William B. Bristowhigher than 33 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
William B. Bristowhigher than 33 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
William B. Bristowhigher than 33 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Near California in English and math: 51% and 34% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 1,140 in English, 1,133 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
In 2025, students in grades 6–8 scored below what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Moderate.grades 6–8 · 2025
Ask: Students scored below what the state expected from their earlier scores. What is the school doing differently for them?
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 1,103 in English, 1,101 in math
Comparison
1,103 students in English and 1,101 in math in grades 6–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
7.2% of students (90 of 1,244) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, about twice the rate at the average California middle school.2025–26
7.2%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Source
CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students
all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 1,244
Comparison
90 of 1,244. District and California figures are averages of school rates (3 Brentwood Union schools; 2,532 scored California middle schools), our calculation.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID51%49%
This schoolCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID34%37%
This schoolCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 59% in 2017 to 51% in 2026. Math went from 47% in 2017 to 34% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2015
51% 1,123 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
58% 1,151 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
59% 1,127 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
60% 1,118 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
61% 1,135 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
52% 1,075 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
48% 1,127 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
50% 1,179 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
49% 1,158 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
51% 1,140 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
This school
California
2015
37% 1,124 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
48% 1,157 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
47% 1,128 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
45% 1,109 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
44% 1,130 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
32% 1,074 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
36% 1,133 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
35% 1,171 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
33% 1,159 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
34% 1,133 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure1,103 students in English, 1,101 in math · grades 6–8 · 2025
English−10ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math−18ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 10 points below that prediction, and in math 18 points below it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: Most students in grades 6–8 haven’t yet met the state’s standard in math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
15 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
14in 100 at the average Brentwood Union school18in 100 at the average California middle school
187 of 1,230 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school15 in 100
at the average Brentwood Union school14 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
7.2%of students were suspended at least once (90 of 1,244), 2025–26
6.3%at the average Brentwood Union school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
16
63 of 407
Grades 7–8
15
124 of 823
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how William B. Bristow works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for William B. Bristow. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
482 English · 478 math tested
English
41% / 39%
Math
24% / 26%
Hispanic or Latino
396 English · 392 math tested
English
42% / 39%
Math
27% / 25%
White
353 English · 352 math tested
English
54% / 62%
Math
37% / 50%
Two or more races
147 English · 145 math tested
English
54% / 62%
Math
39% / 50%
Black or African American
87 English · 86 math tested
English
45% / 33%
Math
21% / 20%
Asian
81 English · 82 math tested
English
65% / 75%
Math
45% / 71%
Filipino
64 English · 63 math tested
English
67% / 74%
Math
54% / 60%
English learners
54 tested per subject
English
2% / 7%
Math
4% / 7%
Students with disabilities
178 tested per subject
English
16% / 14%
Math
11% / 10%
White students did worse than the same group statewide. Asian students and students of two or more races did worse than the same groups statewide in math.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Brentwood Union
vs California
Low-income · 482 tested in English, 478 in math
English
41%
−647%
+239%
Math
24%
−630%
−226%
Hispanic or Latino · 396 tested in English, 392 in math
English
42%
−547%
+339%
Math
27%
−229%
+225%
White · 353 tested in English, 352 in math
English
54%
−761%
−862%
Math
37%
−845%
−1350%
Two or more races · 147 tested in English, 145 in math
English
54%
−357%
−862%
Math
39%
−342%
−1150%
Black or African American · 87 tested in English, 86 in math
English
45%
−247%
■+1233%
Math
21%
−425%
+120%
Asian · 81 tested in English, 82 in math
English
65%
−1176%
−1075%
Math
45%
−2065%
−2671%
Filipino · 64 tested in English, 63 in math
English
67%
−1481%
−774%
Math
54%
−1569%
−660%
English learners · 54 tested
English
2%
−35%
−57%
Math
4%
−15%
−37%
Students with disabilities · 178 tested
English
16%
−319%
+214%
Math
11%
−112%
+110%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Brentwood Union, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
No published rate here for American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino35%
2White31%
3Two or more races9%
4Black or African American8%
5Asian7%
6Filipino5%
7Not reported4%
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
35%
White
31%
Two or more races
9%
Black or African American
8%
Asian
7%
Filipino
5%
Not reported
4%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 2 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (41%, 505 of 1,223). California: 63%.
80% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 79.68%: 39.7 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 49.8 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
70%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school70%
Brentwood Union54%
California47%
43 of 61 English learners here; 369 of 677 in Brentwood Union; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
69th percentile · Solid · elementary · 2026
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
Getting in
Ask Brentwood Union which school serves your address.
Is William B. Bristow Middle a good middle school?
William B. Bristow Middle is in the 33rd percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 31 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), William B. Bristow Middle was near California in English and math: 51% and 34% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are William B. Bristow Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 51% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 34% the math standard; 14% and 14% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 1,140 students were tested in English and 1,133 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does William B. Bristow Middle rank in California?
William B. Bristow Middle is in the 33rd percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Developing, 2026). William B. Bristow Middle ranks #1,696 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is William B. Bristow Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares William B. Bristow Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 23rd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for William B. Bristow Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 15.2% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 187 chronically absent of 1,230 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 7.2%; 90 unduplicated suspended students of 1,244 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does William B. Bristow Middle compare to other schools in Brentwood?
William B. Bristow Middle is in the 33rd percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 1,223 students. Use the schools in Brentwood page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at William B. Bristow Middle?
At William B. Bristow Middle in Brentwood, 41% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 47% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 6 points below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 24% in math; Hispanic students, 42% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 482 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↓ vs CA 17.7% · index 46 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 52 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↓ vs CA average · ≈23rd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 54 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 0.9pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 36 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 54 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
376
17%
30%
28%
25%
47%
48%
−1
Grade 7
380
12%
37%
27%
24%
49%
51%
−2
Grade 8
384
15%
41%
24%
20%
56%
49%
+7
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
377
14%
20%
31%
35%
34%
37%
−3
Grade 7
379
15%
25%
28%
32%
40%
38%
+2
Grade 8
377
14%
14%
30%
42%
28%
36%
−8
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
374
50.3%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
388
50.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
396
47.2%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
374
34.2%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
388
35.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
397
29.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
403
55.3%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
394
43.9%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
382
50.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
401
37.4%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
392
35.0%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
378
32.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
393
49.4%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
377
50.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
357
42.9%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
396
37.6%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
378
42.3%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
359
26.5%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
378
52.9%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
357
53.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
340
48.8%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
377
31.6%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
358
35.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
339
28.9%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
372
60.5%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
384
68.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
379
54.6%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
370
48.1%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
384
48.4%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
376
34.0%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
374
55.4%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
368
63.0%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
376
61.4%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
373
48.8%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
365
45.2%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
371
39.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
364
56.6%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
403
64.8%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
360
54.4%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
361
50.4%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
402
53.7%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
365
35.9%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
395
61%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
374
60%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
382
54%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
395
58%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
378
43%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
384
42%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
371
50%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
377
53%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
375
51%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
372
39%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
377
42%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
375
29%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
387
12%
25%
52%
12%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
482
41%
−5
+2
Hispanic/Latino
396
42%
−5
+3
White
353
54%
−7
−8
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
—
—
-10.0pp
2022
—
—
—
22.7%
6.1%
-3.4pp
2023
—
—
—
14.5%
5.9%
-8.8pp
2024
—
—
—
16.7%
6.8%
-4.8pp
2025
—
—
—
14.4%
7.9%
-3.9pp
2026
31
33
#1696
15.2%
7.2%
+1.3pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
—
15.0%
—
Male
—
15.4%
—
Asian
—
3.6%
—
Black/African American
—
24.2%
—
Filipino
—
1.6%
—
Hispanic/Latino
—
17.4%
—
Two or More Races
—
13.0%
—
White
—
14.8%
—
Students with Disabilities
—
19.4%
—
English Learners
—
19.4%
—
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
—
20.2%
—
All Students
—
15.2%
—
Homeless
—
61.5%
—
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
−10
1,103
Moderate
−18
1,101
Moderate
English Only
−12
874
not categorised
−20
873
not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
−11
457
Moderate
−14
455
Moderate
Hispanic or Latino
−14
386
Moderate
−20
384
Moderate
White
−12
362
Moderate
−23
361
Minimal
Students with Disabilities
−24
166
Minimal
−7
166
Moderate
English Learner
−5
130
Average
−7
130
Moderate
Two or More Races
−1
96
Average
−7
95
Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+6
83
not categorised
−2
83
not categorised
Asian
+10
79
Accelerated
−1
81
Average
Black or African American
−6
77
Moderate
−22
77
Minimal
Filipino
−7
58
Moderate
−1
58
Average
English Learners Only
−22
47
not categorised
−14
47
not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
−12
27
Moderate
−27
27
Minimal
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
17%
exceeded standard · 55% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 403 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
15%
exceeded standard · 56% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 384 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 381 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
1,103 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: −10 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 16th percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.16th pctile · −10 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
1,101 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: −18 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 7th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.7th pctile · −18 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$11,472 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 9,023 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$210 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,223
Central federal expenditures attributed here$576 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,223
District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,379 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 74%Instruction support 9%Student services 6%Administration 4%Buildings & maintenance 7%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94513+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94513
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$142,223
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
38.33%
ZCTA population
69,755
Median age
40.0 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94513 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.