California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Martinezhigher than 71 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Martinezhigher than 71 of the 100 California dots
California’s public middle schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well above California in English, above in math: 59% and 46% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 822 in English, 821 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).
22% of students tested in English reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 19% across California in the same grades.grades 6–8 · spring 2026
22%English · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 6, 7 and 8 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English tested).
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 6–8
MartinezCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID59%49%
MartinezCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 6–8
MartinezCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID46%37%
MartinezCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 51% in 2017 to 59% in 2026, with 2025 and 2026 about the same. Math went from 40% in 2017 to 46% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Martinez
California
2015
52% 950 tested
44% 1,356,180 tested
2016
48% 986 tested
48% 1,366,988 tested
2017
51% 976 tested
48% 1,377,836 tested
2018
54% 981 tested
49% 1,391,379 tested
2019
49% 913 tested
50% 1,390,416 tested
2022
48% 776 tested
47% 1,277,584 tested
2023
50% 746 tested
46% 1,267,562 tested
2024
56% 784 tested
46% 1,269,432 tested
2025
58% 814 tested
49% 1,266,619 tested
2026
59% 822 tested
49% 1,254,039 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 6–8
Year
Martinez
California
2015
40% 949 tested
33% 1,359,309 tested
2016
44% 992 tested
36% 1,371,026 tested
2017
40% 975 tested
37% 1,383,609 tested
2018
41% 979 tested
37% 1,394,516 tested
2019
33% 914 tested
38% 1,394,239 tested
2022
31% 770 tested
31% 1,279,506 tested
2023
35% 744 tested
32% 1,272,024 tested
2024
42% 780 tested
33% 1,277,570 tested
2025
48% 806 tested
36% 1,272,526 tested
2026
46% 821 tested
37% 1,254,800 tested
The state’s growth measure774 students in English, 769 in math · grades 6–8 · 2025
English+2ptsCDE level: Average (3 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math+1ptsCDE level: Average (3 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 2 points above that prediction, and in math 1 point above it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: Most students in grades 6–8 haven’t yet met the state’s standard in math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
10 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
18in 100 at the average California middle school
85 of 897 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school10 in 100
at the average California middle school18 in 100
4.4%of students were suspended at least once (40 of 906), 2025–26
3.7%at the average California middle school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
8
25 of 294
Grades 7–8
10
60 of 603
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how Martinez works for your family.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for Martinez. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 6–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
262 English · 261 math tested
English
40% / 39%
Math
27% / 26%
White
382 tested per subject
English
60% / 62%
Math
50% / 50%
Hispanic or Latino
224 English · 222 math tested
English
49% / 39%
Math
35% / 25%
Two or more races
120 English · 121 math tested
English
70% / 62%
Math
49% / 50%
Students with disabilities
102 English · 101 math tested
English
17% / 14%
Math
15% / 10%
How each student group did
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Martinez Unified
vs California
Low-income · 262 tested in English, 261 in math
English
40%
040%
+139%
Math
27%
027%
+126%
White · 382 tested
English
60%
060%
−262%
Math
50%
050%
050%
Hispanic or Latino · 224 tested in English, 222 in math
English
49%
049%
+1039%
Math
35%
035%
+1025%
Two or more races · 120 tested in English, 121 in math
English
70%
070%
+862%
Math
49%
+148%
−150%
Students with disabilities · 102 tested in English, 101 in math
English
17%
017%
+314%
Math
15%
−116%
+510%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Martinez Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
Asian and Filipino students and English learners: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1White46%
2Hispanic or Latino28%
3Two or more races11%
4Asian4%
5Not reported4%
6Filipino3%
7Black or African American2%
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share<1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
White
46%
Hispanic or Latino
28%
Two or more races
11%
Asian
4%
Not reported
4%
Filipino
3%
Black or African American
2%
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 1 in 3 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (33%, 276 of 843). California: 63%.
74% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 73.77%: 29.5 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 39.9 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
65%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school65%
Martinez Unified54%
California47%
17 of 26 English learners here; 72 of 133 in Martinez Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
High-school endpoint evidence · Alhambra Senior High
The road from this school ends at Alhambra Senior High. UC records 11 enrollees from Alhambra Senior High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 14 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — a child starting here today would reach Alhambra Senior High around 2032, and 6 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 70% of Alhambra Senior High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Most students in grades 6–8 haven’t yet met the state’s standard in math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
How do students get academic help and connect with a trusted adult?
Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?
Common questions
Is Martinez Junior High a good middle school?
Martinez Junior High is in the 71st percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. Its Scope Score is 48 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Martinez Junior High was well above California in English, above in math: 59% and 46% met or exceeded the standard in grades 6–8, against 49% and 37% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are Martinez Junior High's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 59% of students tested in grades 6–8 met or exceeded the English standard and 46% the math standard; 22% and 23% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 49% and 37% met or exceeded, 19% and 21% exceeded. 822 students were tested in English and 821 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does Martinez Junior High rank in California?
Martinez Junior High is in the 71st percentile of 2,532 California comprehensive middle schools (Solid, 2026). Martinez Junior High ranks #712 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 6-to-8 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is Martinez Junior High getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares Martinez Junior High's grade 6 results in 2024 with its grade 8 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 56th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for Martinez Junior High?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 9.5% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 85 chronically absent of 897 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 4.4%; 40 unduplicated suspended students of 906 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does Martinez Junior High compare to other schools in Martinez?
Martinez Junior High is in the 71st percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 843 students. Use the schools in Martinez page or the map view to compare nearby middle schools.
What do reported student-group results show at Martinez Junior High?
At Martinez Junior High in Martinez, 40% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 6–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 40% across the district and 39% across California for the same group in the same grades. That matches the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 27% in math; White students, 60% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 262 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What high school does Martinez Junior High feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of Martinez Junior High's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Alhambra Senior High. Alhambra Senior High is in the 50th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter high schools on its 2025 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Source records
Explore the data
Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.
↑ vs CA 17.7% · index 55 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↑ vs CA 40.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G6 → 2026 G8)
↑ vs CA average · ≈56th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 17.8% · index 61 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 1.5pp higher vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 3.8% · index 48 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▲ 0.7pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↑ vs CA 17.5% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
269
24%
36%
21%
19%
60%
48%
+12
Grade 7
270
20%
34%
26%
20%
54%
51%
+3
Grade 8
283
23%
40%
22%
15%
63%
49%
+14
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 6
268
24%
23%
29%
24%
47%
37%
+10
Grade 7
269
19%
25%
25%
31%
44%
38%
+6
Grade 8
284
25%
21%
28%
26%
46%
36%
+10
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
281
55.2%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
286
62.2%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
247
56.7%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
278
43.2%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
282
54.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
246
44.7%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
286
59.1%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
247
57.5%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
251
51.0%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
285
42.8%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
246
46.3%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
249
38.1%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
242
56.6%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
248
53.6%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
256
39.8%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
243
32.1%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
246
41.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
255
31.4%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
267
44.2%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
257
52.5%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
252
46.8%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
263
28.9%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
255
35.3%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
252
30.2%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
287
51.9%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
325
50.8%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
301
45.5%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
287
29.3%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
326
36.2%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
301
34.5%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
329
51.7%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
307
57.3%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
345
53.6%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
330
37.0%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
305
44.3%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
344
41.9%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
320
49.7%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
340
50.0%
2017 · Grade 8 · ELA
316
52.2%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
320
34.1%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
340
40.9%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math
315
44.1%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
348
51%
2016 · Grade 7 · ELA
326
49%
2016 · Grade 8 · ELA
312
45%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
350
40%
2016 · Grade 7 · Math
328
44%
2016 · Grade 8 · Math
314
47%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
331
53%
2015 · Grade 7 · ELA
316
56%
2015 · Grade 8 · ELA
303
48%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
331
36%
2015 · Grade 7 · Math
316
43%
2015 · Grade 8 · Math
302
40%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
283
23%
25%
40%
13%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
262
40%
−0
+1
White
382
60%
−0
−2
Hispanic/Latino
224
49%
−1
+9
03Nearest middle schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 6 vs grade 8, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Scroll for more columns →
School
Dist
Scope · percentile · band
Advanced
Proficient or Advanced
Grade gap
Cohort growth
Susp
Martinez Junior High ←
—
4871st percentile · Solid · statewide · 2026
22%
52%
+1.1pp
+49 pts
4.4%
Average California middle school
—
40School average · no percentile
18%
41%
+3.0pp
—
3.8%
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
9.4%
11.7%
-0.6pp
2022
—
—
—
20.1%
11.2%
+1.9pp
2023
—
—
—
13.9%
8.9%
-8.8pp
2024
—
—
—
10.6%
5.6%
-6.4pp
2025
—
—
—
8.2%
3.7%
+1.5pp
2026
48
71
#712
9.7%
4.4%
+1.1pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 6 vs grade 8 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
8.2%
12.1%
+3.9pp
Male
10.5%
6.8%
-3.7pp
Asian
2.9%
7.5%
+4.6pp
Black/African American
13.6%
9.1%
-4.5pp
Filipino
0.0%
0.0%
+0.0pp
Hispanic/Latino
8.6%
10.7%
+2.1pp
Two or More Races
8.7%
10.7%
+2.0pp
White
10.9%
8.5%
-2.4pp
Students with Disabilities
16.3%
16.3%
+0.0pp
English Learners
11.8%
9.1%
-2.7pp
Homeless
43.8%
59.1%
+15.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
13.6%
18.1%
+4.5pp
All Students
9.4%
9.5%
+0.1pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
+2
774
Average
+1
769
Average
English Only
+1
657
not categorised
0
652
not categorised
White
+2
339
Average
−2
335
Average
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
−2
293
Average
−6
291
Moderate
Hispanic or Latino
−1
240
Average
+1
240
Average
Students with Disabilities
−5
106
Average
+6
105
Accelerated
Two or More Races
+7
83
Accelerated
−1
83
Average
English Learner
+4
79
Average
+5
79
Accelerated
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
+3
68
not categorised
+2
68
not categorised
Asian
+18
32
Accelerated
+26
32
Exceptional
Filipino
+16
28
Accelerated
+25
28
Exceptional
Black or African American
−3
16
Average
+3
16
Average
English Learners Only
+13
11
not categorised
+22
11
not categorised
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 6
21%
exceeded standard · 59% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 286 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 8
23%
exceeded standard · 63% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 283 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 284 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
774 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: +2 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 52nd percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.52nd pctile · +2 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
769 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: +1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 51st percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.51st pctile · +1 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median ELA estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$12,261 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 3,983 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$428 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 843
Central federal expenditures attributed here$692 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 843
District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,110 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 68%Instruction support 9%Student services 8%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 8%
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 94553+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 94553
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$124,130
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
42.95%
ZCTA population
48,643
Median age
42.6 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94553 →
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=2,532 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.