ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Camerado Springs Middle

Middle School
📍 2480 Merrychase Drive
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
📈
On the Rise

On an upward trajectory — scores are improving faster than average. Worth a closer look.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
492 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
21:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
25%
Teachers
24 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Maintained
+1.6 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Increased
+10.6 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
33.3%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 12 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic23.6%
White66.7%
Asian2.2%
Black0.2%
Other7.3%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Camerado Springs Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard27.9%
Met Standard33.7%
Below Standard38.4%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "62% proficient" for Camerado Springs Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

27.9% of students exceeded standard while 33.7% met it. That exceeded rate is 10.6 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's 14.8 points below the Buckeye Union Elementary district average of 42.7%. The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Students here improve by 4.0 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth, suggesting the school is adding value beyond what students arrive with.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance maintained and Math increased year-over-year. 33.3% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 9.9%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
27.9%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
61.6%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
+4.0pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
9.9%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
4.7%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
1,013
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th18621.5%35.5%22.0%21.0%57.0%
7th17331.8%45.7%15.6%6.9%77.5%
8th14725.2%36.7%19.1%19.1%61.9%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th18729.4%24.1%23.0%23.5%53.5%
7th17331.8%31.8%23.7%12.7%63.6%
8th14727.9%28.6%20.4%23.1%56.5%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog