California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Suzannehigher than 93 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Suzannehigher than 93 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English and math: 74% and 65% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 1,225 in English, 1,247 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
In 2025, students in grades 6–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Accelerated.grades 6–8 · 2025
students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 1,124 in English, 1,122 in math
Comparison
1,124 students in English and 1,122 in math in grades 6–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
41% in English and 47% in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, about twice California’s rate in the same grades (19% and 21%).grades 6–8 · spring 2026
41%English · exceeded the standard47%Math · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 1,225 in English, 1,247 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
Low-income students here (330 tested in English, 337 in math, grades 6–8, spring 2026) met or exceeded the standard far more often than low-income students across California in the same grades (39% and 26%).grades 6–8 · spring 2026
64%English · met or exceeded53%Math · met or exceeded
Source
CDE CAASPP research file, spring 2026
Students
low-income students (CDE: “socioeconomically disadvantaged”) in grades 6–8: 330 in English, 337 in math
Comparison
California: the same group in the same grades, CDE’s statewide rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation). Both gaps are more than twice the margin of error for 330 students in English and 337 in math.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have stayed well above California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
SuzanneCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID74%49%
SuzanneCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
SuzanneCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID65%37%
SuzanneCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 75% in 2017 to 74% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Math went from 70% in 2017 to 65% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Suzanne
California
2015
73% 1,322 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
73% 1,298 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
75% 1,257 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
73% 1,268 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
76% 1,222 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
73% 1,114 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
72% 1,129 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
72% 1,162 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
73% 1,177 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
74% 1,225 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Suzanne
California
2015
66% 1,357 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
68% 1,311 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
70% 1,277 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
66% 1,266 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
69% 1,225 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
62% 1,119 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
62% 1,119 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
64% 1,163 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
64% 1,198 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
65% 1,247 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure1,124 students in English, 1,122 in math · grades 6–8 · 2025
English+8ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+16ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 8 points above that prediction, and in math 16 points above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
School pattern, spring 2026Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
5 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
4in 100 at the average Walnut Valley Unified school18in 100 at the average California middle school
58 of 1,260 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school5 in 100
at the average Walnut Valley Unified school4 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
0.6%of students were suspended at least once (7 of 1,271), 2025–26
1.1%at the average Walnut Valley Unified school3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
4
15 of 425
Grades 7–8
5
43 of 835
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Suzanne works for your family.
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
330 English · 337 math tested
English
64% / 39%
Math
53% / 26%
Asian
735 English · 754 math tested
English
78% / 75%
Math
78% / 71%
Hispanic or Latino
287 English · 286 math tested
English
59% / 39%
Math
34% / 25%
Filipino
99 tested per subject
English
90% / 74%
Math
67% / 60%
Two or more races
55 English · 59 math tested
English
85% / 62%
Math
63% / 50%
White
42 tested per subject
English
67% / 62%
Math
43% / 50%
English learners
145 English · 168 math tested
English
18% / 7%
Math
39% / 7%
Students with disabilities
83 English · 82 math tested
English
19% / 14%
Math
9% / 10%
Low-income students and English learners here did far better than the same groups statewide.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Walnut Valley Unified
vs California
Low-income · 330 tested in English, 337 in math
English
64%
−569%
■+2539%
Math
53%
−1467%
■+2726%
Asian · 735 tested in English, 754 in math
English
78%
−482%
+375%
Math
78%
−785%
+771%
Hispanic or Latino · 287 tested in English, 286 in math
English
59%
−362%
■+2039%
Math
34%
−943%
+925%
Filipino · 99 tested
English
90%
+189%
+1674%
Math
67%
−673%
+760%
Two or more races · 55 tested in English, 59 in math
English
85%
+283%
+2362%
Math
63%
−467%
+1350%
White · 42 tested
English
67%
−269%
+562%
Math
43%
−1053%
−750%
English learners · 145 tested in English, 168 in math
English
18%
−119%
■+117%
Math
39%
−847%
■+327%
Students with disabilities · 83 tested in English, 82 in math
English
19%
−827%
+514%
Math
9%
−1221%
−110%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Walnut Valley Unified, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.
Military-family students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander and homeless students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Asian60%
2Hispanic or Latino23%
3Filipino8%
4Two or more races4%
5White4%
6Black or African American—
7American Indian or Alaska Native—
8Pacific Islander—
9Not reported—
–Unallocated share<1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Asian
60%
Hispanic or Latino
23%
Filipino
8%
Two or more races
4%
White
4%
Black or African American
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Not reported
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (25%, 292 of 1,190). California: 63%.
88% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 87.59%: 40.7 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 46.5 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
67%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school67%
Walnut Valley Unified64%
California47%
95 of 142 English learners here; 1,020 of 1,600 in Walnut Valley Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
The road from this school ends at Walnut High. UC records 132 enrollees from Walnut High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 30 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Walnut High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 91% of Walnut High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Suzanne Middle is in the 93rd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 69 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Suzanne Middle was well above California in English and math: 74% and 65% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Suzanne Middle's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 74% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 65% the math standard; 41% and 47% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 1,225 students were tested in English and 1,247 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Suzanne Middle rank in California?
Suzanne Middle is in the 93rd percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Strong, 2026). Suzanne Middle ranks #176 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Suzanne Middle getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Suzanne Middle's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 72nd percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Suzanne Middle?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 4.6% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 58 chronically absent of 1,260 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 0.6%; 7 unduplicated suspended students of 1,271 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Suzanne Middle compare to other schools in Walnut?
Suzanne Middle is in the 93rd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 1,190 students. Use the schools in Walnut page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Suzanne Middle?
At Suzanne Middle in Walnut, 64% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 69% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 5 points below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 53% in math; Asian students, 78% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 330 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Suzanne Middle feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Suzanne Middle's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Walnut High. Walnut High is in the 93rd percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↑ vs CA 17.7% · index 79 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 74 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↑ vs CA average · ≈72nd calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 68 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.1pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↑ vs CA 3.8% · index 63 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.4pp lower vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 67 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
415
36%
33%
16%
15%
69%
48%
+21
Grade 7
419
43%
31%
14%
12%
74%
51%
+23
Grade 8
391
44%
36%
11%
9%
80%
49%
+31
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
420
48%
18%
17%
17%
66%
37%
+29
Grade 7
429
49%
20%
16%
15%
69%
38%
+31
Grade 8
398
43%
16%
20%
21%
59%
36%
+23
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
388
70.9%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
381
72.4%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
408
76.5%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
400
63.8%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
385
65.5%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
413
62.0%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
372
68.3%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
398
74.9%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
392
73.0%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
372
65.0%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
399
63.9%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
392
64.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
386
71.2%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
376
72.9%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
367
73.3%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
384
58.6%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
372
67.5%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
363
60.1%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
351
70.9%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
348
72.1%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
415
74.7%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
354
65.0%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
348
63.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
417
59.5%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
377
79.8%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
425
72.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
420
76.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
375
76.3%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
428
64.7%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
422
65.9%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
418
72.5%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
409
74.1%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
441
71.7%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
416
61.8%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
409
74.1%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
441
61.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
389
78.4%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
418
77.8%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
450
70.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
396
72.2%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
426
69.3%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
455
69.7%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
397
71%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
442
71%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
459
77%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
400
69%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
445
72%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
466
64%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
395
73%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
439
71%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
488
75%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
407
64%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
451
67%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
499
66%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
398
37%
27%
29%
7%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
330
64%
−5
+26
Asian
735
78%
−4
+3
Hispanic/Latino
287
59%
−4
+19
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
4.2%
2.6%
-7.1pp
2022
—
—
—
7.7%
2.2%
-0.9pp
2023
—
—
—
7.4%
2.2%
+1.8pp
2024
—
—
—
6.0%
0.8%
+2.1pp
2025
—
—
—
5.9%
1.0%
+1.9pp
2026
69
93
#176
4.8%
0.6%
+1.9pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
4.6%
4.0%
-0.6pp
Male
3.5%
5.2%
+1.7pp
Asian
1.4%
2.5%
+1.1pp
Black/African American
7.7%
—
—
Filipino
3.6%
1.0%
-2.6pp
Hispanic/Latino
7.4%
9.6%
+2.2pp
Two or More Races
7.7%
5.7%
-2.0pp
White
8.7%
13.3%
+4.6pp
Students with Disabilities
14.0%
21.1%
+7.1pp
English Learners
4.5%
3.1%
-1.4pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
7.1%
8.0%
+0.9pp
All Students
4.1%
4.6%
+0.5pp
Pacific Islander
6.7%
—
—
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+8
1,124
Accelerated
+16
1,122
Accelerated
Asian
+10
642
Accelerated
+29
642
Exceptional
English Only
+8
612
not categorised
+8
612
not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
+3
319
Average
+12
317
Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino
+3
276
Average
−7
274
Moderate
English Learner
−1
212
Average
+24
211
Exceptional
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+1
107
not categorised
+12
107
not categorised
English Learners Only
−5
105
not categorised
+39
104
not categorised
Filipino
+10
91
Accelerated
+9
91
Accelerated
Students with Disabilities
−13
85
Moderate
−12
84
Moderate
Two or More Races
+16
55
Accelerated
+17
55
Accelerated
White
+3
49
Average
−1
49
Average
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
+9
44
Accelerated
+10
43
Accelerated
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
37%
exceeded standard · 68% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 372 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
44%
exceeded standard · 80% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 391 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 372 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
1,124 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 73rd percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.73rd pctile · +8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
1,122 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 87th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.87th pctile · +16 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$12,119 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 13,493 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$240 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,190
Central federal expenditures attributed here$269 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 1,190
District current expense · FY 2024–25$15,388 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 91789+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 91789
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$125,720
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
54.40%
ZCTA population
40,298
Median age
46.3 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 91789 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.