School district · Madera County

Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary schools

Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary has three ranked public schools. Percentiles by stage, each among the California schools we score at its level (spring 2026 tests): Wasuma Elementary, 37th at elementary and 55th at middle; Oakhurst Elementary, 8th at elementary; Oak Creek Intermediate, 24th at middle. High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

  1. Elementary

    Wasuma Elementary

    37thDeveloping

    grades K–8 · spring 2026 tests

    Oakhurst Elementary

    8thNeeds Support

    grades K–5 · spring 2026 tests

  2. Middle

    Wasuma Elementary

    55thSolid

    grades K–8 · spring 2026 tests

    Oak Creek Intermediate

    24thNeeds Support

    grades 6–8 · spring 2026 tests

  3. High · a separate district

    High school: another district

    Confirm the school for your address with the district.

Fresno Flats Community Day: community day school: students are placed here by probation, district or voluntary referral, including after an expulsion, so we don’t rank it.

Schools around the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district

4 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district score highest?

Wasuma Elementary’s 37th percentile means it scored higher than 37 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district score highest?

Wasuma Elementary’s 55th percentile means it scored higher than 55 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

1 middle school not ranked statewide
  • Fresno Flats Community DayCommunity day school: students are placed here by probation, district or voluntary referral, including after an expulsion, so we don’t rank it

The district

Where does Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district spent $20,935 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction59%
  • Instruction support9%
  • Student services13%
  • Administration9%
  • Buildings & maintenance10%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$10.5 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 25 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 70% of its $15.2 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 133 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 66% of the money. The plan itself puts 76% of it toward staff.

  • Highly-qualified Staff $4.2 million
  • Clean, Caring, Safe and Secure Learning Environments $1.7 million
  • Extended Learning Opportunities/AfterSchool Programs/Eagle Academy/B.L.I.S.S $1.0 million
  • 22 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 25 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $10,000
  • Math $10,000
  • Catch-up help $524,042
  • English learners $42,803

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Response to Intervention$497,322
  • English Language Development Program$32,803
  • Response to Intervention and Special Education Curriculum$26,720
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $2.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $2.4 million and estimates it spent $2.5 million, $0.1 million (2%) more than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $451,183 (4%) lower than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Highly-qualified Staff, which went from $4.4 million to $4.2 million.

Largest cuts

  • Highly-qualified Staff−⁠$194,704
  • Behavioral and Social-Emotional Health & Safety Program−⁠$150,258
  • Physical Health & Fitness Program and Extra-Curricular Activities−⁠$120,538

Largest increases

  • Educational Technology Department+⁠$58,530
  • School-to-Home Communications Program, Educational Partner Meetings, and Special Events+⁠$34,060

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Response to Intervention and Special Education Curriculum$26,720
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 236%34%down 2 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 227%23%down 4 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 226 in 10025 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 27.9%5.9%down 2.0 pts

Goal 3 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Highly-qualified Staff · $4,228,190
  • Clean, Caring, Safe and Secure Learning Environments · $1,687,439
  • Extended Learning Opportunities/​AfterSchool Programs/​Eagle Academy/​B.L.I.S.S · $1,033,326
The full plan3 goals, 38 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($10.5 million).

Where does the money go?

68% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Each and every student will receive high-quality instruction and learning opportunities that will prepare…$7.1 million68% of action budgets

“Each and every student will receive high-quality instruction and learning opportunities that will prepare them for high school and their post-secondary pursuits (college, trade school, military, and/​or the workplace), provided by highly qualified professionals in clean, caring, safe, and secure environments” p. 20 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $7.4 million (−⁠$225,100)

Largest funded actions

  1. Highly-qualified Staff$4.2 millionaction 1.6 · p. 92 ↗
  2. Clean, Caring, Safe and Secure Learning Environments$1.7 millionaction 1.4 · p. 92 ↗
  3. Educational Technology Department$0.8 millionaction 1.3 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $630,486 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Professional Development$0.2 millionaction 1.1 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $149,570 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Healthy Students and Staff$0.2 millionaction 1.5 · p. 92 ↗

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Response to Intervention and Special Education Curriculum · action 1.2 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Students with Disabilities Math and ELA Achievement (District and Oak Creek Intermediate) - Required Action and D.A. Action · action 1.7 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Supports for English Learners · action 1.8 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Hispanic Students Math and ELA Achievement (Oak Creek Intermediate) - Required action · action 1.9 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Support for Long Term English Learners (LTEL) · action 1.10 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Highly-qualified Staff−⁠$0.2 million$4.4 million → $4.2 million · p. 92 ↗
  2. Clean, Caring, Safe and Secure Learning Environments−⁠$0.1 million$1.7 million → $1.7 million · p. 92 ↗
  3. Educational Technology Department+⁠$58,530$737,805 → $796,335 · p. 92 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Professional Development · $212,134 → $192,165 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$19,969
  • Healthy Students and Staff · $190,814 → $179,699 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$11,115
  • Response to Intervention and Special Education Curriculum · $26,720 · p. 92 ↗new or renamed
  • Students with Disabilities Math and ELA Achievement (District and Oak Creek Intermediate) - Required Action and D.A. Action · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged
  • Supports for English Learners · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged
  • Hispanic Students Math and ELA Achievement (Oak Creek Intermediate) - Required action · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged
  • Support for Long Term English Learners (LTEL) · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 93 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 19 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 20 ↗.

Goal 2Each and every student will receive access to high-quality intervention and support programs, services, and…$3.2 million31% of action budgets

“Each and every student will receive access to high-quality intervention and support programs, services, and enrichment activities, with an emphasis on individualizing academic and social- emotional behavioral health & safety challenges and responsibilities, in physically, emotionally, and cognitively safe learning environments” p. 44 ↗

10 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.5 million (−⁠$264,346)

Largest funded actions

  1. Extended Learning Opportunities/​AfterSchool Programs/​Eagle Academy/​B.L.I.S.S$1.0 millionaction 2.3 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $128,698 is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Transportation$0.8 millionaction 2.8 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $773,650 is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Behavioral and Social-Emotional Health & Safety Program$0.5 millionaction 2.1 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $380,278 is state funding counted toward those services
  4. Response to Intervention$0.5 millionaction 2.2 · p. 93 ↗
  5. Physical Health & Fitness Program and Extra-Curricular Activities$0.2 millionaction 2.10 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $221,577 is state funding counted toward those services

5 more funded actions in this goal

  • Attendance · action 2.12 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • English Language Development Program · action 2.4 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $29,863 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Foster Youth and Homeless Student Activities · action 2.11 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • California Cadet Corps leadership program · action 2.6 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2,700 is state funding counted toward those servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Comprehensive School Safety Program · action 2.9 · p. 93 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Behavioral and Social-Emotional Health & Safety Program−⁠$150,258$661,135 → $510,877 · p. 93 ↗
  2. Physical Health & Fitness Program and Extra-Curricular Activities−⁠$120,538$365,882 → $245,344 · p. 93 ↗
  3. Response to Intervention−⁠$35,217$532,539 → $497,322 · p. 93 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Extended Learning Opportunities/​AfterSchool Programs/​Eagle Academy/​B.L.I.S.S · $1.0 million · p. 93 ↗not compared
  • Transportation · $805,077 → $818,516 · p. 93 ↗+⁠$13,439
  • Attendance · $59,610 → $62,370 · p. 94 ↗+⁠$2,760
  • English Language Development Program · $30,676 → $32,803 · p. 93 ↗+⁠$2,127
  • Foster Youth and Homeless Student Activities · $20,840 → $24,520 · p. 93 ↗+⁠$3,680
  • California Cadet Corps leadership program · $13,130 → $13,934 · p. 93 ↗+⁠$804
  • Comprehensive School Safety Program · $34,385 → $2,500 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$31,885

How the plan measures it · 12 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 44 ↗.

Goal 3Each and every educational partner will receive opportunities to engage in the learning process by promoting…$172,1722% of action budgets

“Each and every educational partner will receive opportunities to engage in the learning process by promoting opportunities that strengthen skills, competencies, and abilities of students, parents, staff, and the community” p. 64 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $133,909 (+⁠$38,263)

Largest funded actions

  1. School-to-Home Communications Program, Educational Partner Meetings, and Special Events$110,757action 3.6 · p. 94 ↗
  2. School Site Councils and Parent Advisory Groups$45,780action 3.4 · p. 94 ↗
  3. Educational Partners Survey$5,635action 3.3 · p. 94 ↗
  4. Health & Wellness Committee$5,000action 3.1 · p. 94 ↗
  5. District Safety Committee$5,000action 3.2 · p. 94 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. School-to-Home Communications Program, Educational Partner Meetings, and Special Events+⁠$34,060$76,697 → $110,757 · p. 94 ↗
  2. School Site Councils and Parent Advisory Groups+⁠$22,650$23,130 → $45,780 · p. 94 ↗
  3. District Safety Committee−⁠$18,130$23,130 → $5,000 · p. 94 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Educational Partners Survey · $5,476 → $5,635 · p. 94 ↗+⁠$159
  • Health & Wellness Committee · $5,476 → $5,000 · p. 94 ↗−⁠$476

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 64 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 809 students
1. White: 64%2. Hispanic or Latino: 26%3. Two or more races: 5%4. American Indian or Alaska Native: 3%5. Asian: 1%6. Filipino: <1%7. Not reported: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. White64%
  2. Hispanic or Latino26%
  3. Two or more races5%
  4. American Indian or Alaska Native3%
  5. Asian1%
  6. Filipino<1%
  7. Not reported<1%
  8. Black or African American0%
  9. Pacific Islander0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

73%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 586 of 808 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 54% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (25 of 46 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (1)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Wasuma Elementary, 37th percentile (Developing). Middle: Wasuma Elementary, 55th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (4)

Are the public schools in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district good?

Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary’s 2 public elementary schools run from the 8th to the 37th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Developing and 1 Needs Support. Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary’s 2 public middle schools run from the 24th to the 55th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Needs Support. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How much does the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district spend per student?

The Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district spent $20,935 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 59 cents of every Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $10.5 million into 25 funded actions in 3 goals, 70% of its $15.2 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $7.1 million, 68% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the Bass Lake Joint Union Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.