Public school · Latrobe

Miller's Hill

Shingle Springs · 4–8 · 77 students (2024–25)

95thpercentileStrong

The dots are California’s 2,177 scored public middle schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

74 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Miller's Hillhigher than 95 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Miller's Hillhigher than 95 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Miller's Hillhigher than 95 of the 100 California dots

California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Well above California in English and math: 87% and 71% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6 and 8, against 48% and 35% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 6 and 8: 31
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 6 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 845,117 in English and 848,988 in math tested).

This rating covers grades 6 and 8. Miller's Hill teaches 4–8: grades 4 and 5 results ↓

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Get an email when Miller's Hill’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

How strong are the foundations for high school?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 6 and 8Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 32%
Met standard: 55%
Below standard: 13%

87% met or exceeded · 31 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	32%	19%
Met	55%	29%
Nearly met	7%	24%
Not met	6%	28%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 6 and 8Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 55%
Met standard: 16%
Below standard: 29%

71% met or exceeded · 31 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	55%	20%
Met	16%	15%
Nearly met	19%	23%
Not met	10%	42%

English

grades 4 and 5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 49%
Met standard: 20%
Below standard: 31%

69% met or exceeded · 39 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	49%	24%
Met	20%	23%
Nearly met	23%	20%
Not met	8%	33%

Math

grades 4 and 5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 21%
Met standard: 46%
Below standard: 33%

67% met or exceeded · 39 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	21%	20%
Met	46%	19%
Nearly met	25%	27%
Not met	8%	34%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Read English and math separately, then look at progress and the courses students can take.

Ask: How do students get support, choose courses, and prepare for the move to high school?

Things worth knowing

Open a finding for the evidence

In 2025, students in grades 4–8 scored above what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls them Accelerated in English and Exceptional in math.grades 4–8 · 2025

+9 ptsEnglish · above expected+21 ptsMath · above expected

Source: CDE growth model, 2025
Students: students with scores in both years in grades 4–8: 75
Comparison: 75 students in grades 4–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.

55% of students tested in math reached the top of the state’s four levels, about three times California’s rate in the same grades (20%).grades 6 and 8 · spring 2025

55%Math · exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 6 and 8
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 6 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 848,988 in math tested).

In grades 4 and 5, 69% met or exceeded the standard in English and 67% in math, against 47% and 39% statewide.grades 4 and 5 · spring 2025

69%English · met or exceeded the standard67%Math · met or exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 4 and 5: 39
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 826,162 in English and 832,484 in math tested).

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 6 and 8Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school87%

California48%

Tested: 31 here · 845,117 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	32%	19%
Met	55%	29%
Nearly met	7%	24%
Not met	6%	28%

Math

grades 6 and 8Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school71%

California35%

Tested: 31 here · 848,988 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	55%	20%
Met	16%	15%
Nearly met	19%	23%
Not met	10%	42%

English

grades 4 and 5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school69%

California47%

Tested: 39 here · 826,162 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	49%	24%
Met	20%	23%
Nearly met	23%	20%
Not met	8%	33%

Math

grades 4 and 5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school67%

California39%

Tested: 39 here · 832,484 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	21%	20%
Met	46%	19%
Nearly met	25%	27%
Not met	8%	34%

Progress over time

How are results changing through the middle years?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 6 and 8 · all students tested

201986%28 tested

→

202587%31 tested

Miller's Hill

California, same grades50% → 48%2019 → 2025 · 918,912 → 845,117 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 6 and 8 · all students tested

201968%28 tested

→

202571%31 tested

Miller's Hill

California, same grades38% → 35%2019 → 2025 · 921,254 → 848,988 tested

A comparison of two years, not individual student growth. Each year is a different group of students.

Explore every year, the trend charts & underlying data

Grades 6 and 8 are well above California. Grades 4 and 5 are also well above it.

English met or exceeded, grades 6 and 8

Miller's HillCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)87%48%

Math met or exceeded, grades 6 and 8

Miller's HillCalifornia

0%50%100%201920222025No comparable state tests (COVID)71%35%

Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results; in 2020 and 2021 that was COVID.

2025 was the highest year in this series in both subjects. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 6 and 8
Year	Miller's Hill	California
2019	86% 28 tested	50% 918,912 tested
2022	69% 45 tested	46% 860,600 tested
2023	74% 39 tested	45% 843,666 tested
2024	69% 39 tested	46% 845,113 tested
2025	87% 31 tested	48% 845,117 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 6 and 8
Year	Miller's Hill	California
2019	68% 28 tested	38% 921,254 tested
2022	51% 45 tested	31% 861,823 tested
2023	69% 39 tested	32% 846,602 tested
2024	49% 39 tested	33% 850,652 tested
2025	71% 31 tested	35% 848,988 tested

The state’s growth measure75 students · grades 4–8 · 2025

English+9ptsCDE level: Accelerated (4 of 5)

Math+21ptsCDE level: Exceptional (5 of 5)

What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 9 points above that prediction, and in math 21 points above it.

The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.

Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.

School pattern, spring 2025Solid BaseThe average Met + Exceeded rate across the reported grades and subjects is at least 65%.

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

7 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

18in 100 at the average California middle school

6 of 81 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school7 in 100

at the average California middle school18 in 100

2.4%of students were suspended at least once (2 of 83), 2024–25

3.5%at the average California middle school

Attendance by grade

Chronically absent, 2024–25	Per 100 students	Students
Grades 4–6	6	3 of 52
Grades 7–8	10	3 of 29

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 4–6 and 8 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

White

45 tested per subject · grades 4 and 5 and 8

English71% / 61%

Math64% / 52%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrades 4–6 and 8 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Latrobe	vs California
White · 45 tested · grades 4 and 5 and 8 only
English	71%	071%	+1061%
Math	64%	064%	+1252%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Latrobe, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.

No published rate here for low-income, Hispanic or Latino, Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

How each student group did

Read the student-group results as sentences

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

White75%
Hispanic or Latino—
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Unallocated share25%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
White	75%
Hispanic or Latino	—
Asian	—
Black or African American	—
Filipino	—
Two or more races	—
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 1 in 4 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (27%, 21 of 77). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers7

Average experience12 years

First-year teachers0%

100% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 100.00%: 5.7 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 5.7 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

The school path beyond this campus

Explore schools on the map ↗

Historical links and nearby options · confirm your child’s address and current assignment with the district.

ElementaryLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.
MiddleMiller's HillThis campus · grades 4-8
High schoolLink not recordedAsk the district about this stage.

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

Latrobe Elementary
Historical majority-area link · NCES SABS 2015–16
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.

Getting in

Miller's Hill runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.

Ask Latrobe which school serves your address.

latrobesd.org

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

7900 South Shingle Road, Shingle Springs 95682

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

How do you support kids who arrive ahead, and kids who arrive behind?
Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
How do students get academic help and connect with a trusted adult?
Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

Call (530) 677-0260 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar middle schools2025 statewide percentile

Templeton HomeTempleton Unified · 54 enrolled · 25.9% meal eligibility21stNeeds Support
Capistrano Home/VirtualCapistrano Unified · 82 enrolled · 31.7% meal eligibility93rdStrong
Northcoast Preparatory and Performing Arts AcademyHumboldt County Office of Education · 118 enrolled · 33.1% meal eligibility79thStrong
OCASA College PrepCapistrano Unified · 83 enrolled · 33.7% meal eligibility54thSolid

How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 19.3–35.3% meal eligibility and 39–154 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Miller's Hill a good middle school?

Miller's Hill is in the 95th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 74 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Miller's Hill was well above California in English and math: 87% and 71% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6 and 8, against 48% and 35% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Miller's Hill's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 87% of students tested in grades 6 and 8 met or exceeded the English standard and 71% the math standard; 32% and 55% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 48% and 35% met or exceeded, 19% and 20% exceeded. 31 students were tested in English and 31 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Miller's Hill rank in California?

Miller's Hill is in the 95th percentile of 2,177 California comprehensive middle schools (Strong, 2025). Miller's Hill ranks #104 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Miller's Hill?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 7.4% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 6 chronically absent of 81 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 2.4%; 2 unduplicated suspended students of 83 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 11.1%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 2.8%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Miller's Hill compare to other schools in Shingle Springs?

Miller's Hill is in the 95th percentile (Strong) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 77 students. Use the schools in Shingle Springs page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Miller's Hill?

At Miller's Hill in Shingle Springs, 71.1% of White students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 4, 5 and 8, compared to 71.1% district-wide for those same grades and 61.0% statewide for those same grades. Miller's Hill’s rate for White students matches its district average in ELA. Other subgroups: White students (64.4% met or exceeded the Math standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 45 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Miller's Hill is ranked #104 statewide.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	43.2%	17.2%	42%
Met or exceeded	79.8%	40.0%	23%
Chronic absenteeism	11.1%	18.1%	5%
Suspension rate	2.8%	3.6%	5%
Grade gap (G6→G8, different students)	-7.0pp	+1.5pp	not scored

Exceeded standard: ↑ vs CA 17.2% · index 77 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↑ vs CA 40.0% · index 80 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism: ↑ vs CA 18.1% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.1pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 3.6% · index 53 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 1.8pp lower vs 2024
Grade gap (G6→G8, different students): ↓ vs CA +1.5pp

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 4	19	32%	32%	32%	5%	63%	+19
Grade 5	20	65%	10%	15%	10%	75%	+27
Grade 6	12	33%	58%	8%	0%	92%	+46
Grade 7	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
Grade 8	19	32%	53%	5%	11%	84%	+38

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4084 reporting schools

State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2631 reporting schools

State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 46.2%; n=2658 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 4	19	11%	53%	26%	11%	63%	+22
Grade 5	20	30%	40%	25%	5%	70%	+35
Grade 6	12	50%	25%	25%	0%	75%	+41
Grade 7	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
Grade 8	19	58%	11%	16%	16%	68%	+36

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.5%; n=4086 reporting schools

State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 33.7%; n=2630 reporting schools

State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 32.1%; n=2658 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA	22	72.7%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA	17	76.5%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA	13	69.2%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA	27	66.7%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA	26	69.2%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math	22	59.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	17	41.2%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math	13	46.1%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math	27	63.0%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math	26	50.0%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA	17	76.5%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA	11	81.8%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA	24	79.2%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA	23	52.2%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA	15	66.7%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math	18	77.8%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	11	54.5%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math	24	66.7%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math	23	60.9%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math	15	73.3%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA	11	54.5%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA	23	78.3%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA	23	69.6%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA	17	76.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA	22	68.2%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math	11	27.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	23	65.2%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math	23	47.8%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math	17	76.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math	22	54.5%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA	13	100.0%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA	20	90.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA	11	90.9%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA	20	75.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA	17	82.3%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math	13	100.0%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	20	75.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math	11	63.6%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math	20	65.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math	17	70.6%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	39	33%	36%	31%	0%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
White	45	71.1%	+0	+10

Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Miller's Hill ←	—	7495th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	43.2%	79.8%	−7.0pp	—	2.8%
California average	—	39School average · no percentile	17.2%	40.0%	+1.5pp	—	3.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	62/100	88	#233	California comprehensive middle schools · 1,953 schools
2022	59/100	86	#283	California comprehensive middle schools · 2,113 schools
2023	62/100	89	#231	California comprehensive middle schools · 2,125 schools
2024	59/100	87	#264	California comprehensive middle schools · 2,152 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 9.3% → 2025 · 7.4% · −1.9pp
Suspension rate2024 · 4.7% → 2025 · 2.4% · −2.3pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	79	45.6%	79.8%
2025 · Math	79	35.4%	70.9%
2024 · ELA	105	39.0%	70.5%
2024 · Math	105	30.5%	53.3%
2023 · ELA	90	36.7%	70.0%
2023 · Math	91	37.4%	67.0%
2022 · ELA	96	35.4%	70.8%
2022 · Math	96	31.3%	56.3%
2019 · ELA	81	44.4%	86.4%
2019 · Math	81	44.4%	74.1%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	32.8%	74.6%	6.5%	3.8%	-0.8pp
2022	—	—	—	29.3%	65.5%	32.2%	0.7%	+2.7pp
2023	—	—	—	32.3%	66.5%	11.9%	4.9%	-2.9pp
2024	—	—	—	35.4%	60.7%	11.2%	4.6%	+1.9pp
2025	74	95	#104	43.2%	79.8%	11.1%	2.8%	-7.0pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	3.4%	5.6%	+2.2pp
Male	5.6%	8.9%	+3.3pp
White	6.5%	9.8%	+3.3pp
Students with Disabilities	7.7%	—	—
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	0.0%	11.5%	+11.5pp
All Students	4.8%	7.4%	+2.6pp

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	+9	75	Accelerated	+21	75	Exceptional
English Only	+13	69	not categorised	+23	69	not categorised
White	+13	55	Accelerated	+22	55	Exceptional
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	−2	24	Average	+12	24	Accelerated

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

75 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

76th pctile · +9 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

75 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

93rd pctile · +21 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −1 and the middle half fall between −8 and +6 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$16,547 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 148 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$319 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 77

Central federal expenditures attributed here$16 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 77

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,285 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 52%Instruction support 14%Student services 5%Administration 11%Buildings & maintenance 17%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$16,547 per pupil

2020$15,490 per pupil

2019$15,648 per pupil

2018$15,562 per pupil

2017$13,413 per pupil

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95682

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95682
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$122,436
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	40.36%
ZCTA population	30,065
Median age	45.3 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/millers-hill-3857"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Miller's Hill — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Miller's Hill

Compare schools

Get an email when Miller's Hill’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

How strong are the foundations for high school?

English

Math

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

English

Math

How are results changing through the middle years?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

Parent voices

Teacher & staff voices

How each student group did

White

Students and staff

Student mix

The school path beyond this campus

Elementary links

Miller's Hill runs through 8th grade, so there’s no middle-school move.

Location and visiting

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Similar student populations

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful