Lemonwood Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Lemonwood posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 5.5pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 26 | 8% | 25% | Average · p53 | 17.7% | 3.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 39 | 21% | 43% | Average · p50 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Lemonwood Elementary scores 26 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 24th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “25% proficient” and call it done. Lemonwood deserves a closer read. The school sits in Oxnard, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
The seven-year arc
Climbed from the 11th to the 24th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 500 elementary schools.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 25% of students meet the standard today, above the 21% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 23% | 22% | 19% | 16% | 16% |
| Grade 4 | 32% | 29% | 28% | 32% | 29% |
| Grade 5 | 20% | 27% | 28% | 22% | 33% |
| Grade 6 | 23% | 31% | 31% | 32% | 28% |
| Grade 7 | 16% | 41% | 32% | 42% | 37% |
| Grade 8 | 20% | 21% | 31% | 31% | 37% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 22% | 20% | 24% | 16% | 24% |
| Grade 4 | 24% | 19% | 14% | 21% | 29% |
| Grade 5 | 5% | 9% | 14% | 10% | 18% |
| Grade 6 | 16% | 14% | 12% | 19% | 6% |
| Grade 7 | 3% | 13% | 27% | 22% | 23% |
| Grade 8 | 7% | 6% | 14% | 20% | 16% |
The story this school is actually telling
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The 6 things our score weighs
California's own answer to the same question
California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 49th percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 28th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 53rd. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Lemonwood Elementary in Oxnard, 29.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.2% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Lemonwood Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 2.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (19.0% Math proficient); Hispanic students (30.7% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 20.1 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 496 students tested.
6 of 14 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 16.7pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +7.1pp.
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
— A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly twice the rate of Grades 4–6 students (28.2% vs 11.9%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
Lemonwood Elementary serves grades TK-8. We don’t have attendance-boundary data showing which high school students here continue to, and we’d rather leave this blank than guess from whichever school happens to be nearest. The district office can tell you which high school your address is zoned for.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
$1,051 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 808 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 21% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lemonwood Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Lemonwood Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Lemonwood Elementary rank in California?
Is Lemonwood Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Lemonwood Elementary?
How does Lemonwood Elementary compare to other schools in Oxnard?
How does Lemonwood Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 35
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 68 | 7% | 9% | 24% | 60% | 16% | −27 |
| Grade 4 | 91 | 8% | 21% | 21% | 51% | 29% | −16 |
| Grade 5 | 90 | 9% | 24% | 23% | 43% | 33% | −14 |
| Grade 6 | 81 | 9% | 20% | 30% | 42% | 28% | −18 |
| Grade 7 | 101 | 9% | 28% | 25% | 39% | 37% | −11 |
| Grade 8 | 98 | 12% | 24% | 31% | 33% | 37% | −9 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 84 | 6% | 18% | 17% | 60% | 24% | −22 |
| Grade 4 | 94 | 11% | 18% | 35% | 36% | 29% | −13 |
| Grade 5 | 96 | 8% | 9% | 18% | 65% | 18% | −17 |
| Grade 6 | 80 | 1% | 5% | 34% | 60% | 6% | −28 |
| Grade 7 | 102 | 9% | 14% | 25% | 53% | 23% | −11 |
| Grade 8 | 97 | 9% | 7% | 28% | 56% | 16% | −16 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 193 | 4% | 17% | 48% | 31% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 496 | 29.2% | −2 | −9 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 505 | 30.7% | −2 | −8 |
| English Learners | 248 | 12.1% | −0 | +2 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lemonwood Elementary ← | — | 26 | 8.1% | 24.7% | +5.5pp | +76 pts | 3.1% |
| Harrington Elementary | 1.1 mi | 38 | 7.5% | 26.7% | +24.1pp | — | 0.7% |
| Kamala Elementary | 0.9 mi | 35 | 8.3% | 25.9% | +9.6pp | — | 1.9% |
| Norman R. Brekke Elementary | 2.6 mi | 32 | 26.8% | 51.3% | −30.5pp | — | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 39 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9pp | — | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 20 | 11 | #4909 | 7.1% | 21.1% | 4.7% | 4.2% | -10.2pp |
| 2022 | 21 | 22 | #4494 | 6.2% | 20.8% | 19.3% | 2.9% | -3.3pp |
| 2023 | 21 | 20 | #4603 | 6.7% | 21.1% | 19.1% | 3.2% | -0.4pp |
| 2024 | 25 | 18 | #4723 | 7.5% | 19.6% | 14.9% | 4.7% | +0.3pp |
| 2025 | 26 | 24 | #4373 | 8.1% | 24.7% | 17.7% | 3.1% | +5.5pp |
- — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4.3% | 17.0% | +12.7pp |
| Male | 4.5% | 18.3% | +13.8pp |
| White | 11.1% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 4.4% | 17.2% | +12.8pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 10.6% | 23.8% | +13.2pp |
| English Learners | 3.9% | 14.7% | +10.8pp |
| Homeless | 11.8% | 16.8% | +5.0pp |
| Military-Connected | 0.0% | 3.8% | +3.8pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 4.2% | 18.2% | +14.0pp |
| All Students | 4.4% | 17.7% | +13.3pp |
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | +1 | 432 | Average | −7 | 434 | Moderate |
| Hispanic or Latino | +1 | 413 | Average | −7 | 415 | Moderate |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 0 | 406 | Average | −7 | 408 | Moderate |
| English Learner | +1 | 344 | Average | −9 | 346 | Moderate |
| English Learners Only | −4 | 173 | not categorised | −6 | 175 | not categorised |
| Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only | +5 | 171 | not categorised | −9 | 171 | not categorised |
| Homeless Youth | −6 | 97 | Moderate | −2 | 98 | Average |
| Students with Disabilities | −11 | 60 | Moderate | −3 | 60 | Average |
| English Only | −3 | 57 | not categorised | +1 | 57 | not categorised |
| Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only) | −1 | 53 | Average | −9 | 53 | Moderate |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/lemonwood-elementary-0333"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="Lemonwood Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction