Wilson C. Riles Middle — Rating & test scores

Q: Is Wilson C. Riles Middle a good middle school?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 28 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Wilson C. Riles Middle was well below California in English and math: 34% and 24% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Q: What are Wilson C. Riles Middle's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2026, 34% of students tested in grades 7 and 8 met or exceeded the English standard and 24% the math standard; 7% and 12% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 50% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 665 students were tested in English and 667 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

Q: How does Wilson C. Riles Middle rank in California?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Needs Support, 2026). Wilson C. Riles Middle ranks #1,918 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.

Q: What do attendance and suspension records show for Wilson C. Riles Middle?

CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 24.9% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 188 chronically absent of 755 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 8.4%; 65 unduplicated suspended students of 777 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

Q: How does Wilson C. Riles Middle compare to other schools in Roseville?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 682 students. Use the schools in Roseville page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.

Q: What do reported student-group results show at Wilson C. Riles Middle?

At Wilson C. Riles Middle in Roseville, 26% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 7–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 26% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That matches the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 20% in math; White students, 38% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 418 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Q: What high school does Wilson C. Riles Middle feed into?

In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Wilson C. Riles Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Center High. Center High is in the 41st percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Roseville · 7–8 · 682 students (2024–25)

4747 PFE Road, 95747wcr.centerusd.org ↗(916) 787-8100Principal Brett Homesley

How to read this →

24thpercentileNeeds Support

The dots are California’s 2,532 scored public middle schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2026 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

28 / 100

Weighted composite · 2026
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Wilson C. Rileshigher than 24 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Wilson C. Rileshigher than 24 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Wilson C. Rileshigher than 24 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well below California in English and math: 34% and 24% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students: all students tested in grades 7 and 8: 665 in English, 667 in math
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 838,600 in English and 838,896 in math tested).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence

8.4% of students (65 of 777) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school.2025–26

8.4%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26

Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?

Source: CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students: all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 777
Comparison: 65 of 777. The California figure is an average of school rates (2,532 scored California middle schools), our calculation.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

How strong are the foundations for high school?

Advanced (exceeded)Proficient (met)Below Proficient

English

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced: 7%
Proficient: 27%
Below Proficient: 66%

34% proficient or advanced · 665 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Advanced	7%	19%
Proficient	27%	31%
Developing	27%	23%
Minimal	39%	27%

Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

See each grade’s results →

Math

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

Advanced: 12%
Proficient: 12%
Below Proficient: 76%

24% proficient or advanced · 667 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Advanced	12%	21%
Proficient	12%	16%
Developing	25%	23%
Minimal	51%	40%

See each grade’s results →

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Read English and math separately, then look at progress and the courses students can take.

Ask: How do students get support, choose courses, and prepare for the move to high school?

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school34%

California50%

Tested: 665 here · 838,600 in California.

Math

grades 7 and 8Spring 2026

All students tested

How it compares · proficient or advanced

Same grades · spring 2026 · 0–100%

This school24%

California37%

Tested: 667 here · 838,896 in California.

Progress over time

How are results changing through the middle years?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202536%639 tested

→

202634%665 tested

This school

California, same grades49% → 50%2025 → 2026 · 848,364 → 838,600 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8 · all students tested

Latest annual comparison

202527%636 tested

→

202624%667 tested

This school

California, same grades35% → 37%2025 → 2026 · 851,806 → 838,896 tested

Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.

Explore the available years, charts & underlying data

Chart: 2017–2026. The table includes all available years.

English met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)34%50%

Math met or exceeded, grades 7 and 8

This schoolCalifornia

0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)24%37%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.

English went from 48% in 2017 to 34% in 2026. Math went from 44% in 2017 to 24% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year	This school	California
2015	38% 655 tested	45% 900,059 tested
2016	45% 648 tested	48% 907,715 tested
2017	48% 623 tested	49% 915,271 tested
2018	43% 613 tested	50% 919,277 tested
2019	48% 625 tested	50% 932,985 tested
2022	40% 529 tested	48% 852,094 tested
2023	35% 561 tested	47% 842,173 tested
2024	31% 576 tested	47% 849,026 tested
2025	36% 639 tested	49% 848,364 tested
2026	34% 665 tested	50% 838,600 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 7 and 8
Year	This school	California
2015	34% 656 tested	33% 901,801 tested
2016	41% 646 tested	36% 910,145 tested
2017	44% 620 tested	37% 918,964 tested
2018	38% 605 tested	37% 921,089 tested
2019	36% 625 tested	37% 935,223 tested
2022	24% 527 tested	31% 853,132 tested
2023	26% 557 tested	32% 844,737 tested
2024	25% 581 tested	33% 853,781 tested
2025	27% 636 tested	35% 851,806 tested
2026	24% 667 tested	37% 838,896 tested

The state’s growth measure560 students in English, 557 in math · grades 7–8 · 2025

English−8ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)

Math+6ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 8 points below that prediction, and in math 6 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

Ask: Math is lower than in 2015 here (34% to 24%), while across California it went from 33% to 37%. How does the school check what’s working in math?

Life at school

How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

25 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26

18in 100 at the average California middle school

188 of 755 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school25 in 100

at the average California middle school18 in 100

8.4%of students were suspended at least once (65 of 777), 2025–26

3.7%at the average California middle school

What people here say

Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.

Know this school? Add your answers

Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Wilson C. Riles works for your family.

Answer the family questions →Responder en español

Work here? We don’t check staff emails for Center Joint Unified yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district →

Students

We don’t have student survey results for Wilson C. Riles. Ask whether the school surveys its students, and what it learned from the answers.

Families

Family answers collected by SchoolScope

We don’t show family answers yet. How family answers work

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Staff

We don’t have staff survey results for Wilson C. Riles. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Proficient or Advanced · grades 7 and 8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

418 English · 420 math tested

English26% / 39%

Math20% / 26%

White

217 English · 216 math tested

English38% / 62%

Math31% / 50%

Hispanic or Latino

201 English · 203 math tested

English27% / 40%

Math18% / 25%

Asian

100 English · 101 math tested

English30% / 76%

Math16% / 71%

Black or African American

65 English · 64 math tested

English33% / 34%

Math23% / 20%

Two or more races

54 tested per subject

English37% / 63%

Math28% / 50%

English learners

104 English · 105 math tested

English5% / 7%

Math5% / 7%

Students with disabilities

79 tested per subject

English9% / 14%

Math8% / 9%

Homeless

56 English · 57 math tested

English18% / 28%

Math25% / 17%

Low-income, White, Hispanic or Latino and Asian students and students of two or more races did worse than the same groups statewide.

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Proficient or Advancedgrades 7 and 8 · spring 2026

Group and subject	Here	vs Center Joint Unified	vs California
Low-income · 418 tested in English, 420 in math
English	26%	026%	−1339%
Math	20%	020%	−626%
White · 217 tested in English, 216 in math
English	38%	038%	−2462%
Math	31%	031%	−1950%
Hispanic or Latino · 201 tested in English, 203 in math
English	27%	−128%	−1340%
Math	18%	018%	−725%
Asian · 100 tested in English, 101 in math
English	30%	030%	−4676%
Math	16%	016%	−5571%
Black or African American · 65 tested in English, 64 in math
English	33%	033%	−134%
Math	23%	023%	+320%
Two or more races · 54 tested
English	37%	037%	−2663%
Math	28%	028%	−2250%
English learners · 104 tested in English, 105 in math
English	5%	05%	−27%
Math	5%	05%	−27%
Students with disabilities · 79 tested
English	9%	−110%	−514%
Math	8%	−19%	−19%
Homeless · 56 tested in English, 57 in math
English	18%	018%	−1028%
Math	25%	025%	+817%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Center Joint Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.

Filipino students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2025–26 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

White33%
Hispanic or Latino29%
Asian14%
Black or African American11%
Two or more races8%
Filipino3%
Pacific Islander1%
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Not reported—
Unallocated share<1%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2025–26	Here
White	33%
Hispanic or Latino	29%
Asian	14%
Black or African American	11%
Two or more races	8%
Filipino	3%
Pacific Islander	1%
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 3 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (56%, 382 of 682). California: 63%.

82% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 81.82%: 26.9 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 32.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

English learners

Are English learners making progress in English?

49%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026

This school49%

Center Joint Unified50%

California47%

51 of 104 English learners here; 330 of 659 in Center Joint Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

ElementaryOak Hill ElementaryHistorical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
MiddleWilson C. Riles MiddleThis campus · grades 7-8
High schoolCenter HighHistorical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

Oak Hill Elementary
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
20th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Arthur S. Dudley Elementary
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
8th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Cyril Spinelli Elementary
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
17th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
North Country Elementary
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
24th percentile · Needs Support · elementary · 2026
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Rex Fortune Elementary
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
45th percentile · Developing · elementary · 2026

High-school links

Center High
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
41st percentile · Developing · high · 2025
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

High-school endpoint evidence · Center High

Center HighScope 53historical direct overlap

The road from this school ends at Center High. UC records 17 enrollees from Center High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 14 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Center High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 62% of Center High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

17 UC enrollees (fall 2025) · 14 authorized AP subjects (AP Course Audit 2025 - 2026) → full record on Center High's page

Source: UC & College Board AP Course Ledger

Getting in

Ask Center Joint Unified which school serves your address.

School website: wcr.centerusd.org ↗Office: (916) 787-8100Principal: Brett Homesley

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

4747 PFE Road, Roseville 95747

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Math is lower than in 2015 here (34% to 24%), while across California it went from 33% to 37%. How does the school check what’s working in math?
Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
How do students get academic help and connect with a trusted adult?

Accountability

Who runs this school

Run by Center Joint Unified. The district writes the yearly plan (LCAP) for its schools. See what Center Joint Unified plans.

Common questions

Is Wilson C. Riles Middle a good middle school?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 28 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Wilson C. Riles Middle was well below California in English and math: 34% and 24% met or exceeded the standard in grades 7 and 8, against 50% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Wilson C. Riles Middle's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2026, 34% of students tested in grades 7 and 8 met or exceeded the English standard and 24% the math standard; 7% and 12% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 50% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 665 students were tested in English and 667 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Wilson C. Riles Middle rank in California?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Needs Support, 2026). Wilson C. Riles Middle ranks #1,918 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Wilson C. Riles Middle?

CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 24.9% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 188 chronically absent of 755 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 8.4%; 65 unduplicated suspended students of 777 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Wilson C. Riles Middle compare to other schools in Roseville?

Wilson C. Riles Middle is in the 24th percentile (Needs Support) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 682 students. Use the schools in Roseville page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Wilson C. Riles Middle?

At Wilson C. Riles Middle in Roseville, 26% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 7–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 26% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That matches the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 20% in math; White students, 38% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 418 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

What high school does Wilson C. Riles Middle feed into?

In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Wilson C. Riles Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Center High. Center High is in the 41st percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Other options

If this school isn’t the fit

The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.

Nearby middle schools2026 statewide percentile

Antelope Crossing MiddleDry Creek Joint Elementary · 1.7 mi
72ndSolidScope Score 48/100

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Wilson C. Riles Middle is ranked #1,918 statewide.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2025–26

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	9.8%	17.7%	42%
Met or exceeded	29.1%	40.6%	23%
Chronic absenteeism	24.8%	17.8%	5%
Suspension rate	8.3%	3.8%	5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)	14.3%	17.5%	5%

Exceeded standard: ↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 42 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↓ vs CA 40.6% · index 41 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism: ↓ vs CA 17.8% · index 41 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.7pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate: ↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 32 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · → no change vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC): ↓ vs CA 17.5% · index 40 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students

From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA	Tested	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Minimal	Proficient or Advanced	California	Difference
Grade 7	332	5%	26%	29%	40%	31%	51%	−20
Grade 8	333	9%	29%	23%	39%	38%	49%	−11

California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math	Tested	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Minimal	Proficient or Advanced	California	Difference
Grade 7	335	8%	13%	29%	50%	21%	38%	−17
Grade 8	332	16%	11%	21%	52%	27%	36%	−9

California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA	338	36.7%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA	301	34.5%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math	334	24.9%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math	302	28.8%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA	296	32.8%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA	280	29.6%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math	299	22.7%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math	282	26.9%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA	276	36.6%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA	285	33.7%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math	275	26.6%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math	282	25.2%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA	269	35.7%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA	260	43.9%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math	268	23.1%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math	259	25.5%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA	340	47.6%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA	285	48.4%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math	338	33.7%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math	287	39.0%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA	315	42.2%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA	298	43.6%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math	310	37.7%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math	295	37.6%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA	328	45.7%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA	295	50.9%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math	326	40.5%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math	294	47.3%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA	335	40%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA	313	50%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math	333	35%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math	313	47%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA	326	40%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA	329	37%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math	326	39%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math	330	29%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	Advanced	Proficient	Developing	Minimal
Schoolwide	334	9%	19%	55%	16%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	Proficient or Advanced	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	418	26%	+0	−13
White	217	38%	+0	−24
Hispanic/Latino	201	27%	−0	−13

Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

Listed nearest first, by distance.

Advanced · Proficient or Advanced: Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap: Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth: School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	Advanced	Proficient or Advanced	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Wilson C. Riles Middle ←	—	2824th percentile · Needs Support · statewide · 2026	10%	29%	—	—	8.3%
Antelope Crossing Middle	1.7 mi	4872nd percentile · Solid · statewide · 2026	20%	50%	+3.7pp	—	3.0%
Average California middle school	—	40School average · no percentile	18%	41%	+3.0pp	—	3.8%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2025 · 26.6% → 2026 · 24.9% · −1.7pp
Suspension rate2025 · 8.3% → 2026 · 8.4% · +0.1pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Advanced	Proficient or Advanced
2026 · ELA	665	7.4%	34.1%
2026 · Math	667	12.3%	24.0%
2025 · ELA	639	9.7%	35.7%
2025 · Math	636	13.7%	26.7%
2024 · ELA	576	7.1%	31.3%
2024 · Math	581	10.2%	24.8%
2023 · ELA	561	6.8%	35.1%
2023 · Math	557	10.9%	25.9%
2022 · ELA	529	7.6%	39.7%
2022 · Math	527	9.9%	24.3%
2019 · ELA	625	11.5%	48.0%
2019 · Math	625	16.8%	36.2%
2018 · ELA	613	9.9%	42.9%
2018 · Math	605	16.5%	37.7%
2017 · ELA	623	10.1%	48.1%
2017 · Math	620	16.3%	43.7%
2016 · ELA	648	9%	45%
2016 · Math	646	15%	41%
2015 · ELA	655	7%	38%
2015 · Math	656	12%	34%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	14.8%	10.6%	—
2022	—	—	—	38.7%	8.4%	—
2023	—	—	—	26.0%	11.4%	—
2024	—	—	—	28.2%	13.4%	—
2025	—	—	—	26.4%	8.2%	—
2026	28	24	#1918	24.8%	8.3%	—

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

What we can't show

— The same-year grade contrast is unavailable in this record; it is separate from the two-year aggregate comparison used for scoring.
— Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 13 points in ELA in grades 7–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years

Group	2018–19	2025–26	Δ
Female	18.0%	23.8%	+5.8pp
Male	12.1%	26.0%	+13.9pp
Asian	6.8%	11.2%	+4.4pp
Black/African American	22.7%	34.1%	+11.4pp
Filipino	4.8%	10.0%	+5.2pp
Hispanic/Latino	13.7%	23.1%	+9.4pp
Two or More Races	14.0%	38.1%	+24.1pp
White	16.3%	27.5%	+11.2pp
Students with Disabilities	21.4%	32.7%	+11.3pp
English Learners	12.7%	16.5%	+3.8pp
Homeless	32.7%	47.2%	+14.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	17.4%	28.7%	+11.3pp
All Students	14.9%	24.9%	+10.0pp
Pacific Islander	—	18.2%	—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	−8	560	Moderate	+6	557	Accelerated
English Only	−9	367	not categorised	+4	364	not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	−11	324	Moderate	+8	323	Accelerated
White	−11	177	Moderate	+3	176	Average
Hispanic or Latino	−10	169	Moderate	+9	169	Accelerated
English Learner	−11	135	Moderate	+9	135	Accelerated
English Learners Only	−23	72	not categorised	+15	72	not categorised
Students with Disabilities	−19	72	Moderate	−3	70	Average
Black or African American	−13	68	Moderate	−5	66	Average
Asian	−5	64	Average	+11	64	Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only	0	63	not categorised	−2	63	not categorised
Two or More Races	−13	47	Moderate	+3	47	Average
Homeless Youth	−12	42	Moderate	+10	43	Accelerated
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)	−23	42	Minimal	0	42	Average
Filipino	+2	25	Average	−9	25	Moderate

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

560 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

21st pctile · −8 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

557 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

65th pctile · +6 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,697 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 4,162 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$340 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 682

Central federal expenditures attributed here$226 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 682

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,154 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 63%Instruction support 9%Student services 12%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 8%Other 1%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$12,697 per pupil

2020$12,680 per pupil

2019$12,916 per pupil

2018$12,064 per pupil

2017$10,771 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95747

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95747
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$136,750
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	46.84%
ZCTA population	83,902
Median age	40.2 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95747 →

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/wilson-c-riles-middle-8621"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Wilson C. Riles Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Wilson C. Riles Middle — Rating & test scores

Compare schools

Results are in — see what changed

How strong are the foundations for high school?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

How are results changing through the middle years?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

Know this school? Add your answers

Students

Families

Staff

How each student group did

Low-income

White

Hispanic or Latino

Asian

Black or African American

Two or more races

English learners

Students with disabilities

Homeless

Students and staff

Student mix

Are English learners making progress in English?

The school path beyond this campus

Elementary links

High-school links

Ask Center Joint Unified which school serves your address.

Location and visiting

Questions to ask

Who runs this school

Common questions

If this school isn’t the fit

Explore the data

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful