ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

William FinchCharterOrland, CAGrades K-12154 students

William Finch: A county community school. No Scope Score publishes here.

A Scope Score ranks schools a family can choose between. At William Finch, students are placed here by a district, a probation department, or a county office — so a comparative rank would measure something a family's choice never entered. We show what California reports and hold the rank.

Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated. Enrollment terms vary by charter — ask this school how it enrolls. Learn more

county community school

no score · no band · no rank — enrollment assigned, not chosen

154 students · placed by district, probation, or county

Every figure below is California's own, reported for this school and shown without a rank. Why we withhold a score →

William Finch is a county community school in Orland, California. SchoolScope publishes no Scope Score, performance band, archetype or ranking for schools where enrollment is assigned rather than chosen, so its CDE CAASPP 2025 results appear here unranked.

58 students were tested here on last year's CAASPP. 28.6% met or exceeded the standard; 17.9% exceeded it.

Chronic absenteeism ran 31.8%; the suspension rate was 2.9%. California reports both the same way it does for every school — this page just doesn't rank them here.

If you're trying to understand this school

Families don't choose a court or community school off this page — a student arrives through the court, a probation department, or a district referral. For a specific student, the county office of education or the district's alternative-education office is the right first call.

  • Ask how credits earned here transfer back to a student's home school.
  • Ask what continuity of services looks like when a student moves between this program and a comprehensive campus.
  • Ask what happens to a student's education plan after they leave.
CAASPP 2024–25

This school against the California average

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
% Exceeded% Met+AbsenceSuspension
This school18%29%31.8%2.9%
CA average · Middle School (for reference)17%40%18.1%3.6%
This schoolCA avg
% Exceeded18%17%
% Met+29%40%
Absence31.8%18.1%
Suspension2.9%3.6%
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

How every group of students does here

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 23% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 23%, district —, state 40%23%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 31%, district 20%, state 32%31%
FemaleFemale: this school 26%, district 23%, state 44%26%

9 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended less, than the state average.

Grades 9–12 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 7–8 students (52.2% vs 32.4%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 31.8%, district 11.2%, state 18.1%31.8%
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.9%, district —, state 3.6%2.9%
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–644.4%
Grades 7–832.4%
Grades 9–1252.2%
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 17 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher17 · district 20
Teaching staff9 teachers
Avg. experience14.1 years
Fully credentialed27%
PrincipalDan La Bar
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$55,765 – $112,167
Superintendent salary$191,040

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent · FY 2019–20

It spends $17,018 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $17,018, CA average $14,491$17,018 · spent at this school
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 40%Instruction support 19%Student services 18%Administration 22%Buildings & maintenance 0%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$60,133 per pupil
2019$68,202 per pupil
2018$67,913 per pupil
2017$43,961 per pupil
2016$35,013 per pupil
Who is enrolled

Three in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

At 154 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).

On the state's science test (CAST), 24% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino52.6% · district 53.4% · CA 56.1%
White39.0% · district 35.3% · CA 19.9%
Asian0.7% · district 1.2% · CA 10.2%
Other7.8% · district 10.0% · CA 9.0%
Free or reduced lunch63.0% · CA 64%

Contact

DistrictGlenn County Office of Education
PrincipalDan La Bar
GradesK-12
Enrollment154 students
Nearby schools
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

California's own growth model splits here — the 28th percentile in reading against the 6th in math, among middle schools.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California middle schools in reading, and the 6th in math. We show it; we don't score it.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −5 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 28th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.28th pctile · −5 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −20 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 6th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.6th pctile · −20 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Everything California reports about this school, shown without a rank — grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, climate, and the nearest schools.

01Score factors (not combined)the dimensions a Scope Score would weigh, shown against California · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard17.9%17.2%42%
Met or exceeded28.6%40.0%23%
Chronic absenteeism31.8%18.1%5%
Suspension rate2.9%3.6%5%
Exceeded standard
vs CA 17.2%
Met or exceeded
vs CA 40.0%
Chronic absenteeism
vs CA 18.1%
Suspension rate
vs CA 3.6%
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET+
Grade 3——————
Grade 4——————
Grade 5——————
Grade 67—————
Grade 710—————
Grade 81421%21%0%57%43%
Grade 111911%26%32%32%37%
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET+
Grade 3——————
Grade 4——————
Grade 5——————
Grade 67—————
Grade 710—————
Grade 81414%0%14%71%14%
Grade 11180%0%22%78%0%

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide343%21%62%15%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

03Nearest middle schoolsnearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
William Finch ←—17.9%28.6%——2.9%
Price Intermediate0.7 mi2.4%14.7%+3.0pp—16.6%
California average—17.2%40.0%+1.5pp—3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearExcMet+AbsentSusp
20191.8%27.4%30.0%1.5%
20230.0%13.3%39.7%1.7%
20243.1%12.3%32.0%2.1%
202517.9%28.6%31.8%2.9%
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID)
What we can't show
  • — No Scope Score, performance band, archetype, or state rank publishes for this school — enrollment here is assigned, not chosen, so a comparative rank would mean something different than it does for a neighborhood school. See the Enrollment Axiom at /methodology#peer-class.
  • — No subgroup comparison could be shown for this school this year — either its group sizes fall under CDE's 15-student reporting floor, or district/state comparison data wasn't available for its groups.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
Group20192025
Female42.0%39.8%
Male35.7%52.3%
Hispanic/Latino36.5%44.2%
White37.9%50.0%
Students with Disabilities50.0%60.5%
English Learners25.0%31.8%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged39.4%50.4%
All Students39.6%45.8%
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−525Average−2025Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−522Average−1922Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−1116Moderate−2516Minimal
English Only−112not categorised−1612not categorised
English Learner−1911Moderate−2111Minimal

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction