ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

Will C. Wood Middle

Middle School
📍 1801 Sandcreek Way
Composite Score
out of 100
State Percentile
of middle schools
State Rank
of 1,714 California middle schools
🌱
Building Momentum

Every school has strengths the data doesn’t fully capture. Visit and see for yourself.

Composite scores are SchoolScope's analysis of public data from the California Dept. of Education (CAASPP, chronic absenteeism, suspension rates). They are not official CDE ratings and should not be the sole basis for school decisions. See methodology.

School overview

Enrollment
603 students
Student-Teacher Ratio
23:1
Free/Reduced Lunch
58%
Teachers
26 full-time

Dashboard indicators

ELA Year-over-Year
Increased
+8.1 pts DFS change
Math Year-over-Year
Declined
-3.2 pts DFS change
EL Proficiency (ELPAC)
22.4%
English learners at Level 4 (Well Developed) · 67 tested

Data source: California School Dashboard 2025, ELPAC 2024

Student demographics

Hispanic22.4%
White21.4%
Asian24.7%
Black7.5%
Other24.1%

Performance breakdown

Performance breakdown for Will C. Wood Middle
CategoryPercentage
Exceeded Standard23.2%
Met Standard25.9%
Below Standard50.9%

What other rankings don't show you

Most rating sites report "49% proficient" for Will C. Wood Middle and stop there. Here's what that number hides:

23.2% of students exceeded standard while 25.9% met it. That exceeded rate is 5.9 points above the state average of 17.3%. That's 13.7 points below the Alameda Unified district average of 36.9%. Compared to the 3 nearby schools within ~3 miles, this exceeded rate is 5.2 points higher (vs 18.0% average). The gap between "met" and "exceeded" can reveal how much a school's curriculum challenges students beyond proficiency.

Proficiency drops by 8.7 percentage points from Grade 6 to grade 8 growth — a signal that the school may not be sustaining early gains.

California's Dashboard shows ELA performance increased and Math declined year-over-year. 22.4% of English learners reached Level 4 (Well Developed) on ELPAC.

Chronic absenteeism is 15.6%, better than the state average of 19.3%.

Why the exceeded vs. met split matters →

Key metrics

% Exceeded Standard
23.2%
Students scoring above proficient
% Met or Above
49.1%
Students meeting standard
Growth (G6→G8)
-8.7pp
Change in proficiency rate
Chronic Absenteeism
15.6%
Students missing 10%+ of days
Suspension Rate
5.3%
Students suspended at least once
Total Tested
1,188
Across all grades & subjects

Grade trajectory

ELA Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8
Math Trajectory
G6 → G7 → G8

ELA scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th20427.9%31.9%19.1%21.1%59.8%
7th18819.1%36.2%17.6%27.1%55.3%
8th20119.9%31.8%24.4%23.9%51.7%

Math scores by grade

GradeTestedExceededMetNearly MetNot MetMet+Above
6th20629.1%18.4%24.3%28.2%47.6%
7th19019.5%22.6%25.8%32.1%42.1%
8th19923.6%14.6%19.1%42.7%38.2%
K-12 Feeder PathBoundary data

Feeder patterns derived from 2015-16 NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries may have changed. Contact your school district for current information.

Data source: California Department of Education (2025 test year) · How we score · Explore all schools · Blog