Yellen Learning CenterPublicPalmdale, CAGrades K-858 students
Yellen Learning Center: A special education center. No Scope Score publishes here.
A Scope Score ranks schools a family can choose between. At Yellen Learning Center, students are placed here by an IEP team, not by address and not by lottery — so a comparative rank would measure something a family's choice never entered. We show what California reports and hold the rank.
special education center
no score · no band · no rank — enrollment assigned, not chosen
58 students · placed by an IEP team
Every figure below is California's own, reported for this school and shown without a rank. Why we withhold a score →
Yellen Learning Center is a special education center in Palmdale, California. SchoolScope publishes no Scope Score, performance band, archetype or ranking for schools where enrollment is assigned rather than chosen, so its CDE CAASPP 2025 results appear here unranked.
61 students were tested here on last year's CAASPP. 3.0% met or exceeded the standard; 0.0% exceeded it.
Chronic absenteeism ran 41.4%; the suspension rate was 15.2%. California reports both the same way it does for every school — this page just doesn't rank them here.
If a placement here is part of a child's IEP, this page is background, not the decision — the IEP team meeting is where fit actually gets decided.
- Ask how this placement was determined, and what the annual IEP review looks at.
- Ask what related services — speech, occupational therapy, counseling — are provided on site.
- Ask how and when a return to a less-restrictive setting gets reconsidered.
This school against the California average
| % Exceeded | % Met+ | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 0% | 3% | 41.4% | 15.2% |
| CA average · Middle School (for reference) | 17% | 40% | 18.1% | 3.6% |
Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.
Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 38 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
6 of 11 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
ShowHide California's growth model by student group
California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California middle school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.
— 3 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.
Kids here miss more school, and get suspended more, than the state average.
Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (71.9% vs 47.2%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
About 6 students for every teacher here.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
ShowHide what the district pays
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
It spends $119,687 per student, more than the California average.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
$4,689 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
ShowHide the district's spending year by year
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
Four in five of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
At 58 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California middle school (≈860).
On the state's science test (CAST), 0% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.
Contact
Nearby schools
Nearby public schools across grade levels.
California's own growth model places it near the 5th percentile of middle schools.
Context — never part of the Scope Score
California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California middle schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.
— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California middle school lands at −1 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −8 and +6 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.
Every number on this page
Everything California reports about this school, shown without a rank — grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, climate, and the nearest schools.
| Factor | School | State | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exceeded standard | 0.0% | 17.2% | 42% |
| Met or exceeded | 3.0% | 40.0% | 23% |
| Chronic absenteeism | 41.4% | 18.1% | 5% |
| Suspension rate | 15.2% | 3.6% | 5% |
| Grade gap (G6→G8, different students) | -6.1pp | +1.5pp | not scored |
- Exceeded standard
- vs CA 17.2%
- Met or exceeded
- vs CA 40.0%
- Chronic absenteeism
- vs CA 18.1%
- Suspension rate
- vs CA 3.6%
- Grade gap (G6→G8, different students)
- vs CA +1.5pp
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 17 | 0% | 6% | 6% | 88% | 6% |
| Grade 7 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 8 | 17 | 0% | 0% | 24% | 76% | 0% |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 4 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 5 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 6 | 16 | 0% | 6% | 0% | 94% | 6% |
| Grade 7 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Grade 8 | 15 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% |
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schoolwide | 25 | 0% | 0% | 28% | 72% |
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 33 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Students with Disabilities | 35 | 2.9% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 24 | 4.2% | — | — |
| School | Dist | EXC | MET+ | Grade gap | Cohort growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellen Learning Center ← | — | 0.0% | 3.0% | −6.1pp | — | 15.2% |
| Shadow Hills Engineering and Design Magnet Academy | 1.1 mi | 6.4% | 23.4% | −3.9pp | — | 12.2% |
| Cactus Medical, Health and Technology Magnet Acade | 1.9 mi | 5.4% | 18.8% | +1.8pp | — | 14.9% |
| California average | — | 17.2% | 40.0% | +1.5pp | — | 3.6% |
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
| Year | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.0% | 1.6% | 38.4% | 16.6% |
| 2022 | 1.8% | 1.8% | 52.3% | 13.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0% | 4.2% | 40.6% | 16.4% |
| 2024 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 36.4% | 13.3% |
| 2025 | 0.0% | 3.0% | 41.4% | 15.2% |
- — No Scope Score, performance band, archetype, or state rank publishes for this school — enrollment here is assigned, not chosen, so a comparative rank would mean something different than it does for a neighborhood school. See the Enrollment Axiom at /methodology#peer-class.
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
| Group | 2019 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Female | 52.6% | 46.2% |
| Male | 51.0% | 52.9% |
| Black/African American | 64.3% | 61.5% |
| Hispanic/Latino | 30.3% | 34.8% |
| White | 44.4% | — |
| Students with Disabilities | 51.8% | 51.9% |
| Foster Youth | 37.8% | 52.0% |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 52.3% | 53.9% |
| All Students | 51.3% | 51.9% |
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
| Group | Reading | n | CDE band | Math | n | CDE band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Students | −18 | 37 | Moderate | −23 | 35 | Minimal |
| Students with Disabilities | −19 | 37 | Moderate | −25 | 35 | Minimal |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | −19 | 35 | Moderate | −27 | 33 | Minimal |
| English Only | −18 | 31 | not categorised | −24 | 29 | not categorised |
| Black or African American | −16 | 22 | Moderate | −31 | 21 | Minimal |
| Hispanic or Latino | −22 | 13 | Minimal | −6 | 12 | Moderate |
| Foster Youth | −14 | 11 | Moderate | −44 | 11 | Minimal |
Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.
EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction