San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academyhigher than 26 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academyhigher than 26 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academyhigher than 26 of the 100 California dots
California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100
Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100
Well below California in English and math: 26% and 22% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide.Source
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5: 185 in English, 186 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English and 1,211,701 in math tested).
Other grades here, each placed among California’s schools of that level: middle 39th percentile, Developing (spring 2026 tests).
In 2025, students in grades 4–8 scored below what the state expected from their own earlier scores. The state calls both results Moderate.grades 4–8 · 2025
Ask: Students scored below what the state expected from their earlier scores. What is the school doing differently for them?
Source
CDE growth model, 2025
Students
students with scores in both years in grades 4–8: 316
Comparison
316 students in grades 4–8 with scores in both years. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
10% of students tested in English reached the top of the state’s four levels, against 24% across California in the same grades.grades 3–5 · spring 2026
10%English · exceeded the standard
Source
CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 3–5
Comparison
California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,208,894 in English tested).
3.1% of students (18 of 582) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, about twice the rate at the average California elementary school.2025–26
3.1%of students were suspended at least once, 2025–26
Ask: When a student is suspended, what happens before and after, and who talks with the family?
Source
CDE suspension file, 2025–26
Students
all students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 582
Comparison
18 of 582. District and California figures are averages of school rates (9 Morgan Hill Unified schools; 5,728 scored California elementary schools), our calculation.
Academic achievement
Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Below Proficient combines Developing and Minimal. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2026. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.
Each year tests a different group of students. These results do not track one child’s progress.
Explore the available years, charts & underlying data
English and math have been below California in every tested year since 2015.
Chart: 2017–2026. Hover, tap or focus a chart and use the arrow keys to see each year. The table includes all available years.
English met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID26%46%
This schoolCalifornia
Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5
This schoolCalifornia
0%50%100%201720222026No comparable state tests (COVID)COVID22%42%
This schoolCalifornia
Dotted stretches cross years without comparable results.
English went from 23% in 2017 to 26% in 2026. Math went from 21% in 2017 to 22% in 2026. Each year is a different group of students.
Annual values & tested counts
English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
This school
California
2015
33% 198 tested
41% 1,396,572 tested
2016
30% 231 tested
45% 1,395,534 tested
2017
23% 235 tested
45% 1,384,680 tested
2018
28% 251 tested
49% 1,346,907 tested
2019
29% 238 tested
50% 1,332,547 tested
2022
22% 208 tested
45% 1,260,830 tested
2023
29% 222 tested
44% 1,247,801 tested
2024
23% 205 tested
45% 1,235,509 tested
2025
28% 185 tested
46% 1,232,086 tested
2026
26% 185 tested
46% 1,208,894 tested
Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year
This school
California
2015
28% 200 tested
35% 1,401,446 tested
2016
28% 231 tested
39% 1,401,413 tested
2017
21% 235 tested
40% 1,392,040 tested
2018
23% 251 tested
42% 1,352,321 tested
2019
25% 238 tested
44% 1,338,625 tested
2022
17% 206 tested
38% 1,265,943 tested
2023
21% 219 tested
40% 1,256,519 tested
2024
19% 211 tested
41% 1,249,262 tested
2025
19% 186 tested
41% 1,241,652 tested
2026
22% 186 tested
42% 1,211,701 tested
The state’s growth measure316 students · grades 4–8 · 2025
English−8ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
Math−6ptsCDE level: Moderate (2 of 5)MinimalExceptional
What the number means. California predicts each student’s score from that student’s own English and math scores the year before, based on how students with similar scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as predicted. In English they scored 8 points below that prediction, and in math 6 points below it.
The levels. CDE sorts every school’s result into five levels, from Minimal to Exceptional. The bar under each number shows where this school landed.
Two years at once. For most schools, this one included, CDE’s figure blends the two most recent years of growth, so it moves more slowly than a single year’s scores.
Why our growth can differ. The growth in our Scope Score asks a different question. It doesn’t follow individual students: it compares the latest grade 5 scores here with the school’s grade 3 scores two years earlier, and places that change among California schools at the same level. Children who joined or left the school in between count in ours; the state’s counts only students who took California’s test the year before. So the two can point different ways.
Ask: English is lower than in 2015 here (33% to 26%), while across California it went from 41% to 46%. How does the school check what’s working in English?
Life at school
How often students miss school or are suspended, and how the school describes itself where its website does.
What’s it like
Attendance and discipline
16 in 100students chronically absent, 2025–26
15in 100 at the average Morgan Hill Unified school17in 100 at the average California elementary school
90 of 570 students missed 10% or more of school days.
This school16 in 100
at the average Morgan Hill Unified school15 in 100
at the average California elementary school17 in 100
3.1%of students were suspended at least once (18 of 582), 2025–26
2.2%at the average Morgan Hill Unified school1.6%at the average California elementary school
Attendance by grade
Chronically absent, 2025–26
Per 100 students
Students
Grades 4–6
13
22 of 170
Grades 7–8
16
15 of 93
What people here say
Answers from students, families and staff. Each source stays separate.
Know this school? Add your answers
Have a child here? Answer 7 questions about how San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy works for your family.
We don’t have student survey results for San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy. Ask whether the school surveys its students, and what it learned from the answers.
Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.
Staff
We don’t have staff survey results for San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy. Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.
Every learner
Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.
Kids like mine
How each student group did
Proficient or Advanced · grades 3–8 · spring 2026. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.
HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%
Low-income
186 tested per subject
English
21% / 37%
Math
15% / 28%
Hispanic or Latino
252 English · 251 math tested
English
27% / 38%
Math
19% / 28%
English learners
103 English · 102 math tested · grades 3–7
English
5% / 11%
Math
7% / 13%
Homeless
37 English · 38 math tested · grades 3–5
English
11% / 25%
Math
8% / 21%
Low-income and Hispanic or Latino students did worse than the same groups statewide.
All group results, district comparisons and sources
Proficient or Advancedgrades 3–8 · spring 2026
Group and subject
Here
vs Morgan Hill Unified
vs California
Low-income · 186 tested
English
21%
−728%
−1637%
Math
15%
−621%
−1328%
Hispanic or Latino · 252 tested in English, 251 in math
English
27%
−431%
−1138%
Math
19%
−322%
−928%
English learners · 103 tested in English, 102 in math · grades 3–7 only
English
5%
−27%
−611%
Math
7%
−29%
−613%
Homeless · 37 tested in English, 38 in math · grades 3–5 only
English
11%
−516%
−1425%
Math
8%
−614%
−1321%
Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Morgan Hill Unified, and across California. None is green: no group that is behind statewide does 10 or more points better here than the same group statewide.
White students and students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.
Who goes here
Students and staff
Student mix
2025–26 · eligible enrollment
Incomplete category detail
1Hispanic or Latino80%
2White13%
3Not reported4%
4Two or more races2%
5Asian—
6Black or African American—
7Filipino—
8American Indian or Alaska Native—
9Pacific Islander—
–Unallocated share1%
Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.Full student mix, comparisons & sources
Eligible enrollment, 2025–26
Here
Hispanic or Latino
80%
White
13%
Not reported
4%
Two or more races
2%
Asian
—
Black or African American
—
Filipino
—
American Indian or Alaska Native
—
Pacific Islander
—
Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2025–26. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.
About 3 in 5 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (57%, 366 of 643). California: 63%.
83% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22
CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 83.45%: 24.5 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 29.4 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.
English learners
Are English learners making progress in English?
46%of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026
This school46%
Morgan Hill Unified48%
California47%
72 of 156 English learners here; 440 of 910 in Morgan Hill Unified; 355,274 of 748,916 in California. This measures progress, not fluency. Data source: California Department of Education, 2026 Dashboard ↗.
Questions & evidence
Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.
Inferred through another school · underlying source period unavailable; not a direct feeder
80th percentile · Strong · high · 2025
Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares its own level and peer class; the stages are not one ranking.
An inferred path through a middle-school overlap points to Live Oak High. UC records 22 enrollees from Live Oak High for fall 2025. Its AP Course Audit lists 22 authorized AP subjects for 2025 - 2026. Those figures come from dated records — if a child starting here today later attended Live Oak High, that would be around 2036, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 75% of Live Oak High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.
Is San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy a good elementary school?
San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy is in the 26th percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 26 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2026, on California's state tests (CAASPP), San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy was well below California in English and math: 26% and 22% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 42% statewide. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2026, analyzed by SchoolScope.
What are San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy's CAASPP test scores?
In spring 2026, 26% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 22% the math standard; 10% and 5% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 42% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 185 students were tested in English and 186 in math (CDE CAASPP 2025–26; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).
How does San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy rank in California?
San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy is in the 26th percentile of 5,728 California comprehensive elementary schools (Developing, 2026). San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy ranks #4,192 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. The 2026 Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See full methodology.
Is San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy getting better or worse?
SchoolScope compares San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy's grade 3 results in 2024 with its grade 5 results in 2026, using school-level test aggregates. Students are not matched across years, and enrollment changes can affect the comparison. SchoolScope elementary standardized cohort gain: approximately 68th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across ELA and Math, not matched students in California's separate growth model. It describes an aggregate change; it cannot establish how individual students progressed or what caused it. See full methodology.
What do attendance and suspension records show for San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy?
CDE chronic absence 2025–26: 15.8% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 90 chronically absent of 570 eligible students. CDE suspension 2025–26: 3.1%; 18 unduplicated suspended students of 582 cumulative enrollment. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.
How does San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy compare to other schools in San Martin?
San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy is in the 26th percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 643 students. Use the schools in San Martin page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.
What do reported student-group results show at San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy?
At San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy in San Martin, 21% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) in grades 3–8 scored Proficient or Advanced (formerly Met or Exceeded) in reading and writing in spring 2026, compared with 28% across the district and 37% across California for the same group in the same grades. That is 7 points below the district rate for the same group. Also: low-income students, 15% in math; Hispanic students, 27% in reading and writing. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP, spring 2026. 186 low-income students tested in reading and writing. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.
What middle school does San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy feed into?
In the 2015–16 federal attendance-boundary survey, most of San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy's attendance area fell inside the attendance area of Lewis H. Britton Middle. Lewis H. Britton Middle is in the 54th percentile (Solid) of California’s regular public and charter middle schools on its 2026 Scope Score. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education’s School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.
Other options
If this school isn’t the fit
The closest schools at the same level, by straight-line distance from this campus. Distance isn’t an attendance boundary.
↓ vs CA 21.5% · index 37 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded
↓ vs CA 43.0% · index 35 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Growth (2024 G3 → 2026 G5)
↑ vs CA average · ≈68th calibrated reference pctile
Chronic absenteeism
↑ vs CA 16.9% · index 52 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▼ 0.8pp lower vs 2025
Suspension rate
↓ vs CA 1.6% · index 39 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 0.7pp higher vs 2025
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
↓ vs CA 17.5% · index 41 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.
02By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2025–26 · % of tested students+
From 2025–26 reporting, California calls Level 3 Proficient and Level 4 Advanced (formerly Standard Met and Standard Exceeded). “Proficient or Advanced” combines both levels in the 2025–26 results shown here. California's level descriptions.
ELA · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
ELA
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 3
67
12%
16%
20%
52%
28%
44%
−16
Grade 4
49
12%
8%
11%
69%
20%
46%
−26
Grade 5
69
7%
22%
17%
54%
29%
49%
−20
Grade 6
38
5%
29%
29%
37%
34%
48%
−14
Grade 7
49
4%
18%
23%
55%
22%
51%
−29
Grade 8
38
5%
45%
26%
24%
50%
49%
+1
California is the state's own English result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
Math · 2025–26 results by grade
Scroll for more columns →
Share of students tested, spring 2026
Math
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Proficient or Advanced
California
Difference
Grade 3
68
7%
25%
28%
40%
32%
47%
−15
Grade 4
49
8%
16%
21%
55%
24%
42%
−18
Grade 5
69
1%
9%
20%
70%
10%
37%
−27
Grade 6
38
26%
8%
24%
42%
34%
37%
−3
Grade 7
48
4%
8%
21%
67%
12%
38%
−26
Grade 8
37
5%
25%
27%
43%
30%
36%
−6
California is the state's own math result for each grade, counting every student tested there.
We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.
Earlier years · grade and subject
Scroll for more columns →
Year · grade · subject
Students with scores
Met or exceeded
2025 · Grade 3 · ELA
52
15.4%
2025 · Grade 4 · ELA
72
23.6%
2025 · Grade 5 · ELA
61
44.3%
2025 · Grade 6 · ELA
67
14.9%
2025 · Grade 7 · ELA
62
38.7%
2025 · Grade 8 · ELA
71
23.9%
2025 · Grade 3 · Math
52
15.4%
2025 · Grade 4 · Math
72
18.1%
2025 · Grade 5 · Math
62
22.6%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math
68
8.8%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math
61
21.3%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math
73
27.4%
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA
70
14.3%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA
65
26.1%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA
70
28.6%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA
72
29.2%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA
69
27.5%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA
63
31.8%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math
70
15.7%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math
67
28.4%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math
74
14.9%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math
71
19.7%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math
69
26.1%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math
63
9.5%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA
69
30.4%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA
74
18.9%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA
79
36.7%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA
75
21.3%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA
70
21.4%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA
63
23.8%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math
68
26.5%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math
74
20.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math
77
15.6%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math
75
20.0%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math
70
14.3%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math
62
11.3%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA
67
20.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA
74
21.6%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA
67
22.4%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA
81
16.1%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA
67
13.4%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA
71
18.3%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math
67
19.4%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math
73
12.3%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math
66
18.2%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math
80
7.5%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math
66
10.6%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math
71
9.9%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA
78
34.6%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA
79
30.4%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA
81
21.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA
80
23.8%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA
61
31.1%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA
47
27.7%
2019 · Grade 3 · Math
78
37.2%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math
79
26.6%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math
81
12.3%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math
80
15.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math
61
8.2%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math
47
10.6%
2018 · Grade 3 · ELA
81
33.3%
2018 · Grade 4 · ELA
83
25.3%
2018 · Grade 5 · ELA
87
26.4%
2018 · Grade 6 · ELA
70
20.0%
2018 · Grade 7 · ELA
46
26.1%
2018 · Grade 8 · ELA
—
—
2018 · Grade 3 · Math
81
33.3%
2018 · Grade 4 · Math
83
22.9%
2018 · Grade 5 · Math
87
12.6%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math
70
12.9%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math
46
13.0%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math
—
—
2017 · Grade 3 · ELA
81
28.4%
2017 · Grade 4 · ELA
81
23.5%
2017 · Grade 5 · ELA
73
15.1%
2017 · Grade 6 · ELA
63
27.0%
2017 · Grade 7 · ELA
—
—
2017 · Grade 3 · Math
81
29.6%
2017 · Grade 4 · Math
81
18.5%
2017 · Grade 5 · Math
73
13.7%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math
63
20.6%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math
—
—
2016 · Grade 3 · ELA
83
25%
2016 · Grade 4 · ELA
76
26%
2016 · Grade 5 · ELA
72
40%
2016 · Grade 6 · ELA
53
43%
2016 · Grade 3 · Math
83
41%
2016 · Grade 4 · Math
76
22%
2016 · Grade 5 · Math
72
19%
2016 · Grade 6 · Math
53
25%
2015 · Grade 3 · ELA
72
26%
2015 · Grade 4 · ELA
70
30%
2015 · Grade 5 · ELA
56
45%
2015 · Grade 6 · ELA
65
35%
2015 · Grade 3 · Math
72
32%
2015 · Grade 4 · Math
71
23%
2015 · Grade 5 · Math
57
28%
2015 · Grade 6 · Math
65
28%
Current 2025–26 grade results appear above. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against original CDE files; independent re-verification of other stored historical years remains incomplete. The 2015 and 2016 percentages are rounded to whole numbers in the source. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.
Scroll for more columns →
Science (CAST)
Tested
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Minimal
Schoolwide
108
5%
16%
64%
16%
CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.
Scroll for more columns →
Subgroup · ELA
Tested
Proficient or Advanced
vs district
vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
186
21%
−7
−16
Hispanic/Latino
252
27%
−5
−11
English Learners
103
5%
−2
−7
03Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context+
Listed nearest first, by distance.
Advanced · Proficient or Advanced
Average every tested grade and subject, so they differ from the English and math figures above.
Grade gap
Grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students.
Cohort growth
School-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points. That’s the measurement the Scope Score weights.
Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.
04More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score+
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Scroll for more columns →
Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year
Scope Score
Percentile
Rank
Comparison group
2019
21/100
6
#5127
California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.
Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.
CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2025 and 2026; the change is 2026 minus 2025 in percentage points.
Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. The 2015–2018 rows were checked against CDE’s original research files. The 2015 and 2016 files report whole percentages; later rows round to one decimal here. Older stored rows from other years still need independent original-file re-verification. A dash is unavailable, not zero. Before spring 2026, Advanced was reported as Exceeded and proficient or advanced as met or exceeded.
Scroll for more columns →
Year
Scope
Pctile
Rank
Absent
Susp
Grade gap
2019
—
—
—
14.0%
3.5%
-19.2pp
2022
—
—
—
33.4%
3.9%
+0.1pp
2023
—
—
—
26.5%
4.8%
-2.3pp
2024
—
—
—
22.9%
2.8%
+6.7pp
2025
—
—
—
16.7%
2.2%
+18.0pp
2026
26
26
#4192
15.9%
3.0%
-10.8pp
The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
— Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
— Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 16 points in ELA in grades 3–8 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2025–26 school years+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
2018–19
2025–26
Δ
Female
13.2%
12.9%
-0.3pp
Male
15.3%
18.4%
+3.1pp
Hispanic/Latino
15.5%
17.7%
+2.2pp
Two or More Races
0.0%
7.7%
+7.7pp
White
11.5%
4.1%
-7.4pp
Students with Disabilities
25.9%
33.0%
+7.1pp
English Learners
14.9%
15.6%
+0.7pp
Homeless
29.1%
22.3%
-6.8pp
Military-Connected
15.0%
6.5%
-8.5pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
17.2%
20.6%
+3.4pp
All Students
14.2%
15.8%
+1.6pp
Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.
06California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored+
Scroll for more columns →
Group
ELA
n
CDE band
Math
n
CDE band
All Students
−8
316
Moderate
−6
316
Moderate
Hispanic or Latino
−6
259
Moderate
−6
259
Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged
−6
195
Moderate
−5
195
Average
English Learner
−6
152
Moderate
−5
152
Average
English Only
−13
137
not categorised
−10
137
not categorised
English Learners Only
−10
100
not categorised
−5
100
not categorised
Homeless Youth
−9
61
Moderate
−6
61
Moderate
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only
−4
52
not categorised
−3
52
not categorised
Students with Disabilities
−9
51
Moderate
−16
51
Moderate
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)
−1
45
Average
+2
45
Average
White
−11
36
Moderate
−4
36
Average
CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.
07Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures+
School-grade cohort proxy · ELA endpoints
ELA · 2024 · Grade 3
4%
exceeded standard · 14% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 70 ELA test records with scores
→
ELA · 2026 · Grade 5
7%
exceeded standard · 29% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 69 ELA test records with scores
Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 69 (school-grade cohort proxy).
These paired percentages describe ELA results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across ELA and Math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.
California growth model · reported-school field
State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
316 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, ELA: −8 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 21st percentile of 7,519 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.21st pctile · −8 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8
CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard
Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25
ALL students, grades 4–8
316 students
estimate WEIGHTED
SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory
California growth model, math: −6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 30th percentile of 7,518 reported schools in SchoolScope's retained inventory.30th pctile · −6 pts
this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math
Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.
08Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure+
Per-pupil spending
District · current expense$11,457 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 8,245 pupils
California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil
NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records
School-level federal expenditures$49 per pupil
CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 643
Central federal expenditures attributed here$445 per pupil
CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 643
District current expense · FY 2024–25$18,433 per ADA
CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator
These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.
How the California mean was selected
SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.
Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation
SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.
NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021
09ZIP-area community recordRead census estimates for the surrounding ZIP area, not the school's students.ACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95046+
Scroll for more columns →
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95046
Measure
Estimate
Median household income
$158,550
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)
38.43%
ZCTA population
6,324
Median age
47.3 years
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 95046 →
Embed this scorecard
<iframe
src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/san-martin-gwinn-environmental-science-academy-7948"
width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
title="San Martin Gwinn Environmental Science Academy — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>
Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.
Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 · n=5,728 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-10-15
Help us make SchoolScope more useful
Optional. Up to 280 characters.
Anonymous. Your answer stays with us — we don’t publish it.
Thanks — that helps.
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction
We use cookies for authentication and to understand how parents use SchoolScope. See our Privacy Policy.