ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Placer County Pathways Charter · Auburn

Placer County Pathways Charter: Most kids here clear the bar, year after year. The question is what happens after that.

Placer County Pathways Charter posts 67% meeting the standard, and 27.6% going well past it. Most kids here keep up. Fewer get pushed further. Ask the school what it does for a child who already finds the work easy.

360 Nevada Street, 95603 (opens in new tab)·Placer County Office of Education·Auburn·Grades TK-12·293 students·51% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(530) 745-1440·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4845
% Exceeded28%21%
% Met+67%43%
Growth-11.2-2.9
Absence18.7%17.9%
Suspension2.3%1.6%
Scope Score
48
🏫 Solid Base · Developing
ranked #2,067 statewide

Placer County Pathways Charter scores 48 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 64th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🏫 Solid Base — Ask what the school does for a kid who's already meeting the standard with room to spare — steady proficiency across the board doesn't tell you whether the strongest kids are being pushed further.

Most rating sites would stop at “67% proficient” and call it done. Placer County Pathways Charter deserves a closer read. The school sits in Auburn, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, Placer County Pathways Charter enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 36th to the 64th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 1400 elementary schools.

CA Dashboard
ELAOrange(Declined Significantly)MathOrange(Declined Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 67% of students meet the standard today, above the 52% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 344%59%65%76%70%
Grade 468%52%67%71%77%
Grade 550%44%52%52%71%
Grade 652%67%62%63%74%
Grade 762%50%71%58%50%
Grade 845%17%48%80%47%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 356%59%70%81%70%
Grade 463%56%50%54%68%
Grade 529%36%36%48%46%
Grade 660%50%48%58%65%
Grade 750%40%57%58%46%
Grade 853%21%30%53%41%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

48%
22%
30%
Grade 3 · 70% proficient
41%
36%
23%
Grade 4 · 77% proficient
33%
38%
29%
Grade 5 · 71% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding falls 14.5pp across grades; the proficiency floor barely moves. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
27.6%
State 21.3%
6.3pp above state avg
Growth (G3→G5)
-11.2pp
State -2.9pp
Scores decline across grades
Met or exceeded
66.9%
State 42.7%
24.2pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
18.7%
State 17.9%
0.7pp above state avg
Suspension rate
2.3%
State 1.6%
0.7pp above state avg
Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Placer County Pathways Charter in Auburn, 47.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Placer County Pathways Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (47.8% Math proficient); White students (64.5% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 23 students tested.

All students at this school: 59% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 59%, district —, state 43%59%
WhiteWhite: this school 61%, district 57%, state 56%61% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 55%, district 50%, state 42%55% · −4 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 60%, district 58%, state 44%60% · +1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 48%, district 44%, state 32%48% · −11 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 9%, district 11%, state 15%9% · −50 vs school

7 of 13 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 18.7%, district 18.7%, state 17.9%18.7% · +0.7pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 2.3%, district —, state 1.6%2.3% · +0.7pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–60.0%
Grades 7–816.7%
Grades 9–1241.1%
TK/K0.0%

Where the path goes

Placer County Pathways Charter serves grades K-12 — students can complete their entire K-12 education here, with no school-to-school transitions.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 16:1, district 14:116:1
Teaching staff22 teachers
Avg. experience7.3 years
Fully credentialed53%
First-year teachers5%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$56,877 – $132,107
Principal salary$0 – $0
Superintendent salary$333,928

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,650, CA average $14,815$20,650 · spent at this school

These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.

Federal share$2,835 per student

$2,835 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction17%
Instruction support36%
Student services23%
Administration18%
Buildings & maintenance6%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2017 — the newest published
2017$55,935 per pupil
2016$60,642 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

White62.1%
District 58.6% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic29.0%
District 27.5% · CA 56.1%
Other7.2%
District 9.3% · CA 9.0%
Black1.4%
District 3.4% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.3%
District 1.2% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 50.5% (13pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$85K · CA $85K
Median home value$651K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+34% · CA 35%
ZIP population28,432
Median age49 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 54% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Placer County Pathways Charter a good elementary school?

Placer County Pathways Charter has a Scope Score of 48 out of 100, placing it in the 64th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #2,067 statewide. 27.6% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 6.3 percentage points above the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (38%), grade 3-to-5 growth (27%), met or exceeded (proficient) (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Placer County Pathways Charter's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 66.9% of students at Placer County Pathways Charter met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 27.6% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 39.3% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 27.6% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 138 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Placer County Pathways Charter rank in California?

Placer County Pathways Charter ranks #2,067 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 64th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Placer County Pathways Charter getting better or worse?

Based on 2025 CAASPP data, proficiency at Placer County Pathways Charter decreases by 11.2 percentage points from Grade 3 to grade 5 growth. This downward pattern doesn't necessarily mean the school is failing — it can reflect cohort differences, demographic shifts, or curriculum changes. A campus visit and conversation with teachers can reveal what the numbers can't. Growth trajectory is weighted at 15% in the elementary Scope Score because it measures what the school does, not just who walks in the door.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Placer County Pathways Charter?

18.7% of students at Placer County Pathways Charter are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 2.3%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Placer County Pathways Charter compare to other schools in Auburn?

Placer County Pathways Charter scores 48/100 (64th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 293 students. Use the schools in Auburn page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Placer County Pathways Charter serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Placer County Pathways Charter in Auburn, 47.8% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 44.0% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Placer County Pathways Charter outperforms its district average for low-income students by 3.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (47.8% Math proficient); White students (64.5% ELA proficient). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 23 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 38%
27.6%
↑ vs CA 21.3% · 56th pctile
Growth (G3→G5) · 27%
-11.2pp
↓ vs CA -2.9pp · 38th pctile
Met or exceeded · 20%
66.9%
↑ vs CA 42.7% · 68th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
18.7%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 49th pctile
Suspension rate · 5%
2.3%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 44th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 32348%22%26%4%70%+26
Grade 42241%36%9%14%77%+32
Grade 52433%38%25%4%71%+23
Grade 62339%35%17%9%74%+27
Grade 72417%33%25%25%50%+2
Grade 83219%28%22%31%47%+1
Grade 117
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3239%61%26%4%70%+24
Grade 42218%50%23%9%68%+27
Grade 52417%29%46%8%46%+11
Grade 62339%26%30%4%65%+30
Grade 72421%25%38%17%46%+12
Grade 83222%19%19%41%41%+8
Grade 117
Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Grade 5/8/115618%36%27%20%

CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged2347.8%+4+10
White11064.5%+3+3
03Peer comparison · nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+GrowthSusp
Placer County Pathways Charter ←4827.6%66.9%−11.22.3%
Bowman Charter2.4 mi6031.7%63.2%+15.10.6%
Skyridge Elementary2.3 mi4720.9%48.5%+0.12.0%
EV Cain Middle0.2 mi348.4%35.6%−11.06.0%
California average4521.3%42.7%−2.91.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrowth
20193736#350417.5%51.8%21.4%3.6%-10.4pp
20224264#205327.5%50.9%17.9%0.2%-18.8pp
20233950#283635.0%56.6%18.7%2.4%-23.5pp
20245980#112033.5%63.7%17.4%1.4%-28.6pp
20254864#206727.6%66.9%18.7%2.3%-11.2pp
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female13.4%18.4%+5.0pp
Male26.4%19.3%-7.1pp
Asian11.1%
Hispanic/Latino20.0%25.0%+5.0pp
Two or More Races35.0%32.0%-3.0pp
Students with Disabilities23.5%23.3%-0.2pp
English Learners31.6%36.8%+5.2pp
Homeless70.0%34.8%-35.2pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged39.1%29.7%-9.4pp
All Students21.7%18.8%-2.9pp
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction