Math
35%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Charter middle school
California Connections Academy North Bay
This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.
65% of tested students are Proficient or Advanced in English and 35% in math. Explore the evidence alongside the opportunities your child would use.
SchoolScope archetype
Building Momentum
What this means for your family
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
How archetypes are assigned →Data sources · Methodology · State tests: 2025
Contact
English
65%Grades 6 & 8 · Proficient or Advanced
Students
—Total enrollment
Chronic absence
27%Students absent 10% or more of school days
What are you trying to decide?
The overall score is a starting point.
Look at subject results, trends and student groups, then consider the opportunities your child would use.
View school performance →Start with your child’s daily experience.
Explore teaching, coursework and student-group results. A schoolwide average cannot predict an individual experience.
Explore student experience →Confirm the enrollment route.
Check the address, grade and enrollment requirements directly with the district or school.
Check attendance and enrollment →Compare the options you can access.
Use comparable evidence alongside entry requirements, cost and location.
Compare nearby schools →Academic performance
What do the results tell us?
2025 results · Grades 6 & 8 · weighted by students tested within each subject.
Proficient or Advanced combines Levels 3 and 4, formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded. California changed the names for 2025–26; the cut scores did not. About the labels →
Share at Proficient or Advanced
● Math┄ English
Gaps in the lines mark years without annual results.
Exact annual results
| Year | Math | English |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 22% | 43% |
| 2022 | — | 73% |
| 2023 | 25% | 58% |
| 2024 | 18% | 27% |
| 2025 | 35% | 65% |
Each year describes that year’s tested students. Changes between years do not follow the same children over time. Cohort-growth evidence, when available, is labeled separately below.
How achievement is distributed
AdvancedStandard Exceeded
25%ProficientStandard Met
10%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
25%MinimalStandard Not Met
40%AdvancedStandard Exceeded
10%ProficientStandard Met
55%DevelopingStandard Nearly Met
15%MinimalStandard Not Met
20%Achievement-level percentages are not percentiles. “Developing” here is a test achievement level, separate from the SchoolScope performance band with the same name.
Annual results and the full academic record
Is it getting better · CAASPP 2019 to 2025
Climbed from the 37th to the 60th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 middle schools.
Most rating sites would stop at “42% proficient” and call it done. California Connections Academy North Bay deserves a closer read. It sits at the 60th percentile of 2,177 California middle schools — but the ranking is the least interesting thing on this page.
California Connections Academy North Bay's low-income kids hit 52.9% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
As a charter, California Connections Academy North Bay enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.
88 tested · 2 of 3 grades published · no cohort tracked
California Connections Academy North Bay scores 40 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 60th percentile of 2,177 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 42% of students meet the standard today, above the 38% who did in 2019.
Percentile among 2,177 middle schools statewide
ELAYellow(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)
ShowHide the by-grade tables, year by year
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 59% | 44% | — | 45% | 38% |
| Grade 8 | 43% | 73% | 58% | 27% | 65% |
| Grade 11 | 65% | 56% | 71% | 38% | 61% |
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 29% | 20% | — | 36% | 31% |
| Grade 8 | 22% | — | 25% | 18% | 35% |
| Grade 11 | 19% | 11% | 7% | 17% | 41% |
Where students land · CAASPP 2024–25
Two in five of students here meet the standard. One in five clear it by a lot.
ELA52% met or exceeded
Exceeded 19%Met 33%Nearly Met 22%Not Met 26%
Math36% met or exceeded
Exceeded 22%Met 13%Nearly Met 27%Not Met 37%
Exceeded Met Nearly Met Not Met
California middle schools · average17% exceeded · 40% met or exceeded
This school against the California average
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 40 | 18% | 42% | — | 26.7% | 1.1% |
| CA average · Middle School | 39 | 17% | 40% | — | 18.1% | 3.6% |
This schoolCA avg
Scope4039
% Exceeded18%17%
% Met+42%40%
Growth——
Absence26.7%18.1%
Suspension1.1%3.6%
California’s growth results and student groups
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25
California's own growth model splits here — the 26th percentile in reading against the 65th in math, among middle schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits about at the middle of California middle schools in reading, and the 65th in math. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 26th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.26th pctile · −6 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 65th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.65th pctile · +6 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Students & opportunity
Who shares in the school’s results?
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25
How every group of students does here
At California Connections Academy North Bay in Middletown, 52.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. California Connections Academy North Bay outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.4% Math proficient); White students (70.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 6.4 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 17 students tested.
Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 47% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 47%, district —, state 40%47%
WhiteWhite: this school 56%, district 44%, state 56%56% · +9 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 56%, district 42%, state 44%56% · +9 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 41%, district 33%, state 32%41% · −6 vs school
MaleMale: this school 50%, district 40%, state 42%50% · +3 vs school
7 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The daily experience
What is it like to be a student here?
Students per teacher
Student–teacher ratio is a schoolwide staffing measure, not an average class size.
Teacher experience
Average teacher experience in the published staffing record. It does not measure individual teacher effectiveness.
Chronically absent
The share of students absent for at least 10% of their enrolled school days. Attendance reflects both school and out-of-school circumstances.
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25
The people teaching here
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Teaching staff217 teachers
Avg. experience11.6 years
Fully credentialed89%
First-year teachers0%
PrincipalRichard Savage
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$55,752 – $95,216
Principal salary$122,416 – $134,842
Superintendent salary$186,732
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
Attendance & discipline · 2024–25
Showing up, and staying in class
Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 26.7%, district 26.8%, state 18.1%26.7% · +8.6pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.1%, district —, state 3.6%1.1% · −2.5pp vs state
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Resources & neighborhood
What sits behind the school experience?
Explore school spending and the district budget
What gets spent · FY 2024–25
Its district spends $12,093 per student, less than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $12,093, CA average $14,491$12,093 · district average
District current expense · FY 2024–25$17,348 per student
District averageCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 58%Instruction support 10%Student services 12%Administration 10%Buildings & maintenance 9%Other 1%
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$12,093 per pupil
2019$11,549 per pupil
2018$11,671 per pupil
2017$10,557 per pupil
2016$11,227 per pupil
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood · ACS 2024
The neighborhood it serves
Context — never part of the Scope Score
Worth knowing
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 44% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Hispanic or Latino33.3% · district 31.6% · CA 56.1%
White45.8% · district 58.9% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.1% · district 0.6% · CA 10.2%
Black4.9% · district 0.3% · CA 4.8%
Other13.9% · district 8.6% · CA 9.0%
GenderFemale 51.4% · Male 45.8% · Non-binary 2.8%
Median income$79K · CA $85K
Median home value$387K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+31% · CA 35%
ZIP population3,422
Median age46 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Culture & philosophy
What is the school’s approach?
School-stated approach · questions for your visit
Look beyond the brochure
A source-reviewed culture summary is not available for this profile yet. Ask how teaching, student support and family communication work day to day.
Read the school’s own website ↗Family voices
What would you want another family to know about the daily experience here?
Ask a current family: “When your child needs help, how does the school respond?”
Educator voices
What should families understand about teaching, support and the school community?
Ask an educator: “How do you adapt a typical day for children with different needs?”
Compare nearby schools
What are the alternatives?
Compare schools serving the same grade stage. Private schools have no comparable state-test score.
2025 · middle schools · combined reading and math measures. Percentiles compare schools within their enrollment group.
No nearby schools in this category are listed. The school being viewed stays visible for reference.
| School | Type | Performance band | Advanced | Proficient or Advanced | Distance | Select |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Connections Academy North Bay | Charter | Solid | 18% | 42% | School being viewed | |
| Middletown Middle | Public | Developing | 10% | 37% | 0.2 mi |
More nearby public and private options
Your other options
Your other options
Nearby public schools across grade levels, plus private options within 10 miles.
Private schools do not receive a Scope Score or statewide ranking on SchoolScope.
2 private schools within 10 miles
Not scored
What should I check before applying?
- District public
- Confirm the attendance boundary and any permit options.
- Charter
- Check applications, priorities and deadlines with each school.
- Private
- Confirm admission requirements, tuition and financial aid.
Moving & enrollment
Which schools could serve my child?
Check enrollment with this charter school
Ask the school about applications, priorities and deadlines for your child’s grade.
School website →Schools across the K–12 journey
Elementary · K–5
Middle · 6–8
High school · 9–12
Source: proximity. Schools are grouped by grade stage. Nearby schools are not confirmed feeder links or address assignments. Verify the current path and eligibility with the district.
Charter enrollment details
Plan your next step
What should I do next?
Worth a school visit
Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is California Connections Academy North Bay a good middle school?
California Connections Academy North Bay has a Scope Score of 40 out of 100, placing it in the 60th percentile of California middle schools and ranked #878 statewide. 18.4% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is near the California average of 17.2%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are California Connections Academy North Bay's CAASPP test scores?
On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 42.3% of students at California Connections Academy North Bay met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 18.4% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 23.9% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 18.4% went beyond it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it shows how many students go beyond the standard rather than only meeting it. 66 student-subject combinations were assessed.
How does California Connections Academy North Bay rank in California?
California Connections Academy North Bay ranks #878 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 60th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.
What is the attendance and school culture like at California Connections Academy North Bay?
26.7% of students at California Connections Academy North Bay are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 18.1%. The suspension rate is 1.1%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.
How does California Connections Academy North Bay compare to other schools in Middletown?
California Connections Academy North Bay scores 40/100 (60th percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. Use the schools in Middletown page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.
How does California Connections Academy North Bay serve low-income and underrepresented students?
At California Connections Academy North Bay in Middletown, 52.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 40.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. California Connections Academy North Bay outperforms its district average for low-income students by 12.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (29.4% Math proficient); White students (70.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 6.4 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 17 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
Use the published evidence to prepare questions, then verify fit and access with the school.
Behind the evidence
Inspect the full record
Public sources, visible methods and the underlying school record. Source years and limitations stay attached to the evidence.
How the Scope Score is calculated
On a narrow screen, scroll the table sideways to see the state comparison and weights.
What the score weighs · CAASPP 2024–25
The 4 things our score weighs
| What we weigh | Here | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 18.4% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 42.3% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 26.7% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
Source CAASPP 2025 · California Department of Education. Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How the score is built
A closer look at the evidence
California Connections Academy North Bay: reading the evidence
California Connections Academy North Bay posts 42% meeting the standard against 40% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.
Subject proficiency describes tested students, while graduation describes a graduating cohort. These figures are not successive stages followed by the same students.
This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Explore the underlying data →Every number: score factors, grades, student groups and downloads
Every number · For the data nerds
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.
California Connections Academy North Bay is ranked #878 statewide.
01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 18.4% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 42.3% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 26.7% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 1.1% | 3.6% | 5% |
- Exceeded standard
- ↑ vs CA 17.2% · index 51 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Met or exceeded
- ↑ vs CA 40.0% · index 52 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint
- Chronic absenteeism
- ↓ vs CA 18.1% · index 39 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 4.4pp lower vs 2024
- Suspension rate
- ↑ vs CA 3.6% · index 60 · 50 = CA middle-school midpoint · ▼ 0.5pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 7 | 13 | 15% | 23% | 46% | 15% | 38% | −9 |
| Grade 8 | 20 | 10% | 55% | 15% | 20% | 65% | +19 |
| Grade 11 | 28 | 21% | 39% | 14% | 25% | 61% | +12 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 7 | 13 | 23% | 8% | 38% | 31% | 31% | −3 |
| Grade 8 | 20 | 25% | 10% | 25% | 40% | 35% | +3 |
| Grade 11 | 29 | 28% | 14% | 31% | 28% | 41% | +18 |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 59 | 17% | 27% | 44% | 12% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 17 | 52.9% | +13 | +15 |
| White | 30 | 70.0% | +20 | +8 |
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Connections Academy North Bay ← | — | 40 | 18.4% | 42.3% | — | — | 1.1% |
| Middletown Middle | 0.2 mi | 28 | 10.1% | 37.4% | −0.9pp | — | 13.4% |
| California average | — | 39 | 17.2% | 40.0% | +1.5pp | — | 3.6% |
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Grade gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 30 | 37 | #1229 | 10.2% | 38.4% | 27.9% | 1.2% | — |
| 2022 | 40 | 66 | #717 | 14.5% | 45.5% | 19.1% | 1.6% | — |
| 2023 | 38 | 65 | #752 | 16.7% | 41.7% | 25.0% | 2.5% | — |
| 2024 | 36 | 52 | #1028 | 15.9% | 31.8% | 31.0% | 1.6% | — |
| 2025 | 40 | 60 | #878 | 18.4% | 42.3% | 26.7% | 1.1% | — |
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
- — Growth data isn't available — the state needs matched grades across years to compute it.
- — Scored here as a middle school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 05 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −6 | 27 | Moderate | +6 | 27 | Accelerated |
| English Only | −9 | 25 | not categorised | +1 | 25 | not categorised |
| White | −14 | 20 | Moderate | +14 | 20 | Accelerated |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −16 | 15 | Moderate | +2 | 15 | Average |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/california-connections-academy-north-bay-9601"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="California Connections Academy North Bay — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,177 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction