |
| Dual enrollment | not offered |
| Algebra I in grade 8 | not reported |
| Calculus sections | 0 |
| Physics sections | 1 |
| Chemistry sections | 0 |
| Total enrollment (CRDC) | 204 |
Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.
09College destinationsclass of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate
ShowHide table 09 — College destinations
| Destination | Completers | % (derived) |
|---|---|---|
| University of California | 3 | 6.8% |
| California State University | 2 | 4.5% |
| California community college | 23 | 52.3% |
| In-state private | 0 | 0.0% |
| Out-of-state, 4-year | 1 | 2.3% |
| Out-of-state, 2-year | 0 | 0.0% |
| Not enrolled | 15 | 34.1% |
44 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 66% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.
10California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 10 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +3 | 54 | Average | −7 | 54 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | +6 | 45 | Accelerated | −8 | 45 | Moderate |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −1 | 41 | Average | −8 | 41 | Moderate |
| English Learner | −3 | 28 | Average | −5 | 28 | Average |
| English Only | +3 | 17 | not categorised | −6 | 17 | not categorised |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +1 | 17 | not categorised | 0 | 17 | not categorised |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | +6 | 13 | Accelerated | −5 | 13 | Average |
| English Learners Only | −9 | 11 | not categorised | −14 | 11 | not categorised |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/anderson-valley-junior-senior-high-0900"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Anderson Valley Junior-Senior High — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=1,647 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · UC Infocenter (annual refresh, summer) — ‹5/‹3 = masked, never summed across campuses · CRDC 2020-21 (biennial; next expected 2021-22) · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-09-27
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction