ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
William B. Bristow Middle · Brentwood

William B. Bristow Middle: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

William B. Bristow posts 41% meeting the standard against 39% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

855 Minnesota Avenue, 94513 (opens in new tab)·Brentwood Union·Brentwood·Grades 6-8·1,223 students·0% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(925) 513-6460·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope3343
% Exceeded14%17%
% Met+41%39%
Growth-3.9+1.5
Absence14.4%18.5%
Suspension7.9%3.7%
Scope Score
33
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,544 statewide · #3 of 3 in Brentwood Union

William B. Bristow Middle scores 33 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 31st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “41% proficient” and call it done. William B. Bristow deserves a closer read. It sits at the 31st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Slipped from the 50th to the 31st percentile since 2019.

CA Dashboard
ELAYellow(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 41% meet the standard today, versus 52% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 660%53%49%55%50%
Grade 768%54%50%44%50%
Grade 855%49%43%51%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 648%32%38%37%34%
Grade 748%35%42%35%35%
Grade 834%29%26%33%29%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

15%
35%
50%
Grade 6 · 50% proficient
13%
37%
50%
Grade 7 · 50% proficient
13%
34%
53%
Grade 8 · 47% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 1.8pp across grades; the floor slips 3.1pp. The state average falls 0.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
13.8%
State 16.8%
3.1pp below state avg
Growth (G6→G8)
-3.9pp
State +1.5pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
41.1%
State 39.3%
1.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
14.4%
State 18.5%
4.2pp below state avg
Suspension rate
7.9%
State 3.7%
4.3pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
18.2%
State 18.0%
0.2pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 6 and grade 8 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At William B. Bristow Middle in Brentwood, 37.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William B. Bristow Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 6.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 44.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 476 students tested.

All students at this school: 41% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 41%, district —, state 39%41%
FemaleFemale: this school 43%, district 53%, state 44%43% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 39%, district 49%, state 42%39% · −2 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 32%, district 38%, state 32%32% · −9 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 33%, district 40%, state 32%33% · −8 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 45%, district 55%, state 56%45% · +4 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 16%, district 21%, state 15%16% · −25 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 48%, district 52%, state 56%48% · +7 vs school
AsianAsian: this school 54%, district 71%, state 72%54% · +13 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 25%, district 35%, state 26%25% · −16 vs school
FilipinoFilipino: this school 60%, district 69%, state 65%60% · +19 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 9%, district 13%, state 11%9% · −32 vs school

5 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 8.4pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: -2.8pp.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 14.4%, district 13.8%, state 18.5%14.4% · −4.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 7.9%, district —, state 3.7%7.9% · +4.3pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.3% vs 10.1%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–610.1%
Grades 7–816.3%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 24:1, district 25:124:1
Teaching staff50 teachers
Avg. experience14.8 years
Fully credentialed80%
First-year teachers10%
Intern / emergency permit1.3%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$60,575 – $120,222
Principal salaryFrom $143,852
Superintendent salary$276,598

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $12,170, CA average $14,491$12,170 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$210 per student

$210 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,379 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction74%
Instruction support9%
Student services6%
Administration4%
Buildings & maintenance7%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$11,472 per pupil
2019$10,720 per pupil
2018$11,198 per pupil
2017$10,586 per pupil
2016$10,277 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic34.8%
District 33.2% · CA 56.1%
White33.8%
District 27.1% · CA 19.9%
Other17.3%
District 18.1% · CA 9.0%
Black7.1%
District 8.4% · CA 4.8%
Asian7.0%
District 13.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible -0.3% (64pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$142K · CA $85K
Median home value$838K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+38% · CA 35%
ZIP population69,755
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 30% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is William B. Bristow Middle a good middle school?

William B. Bristow Middle has a Scope Score of 33 out of 100, placing it in the 31st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,544 statewide. 13.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 3.1 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 6-to-8 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are William B. Bristow Middle's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 41.1% of students at William B. Bristow Middle met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 13.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 27.4% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 13.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 2,317 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does William B. Bristow Middle rank in California?

William B. Bristow Middle ranks #1,544 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 31st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is William B. Bristow Middle getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at William B. Bristow Middle decreases by 3.9 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the middle Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at William B. Bristow Middle?

14.4% of students at William B. Bristow Middle are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 7.9%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does William B. Bristow Middle compare to other schools in Brentwood?

William B. Bristow Middle scores 33/100 (31st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 1,223 students. Use the schools in Brentwood page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does William B. Bristow Middle serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At William B. Bristow Middle in Brentwood, 37.0% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 43.8% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. William B. Bristow Middle trails its district average for low-income students by 6.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (26.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (41.8% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 44.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 476 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
13.8%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 47th pctile
Growth (G6→G8) · 27%
-3.9pp
↓ vs CA +1.5pp · 31th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
41.1%
↑ vs CA 39.3% · 51th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
14.4%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 56th pctile
▼ 2.4pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
7.9%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 33th pctile
▲ 1.2pp higher vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
18.2%
↑ vs CA 18.0% · 46th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 637415%35%24%26%50%+4
Grade 738813%37%26%24%50%+3
Grade 839613%34%31%22%47%+1
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 637415%19%35%31%34%−1
Grade 738813%22%28%36%35%+1
Grade 839713%16%21%49%29%−3
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/113969%21%54%17%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged47637.0%−7−1
Hispanic/Latino40441.8%−5+3
White37953.6%−6−8
03Peer comparison · nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
William B. Bristow Middle ←3313.8%41.1%−3.97.9%
Edna Hill Middle1.3 mi4621.3%50.0%+1.86.7%
California average4316.8%39.3%+1.53.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193950#99519.3%52.3%-10.0pp
20223649#110313.0%41.9%22.6%6.1%-3.4pp
20233846#118713.5%41.5%14.4%5.9%-8.8pp
20243850#110015.6%42.4%16.7%6.8%-4.8pp
20253331#154413.8%41.1%14.4%7.9%-3.9pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female14.6%
Male14.1%
Asian6.7%
Black/African American15.9%
Filipino17.5%
White11.1%
Hispanic/Latino15.3%
Two or More Races13.9%
Students with Disabilities22.3%
English Learners25.6%
Homeless46.7%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged19.6%
All Students14.3%
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction