School district · Merced County

Weaver Union schools

Weaver Union has two ranked public elementary schools and one middle school. Pioneer Elementary is at the 28th percentile, Farmdale Elementary the 13th and Weaver Middle the 26th, each among the California schools we score at its level (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

  1. Elementary

    Pioneer Elementary

    28thDeveloping

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

    Farmdale Elementary

    13thNeeds Support

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

  2. Middle

    Weaver Middle

    26thDeveloping

    grades 6–8 · spring 2026 tests

  3. High · a separate district

    High school: another district

    Confirm the school for your address with the district.

Schools around Weaver Union

3 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Weaver Union score highest?

Pioneer Elementary’s 28th percentile means it scored higher than 28 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Weaver Union

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Middle schools

Where does the middle school we score in Weaver Union stand?

Weaver Middle’s 26th percentile means it scored higher than 26 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

The district

Where does Weaver Union’s money go, and what does it plan?

Weaver Union spent $19,168 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Weaver Union dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction63%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services10%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$17.1 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 55 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 27% of its $62.6 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 125 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 14%, and the three largest, Class Size TK - 3, Site Maintenance and Interventions K - 5, take 32% between them. The plan itself puts 77% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

8 of the plan’s 55 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Math $0.5 million
  • Catch-up help $1.6 million
  • English learners $0.6 million

Largest of these

  • Interventions K - 5$1.3 million
  • Two-Period Math$485,267
  • ELD Newcomer$414,178
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $15.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $16.1 million and estimates it spent $16.9 million, $0.8 million (5%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $611,406 (4%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Instructional Materials, which went from $734,700 to $40,000.

Largest cuts

  • Instructional Materials−⁠$694,700
  • Extra-Curricular Activities−⁠$341,109
  • Supplemental Computer Based Curriculum Supports−⁠$119,045

Largest increases

  • Library+⁠$463,659
  • 1:1 Devices+⁠$302,951
  • Release Time for Professional Learning+⁠$244,517

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • English Learners and Low-Income pupils continue to demonstrate academic performance gaps, and classroom implementation of high-leverage instructional practices is inconsistent$50,000

Ask: What did Instructional Materials pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $694,700 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 537%36%down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 2 and 532%29%down 3 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoals 2 and 420 in 10020 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoals 2, 4 and 55.8%5.8%no change

Goals 1 and 3 aren’t shown because they track other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Class Size TK - 3 · $2,456,602
  • Site Maintenance · $1,833,031
  • Interventions K - 5 · $1,260,240
The full plan5 goals, 32 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($17.1 million).

Where does the money go?

59% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1 · Maintenance of Progress GoalWeaver will continue to provide an educational experience that includes highly qualified staff, culturally…$10.1 million59% of action budgets

“Weaver will continue to provide an educational experience that includes highly qualified staff, culturally responsive and inclusive curriculum, sufficient and appropriate instructional materials and well maintained, safe and secure school facilities” p. 10 ↗

19 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $9.6 million (+⁠$459,327)

Largest funded actions

  1. Class Size TK - 3$2.5 millionaction 1.2 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Site Maintenance$1.8 millionaction 1.4 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Academic Coaches$1.0 millionaction 1.1 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Supervision$0.9 millionaction 1.7 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. 1:1 Devices$0.8 millionaction 1.6 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

14 more funded actions in this goal

  • Library · action 1.13 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.7 million
  • Facility Needs: Additional Classrooms for Growth · action 1.17 · p. 78 ↗$0.6 million
  • Medical Assistant · action 1.9 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Release Time for Professional Learning · action 1.16 · p. 78 ↗$0.3 million
  • Campus Safety Monitor · action 1.8 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Safety Plans · action 1.12 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Independent Study · action 1.18 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Crossing Guards · action 1.11 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Field Trips · action 1.14 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Recruit and Hire · action 1.19 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Supplemental Computer Based Curriculum Supports · action 1.3 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Instructional Materials · action 1.5 · p. 77 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Surveillance and Alarms · action 1.10 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • TIP and Admin KEYS · action 1.15 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional Materials−⁠$694,700$734,700 → $40,000 · p. 77 ↗
  2. Library+⁠$463,659$207,388 → $671,047 · p. 78 ↗
  3. 1:1 Devices+⁠$302,951$510,896 → $813,847 · p. 77 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Class Size TK - 3 · $2.2 million → $2.5 million · p. 77 ↗+⁠$0.2 million
  • Site Maintenance · $1.9 million → $1.8 million · p. 77 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • Academic Coaches · $1.0 million → $1.0 million · p. 77 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Supervision · $837,576 → $891,719 · p. 77 ↗+⁠$54,143
  • Facility Needs: Additional Classrooms for Growth · $600,000 → $600,000 · p. 78 ↗unchanged
  • Medical Assistant · $279,447 → $309,330 · p. 77 ↗+⁠$29,883
  • Release Time for Professional Learning · $30,000 → $274,517 · p. 78 ↗+⁠$244,517
  • Campus Safety Monitor · $236,220 → $262,507 · p. 77 ↗+⁠$26,287
  • Safety Plans · $275,550 → $250,000 · p. 78 ↗−⁠$25,550
  • Independent Study · $160,450 → $169,839 · p. 78 ↗+⁠$9,389
  • Crossing Guards · $161,354 → $124,825 · p. 78 ↗−⁠$36,529
  • Field Trips · $91,000 → $100,000 · p. 78 ↗+⁠$9,000
  • Recruit and Hire · $90,430 → $95,829 · p. 78 ↗+⁠$5,399
  • Supplemental Computer Based Curriculum Supports · $192,045 → $73,000 · p. 77 ↗−⁠$119,045
  • Surveillance and Alarms · $40,000 → $40,000 · p. 78 ↗unchanged
  • TIP and Admin KEYS · $80,000 → $40,000 · p. 78 ↗−⁠$40,000

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 10 ↗.

Goal 2 · Focus GoalWeaver will show yearly growth for the "All students" group, and show a total improvement of 15% by May 31…$3.7 million22% of action budgets

“Weaver will show yearly growth for the "All students" group, and show a total improvement of 15% by May 31, 2027. We will also lower the achievement gap that exists between the "All Students" group and identified subgroups by 15% by May 31, 2027, as measured by CAASPP 2025/​2026 results in ELA and Math for grades 3-8. Identified subgroups: Unduplicated student groups (English Learners, Socio-economically Disadvantaged and Foster Youth), African American Students and Students With Disabilities” p. 19 ↗

17 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.3 million (+⁠$451,493)

Largest funded actions

  1. Interventions K - 5$1.3 millionaction 2.2 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Alternative Settings$0.7 millionaction 2.5 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Two-Period Math$0.5 millionaction 2.1 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. ELD Newcomer$0.4 millionaction 2.4 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Early Intervention Preschool Expansion$0.2 millionaction 2.18 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

12 more funded actions in this goal

  • ELD Academic Coach · action 2.11 · p. 79 ↗$0.2 million
  • 6 - 8 Intervention/​Enrichment · action 2.3 · p. 78 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $118,402 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • Professional Development · action 2.7 · p. 79 ↗$0.1 million
  • Improving Your Tomorrow · action 2.13 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Content Specific Professional Development · action 2.15 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Development for IEP Compliance · action 2.9 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Foster Youth Policies & Procedures · action 2.12 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Positive Attendance Initiatives · action 2.14 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Small-Group Tutoring for African American Students · action 2.17 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • ELD Professional Development · action 2.10 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • AAPAC · action 2.8 · p. 79 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Restorative Practices · action 2.6 · p. 79 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Interventions K - 5+⁠$0.2 million$1.0 million → $1.3 million · p. 78 ↗
  2. Professional Development+⁠$101,932$20,000 → $121,932 · p. 79 ↗
  3. Alternative Settings+⁠$89,045$609,585 → $698,630 · p. 79 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Two-Period Math · $441,717 → $485,267 · p. 78 ↗+⁠$43,550
  • ELD Newcomer · $419,628 → $414,178 · p. 79 ↗−⁠$5,450
  • Early Intervention Preschool Expansion · $180,000 → $180,000 · p. 80 ↗unchanged
  • ELD Academic Coach · $169,232 → $174,390 · p. 79 ↗+⁠$5,158
  • 6 - 8 Intervention/​Enrichment · $178,941 → $168,402 · p. 78 ↗−⁠$10,539
  • Improving Your Tomorrow · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
  • Content Specific Professional Development · $20,000 → $40,000 · p. 79 ↗+⁠$20,000
  • Professional Development for IEP Compliance · $5,000 → $20,000 · p. 79 ↗+⁠$15,000
  • Foster Youth Policies & Procedures · $18,198 → $17,452 · p. 79 ↗−⁠$746
  • Positive Attendance Initiatives · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
  • Small-Group Tutoring for African American Students · $50,000 → $10,000 · p. 79 ↗−⁠$40,000
  • ELD Professional Development · $3,700 → $3,700 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
  • AAPAC · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 79 ↗unchanged
  • Restorative Practices · $2,000 → $295 · p. 79 ↗−⁠$1,705

How the plan measures it · 8 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 19 ↗.

Goal 3Weaver believes that strong and effective communication between school and home increases meaningful parent…$767,6834% of action budgets

“Weaver believes that strong and effective communication between school and home increases meaningful parent engagement and enhances the overall success of our students” p. 34 ↗

6 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $787,741 (−⁠$20,058)

Largest funded actions

  1. Communication$389,262action 3.4 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. `Community Liaison$341,921action 3.1 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Parent Ed. Courses$12,500action 3.6 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Family/​Community Events$9,000action 3.3 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Parent Surveys$9,000action 3.5 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

1 more funded action in this goal

  • Translation · action 3.2 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$6,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. `Community Liaison+⁠$20,485$321,436 → $341,921 · p. 80 ↗
  2. Communication−⁠$18,543$407,805 → $389,262 · p. 80 ↗
  3. Family/​Community Events−⁠$16,500$25,500 → $9,000 · p. 80 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Parent Ed. Courses · $9,000 → $12,500 · p. 80 ↗+⁠$3,500
  • Parent Surveys · $9,000 → $9,000 · p. 80 ↗unchanged
  • Translation · $15,000 → $6,000 · p. 80 ↗−⁠$9,000

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 34 ↗.

Goal 4Weaver will provide supports to promote school connectedness and support the social-emotional…$2.5 million15% of action budgets

“Weaver will provide supports to promote school connectedness and support the social-emotional well-being/​mental health of our students” p. 42 ↗

11 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $2.8 million (−⁠$279,356)

Largest funded actions

  1. Counseling$948,105action 4.4 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Behavior Specialists$391,801action 4.2 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Extended Learning Opportunities$355,000action 4.11 · p. 81 ↗
  4. Extra-Curricular Activities$312,408action 4.1 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Preschool Program Coordinator$178,743action 4.5 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

6 more funded actions in this goal

  • Benchmark Assessments · action 4.6 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$129,406
  • Site Block Grants · action 4.3 · p. 80 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$69,000
  • Additional Transportation · action 4.8 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$50,000
  • Bus Route to Grove · action 4.9 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$50,000
  • Mental Health Referrals · action 4.7 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$5,000
  • Wellness Committee · action 4.12 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$5,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Extra-Curricular Activities−⁠$341,109$653,517 → $312,408 · p. 80 ↗
  2. Counseling+⁠$57,080$891,025 → $948,105 · p. 80 ↗
  3. Preschool Program Coordinator+⁠$10,909$167,834 → $178,743 · p. 80 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Behavior Specialists · $393,443 → $391,801 · p. 80 ↗−⁠$1,642
  • Extended Learning Opportunities · $355,000 → $355,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged
  • Benchmark Assessments · $134,000 → $129,406 · p. 81 ↗−⁠$4,594
  • Site Block Grants · $69,000 → $69,000 · p. 80 ↗unchanged
  • Additional Transportation · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged
  • Bus Route to Grove · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged
  • Mental Health Referrals · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged
  • Wellness Committee · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 9 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 42 ↗.

Goal 5 · Focus GoalBoth as a District, and individual school we will move the identified Target Groups out of the lowest…$52,000under 1% of action budgets

“Both as a District, and individual school we will move the identified Target Groups out of the lowest performing classification (RED) on the California Dashboard Status & Change 5X5 rubric. We will do this by showing yearly improvement on the Dashboard in in following identified groups: (District- wide - *Foster Youth = Suspensions +12.7%) /​/ (Pioneer Elementary - *EL Students = ELPI -17.4%, *Special Education Students = ELA -23.5%) /​/ (Weaver Middle School - *EL Students = ELA -15.8%, Math -16.2% & Suspensions +16%- *Special Education Students = ELA -4.3% & Math -7.7% - *White Students = Suspensions +0.8%) For reference ELA, Math & ELPI are improved when you see "Increases", as that indicates students are getting closer to being proficient. In Suspensions a "Decrease" indicates an improvement as it shows a lower percentage of students are being suspended” p. 51 ↗

2 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $52,000 (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. English Learners and Low-Income pupils continue to demonstrate academic performance gaps, and classroom implementation of high-leverage instructional practices is inconsistent$50,000action 5.2 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. District Subgroup Discipline Team$2,000action 5.1 · p. 81 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • English Learners and Low-Income pupils continue to demonstrate academic performance gaps, and classroom implementation of high-leverage instructional practices is inconsistent · $50,000 · p. 81 ↗new or renamed
  • District Subgroup Discipline Team · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 81 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 4 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 51 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 3,047 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 72%2. Asian: 13%3. White: 7%4. Black or African American: 4%5. Two or more races: 2%6. Not reported: 1%7. Filipino: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino72%
  2. Asian13%
  3. White7%
  4. Black or African American4%
  5. Two or more races2%
  6. Not reported1%
  7. Filipino<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

93%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 2,821 of 3,047 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Weaver Union extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 41% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (220 of 539 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

2 schools getting state support, 2025–26

Farmdale Elementary (Targeted support) · Weaver Middle (Targeted support)

  • Farmdale ElementaryTargeted support: homeless students and White students
  • Weaver MiddleTargeted support: Black or African American students, students with disabilities and students of two or more races

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (3)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Weaver Union rank highest?

Elementary: Pioneer Elementary, 28th percentile (Developing). Middle: Weaver Middle, 26th percentile (Developing). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Weaver Union district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (4)

Are the public schools in Weaver Union good?

Weaver Union’s 2 public elementary schools run from the 13th to the 28th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Weaver Union has one public middle school we score, Weaver Middle, at the 26th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How much does Weaver Union spend per student?

Weaver Union spent $19,168 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Weaver Union dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Weaver Union’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $17.1 million into 55 funded actions in 5 goals, 27% of its $62.6 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $10.1 million, 59% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Weaver Union, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.