Compare · middle

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet and Culver City Middle

Culver City Middle scores 81 and Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet 75 among California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). Culver City Middle’s English (reading and writing) and math results are clearly higher.

No campus drawing yet

Culver City Middle

Culver City Unified

81

StrongScope Score · 78th percentile
Add a schoolUp to four at the same level

Campus drawings © OpenStreetMap contributors. A drawing shows the campus, not an attendance boundary.

Add or change schools

2 of 4 schools · Find schools to compare

Save schools as you browse and compare them here any time. Create a free account

Start over with schools near a place

Biggest differences

What are the biggest differences?

The biggest difference in test results is in math. Culver City Middle has the highest share and Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet has the lowest.

Biggest difference

28points

in math. 52% of Culver City Middle students scored Proficient or Advanced. At Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet it was 24%.

Lowest absence

7in 100

students at Culver City Middle missed 10% or more of school days. It was 29 in 100 at Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet.

Low-income families

82%

of Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet’s students are from low-income families. At Culver City Middle it is 39%.

Each tile is read from the figures below, for the schools scored among California middle schools. Chronic absence is the 2025–26 school year. Students from low-income families are students eligible for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25.

Test results

How do their test results compare?

The dark part of each bar is students who scored Advanced. The light part is students who scored Proficient. The dashed line is California for the same grades.

English: Proficient or Advanced

Reading and writing

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet37%Advanced: 8%
Culver City Middle64%Clearly aheadAdvanced: 29%, clearly ahead
California49%Advanced: 19%

Math: Proficient or Advanced

Share of students tested

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet24%Advanced: 11%
Culver City Middle52%Clearly aheadAdvanced: 34%, clearly ahead
California37%Advanced: 21%

Grades 6–8, spring 2026. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education.

Year by year

How have their results changed?

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet’s English results changed the most. In 2017, 46% of its students were in the state’s top two test levels. In 2026 it was 37%.

Share of students in the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grades 6–8. Each year is a different group of students.

English

Math

The lines break across the COVID years, when state testing was waived or optional. Each figure is our combination of the grades’ published results, weighted by students tested. Source: California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education.

Life at school

Do students show up and stay in class?

A shorter bar is better here. The dashed line is the average California middle school we score.

Chronically absent

Students in 100 who missed 10% or more of school days

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet29 in 100128 of 448 students
Culver City Middle7 in 100Clearly ahead108 of 1,548 students
Average school18 in 100

Suspended at least once

Share of students enrolled at any point in the year

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet0.8%4 of 471 students
Culver City Middle2.3%35 of 1,553 students
Average school3.7%

2025–26 school year. Average school: the average California middle school we score. Source: California Department of Education.

State growth measure

How did results compare with what the state expected?

The state sets an expected score for each student from that student’s earlier scores. A bar to the right means students scored above it.

English

Points against the expected score

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet−11points
Culver City Middle−1point

Math

Points against the expected score

Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet−25points
Culver City Middle−6points
  • Orville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetThe state calls the English result Moderate and the math result Minimal. 407 students in English, 411 in math.
  • Culver City MiddleThe state calls the English result Average and the math result Moderate. 1,425 students in English, 1,416 in math.

Grades 6–8, spring 2025. Students with scores in both years. The measure describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education growth model.

Culture, side by side

What do the school, its families and the records say?

A school’s words are its claims. The district’s survey and the staffing records are evidence.

MeasureOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetCulver City Middle
LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26The share of students, families and staff who agreed. The mark on each bar is the district.
Students: SafetyOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet62%LAUSD 64% · 400 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Students: BelongingOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet50%LAUSD 55% · 277 to 400 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Students: Caring adultsOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet58%LAUSD 61% · 375 to 398 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Staff: SafetyOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet96%LAUSD 94% · 46 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
From the staffing records
Average years of teaching experience2024–25 school yearOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet11Culver City Middle12
Teachers in their first year2024–25 school yearOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet4%Culver City Middle4%
Show every subject in the survey
MeasureOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetCulver City Middle
LAUSD School Experience Survey, 2025–26
Students: EngagementOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet56%LAUSD 58% · 378 to 387 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Students: High expectationsOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet70%LAUSD 73% · 381 to 386 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Students: Bullied 2 or more times in the past 30 daysLower is betterOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet26%LAUSD 19% · 278 to 395 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Staff: Caring adultsOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet81%LAUSD 84% · 45 to 46 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Staff: High expectationsOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet88%LAUSD 92% · 41 to 44 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file
Staff: Bullying called a mild or insignificant problemOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet41%LAUSD 71% · 46 answersCulver City MiddleNo survey on file

School statements are from each school’s own website on the date shown. A survey figure averages the questions on that subject: the share who agreed, or for student bullying the share it happened to. Teacher records are from the California Department of Education. Nothing here is about a named person.

Who attends

Who attends, and how big are they?

The table shows how many students each school has and how many are from low-income families.

MeasureOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetCulver City Middle
StudentsFederal school directory, 2024–25Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet456Culver City Middle1,523
Students from low-income familiesEligible for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. California: 63%Orville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet82%374 of 456 studentsCulver City Middle39%601 of 1,523 students
Students per teacherA staffing ratio, not class sizeOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet18Culver City Middle21
Show grades and who runs each school
MeasureOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetCulver City Middle
GradesOrville Wright Engineering and Design Magnet6–8Culver City Middle6–8
Who runs the schoolOrville Wright Engineering and Design MagnetLos Angeles UnifiedCulver City MiddleCulver City Unified

Sources

Sources and definitions

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How we score schools

Test results are from California’s state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026. Each figure is the share of students tested in the level’s grades who scored Proficient or Advanced, for one subject. California’s figure is our combination of the state’s published rows for the same grades.

“Clearly ahead” marks a figure that is ahead of the others by more than twice the margin of error. On chronic absence, ahead means lower.

Chronic absence and suspensions are the California Department of Education’s 2025–26 counts. “Chronically absent” means a student missed 10% or more of school days. The average school is the average California school we score at these schools’ level, with each school counted once.

The state growth measure is points above or below what the state expected from these students’ earlier scores. It covers grades 4–8 and comes from the state’s spring 2025 release.

The year-by-year chart shows each spring’s results for grades 6–8. Each year is a different group of students, so the chart does not show how the same students changed.

Students and students per teacher are from the federal school directory, 2024–25. Students from low-income families are students counted as eligible for free or reduced-price meals in the California Department of Education’s 2024–25 count.

Teacher experience is the California Department of Education’s staffing file for the school year shown (teachers only).