School district · Merced County

Gustine Unified schools

Gustine Unified has two ranked public elementary schools, one middle school and one high school. Romero Elementary is at the 52nd percentile, Gustine Elementary the 7th, Gustine Middle the 29th and Gustine High the 34th, each among the California schools we score at its level (spring 2026 tests; high schools, spring 2025).

  1. Elementary

    Romero Elementary

    52ndSolid

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

    Gustine Elementary

    7thNeeds Support

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

  2. Middle

    Gustine Middle

    29thDeveloping

    grades 6–8 · spring 2026 tests

  3. High

    Gustine High

    34thDeveloping

    grades 9–12 · spring 2025 tests

Schools around Gustine Unified

4 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Gustine Unified score highest?

Romero Elementary’s 52nd percentile means it scored higher than 52 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Gustine Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Middle schools

Where does the middle school we score in Gustine Unified stand?

Gustine Middle’s 29th percentile means it scored higher than 29 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

High schools

Where does the high school we score in Gustine Unified stand?

Gustine High’s 34th percentile means it scored higher than 34 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

The district

Where does Gustine Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Gustine Unified spent $21,251 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 56 cents of every Gustine Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction56%
  • Instruction support11%
  • Student services12%
  • Administration9%
  • Buildings & maintenance11%
  • Other1%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$8.0 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 31 funded actions in 4 goals. That’s 23% of its $35.5 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 151 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 44% of the money. The plan itself puts 69% of it toward staff.

  • Support Services for Social Emotional and Mental Health $1.3 million
  • High Quality Staff Professional Development and Instructional Coaching $1.2 million
  • Safe Facitlities $1.0 million
  • 28 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

5 of the plan’s 31 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $10,000
  • Math $50,000
  • Catch-up help $669,380
  • English learners $1,500

Largest of these

  • Academic Intervention$413,070
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)$256,310
  • Increase Achievement in Mathematics$50,000
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $6.9 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $7.8 million and estimates it spent $8.9 million, $1.1 million (14%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $1.2 million (13%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Curriculum and Instruction, which went from $525,000 to $72,795.

Largest cuts

  • Curriculum and Instruction−⁠$452,205
  • School Safety and Positive Learning Environment−⁠$287,030
  • Additional Student Supports−⁠$283,061

Largest increases

  • Safe Facitlities+⁠$424,260
  • Support Services for Social Emotional and Mental Health+⁠$175,504
  • Educational Technology Integration+⁠$113,356

Ask: What did Curriculum and Instruction pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $452,205 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 126%31%up 5 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 115%19%up 4 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 2 · Positive School Climate and Culture29 in 10025 in 1004 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 2 · Positive School Climate and Culture4.4%3.4%down 1.0 pts

Goal 4 tracks named schools and Goal 3 tracks other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Support Services for Social Emotional and Mental Health · $1,287,355
  • High Quality Staff Professional Development and Instructional Coaching · $1,185,282
  • Safe Facitlities · $1,042,760
The full plan4 goals, 62 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($8.0 million).

Where does the money go?

53% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Gustine Unified School District will increase student achievement and prepare students to be college and…$4.2 million53% of action budgets

“Gustine Unified School District will increase student achievement and prepare students to be college and career ready by providing opportunities for access to a broad course of study, academic counseling and intervention supports, technology and research based curriculum, provided by a high quality professional staff, as evidenced by state and local data” p. 15 ↗

16 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $5.3 million (−⁠$1.1 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. High Quality Staff Professional Development and Instructional Coaching$1.2 millionaction 1.4 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $550,923 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. College and Career Readiness$0.7 millionaction 1.6 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Additional Student Supports$0.6 millionaction 1.7 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $177,500 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Academic Intervention$0.4 millionaction 1.2 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Academic Counseling$0.4 millionaction 1.9 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

11 more funded actions in this goal

  • Educational Technology Integration · action 1.10 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) · action 1.3 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Experiential Learning · action 1.5 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • English Language Learner Supports · action 1.8 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Curriculum and Instruction · action 1.1 · p. 108 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Increase Achievement in Mathematics · action 1.16 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Supplies for Unduplicated · action 1.11 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Celebrations of Learning and Incentives · action 1.17 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Increased Achievement in English Language Arts · action 1.15 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Classroom Environment · action 1.12 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Long Term English Learners · action 1.18 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Curriculum and Instruction−⁠$452,205$525,000 → $72,795 · p. 108 ↗
  2. Additional Student Supports−⁠$283,061$892,525 → $609,464 · p. 108 ↗
  3. Academic Intervention−⁠$202,758$615,828 → $413,070 · p. 108 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • High Quality Staff Professional Development and Instructional Coaching · $1.3 million → $1.2 million · p. 108 ↗−⁠$0.1 million
  • College and Career Readiness · $664,997 → $726,250 · p. 108 ↗+⁠$61,253
  • Academic Counseling · $328,000 → $362,194 · p. 108 ↗+⁠$34,194
  • Educational Technology Integration · $160,000 → $273,356 · p. 109 ↗+⁠$113,356
  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) · $209,500 → $256,310 · p. 108 ↗+⁠$46,810
  • Experiential Learning · $109,500 → $155,666 · p. 108 ↗+⁠$46,166
  • English Language Learner Supports · $104,166 → $97,349 · p. 108 ↗−⁠$6,817
  • Increase Achievement in Mathematics · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 109 ↗unchanged
  • Supplies for Unduplicated · $14,500 → $15,500 · p. 109 ↗+⁠$1,000
  • Celebrations of Learning and Incentives · $23,910 → $14,500 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$9,410
  • Increased Achievement in English Language Arts · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 109 ↗unchanged
  • Classroom Environment · $60,000 → $5,500 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$54,500
  • Long Term English Learners · $7,000 → $1,500 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$5,500

How the plan measures it · 40 measures · 2 quoted

  • Percent of Teachers that are highly qualified (LCFF p. 16 ↗
    Baseline
    71.2% (TAMO 2022- 2023)
    Target for year 3
    80%
  • Rate of Teacher Misassignments (LCFF p. 16 ↗
    Baseline
    2.5% (TAMO 2022-23)
    Target for year 3
    0

38 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Positive School Climate and Culture$3.6 million45% of action budgets

“GUSD will provide an inclusive and supportive learning environment by providing clean and safe facilities, student support services for social emotional learning and mental health, as well as extra and co-curricular activities as measured by state and local data” p. 54 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.7 million (−⁠$45,662)

Largest funded actions

  1. Support Services for Social Emotional and Mental Health$1.3 millionaction 2.2 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Safe Facitlities$1.0 millionaction 2.1 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. School Safety and Positive Learning Environment$0.7 millionaction 2.5 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Health Services for Low income, Foster Youth, SPED$0.4 millionaction 2.3 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Engagement, Enrichment, and Leadership$0.1 millionaction 2.4 · p. 109 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Attendance · action 2.7 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Positive Behavior Intervention Supports (PBIS), Restorative Practices, and other behavioral support · action 2.6 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Safe Facitlities+⁠$0.4 million$0.6 million → $1.0 million · p. 109 ↗
  2. School Safety and Positive Learning Environment−⁠$0.3 million$1.0 million → $0.7 million · p. 110 ↗
  3. Support Services for Social Emotional and Mental Health+⁠$0.2 million$1.1 million → $1.3 million · p. 109 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Health Services for Low income, Foster Youth, SPED · $409,500 → $372,062 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$37,438
  • Engagement, Enrichment, and Leadership · $162,500 → $79,225 · p. 109 ↗−⁠$83,275
  • Attendance · $146,161 → $73,611 · p. 110 ↗−⁠$72,550
  • Positive Behavior Intervention Supports (PBIS), Restorative Practices, and other behavioral support · $84,008 → $28,875 · p. 110 ↗−⁠$55,133

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 54 ↗.

Goal 3Parent, Family, and Community Partnerships$93,4021% of action budgets

“GUSD will create partnerships with parents, families and the community to provide meaningful opportunities that will build the capacity of all in order to inform and enhance student achievement as well as celebrate student learning” p. 76 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $178,930 (−⁠$85,528)

Largest funded actions

  1. Structures for Communication$37,220action 3.5 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Family Partnerships$26,082action 3.4 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Parent Capacity Building$19,000action 3.1 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Engagement Opportunities$8,100action 3.2 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Child Care for Parents to Engage$3,000action 3.3 · p. 110 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Parent Capacity Building−⁠$43,500$62,500 → $19,000 · p. 110 ↗
  2. Engagement Opportunities−⁠$28,230$36,330 → $8,100 · p. 110 ↗
  3. Structures for Communication−⁠$12,380$49,600 → $37,220 · p. 110 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Family Partnerships · $20,500 → $26,082 · p. 110 ↗+⁠$5,582
  • Child Care for Parents to Engage · $10,000 → $3,000 · p. 110 ↗−⁠$7,000

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 76 ↗.

Goal 4 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalEquity Multiplier Pioneer High School$77,0001% of action budgets

“Starting in the 2024-2025 school year, Equity Multiplier funds were made available for schools which met the non-stability rate and high socioeconomically disadvantaged rates. By June 6th, 2026, Pioneer High School will increase the College and Career Indicator by 5% and achieve a 5% increase in the Graduation rate on the CA Dashboard” p. 84 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $50,535 (+⁠$26,465)

Largest funded actions

  1. Learning Classrooms$50,000action 4.3 · p. 110 ↗
  2. Counseling Support$15,000action 4.2 · p. 110 ↗
  3. College and Career Preparedness$12,000action 4.1 · p. 110 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Learning Classrooms+⁠$30,000$20,000 → $50,000 · p. 110 ↗
  2. College and Career Preparedness−⁠$3,535$15,535 → $12,000 · p. 110 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Counseling Support · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 110 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 5 measures · 2 quoted

  • Graduation Rate CA Dashboard p. 85 ↗
    Baseline
    89.5% Graduated
    Target for year 3
    95% graduated
  • Percent of students who received two individual Academic Counseling sessions during the school year p. 85 ↗
    Baseline
    39%
    Target for year 3
    100%

3 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 1,627 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 88%2. White: 8%3. Not reported: 1%4. Two or more races: 1%5. Filipino: <1%6. Asian: <1%7. Black or African American: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino88%
  2. White8%
  3. Not reported1%
  4. Two or more races1%
  5. Filipino<1%
  6. Asian<1%
  7. Black or African American<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

81%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,314 of 1,627 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Gustine Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 46% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (211 of 456 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Gustine High (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (1)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Gustine Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Romero Elementary, 52nd percentile (Solid). Middle: Gustine Middle, 29th percentile (Developing). High: Gustine High, 34th percentile (Developing). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Gustine Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (4)

Are the public schools in Gustine Unified good?

Gustine Unified’s 2 public elementary schools run from the 7th to the 52nd percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Needs Support. Gustine Unified has one public middle school we score, Gustine Middle, at the 29th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing. Gustine Unified has one public high school we score, Gustine High, at the 34th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How much does Gustine Unified spend per student?

Gustine Unified spent $21,251 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 56 cents of every Gustine Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Gustine Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $8.0 million into 31 funded actions in 4 goals, 23% of its $35.5 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $4.2 million, 53% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Gustine Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.