Alternative school · San Luis Obispo County Office of Educati

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter

721 Mendocino Avenue, Camp San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo · 241 students · Grades 10–12

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four high schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap, inside the campus outline from the California School Campus Database (2025). Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Strong91st percentile. Ranked only against California alternative high schools. Higher than 90 of the 97 other scored California alternative high schools.

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter is an alternative school. Students are enrolled through a placement, application, or referral process specific to the program.

In 2024–25, 86% of the class graduated in four years (159 of 185); across California’s alternative high schools, 35%.

Source for this line
Source
CDE four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), 2024–25
Students
students who started 9th grade together: 185
Comparison
Alternative high schools with a graduation record: graduates divided by students who started 9th grade together, across 122 public schools’ rows (our combination, not CDE’s published state rate; 8,737 of 24,956). It counts every school with a graduation record, so it can differ from the number of schools we rank.

In its own words

What does Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter say about itself?

These lines come from the school’s own website. They are the school’s description. They are not parent reviews or test results.

“Our aim and philosophy is to produce well-rounded, competent graduates who successfully and immediately transition into the workforce, higher education, vocational schools, or enlist in the military.”
grizzlyyouthacademy.org (opens in a new tab), read October 23, 2026

Every line here is from grizzlyyouthacademy.org, read October 23, 2026.

Over time

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English went from 11% to 13% and math from 1% to 2%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grade 11. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%201720182019202220232024202520268%13%Grizzly ChalleNGe CharterThis school

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%201720182019202220232024202520261%2%Grizzly ChalleNGe CharterThis school

The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now.

English, grade 11: share at the top two levels
SpringGrizzly ChalleNGe CharterTested here
20178%109
20186%107
201917%118
202222%82
202326%72
202415%85
202511%79
202613%53
Math, grade 11: share at the top two levels
SpringGrizzly ChalleNGe CharterTested here
20171%109
20180%107
20190%115
20220%80
20234%71
20240%85
20251%78
20262%54

Tests

How does Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter compare with California alternative schools?

Well below California alternative schools in both subjects.

English

13%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

602711
California alternative high schools33%

Math

2%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

94
California alternative high schools14%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grade 11, spring 2026, 13% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 2% in math, against 33% and 14% at California alternative schools.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grade 11 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

How does math compare with English?

In grade 11, spring 2026, math trails English by 11 percentage points in the share who scored Proficient or Advanced, against 19 points at California alternative schools. The grade 11 cards above give each subject’s share.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grade 11 · This school2%11%27%60%53
English, grade 11 · California alternative high schools10%23%29%38%11,827
Math, grade 11 · This school2%0%4%94%54
Math, grade 11 · California alternative high schools8%6%12%74%11,786

Spring 2026, grade 11 combined: 53 tested in English, 54 tested in math. California alternative schools combines those schools’ results, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 87% of students. 7 of 452 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

2in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (7 of 452 students).

At the average California alternative high school we score: 44 in 100.

Suspensions: 0 students were suspended at least once. Average California alternative high school we score 1.0%.

Students, 2024–25

241

students in grades 10–12.

Hispanic or Latino 87%White 8%

Family income

85%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 204 of 241.

Teachers, 2024–25

18

teachers, with 12 years of experience on average.

6% were in their first year.

75% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

40%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (19 of 47 students).

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino87%
White8%
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 11.3 of 15 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students scored well below the same groups at California alternative high schools.

This schoolThe same group, California alternative high schools
  • Low-incomeEnglish · 48 tested12%California alternative high schools 30%
  • Low-incomeMath · 49 tested2%California alternative high schools 13%
  • Hispanic or LatinoEnglish · 44 tested16%California alternative high schools 31%
  • Hispanic or LatinoMath · 45 tested2%California alternative high schools 12%

12% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 2% in math (grade 11, spring 2026), against 30% and 13% for the same group at California alternative high schools. Hispanic or Latino students: 16% in English and 2% in math, against 31% and 12% for the same group at California alternative high schools.

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grade 11, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results against California alternative high schools

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrade 11 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs California alternative high schools
Low-income · 48 tested in English, 49 in math
English12%−1830%
Math2%−1113%
Hispanic or Latino · 44 tested in English, 45 in math
English16%−1531%
Math2%−1012%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject at California alternative high schools. No group that is behind at California alternative high schools does 10 or more points better here.

Students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, White, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

After high school

How many students here graduate, and where do they go next?

86% of students graduated in four years in 2024–25. That compares with 35% at California alternative high schools. 86% were ready for college or career (state measure) in 2024–25. 36% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months.

ready for college or career (state measure), 2024–25

86%

of graduates finished the UC/CSU course list, 2024–25

0%

Graduation, college and university records

Preparation · each measure describes a different student group

Graduated in four years

86%

California alternative high schools: 35%

2024–25 · 159 of 185 students who started 9th grade together

Ready for college or career (state measure)

86%

California alternative high schools: 11%

2024–25 · 168 of 195 students in the state’s measure

Finished the UC/CSU course list

0%

California alternative high schools: 19%

2024–25 · 0 of 159 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list

Destinations · class of 2023

Where students who finished high school went

36% enrolled in college within 12 months · 171 students who finished high school

  • University of California0 · 0%
  • California State University1 · 1%
  • California community college56 · 33%
  • In-state private0 · 0%
  • Out-of-state, 4-year1 · <1%
  • Out-of-state, 2-year4 · 2%
  • Not enrolled109 · 64%

Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: each count divided by all high-school completers (graduates and other students who finished), rounded together so they total 100. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.

Where the class of 2023 went
36%enrolled in college within a year

171 completers, class of 2023

  • University of California0 (0%)
  • California State University1 (1%)
  • California community college56 (33%)
  • In-state private0 (0%)
  • Out-of-state, 4-year1 (0%)
  • Out-of-state, 2-year4 (2%)
  • Not enrolled109 (64%)

Source: CDE’s college-going rate for the class of 2023 (enrolled in college within 12 months). Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers, rounded together so they total 100. A dash means we have no figure for that row; it isn’t zero.

Where these figures come fromEach measure’s source, student group and definition
Graduated in four years
2024–25 · 159 of 185 students who started 9th grade together. California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.
Ready for college or career (state measure)
2024–25 · 168 of 195 students in the state’s measure. California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator (CCI), overall “Prepared” rate, among the students in the indicator’s group. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of Prepared students and indicator students across California alternative high schools, not a CDE figure.
Finished the UC/CSU course list
2024–25 · 0 of 159 graduates finished the UC/CSU course list. California Department of Education, A–G completion records (graduates who met the UC/CSU course requirements). Course completion is separate from college enrollment. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates who finished the list across California alternative high schools, not a CDE figure.
Where students who finished high school went
CDE college-going records, class of 2023. College enrollment is counted for 12 months after finishing high school and matched to college records, so this runs about two years behind. A dash is unavailable, not zero.
Advanced courses on record

What other courses and pathways are on record?

College courses in high school (dual enrollment)
205 students took one

2023–24

Students taking a college course for credit while in high school, often through a community college. Federal Civil Rights Data Collection, school-reported.

Family and staff answers

What would staff tell you?

Staff in this district cannot yet answer a short set of questions about Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  2. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Staff

Staff can’t answer for this school yet

We don’t check staff emails for San Luis Obispo County Office of Educati yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district

Money

How much is spent on each student here?

$73,425 for each student in 2024–25. California’s high schools spent $20,309 for each student.

$73,425

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$27,172
The school’s share of district office costs
$46,253
Of the total, from federal funds
$12,303
  • Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter$73,425
  • San Luis Obispo County Office of Educati high schools$76,058
  • California high schools$20,309

The district and California figures combine their high schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,655 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

The neighborhood

What is the area around Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 93405. They are not figures for the families at Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter.

Typical household income in a year

$60,399

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 93405.

Typical home value
$949,700
People who live in this ZIP code
25,002
Typical age
22.6 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
55%

What you can do

Who can act on Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter’s results?

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter’s own board decides its plan.

Where is its yearly plan?

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter is a charter school that CDE lists as locally funded, through its district. San Luis Obispo County Office of Education authorized this charter; its current term ends June 30, 2031.

What its plan pays for ↓

Authorizer from the California Department of Education’s charter term file; term from its Charter School Database, checked October 22, 2026. Source 

State support

The state hasn’t placed Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter in a support program. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26. Source 

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 10 questions to Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What extra help do low-income students get, and how do you know it’s working?2% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in math, grade 11, spring 2026 (49 students tested); the same group at California alternative high schools: 13%
  2. Which courses and career pathways does the school run, and who can enroll?
  3. How do counselors help students plan for college, training or work?
  4. What support is available when a student falls behind on graduation requirements?
  5. How does this approach show up in an ordinary lesson?From its own words, on how it teaches.
  6. Which grades take part in these programs, and how often?From its own words, on programs.

Before you apply

  1. Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
  2. What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Getting in

How do I get in?

Ask Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

Where it is

Where is Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter?

Address
721 Mendocino Avenue, Camp San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo 93405Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Kyle MartinAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated February 9, 2023.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 8 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter how it admits students. Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates. See the details ↓

Is Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter a good alternative school?

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter scores higher than 91 in 100 of the 98 California alternative high schools we score, compared only within that group: 91st percentile, Strong, spring 2025. Why alternative schools are ranked separately. See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 2 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 44 in 100 at the average California alternative high school we score. 0 of 503 students were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 1.0% at the average California alternative high school we score. See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 13% of low-income students in grade 11 at Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter in San Luis Obispo scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 30% for the same group at California alternative high schools. See the details ↓

What could my child study here?

205 students took a college course for credit in 2023–24, by the federal Civil Rights Data Collection. See the details ↓

Where do students go after finishing high school here?

36% of the class of 2023 enrolled in college within 12 months, by CDE’s college-going records. See the details ↓

What does its own plan pay for?

In its 2026–27 plan, $4.3 million is planned for 26 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 71% of its $6.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan.

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

Its own plan

What does Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter’s own plan commit to?

$4.3 million is planned for 26 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 71% of its $6.0 million general fund budget.

$4.3million

planned in the school’s own plan for 2026–27

The three largest actions in the plan

  • Credentialing$1.0 million
  • Post-secondary Education and Careers$501,394
  • Reduce Class Sizes$467,223

These are planned amounts; the charter school reports what it spent in a later plan. Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 73 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

The whole plan: every goal, what it measures and what it pays for

The plan lists what the school commits to spend and measure.

The 2026–27 plan in short

Source: the charter school’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 73 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 47% of the money. The plan itself puts 97% of it toward staff.

  • Credentialing $1.0 million
  • Post-secondary Education and Careers $501,394
  • Reduce Class Sizes $467,223
  • 23 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

3 of the plan’s 26 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

  • Catch-up help $9,400
  • English learners $73,885

Largest of these

  • ELD Professional Development$52,902
  • ELD Instruction$20,983
  • Interventions$9,400
For high-need students

It plans $1.5 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $1.2 million and estimates it spent $1.3 million, $0.1 million (4%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $139,087 (3%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Credentialing, which went from $1.2 million to $1.0 million.

Largest cuts

  • Credentialing−⁠$113,632
  • Maintain Effective Learning Environment−⁠$105,206

Largest increases

  • Individual Learning Plans+⁠$107,474
  • Reduce Class Sizes+⁠$77,219
  • Academic Rigor+⁠$33,738
The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Credentialing · $1,043,481
  • Post-secondary Education and Careers · $501,394
  • Reduce Class Sizes · $467,223
The full plan5 goals, 14 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($4.3 million).

Where does the money go?

55% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Improve the academic achievement of all students enrolled in GYA$2.4 million55% of action budgets

15 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.3 million (+⁠$53,975) · p. 9 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Credentialing$1.0 millionaction 1.1 · p. 33 ↗
  2. Reduce Class Sizes$0.5 millionaction 1.9 · p. 33 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Academic Rigor$0.1 millionaction 1.3 · p. 33 ↗
  4. 21st Century Learning Skills$0.1 millionaction 1.10 · p. 33 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $24,800 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Primary Language Support$0.1 millionaction 1.11 · p. 33 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $95,564 is state funding counted toward those services

10 more funded actions in this goal

  • Parent Engagement · action 1.7 · p. 33 ↗$0.1 million
  • Local Partner · action 1.5 · p. 33 ↗$0.1 million
  • Mental Health · action 1.8 · p. 33 ↗$0.1 million
  • ELD Professional Development · action 1.14 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $37,813 is state funding counted toward those services$0.1 million
  • Redesignation · action 1.13 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4,150 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Communication with Foster Youth Guardians · action 1.12 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • ELD Instruction · action 1.15 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $4,150 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Facilities · action 1.2 · p. 33 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Barriers · action 1.4 · p. 33 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Interventions · action 1.6 · p. 33 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Credentialing−⁠$0.1 million$1.2 million → $1.0 million · p. 33 ↗
  2. Reduce Class Sizes+⁠$77,219$390,004 → $467,223 · p. 33 ↗
  3. Academic Rigor+⁠$33,738$104,178 → $137,916 · p. 33 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • 21st Century Learning Skills · $130,649 → $126,412 · p. 33 ↗−⁠$4,237
  • Primary Language Support · $101,708 → $112,786 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$11,079
  • Parent Engagement · $106,548 → $99,111 · p. 33 ↗−⁠$7,437
  • Local Partner · $83,865 → $95,180 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$11,315
  • Mental Health · $68,387 → $74,272 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$5,885
  • ELD Professional Development · $43,773 → $52,902 · p. 34 ↗+⁠$9,128
  • Redesignation · $30,095 → $43,110 · p. 34 ↗+⁠$13,015
  • Communication with Foster Youth Guardians · $40,810 → $42,189 · p. 34 ↗+⁠$1,379
  • ELD Instruction · $15,585 → $20,983 · p. 34 ↗+⁠$5,398
  • Facilities · $19,945 → $20,750 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$805
  • Barriers · $5,502 → $11,921 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$6,419
  • Interventions · $5,500 → $9,400 · p. 33 ↗+⁠$3,900

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 9 ↗.

Goal 2Prepare all students for college and careers$786,32618% of action budgets

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $746,292 (+⁠$40,034) · p. 15 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Post-secondary Education and Careers$501,394action 2.1 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $437,166 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. CTE$150,407action 2.4 · p. 34 ↗
  3. Course Offerings$93,228action 2.3 · p. 34 ↗
  4. Placement$41,297action 2.2 · p. 34 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Post-secondary Education and Careers+⁠$16,538$484,855 → $501,394 · p. 34 ↗
  2. CTE+⁠$9,640$140,767 → $150,407 · p. 34 ↗
  3. Placement+⁠$8,986$32,311 → $41,297 · p. 34 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Course Offerings · $88,359 → $93,228 · p. 34 ↗+⁠$4,869

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 15 ↗.

Goal 3Support all students to successfully transition in the post residential phase$638,98115% of action budgets

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $508,296 (+⁠$130,685) · p. 20 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Individual Learning Plans$375,035action 3.3 · p. 34 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Social Emotional Support$183,098action 3.2 · p. 34 ↗
  3. Program Completers$80,848action 3.1 · p. 34 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Individual Learning Plans+⁠$107,474$267,561 → $375,035 · p. 34 ↗
  2. Social Emotional Support+⁠$11,919$171,179 → $183,098 · p. 34 ↗
  3. Program Completers+⁠$11,292$69,556 → $80,848 · p. 34 ↗

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 20 ↗.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEducator retention$501,70912% of action budgets

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $575,720 (−⁠$74,011) · p. 23 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Maintain Effective Learning Environment$249,069action 4.1 · p. 34 ↗
  2. Increased Social Emotional Support$160,184action 4.4 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Independent Study Instruction and Support$86,456action 4.3 · p. 35 ↗
  4. Climate Surveying$6,000action 4.2 · p. 35 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Maintain Effective Learning Environment−⁠$105,206$354,275 → $249,069 · p. 34 ↗
  2. Increased Social Emotional Support+⁠$28,589$131,595 → $160,184 · p. 35 ↗
  3. Independent Study Instruction and Support+⁠$2,606$83,850 → $86,456 · p. 35 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Climate Surveying · $6,000 → $6,000 · p. 35 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 23 ↗.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalIncrease English Learner Progress$00% of action budgets

No funded actions in this plan · 2025–26 plan: $11,596 (−⁠$11,596) · p. 26 ↗

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 26 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 14 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
14
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census BureauU.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil RightsNational Student Clearinghouse
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

After high school

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values and weights · 2024–25 · ranked #8 of 98 California alternative high schools we score
Score factors, 2024–25
FactorSchoolWeight
Graduation rate86%25%
Exceeded standardaverage of English and math2%22%
Ready for college or career (state measure)86%20%
Met or exceededaverage of English and math6%18%
Chronically absent4 in 1005%
Suspension rate0 of 5305%
English learners: top level5%5%

Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter is ranked only among California alternative high schools, so this table sets it beside no other school; the chapters above compare each figure with that class. School values are from 2024–25. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2024–25 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

The 2024–25 Scope Score, in the current-formula row below, uses the state’s college-or-career readiness measure, 2024–25. No verified earlier Scope Scores are available here.

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2024–25—91#8California alternative high schools · 98 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23 and 2023–24 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspension
2018–1910 in 1000 of 496
2021–22not on filenot on file
2022–23not on filenot on file
2023–243 in 1000 of 502
2024–254 in 1000 of 530

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Results by gradeEnglish and math · grade 11 · spring 2026 · % of tested students

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
EnglishTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or Advanced
Grade 11532%11%27%60%13%

Math · 2025–26 results by grade

Share of students tested, spring 2026
MathTestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalProficient or Advanced
Grade 11542%0%4%94%2%

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English532%13%
2026 · Math542%2%
2025 · English793%11%
2025 · Math781%1%
2024 · English851%15%
2024 · Math850%0%
2023 · English7210%26%
2023 · Math710%4%
2022 · English822%22%
2022 · Math800%0%
2019 · English1180%17%
2019 · Math1150%0%
2018 · English1072%6%
2018 · Math1070%0%
2017 · English1090%8%
2017 · Math1090%1%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 11 · English7911%
2025 · Grade 11 · Math781%
2024 · Grade 11 · English8515%
2024 · Grade 11 · Math850%
2023 · Grade 11 · English7226%
2023 · Grade 11 · Math714%
2022 · Grade 11 · English8222%
2022 · Grade 11 · Math800%
2019 · Grade 11 · English11817%
2019 · Grade 11 · Math1150%
2018 · Grade 11 · English1076%
2018 · Grade 11 · Math1070%
2017 · Grade 11 · English1098%
2017 · Grade 11 · Math1091%

Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide230%30%52%17%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advanced
Low-income4812%
Hispanic or Latino4416%

Each group is compared with the same group at California alternative high schools under Every learner.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 4 in 100 → 2025–26 · 2 in 100 · −2 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 0 of 530 → 2025–26 · 0 of 503 · 0.0 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female7 in 1001 in 100−6 in 100
Male11 in 1002 in 100−9 in 100
Hispanic or Latino10 in 1002 in 100−8 in 100
White4 of 561 of 34—
Students with disabilities5 of 680 of 83—
English learners11 of 853 in 100—
Homeless6 of 432 of 56—
Low-income10 in 1002 in 100−8 in 100
All students10 in 1002 in 100−8 in 100
Military families—0 of 11—

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Graduation and readinessstate records · each rate for its own year and class of students
MeasureSource record
This school · CCI overall PreparedCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 86% · numerator 168 students classified Prepared · denominator 195 CCI students.
AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · all students · AP pathway rate 1% · AP-pathway numerator 1 · denominator 168 (CCI Prepared students). This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.

CDE's overall Prepared rate is the college-readiness factor in the Scope Score (20% of the high school score). The school rate is 168 of 195 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The school CCI rate has its own student cohort and source year.

Graduation rate
86%
AP route, among those ready for college or career
1%
2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students ready for college or career (CDE’s “Prepared”), not course offerings
Finished the UC/CSU course list (A–G)
0%
This school may not offer A–G courses
College-going rate
36%

These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A–G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.

Advanced coursework, federal snapshot2023–24 · Civil Rights Data Collection · dated historical snapshot
MeasureThis school
AP offerednot reported
AP course countnot reported
AP enrollment (male/female)not reported
IB participationnot reported
Dual enrollmentoffered · 205 enrolled
Algebra I in grade 8not reported
Calculus sections0
Physics sections0
Chemistry sections0
Reported male/female enrollment (CRDC)225

These counts aren’t part of the Scope Score. “Not reported” means the federal record has no value for that item; it isn’t a zero. Enrollment counts add the male and female students the survey reports.

College destinationsclass of 2023 · state college-going records, 12 months after graduation
DestinationCompleters% (derived)
University of California00%
California State University11%
California community college5633%
In-state private00%
Out-of-state, 4-year10%
Out-of-state, 2-year42%
Not enrolled10964%

171 students who finished high school, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 36% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ all who finished high school; CDE calls them completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$87,084 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 321 pupils

School-level federal expenditures$6,079 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 241

Central federal expenditures attributed here$6,224 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 241

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 22%Instruction support 36%Student services 11%Administration 23%Buildings & maintenance 8%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$7,113,35022.25%22%
Instruction support$11,631,12436.39%36%
Student services$3,427,61510.72%11%
Administration$7,321,85122.91%23%
Buildings & maintenance$2,404,6367.52%8%
Total$31,963,763100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $31,963,763 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$87,084 per pupil
2020$73,837 per pupil
2019$74,448 per pupil
2018$72,312 per pupil
2017$62,664 per pupil
Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 93405 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 93405 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$60,399
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)55%
ZIP-area population25,002
Median age22.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 93405 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/grizzly-challenge-charter-1725"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Grizzly ChalleNGe Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2024–25 results, compared across 98 alternative high schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · federal civil rights data (CRDC) 2023–24, a past snapshot · state college-going records, class of 2023, matched to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment · Data updated October 15, 2026

  • Each percentile compares it only with California alternative high schools.