School district · Sacramento County

Galt Joint Union Elementary schools

Galt Joint Union Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 5 public elementary schools run from the 24th to the 64th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 5 schools

from 24th to 64th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Lake Canyon Elementary: 64th percentile, Solid
  • River Oaks Elementary: 60th percentile, Solid
  • Vernon E. Greer Elementary: 48th percentile, Developing
  • Marengo Ranch Elementary: 34th percentile, Developing
  • Valley Oaks Elementary: 24th percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
2Developing
2Solid
0Strong

Middle · 1 school

at 50th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Robert L. McCaffrey Middle: 50th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

Schools around the Galt Joint Union Elementary district

6 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district score highest?

Lake Canyon Elementary is highest, at the 64th percentile.

That’s higher than 64 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 2 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district had 13 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Where does the middle school we score in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district stand?

Robert L. McCaffrey Middle is at the 50th percentile.

That’s higher than 50 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). It’s the only public middle school we score in Galt Joint Union Elementary.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

The district

Where does Galt Joint Union Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Galt Joint Union Elementary district spent $17,817 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 68 cents of every Galt Joint Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction68%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services6%
  • Administration7%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$36.6 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 29 funded actions in 2 goals. That’s 59% of its $61.8 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 112 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 54% of the money. The plan itself puts 85% of it toward staff.

  • Certificated Teaching Staff $14.0 million
  • Expanded Learning Programs $2.9 million
  • Administrative Staffing $2.8 million
  • 26 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

4 of the plan’s 29 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name catch-up help or English learners
  • Catch-up help $0.1 million
  • English learners $1.6 million

Largest of these

  • Dual Language Immersion (DLI) Program$1.2 million
  • Long Term English Learners$315,540
  • English Learners-ELD$84,272
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $7.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $7.8 million and estimates it spent $10.9 million, $3.1 million (41%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $450,433 (1%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Instructional Assistant (IA) Support, which went from $843,348 to $413,038.

Largest cuts

  • Instructional Assistant (IA) Support−⁠$430,310
  • Administrative Staffing−⁠$100,001

Largest increases

  • Professional Learning+⁠$100,000

Ask: What did Instructional Assistant (IA) Support pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $430,310 less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 153%53%no change
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 140%40%no change
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 214 in 10015 in 1001 more in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 23.1%3.5%up 0.4 pts

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Certificated Teaching Staff · $14,012,171
  • Expanded Learning Programs · $2,949,051
  • Administrative Staffing · $2,781,176
The full plan2 goals, 29 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($36.6 million).

Where does the money go?

77% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Engaging all learners with a focus on academic rigor using inclusive practices in a variety of learning environments$28.1 million77% of action budgets

22 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $28.5 million (−⁠$450,433) · p. 20 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Certificated Teaching Staff$14.0 millionaction 1.2 · p. 71 ↗
  2. Administrative Staffing$2.8 millionaction 1.4 · p. 71 ↗
  3. School Readiness$2.4 millionaction 1.1 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $980,821 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Class Size$1.7 millionaction 1.5 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Transportation Services$1.5 millionaction 1.16 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

17 more funded actions in this goal

  • Dual Language Immersion (DLI) Program · action 1.8 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$1.2 million
  • California Content Standards · action 1.12 · p. 72 ↗$0.8 million
  • Technology for Instruction and Learning · action 1.14 · p. 72 ↗$0.7 million
  • Online Learning Courseware · action 1.13 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $140,015 is state funding counted toward those services$0.5 million
  • Instructional Assistant (IA) Support · action 1.7 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $208,038 is state funding counted toward those services$0.4 million
  • Academics · action 1.20 · p. 72 ↗$0.4 million
  • Long Term English Learners · action 1.22 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Alternative Educational Options · action 1.11 · p. 72 ↗$0.3 million
  • AVID Program · action 1.6 · p. 71 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Professional Learning · action 1.10 · p. 72 ↗$0.2 million
  • College and Career Pathways · action 1.17 · p. 72 ↗$0.2 million
  • Intern Teachers · action 1.3 · p. 71 ↗$0.1 million
  • English Learners-ELD · action 1.21 · p. 73 ↗$0.1 million
  • Academic Conferences/​MTSS · action 1.9 · p. 72 ↗$0.1 million
  • Parental Participation in LCAP process · action 1.19 · p. 72 ↗$0.1 million
  • Parent Involvement/​Family Engagement · action 1.18 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Parent Engagement and Participation · action 1.15 · p. 72 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional Assistant (IA) Support−⁠$430,310$843,348 → $413,038 · p. 71 ↗
  2. Administrative Staffing−⁠$0.1 million$2.9 million → $2.8 million · p. 71 ↗
  3. Professional Learning+⁠$100,000$140,000 → $240,000 · p. 72 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Certificated Teaching Staff · $14.0 million → $14.0 million · p. 71 ↗unchanged
  • School Readiness · $2.4 million → $2.4 million · p. 71 ↗unchanged
  • Class Size · $1.7 million → $1.7 million · p. 71 ↗unchanged
  • Transportation Services · $1.5 million → $1.5 million · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Dual Language Immersion (DLI) Program · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 71 ↗unchanged
  • California Content Standards · $759,409 → $759,409 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Technology for Instruction and Learning · $680,293 → $680,293 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Online Learning Courseware · $540,015 → $540,015 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Academics · $406,018 → $406,018 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Long Term English Learners · $315,540 → $315,540 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Alternative Educational Options · $274,104 → $274,103 · p. 72 ↗−⁠$0
  • AVID Program · $258,831 → $258,831 · p. 71 ↗unchanged
  • College and Career Pathways · $200,000 → $200,000 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Intern Teachers · $111,000 → $90,878 · p. 71 ↗−⁠$20,122
  • English Learners-ELD · $84,272 → $84,272 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Academic Conferences/​MTSS · $75,000 → $75,000 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Parental Participation in LCAP process · $60,000 → $60,000 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Parent Involvement/​Family Engagement · $20,400 → $20,400 · p. 72 ↗unchanged
  • Parent Engagement and Participation · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 72 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 18 measures · 2 quoted

  • 100% of Students taught with CCSS aligned ELA, Math, ELD & NGSS curriculum and supplemental bridge resources will be maintained at 100% p. 28 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-24 District Data Maintained 100%
    Target for year 3
    2026-27 District Data Maintained 100%
  • School Readiness direct services to unduplicated families will increase by at least 25 families each year p. 28 ↗
    Baseline
    2023-2024 263 unduplicated families were served
    Target for year 3
    338 unduplicated families were served

16 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 2Promoting PreK-8 whole learner development through social and emotional learning opportunities in a variety…$8.6 million23% of action budgets

“Promoting PreK-8 whole learner development through social and emotional learning opportunities in a variety of safe and supportive environments” p. 47 ↗

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $8.6 million (unchanged)

Largest funded actions

  1. Expanded Learning Programs$2.9 millionaction 2.3 · p. 73 ↗
  2. Facilities$2.5 millionaction 2.4 · p. 73 ↗
  3. Behavior$1.2 millionaction 2.6 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $358,387 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Mental Health Supports$0.9 millionaction 2.1 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $569,992 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Safety$0.8 millionaction 2.2 · p. 73 ↗

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • Chronic Absenteeism · action 2.7 · p. 73 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $180,937 is state funding counted toward those services$0.2 million
  • SEL Curriculum · action 2.5 · p. 73 ↗under $0.1 million

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Expanded Learning Programs · $2.9 million → $2.9 million · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Facilities · $2.5 million → $2.5 million · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Behavior · $1.2 million → $1.2 million · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Mental Health Supports · $851,629 → $851,629 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Safety · $831,025 → $831,025 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • Chronic Absenteeism · $245,862 → $245,862 · p. 73 ↗unchanged
  • SEL Curriculum · $20,000 → $20,000 · p. 73 ↗unchanged

How the plan measures it · 11 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 47 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 3,452 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 62%2. White: 28%3. Two or more races: 4%4. Asian: 4%5. Filipino: 1%6. Black or African American: 1%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino62%
  2. White28%
  3. Two or more races4%
  4. Asian4%
  5. Filipino1%
  6. Black or African American1%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

56%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 1,851 of 3,281 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Galt Joint Union Elementary isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 47% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (204 of 434 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (2)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Lake Canyon Elementary, 64th percentile (Solid). Middle: Robert L. McCaffrey Middle, 50th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district good?

Galt Joint Union Elementary’s 5 public elementary schools run from the 24th to the 64th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Solid, 2 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Galt Joint Union Elementary has one public middle school we score, Robert L. McCaffrey Middle, at the 50th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district had 13 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the Galt Joint Union Elementary district spend per student?

The Galt Joint Union Elementary district spent $17,817 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 68 cents of every Galt Joint Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Galt Joint Union Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $36.6 million into 29 funded actions in 2 goals, 59% of its $61.8 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $28.1 million, 77% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Galt Joint Union Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.