ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Academies of the Antelope Valley · Quartz HillCharter

Academies of the Antelope Valley: No single number tells this school's story. Here's the honest picture.

Academies of the Antelope Valley posts 30% meeting the standard and 7.8% exceeding it, against 39% and 16.8% statewide. The gaps and the bright spots below are the real read.

6300 West Avenue L, 93536 (opens in new tab)·Antelope Valley Union High·Quartz Hill·Grades 6-12·677 students·54% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(661) 943-3031·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2022–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2738
% Exceeded8%17%
% Met+30%39%
Growth
Absence12.1%18.5%
Suspension5.2%3.7%
Scope Score
27
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #1,544 statewide

Academies of the Antelope Valley scores 27 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 31st percentile of 2,238 California middle schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “30% proficient” and call it done. Academies of the Antelope Valley deserves a closer read. The school sits in Quartz Hill, where more than half of students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, Academies of the Antelope Valley enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,238 middle schools statewide

Has stayed near the 31st percentile since 2022.

ELAYellow(Increased)MathYellow(Increased)
ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 622%37%21%30%
Grade 747%47%45%48%42%
Grade 849%45%39%40%46%
Grade 1146%60%39%53%52%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 67%15%10%15%
Grade 727%18%25%26%20%
Grade 822%18%19%22%26%
Grade 1112%9%13%7%9%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

27%
71%
Grade 6 · 29% proficient
9%
33%
58%
Grade 7 · 42% proficient
15%
31%
54%
Grade 8 · 46% proficient

The honest read: the share exceeding rises 13.2pp across grades; the floor rises 16.9pp. The state average rises 0.1pp over the same span. Kids here gain ground the longer they stay — the pattern you want to see. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
7.8%
State 16.8%
9.0pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
29.9%
State 39.3%
9.4pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
12.1%
State 18.5%
6.4pp below state avg
Suspension rate
5.2%
State 3.7%
1.5pp above state avg
Grade gap (G6→G8, different students)
+14.1pp
State +1.5pp
No same-cohort record for this school, so growth is left out of its Scope Score altogether and the other measures carry more of the weight. The number here is this year's grade 3 against this year's grade 5 — different children, not a cohort followed over time. Compared against the state's own grade gap, which is the only fair reading of it.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California middle schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 26th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.26th pctile · −6 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −14 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 13th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.13th pctile · −14 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what the school is working on next. Strong numbers tell you where a school is, not where it's going.

  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Academies of the Antelope Valley in Quartz Hill, 36.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Academies of the Antelope Valley outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 316 students tested.

All students at this school: 32% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 32%, district —, state 39%32%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 28%, district 26%, state 32%28% · −4 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 26%, district 22%, state 32%26% · −6 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 32%, district 28%, state 44%32% · +1 vs school
MaleMale: this school 31%, district 25%, state 42%31% · −1 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 49%, district 40%, state 56%49% · +18 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 24%, district 15%, state 26%24% · −7 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 6%, state 15%5% · −26 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 0%, district 3%, state 11%0% · −32 vs school
Two or More RacesTwo or More Races: this school 45%, district 32%, state 56%45% · +14 vs school

7 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 10.5pp from grade 6 to grade 8 at this school. District average: +10.5pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only364 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −4 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 364 students.−4 pts · −4 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students328 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 328 students.−11 pts · −9 vs typical
Low-income students270 studentsLow-income students, reading: −14 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 270 students.−14 pts · −11 vs typical
White62 studentsWhite, reading: +5 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 62 students.+5 pts · +5 vs typical
English Learner58 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 58 students.−15 pts · −10 vs typical
Math
English Only364 studentsEnglish Only, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 364 students.−13 pts · −10 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students327 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −6 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 327 students.−15 pts · −9 vs typical
Low-income students269 studentsLow-income students, math: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 269 students.−15 pts · −10 vs typical
White62 studentsWhite, math: −14 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 62 students.−14 pts · −15 vs typical
English Learner57 studentsEnglish Learner, math: −17 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California middle school, 57 students.−17 pts · −14 vs typical
this school typical California middle school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 3 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 12.1%, district 33.8%, state 18.5%12.1% · −6.4pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 5.2%, district —, state 3.7%5.2% · +1.5pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–612.0%
Grades 7–813.4%
Grades 9–129.0%

Where the path goes

Academies of the Antelope Valley serves grades 6-12 — students can complete middle and high school here, without a separate middle-to-high transition.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 21:1, district 24:121:1
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience12.6 years
Fully credentialed78%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$50,398 – $133,882
Principal salaryUp to $181,958
Superintendent salary$336,653

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $20,810, CA average $14,491$20,810 · spent at this school
Federal share$408 per student

$408 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,987 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction59%
Instruction support12%
Student services12%
Administration5%
Buildings & maintenance11%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$13,452 per pupil
2019$13,747 per pupil
2018$13,693 per pupil
2017$13,553 per pupil
2016$12,151 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic67.5%
District 67.2% · CA 56.1%
White13.0%
District 8.9% · CA 19.9%
Black10.9%
District 16.6% · CA 4.8%
Other7.7%
District 6.2% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.9%
District 1.0% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 54.1% (10pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$107K · CA $85K
Median home value$534K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+26% · CA 35%
ZIP population73,412
Median age37 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

On the state's science test (CAST), 32% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Academies of the Antelope Valley a good middle school?

Academies of the Antelope Valley has a Scope Score of 27 out of 100, placing it in the 31st percentile of California middle schools and ranked #1,544 statewide. 7.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 9.0 percentage points below the California average of 16.8%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for middle schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 6-to-8 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Academies of the Antelope Valley's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 29.9% of students at Academies of the Antelope Valley met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 7.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 22.1% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 7.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 1,025 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Academies of the Antelope Valley rank in California?

Academies of the Antelope Valley ranks #1,544 among California middle schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 31st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 6 to grade 8 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Academies of the Antelope Valley?

12.1% of students at Academies of the Antelope Valley are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 18.5%. The suspension rate is 5.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Academies of the Antelope Valley compare to other schools in Quartz Hill?

Academies of the Antelope Valley scores 27/100 (31st percentile) among California middle schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 677 students. Use the schools in Quartz Hill page or the map view to compare all middle schools nearby.

How does Academies of the Antelope Valley serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Academies of the Antelope Valley in Quartz Hill, 36.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 34.1% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Academies of the Antelope Valley outperforms its district average for low-income students by 2.3 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (14.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (37.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 37.2 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 316 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
7.8%
↓ vs CA 16.8% · 40th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
29.9%
↓ vs CA 39.3% · 42th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
12.1%
↑ vs CA 18.5% · 59th pctile
▲ 0.6pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
5.2%
↓ vs CA 3.7% · 44th pctile
▲ 1.6pp higher vs 2024
Grade gap (G6→G8, different students) · not scored
+14.1pp
↑ vs CA +1.5pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 6882%27%34%36%30%−17
Grade 72129%33%32%26%42%−5
Grade 821315%31%29%24%46%+0
Grade 115616%36%32%16%52%+3
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 6882%13%27%58%15%−20
Grade 72126%15%38%42%20%−13
Grade 821212%14%27%47%26%−6
Grade 11552%7%15%76%9%−15

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide25610%22%59%9%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged31636.4%+2−2
Hispanic/Latino39637.1%−2−2
White6365.1%+10+3
03Nearest middle schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Academies of the Antelope Valley ←277.8%29.9%+14.1pp5.2%
Joe Walker Middle0.8 mi4322.6%49.5%−55.9pp10.2%
Endeavour Middle2.1 mi121.8%11.6%−0.6pp10.6%
California average3816.8%39.3%+1.5pp3.7%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20222533#14417.3%26.1%23.2%6.1%+16.5pp
20232845#11988.9%30.2%16.3%5.3%+3.0pp
20242936#14187.7%27.8%11.5%3.5%+15.8pp
20252731#15447.8%29.9%12.1%5.2%+14.1pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as a middle school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female9.4%11.3%+1.9pp
Male10.8%12.7%+1.9pp
Black/African American14.7%15.7%+1.0pp
White0.0%25.0%+25.0pp
Hispanic/Latino9.7%11.5%+1.8pp
Two or More Races7.9%13.2%+5.3pp
Students with Disabilities21.3%11.4%-9.9pp
English Learners12.1%9.8%-2.3pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged10.8%13.6%+2.8pp
All Students10.0%11.9%+1.9pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−6471Moderate−14470Moderate
English Only−4364not categorised−13364not categorised
Hispanic or Latino−11328Moderate−15327Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−14270Moderate−15269Moderate
White+562Accelerated−1462Moderate
English Learner−1558Moderate−1757Moderate
Black or African American−144Average−1644Moderate
Students with Disabilities−2544Minimal−1044Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only−131not categorised−1430not categorised
English Learners Only−2627not categorised−1827not categorised
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)−2125Minimal−1925Moderate
Two or More Races+521Accelerated−2121Minimal

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/academies-of-the-antelope-valley-6003"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Academies of the Antelope Valley — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,238 middle schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction