Charter school · Sacramento City Unified

Sacramento New Technology Early College High — Rating & test scores

1400 Dickson Street, Sacramento · 155 students · Grades 9–12

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four high schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 69

Needs SupportScope Score · 20th percentile. Higher than 20 in 100 of the 1,498 California public high schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

In 2024–25, 94% of the class graduated in four years (31 of 33); across California, 89%.

Source for this line
Source
CDE four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), 2024–25
Students
students who started 9th grade together: 33
Comparison
California: graduates divided by students who started 9th grade together, across 2,281 public schools’ rows (our combination, not CDE’s published state rate; 432,702 of 487,177).

Overview

Is this school a good high school?

Needs Support. Sacramento New Technology Early College is lower than most California high schools on test results and attendance.

Test results, spring 2025

English, Proficient or Advanced224%
Math, Proficient or Advanced99%
English, Advanced2115%
Math, Advanced153%

Showing up, 2024–25

Attendance2230 in 100
Sacramento New Technology Early College’s place among California high schools, out of 100Sacramento City Unified’s other high schoolsBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

43 of 153 students missed 10% or more of school days in 2025–26, against 32 in 100 at the average Sacramento City Unified high school.

Each bar is Sacramento New Technology Early College’s place among 1,498 California public high schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2025, grade 11, the latest year with a high school Scope Score. That year the state called these levels Met or exceeded and Exceeded. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Source for the sentence
CDE chronic absenteeism file, 2025–26. All students counted for chronic absence (CDE’s eligible enrollment): 153. District and California figures are averages of school rates (13 Sacramento City Unified schools; 1,492 scored California high schools), our calculation.

In its own words

What does this school say about itself?

These lines come from the school’s own website. They are the school’s description. They are not parent reviews or test results.

“EVERY Student experiences college classes in a supportive and nurturing environment designed for success no matter where the student is academically.”
newtech.scusd.edu (opens in a new tab), read November 12, 2026

Every line here is from newtech.scusd.edu, read November 12, 2026.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

5 of the 9 high schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Sacramento New Technology Early College. Each school is compared with every California high school.

Scope Score

10 high schools within 3.6 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. West CampusNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 9598th
  2. School of Engineering & SciencesSchool of choice · by applicationScope Score 7862nd
  3. River CityWashington Unified · by addressScope Score 7337th
  4. The METCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 7024th
  5. C. K. McClatchyNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 7023rd
  6. Sacramento New Technology Early CollegeScope Score 6920th
  7. John F. KennedyNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 6610th
  8. Sacramento CharterCharter · its own lotteryScope Score 658th
  9. Luther BurbankNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 635th
  10. Capital City Independent StudySchool of choice · by applicationScope Score 581st
Sacramento City UnifiedA neighborhood school in another districtCharterMagnet or school of choice

A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer. A charter school takes applications from any family and holds a lottery when it has more applicants than seats. A magnet or other school of choice takes applications through its district.

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, grade 11. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students met or exceeded the standard in English.

25%50%75%0%25%50%75%100%

7 of 10 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, grade 11. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does this school compare with schools like it?

Sacramento New Technology Early College’s Scope Score is 69. 332 California high schools, counting Sacramento New Technology Early College, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 72. Sacramento New Technology Early College’s result is higher than 95 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 332

  1. Students from low-income families: 86%

    Scope Score 93Strong · 96th percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 89%

    Scope Score 92Strong · 96th percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 85%

    Scope Score 91Strong · 95th percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 91%

    Middle College High

    San Bernardino

    Scope Score 90Strong · 93rd percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 82%

    Scope Score 88Strong · 91st percentile

332 California public high schools where 82% to 94% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2025.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public high school we score where 82% to 94% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Sacramento New Technology Early College’s share. The count includes Sacramento New Technology Early College. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2025, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

English went from 24% to 23% and math from 9% to 12%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grade 11. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202655%38%57%CaliforniaCalifornia43%Sacramento City UnifiedDistrict23%Sacramento New Technology Early CollegeThis school

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%2017201820192022202320242025202629%15%32%CaliforniaCalifornia22%Sacramento City UnifiedDistrict12%Sacramento New Technology Early CollegeThis school

The hatched block marks years with no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Between 26 and 42 students were tested here each year in each subject. With 26 students, one student is 4 points, so each year is a dot and no line joins them. Sacramento City Unified’s line combines its 12 high schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other schools. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Sacramento City Unified’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grade 11: share at the top two levels
SpringSacramento New Technology Early CollegeSacramento City UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
201738%55%60%40
201840%49%56%42
201946%52%57%35
202217%43%55%35
202331%41%55%36
202438%44%56%42
202524%41%57%34
202623%43%57%26
Math, grade 11: share at the top two levels
SpringSacramento New Technology Early CollegeSacramento City UnifiedCaliforniaTested here
201715%29%32%40
201812%27%31%41
201917%27%32%35
20226%19%27%35
20238%18%27%36
202417%20%28%42
20259%23%30%34
202612%22%32%26

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

23% of the 26 students tested scored Proficient or Advanced in English; 12% did in math.

English

23%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

5027158
Sacramento City Unified40%California57%

Math

12%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

73158
Sacramento City Unified21%California32%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grade 11, spring 2026, 23% of the 26 students tested scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 57% across California. In math, 12% did, against 32% across California. Fewer than 30 students tested, so one year’s result can change a lot. Ask how results looked in other years.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grade 11 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grade 11 · This school8%15%27%50%26
English, grade 11 · California27%30%21%22%414,559
English, grade 11 · Sacramento City Unified17%23%24%36%2,684
Math, grade 11 · This school4%8%15%73%26
Math, grade 11 · California16%16%20%48%413,523
Math, grade 11 · Sacramento City Unified8%13%18%61%2,674

Spring 2026, grade 11 combined: 26 tested in English, 26 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 66% of students. 43 of 153 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

28in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (43 of 153 students).

At the average Sacramento City Unified high school: 32 in 100. At the average California high school: 22 in 100.

Suspensions: 3.1% of students were suspended at least once (5 of 159). Average California high school 2.9%.

Students, 2024–25

155

students in grades 9–12.

Hispanic or Latino 66%Black or African American 16%White 9%

Family income

88%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 137 of 155. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

11

teachers, with 12 years of experience on average.

0% were in their first year.

60% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

36%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (8 of 22 students).

Sacramento City Unified: 41%. California: 47%.

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino66%
Black or African American16%
White9%
Asian—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 6.1 of 10.2 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

After high school

How many students here graduate, and where do they go next?

94% of students graduated in four years in 2024–25. That compares with 89% across California. 61% were ready for college or career (state measure) in 2024–25. 73% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months.

ready for college or career (state measure), 2024–25

61%

Across California: 52%.

of graduates finished the UC/CSU course list, 2024–25

45%

At the average California high school: 56%.

Graduation, college and university records

Preparation · each measure describes a different student group

Graduated in four years

94%

Across California: 89%

2024–25 · 31 of 33 students who started 9th grade together

Ready for college or career (state measure)

61%

Across California: 52%

2024–25 · 20 of 33 students in the state’s measure

Finished the UC/CSU course list

45%

Average California high school: 56%

2024–25 · 14 of 31 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list

Destinations · class of 2023

Where students who finished high school went

73% enrolled in college within 12 months · 30 students who finished high school

  • University of California UC detail ↓0 · 0%
  • California State University2 · 7%
  • California community college18 · 60%
  • In-state private2 · 6%
  • Out-of-state, 4-year0 · 0%
  • Out-of-state, 2-year0 · 0%
  • Not enrolled8 · 27%

Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: each count divided by all high-school completers (graduates and other students who finished), rounded together so they total 100. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.

Where the class of 2023 went
73%enrolled in college within a year

30 completers, class of 2023

  • University of California0 (0%)
  • California State University2 (7%)
  • California community college18 (60%)
  • In-state private2 (6%)
  • Out-of-state, 4-year0 (0%)
  • Out-of-state, 2-year0 (0%)
  • Not enrolled8 (27%)

Source: CDE’s college-going rate for the class of 2023 (enrolled in college within 12 months). Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers, rounded together so they total 100. A dash means we have no figure for that row; it isn’t zero.

Where these figures come fromEach measure’s source, student group and definition
Graduated in four years
2024–25 · 31 of 33 students who started 9th grade together. California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.
Ready for college or career (state measure)
2024–25 · 20 of 33 students in the state’s measure. California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator (CCI), overall “Prepared” rate, among the students in the indicator’s group. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.
Finished the UC/CSU course list
2024–25 · 14 of 31 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list. California Department of Education, A–G completion records (graduates who met the UC/CSU course requirements). Course completion is separate from college enrollment.
Where students who finished high school went
CDE college-going records, class of 2023. College enrollment is counted for 12 months after finishing high school and matched to college records, so this runs about two years behind. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
A closer look: UC admission recordsApplied, admitted and enrolled, from each university system’s own records

UC’s own records

University of California

Fall 2025 first-year entry · counts, not a school rating

Applied
5
Admitted
3
Enrolled
under 3

By campus · fall 2025

  • UC DavisApplied 5 · Admitted under 3 · Enrolled under 3

These records don’t show the school’s effect on admission. A student can apply to several campuses, so campus counts don’t add up to the total. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees; “+” marks a partial count; a dash is unavailable. Source: UC admissions by source school.

Each fall since 2016

  • Fall 2025Applied 5 · Admitted 3 · Enrolled under 3
  • Fall 2021Applied 6 · Admitted 3 · Enrolled under 3
  • Fall 2020Applied 8 · Admitted 6 · Enrolled under 3
  • Fall 2019Applied 9 · Admitted 5 · Enrolled under 3
  • Fall 2017Applied 6 · Admitted 4 · Enrolled under 3
  • Fall 2016Applied 5 · Admitted 3 · Enrolled 3
Advanced courses on record

What other courses and pathways are on record?

College courses in high school (dual enrollment)
66 students took one

2023–24

Students taking a college course for credit while in high school, often through a community college. Federal Civil Rights Data Collection, school-reported.

Family and staff answers

What would families and staff tell you?

Families and staff can answer a short set of questions about Sacramento New Technology Early College. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Staff answers show once 5 people have answered.Until then this page shows no staff answers.
  2. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  3. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  4. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.
  5. Staff confirm a work email.Staff answers come only from people who confirmed an email address at Sacramento City Unified.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

Staff

No staff answers yet

5 answers needed before they show

  • Would you send your own child to this school?Yes · Maybe · No
  • Do you plan to work at this school next year?Yes · Not sure · No
  • Do you have the materials and supplies you need to teach?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • And 5 more questions.

Answer the staff questionsHow staff answers work

Money

How much is spent on each student here?

$28,203 for each student in 2024–25. California’s high schools spent $20,309 for each student.

$28,203

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$16,030
The school’s share of district office costs
$12,173
Of the total, from federal funds
$3,183
  • Sacramento New Technology Early College$28,203
  • Sacramento City Unified high schools$24,510
  • California high schools$20,309

The district and California figures combine their high schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,655 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

The neighborhood

What is the area around this school like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 95822. They are not figures for the families at Sacramento New Technology Early College.

Typical household income in a year

$86,801

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 95822.

Typical home value
$466,000
People who live in this ZIP code
46,569
Typical age
38.1 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
30%

What you can do

Who can act on this school’s results?

Sacramento New Technology Early College’s own board decides its plan.

State support

The state hasn’t placed Sacramento New Technology Early College in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 11 questions to Sacramento New Technology Early College. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What extra help do students who are behind get, and how do you know it’s working?77% in English and 88% in math scored at the Developing or Minimal level, grade 11, spring 2026 (26 students tested in each); California: 43% and 68%
  2. Which courses and career pathways does the school run, and who can enroll?
  3. How do counselors help students plan for college, training or work?
  4. What support is available when a student falls behind on graduation requirements?
  5. How does this approach show up in an ordinary lesson?From its own words, on how it teaches.
  6. Which grades take part in these programs, and how often?From its own words, on programs.
  7. Which grades learn each language, and for how much of the day?From its own words, on languages.

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

Which schools feed into this school, and how do I get in?

Ask Sacramento New Technology Early College how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. No assigned next school.

Sacramento New Technology Early College is a charter, so a student’s later schools follow the family’s home address, not this campus, unless the family applies elsewhere. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level.

  1. Elementary
    Sutterville Elementary
    Scope Score 83Strong · 82nd percentile · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
  2. Middle
    Sam Brannan Middle
    Scope Score 70Needs Support · 20th percentile · 2026Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder
  3. High · this school
    Sacramento New Technology Early College High
    Grades 9–12Scope Score 69Needs Support · 20th percentile

These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Sutterville Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 83 · Strong · 82nd percentile · elementary · 2026

  • John Cabrillo Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 69 · Needs Support · 13th percentile · elementary · 2026

  • Hollywood Park Elementary

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 70 · Needs Support · 20th percentile · elementary · 2026

Middle-school links

  • Sam Brannan Middle

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 70 · Needs Support · 20th percentile · middle · 2026

  • California Middle

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 75 · Solid · 52nd percentile · middle · 2026

  • Fern Bacon Middle

    Nearby same-district option · distance estimate, not a confirmed feeder

    Scope Score 70 · Needs Support · 18th percentile · middle · 2026

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking.

Where it is

Where is this school?

Address
1400 Dickson Street, Sacramento 95822Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Jessica MartinAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated August 21, 2024.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 7 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Sacramento New Technology Early College how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Sacramento New Technology Early College a good high school?

Sacramento New Technology Early College High has a Scope Score of 69. It scored higher than 20 in 100 of California’s 1,498 scored public high schools (Needs Support, 20th percentile, spring 2025). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 28 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 32 in 100 at the average Sacramento City Unified high school. 3.1% of students (5 of 159) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 2.9% at the average California high school. See the details ↓

What could my child study here?

66 students took a college course for credit in 2023–24, by the federal Civil Rights Data Collection. See the details ↓

Where do students go after finishing high school here?

73% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months, by CDE’s college-going records. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $2.7 million is planned for 17 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s more than its $2.6 million general fund budget. Its largest action, Basic Teaching Staff, is $1.3 million. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does this school’s own plan commit to?

$2.7 million is planned for 17 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s more than its $2.6 million general fund budget.

$2.7million

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Basic Teaching Staff$1.3 million
  • Basic Operations$490,841
  • Special Education Contribution$310,353

Its largest action, Basic Teaching Staff, is $1.3 million. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 76 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 76 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 77% of the money. The plan itself puts 73% of it toward staff.

  • Basic Teaching Staff $1.3 million
  • Basic Operations $490,841
  • Special Education Contribution $310,353
  • 14 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

1 of the plan’s 17 funded actions names reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in its title.

  • Catch-up help $7,000
  • English learners $7,000

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Dual Enrollment Success Support & Interventions for EL, LI, and SWD$7,000
For high-need students

It plans $1,600 in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $65,000 and estimates it spent $0, $65,000 (100%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $65,000 under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $239,913 (8%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is School Counselor Support for Dual Enrollment, which went from $166,000 to $67,721.

Largest cuts

  • School Counselor Support for Dual Enrollment−⁠$98,279
  • Special Education Contribution−⁠$43,737
  • PD for Project-Based Learning−⁠$14,000

Largest increases

  • Registrar to record and monitor college transcripts+⁠$13,000
  • Basic Teaching Staff+⁠$11,637

Ask: What did School Counselor Support for Dual Enrollment pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $98,279 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for this school as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

The test rows are schoolwide results for every grade the school tests; the source doesn’t list which grades. The headline at the top of this page covers grade 11 only: 23% in English and 12% in math, spring 2026.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 224%23%down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 29%12%up 3 pts

Goal 3 tracks named schools and Goals 1 and 4 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the school tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Basic Teaching Staff · $1,303,000
  • Basic Operations · $490,841
  • Special Education Contribution · $310,353
The full plan4 goals, 24 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($2.7 million).

Where does the money go?

89% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1 · Maintenance of Progress GoalFundamental education will be offered within a safe, sanitary, and encouraging atmosphere$2.4 million89% of action budgets

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.5 million (−⁠$41,659) · p. 11 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Basic Teaching Staff$1.3 millionaction 1.2 · p. 35 ↗
  2. Basic Operations$0.5 millionaction 1.1 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Special Education Contribution$0.3 millionaction 1.5 · p. 35 ↗
  4. Basic Operational Costs$0.2 millionaction 1.3 · p. 35 ↗
  5. District Costs$0.1 millionaction 1.4 · p. 35 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Special Education Contribution−⁠$43,737$354,090 → $310,353 · p. 35 ↗
  2. Basic Teaching Staff+⁠$11,637$1.3 million → $1.3 million · p. 35 ↗
  3. Basic Operations−⁠$9,559$500,400 → $490,841 · p. 35 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Basic Operational Costs · $212,526 → $212,526 · p. 35 ↗unchanged
  • District Costs · $127,780 → $127,780 · p. 35 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 3 measures · 1 quoted

  • Access to standards aligned instructional materials p. 11 ↗
    Baseline
    100% Data Year:2023-24 Data …
    Target for year 3
    100%

2 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Encourage progress toward achieving or surpassing benchmarks in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics…$28,6001% of action budgets

“Encourage progress toward achieving or surpassing benchmarks in English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics for every student, especially underserved populations, as evidenced by local ongoing assessments and academic performance” p. 14 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $63,000 (−⁠$34,400)

Largest funded actions

  1. Supplemental Curriculum & Instructional Supplies, and Small School Sports Uniforms$16,000action 2.4 · p. 35 ↗
  2. PD for Project-Based Learning$11,000action 2.5 · p. 36 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. ELPAC Testing Support$1,600action 2.2 · p. 35 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. PD for Project-Based Learning−⁠$14,000$25,000 → $11,000 · p. 36 ↗
  2. Supplemental Curriculum & Instructional Supplies, and Small School Sports Uniforms−⁠$4,000$20,000 → $16,000 · p. 35 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • ELPAC Testing Support · $1,600 · p. 35 ↗new or renamed

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 2 quoted

  • Smarter Balanced ELA Met or Exceeded Standard p. 14 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 30.56% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 45% …
  • Smarter Balanced Math Met or Exceeded Standard p. 14 ↗
    Baseline
    All: 8.34% …
    Target for year 3
    All: 20% …

9 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalFoster a nurturing and inclusive environment that promotes positive attitudes, behaviors, and relationships…$74,0003% of action budgets

“Foster a nurturing and inclusive environment that promotes positive attitudes, behaviors, and relationships among students, staff, and the broader school community, thereby enhancing overall school culture and climate. By 2027 the suspension rate for Black Students at New Tech HS will be no more than 5%, student overall sense of safety and security will be above 90%, and Chronic Absenteeism for Black Students will be below 15% as measured by the metrics and data sources listed below” p. 20 ↗

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $151,575 (−⁠$77,575)

Largest funded actions

  1. Parent Advisor$40,000action 3.5 · p. 36 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Young Moguls Program$34,000action 3.3 · p. 36 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Parent Advisor−⁠$11,575$51,575 → $40,000 · p. 36 ↗
  2. Young Moguls Program−⁠$1,000$35,000 → $34,000 · p. 36 ↗

How the plan measures it · 8 measures · 3 quoted

  • Attendance Rate p. 20 ↗
    Baseline
    90.77% Data …
    Target for year 3
    95%
  • Chronic Absenteeism p. 20 ↗
    Baseline
    ALL: 30.9% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL: 25% …
  • Suspension Rate p. 21 ↗
    Baseline
    ALL: 9.1% …
    Target for year 3
    ALL: 3% or less …

5 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 4Facilitate comprehensive programs and initiatives to equip all students with the necessary academic skills…$191,7217% of action budgets

“Facilitate comprehensive programs and initiatives to equip all students with the necessary academic skills, career competencies, and resources essential for successful transitions to post-secondary education, vocational training, or the workforce, ensuring equitable opportunities for future success” p. 25 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $278,000 (−⁠$86,279)

Largest funded actions

  1. Registrar to record and monitor college transcripts$69,000action 4.4 · p. 36 ↗
  2. School Counselor Support for Dual Enrollment$67,721action 4.3 · p. 36 ↗
  3. Early College Program Marketing$20,000action 4.7 · p. 37 ↗
  4. College and Career Field Trips$10,000action 4.5 · p. 36 ↗
  5. College Texts and Materials for Dual Enrollment Program$10,000action 4.6 · p. 36 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Internship/​DOL Coordinator · action 4.1 · p. 36 ↗$8,000
  • Dual Enrollment Success Support & Interventions for EL, LI, and SWD · action 4.2 · p. 36 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$7,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. School Counselor Support for Dual Enrollment−⁠$98,279$166,000 → $67,721 · p. 36 ↗
  2. Registrar to record and monitor college transcripts+⁠$13,000$56,000 → $69,000 · p. 36 ↗
  3. College and Career Field Trips+⁠$5,000$5,000 → $10,000 · p. 36 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Early College Program Marketing · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 37 ↗unchanged
  • College Texts and Materials for Dual Enrollment Program · $15,000 → $10,000 · p. 36 ↗−⁠$5,000
  • Internship/​DOL Coordinator · $8,000 → $8,000 · p. 36 ↗unchanged
  • Dual Enrollment Success Support & Interventions for EL, LI, and SWD · $8,000 → $7,000 · p. 36 ↗−⁠$1,000

How the plan measures it · 2 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 25 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 15 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
15
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census BureauUniversity of CaliforniaU.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil RightsNational Student Clearinghouse
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

After high school

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2024–25 · ranked #1,185 of 1,498 California high schools we score · #6 of 13 in Sacramento City Unified
Score factors, 2024–25
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Graduation rate94%5825%
Exceeded standardaverage of English and math9%4322%
Ready for college or career (state measure)61%6020%
Met or exceededaverage of English and math16%3618%
Chronically absent29 in 100505%
Suspension rate9.7% (16 of 165)315%
English learners: top level0%—5%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California high schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2024–25. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2024–25 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

The 2024–25 Scope Score, in the current-formula row below, uses the state’s college-or-career readiness measure, 2024–25. No verified earlier Scope Scores are available here.

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2024–256920#1185California high schools · 1,498 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23 and 2023–24 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspension
2018–1912 in 1007.0% (15 of 213)
2021–22not on filenot on file
2022–23not on filenot on file
2023–2424 in 1006.4% (11 of 172)
2024–2529 in 1009.7% (16 of 165)

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Results by gradeEnglish and math · grade 11 · spring 2026 · % of tested students

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
EnglishTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or AdvancedCaliforniaDifference
Grade 11268%15%27%50%23%57%−34

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
MathTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or AdvancedCaliforniaDifference
Grade 11264%8%15%73%12%32%−20

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English268%23%
2026 · Math264%12%
2025 · English3415%24%
2025 · Math343%9%
2024 · English4210%38%
2024 · Math422%17%
2023 · English3617%31%
2023 · Math363%8%
2022 · English353%17%
2022 · Math350%6%
2019 · English3526%46%
2019 · Math356%17%
2018 · English4219%40%
2018 · Math417%12%
2017 · English4012%38%
2017 · Math400%15%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 11 · English3424%
2025 · Grade 11 · Math349%
2024 · Grade 11 · English4238%
2024 · Grade 11 · Math4217%
2023 · Grade 11 · English3631%
2023 · Grade 11 · Math368%
2022 · Grade 11 · English3517%
2022 · Grade 11 · Math356%
2019 · Grade 11 · English3546%
2019 · Grade 11 · Math3517%
2018 · Grade 11 · English4240%
2018 · Grade 11 · Math4112%
2017 · Grade 11 · English4038%
2017 · Grade 11 · Math4015%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide528%10%71%12%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 29 in 100 → 2025–26 · 28 in 100 · −1 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 9.7% (16 of 165) → 2025–26 · 3.1% (5 of 159) · −6.6 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female10 of 8417 of 64—
Male11 in 10026 of 89—
Black or African American5 of 2911 of 24—
Hispanic or Latino9 in 10026 in 100+17 in 100
Two or more races2 of 11——
White3 of 322 of 14—
Students with disabilities5 of 3312 of 32—
English learners1 of 338 of 25—
Low-income11 in 10029 in 100+18 in 100
All students12 in 10028 in 100+16 in 100

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Graduation and readinessstate records · each rate for its own year and class of students
MeasureSource record
This school · CCI overall PreparedCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 61% · numerator 20 students classified Prepared · denominator 33 CCI students.
California · CCI overall PreparedCDE statewide CCI cohort · CCI source year 2025 · all students · overall Prepared rate 52% · numerator 257,567 students classified Prepared · denominator 497,814 CCI students.
AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · AP pathway rate 0% · AP-pathway numerator 0 · denominator 20 (CCI Prepared students). This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.

CDE's overall Prepared rate is the college-readiness factor in the Scope Score (20% of the high school score). The school rate is 20 of 33 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The California figure is CDE's statewide CCI student cohort, not an average of SchoolScope's comparable high schools or the SchoolScope school-rank pool.

Graduation rate
94%
AP route, among those ready for college or career
0%
2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students ready for college or career (CDE’s “Prepared”), not course offerings
Finished the UC/CSU course list (A–G)
45%
A–G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-going rate
73%

These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A–G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.

UC admissions, universitywidefall 2016–2025 · applied, admitted, enrolled, mean GPA · summed across CEEB codes
YearAppliedAdmittedEnrolledMean GPA (applied)Mean GPA (admitted)Mean GPA (enrolled)
202553under 33.50——
202163under 33.81——
202086under 33.443.54—
201995under 33.823.92—
201764under 33.53——
20165333.60——

Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. GPA is each group's mean weighted, capped high-school GPA for 10th/11th-grade college-preparatory courses. SchoolScope leaves GPA unavailable when several CEEB codes contribute rather than combining their means. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees, shown here as “under 5” or “under 3”; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here. Complete, matching counts can support a historical descriptive rate, but do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances. Series shown from 2016.

UC admissions by campuslatest falls on file · each campus counted separately
CampusYearAppliedAdmittedEnrolled
Davis20255under 3under 3
Davis20205under 3under 3
Davis20196under 3under 3
Davis20175under 3under 3
Los Angeles20195under 3under 3
Merced202076under 3
Santa Cruz201953under 3
Universitywide202553under 3
Universitywide202163under 3
Universitywide202086under 3
Universitywide201995under 3
Universitywide201764under 3

Source: UC admissions by source school. Dated fall first-year UC applicants, admitted students, and enrollees. Campus totals are not interchangeable with Universitywide; students can apply to several campuses. Universitywide is separately reported; never derive it by adding campus rows. Universitywide applicant and admit counts are unduplicated. UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or under 3 admits or enrollees, shown here as “under 5” or “under 3”; — means unavailable, and a reported zero remains zero. A + marks a partial SchoolScope sum of observed counts, not a complete total; missing contributions may be zero. No admit rate is computed here; these records do not establish a school's effect or predict individual chances.

Advanced coursework, federal snapshot2023–24 · Civil Rights Data Collection · dated historical snapshot
MeasureThis school
AP offerednot reported
AP course countnot reported
AP enrollment (male/female)not reported
IB participationnot reported
Dual enrollmentoffered · 66 enrolled
Algebra I in grade 8not reported
Calculus sections0
Physics sections0
Chemistry sections0
Reported male/female enrollment (CRDC)153

These counts aren’t part of the Scope Score. “Not reported” means the federal record has no value for that item; it isn’t a zero. Enrollment counts add the male and female students the survey reports.

College destinationsclass of 2023 · state college-going records, 12 months after graduation
DestinationCompleters% (derived)
University of California00%
California State University27%
California community college1860%
In-state private26%
Out-of-state, 4-year00%
Out-of-state, 2-year00%
Not enrolled827%

30 students who finished high school, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 73% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ all who finished high school; CDE calls them completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows above.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$15,654 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 40,711 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$324 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 155

Central federal expenditures attributed here$2,859 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 155

District current expense · FY 2024–25$24,421 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 62%Instruction support 13%Student services 12%Administration 5%Buildings & maintenance 8%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$506,760,54162.13%62%
Instruction support$107,070,69713.13%13%
Student services$94,256,79211.56%12%
Administration$39,104,7294.79%5%
Buildings & maintenance$67,145,8158.23%8%
Total$815,598,118100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $815,598,118 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$15,654 per pupil
2020$13,792 per pupil
2019$14,667 per pupil
2018$12,722 per pupil
2017$11,601 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders9.5%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 95822 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 95822 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$86,801
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)30%
ZIP-area population46,569
Median age38.1 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95822 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/new-technology-high-1881"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Sacramento New Technology Early College High — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2024–25 results, compared across 1,498 high schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · UC fall first-year source records — UC blanks counts under 5 applicants or 3 admits or enrollees; “+” marks a partial count; the all-campus total is reported separately · federal civil rights data (CRDC) 2023–24, a past snapshot · state college-going records, class of 2023, matched to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment · Data updated October 15, 2026

  • No student group comparison is shown for this school this year: either no group had 30 or more students tested in each subject, or no same-grade district or state rate was available for its groups.

How we analyzeRequest a correction