ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in

San Bernardino County Special EducationPublicSan Bernardino, CAGrades TK-121,860 students

San Bernardino County Special Education: A special education center. No Scope Score publishes here.

A Scope Score ranks schools a family can choose between. At San Bernardino County Special Education, students are placed here by an IEP team, not by address and not by lottery — so a comparative rank would measure something a family's choice never entered. We show what California reports and hold the rank.

special education center

no score · no band · no rank — enrollment assigned, not chosen

1,860 students · placed by an IEP team

Every figure below is California's own, reported for this school and shown without a rank. Why we withhold a score →

San Bernardino County Special Education is a special education center in San Bernardino, California. SchoolScope publishes no Scope Score, performance band, archetype or ranking for schools where enrollment is assigned rather than chosen, so its CDE CAASPP 2025 results appear here unranked.

156 students were tested here on last year's CAASPP. 0.6% met or exceeded the standard; 0.0% exceeded it.

Chronic absenteeism ran 50.5%; the suspension rate was 3.0%. California reports both the same way it does for every school — this page just doesn't rank them here.

Worth a conversation

If a placement here is part of a child's IEP, this page is background, not the decision — the IEP team meeting is where fit actually gets decided.

  • Ask how this placement was determined, and what the annual IEP review looks at.
  • Ask what related services — speech, occupational therapy, counseling — are provided on site.
  • Ask how and when a return to a less-restrictive setting gets reconsidered.
CAASPP 2024–25

This school against the California average

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
% Exceeded% Met+AbsenceSuspension
This school0%1%50.5%3.0%
CA average · Elementary School (for reference)21%43%17.9%1.6%
This schoolCA avg
% Exceeded0%21%
% Met+1%43%
Absence50.5%17.9%
Suspension3.0%1.6%
Who it works for · CAASPP 2024–25

Low-income students here meet the ELA standard behind the same group statewide.

Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 32 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.

Met or exceeded · reading and math combined
All students at this school: 2% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 2%, district —, state 43%2%
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 2%, district 2%, state 15%2%
MaleMale: this school 3%, district 4%, state 42%3%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 3%, district 3%, state 32%3%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 1%, district 4%, state 32%1%
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 0%, district 2%, state 26%0%

11 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
ShowHide Student-group results by grade
Student-group results by grade

Results compare different grade groups in the same year, relative to the lowest tested grade. They do not track the same children over time. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

ShowHide California's growth model by student group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Students with disabilities74 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −24 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 74 students.−24 pts · −16 vs typical
English Only66 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −24 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 66 students.−24 pts · −27 vs typical
Low-income students60 studentsLow-income students, reading: −23 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 60 students.−23 pts · −23 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students37 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −32 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 37 students.−32 pts · −33 vs typical
Math
Students with disabilities74 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −23 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 74 students.−23 pts · −18 vs typical
English Only66 studentsEnglish Only, math: −20 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 66 students.−20 pts · −21 vs typical
Low-income students60 studentsLow-income students, math: −20 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 60 students.−20 pts · −19 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students37 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −22 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 37 students.−22 pts · −21 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Attendance & discipline · 2024–25

Kids here miss more school, and get suspended more, than the state average.

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 50.5%, district 21.9%, state 17.9%50.5%
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.0%, district —, state 1.6%3.0%
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
ShowHide attendance by student group and by grade
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–653.1%
Grades 7–850.7%
Grades 9–1261.7%
TK/K68.5%
The people teaching · CDE staffing 2024–25

About 11 students for every teacher here.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Students per teacher11 · district 19
Teaching staff172 teachers
Avg. experience8.6 years
Fully credentialed32%
First-year teachers15%
Intern / emergency permit1.1%
PrincipalRichard Frederick
ShowHide what the district pays
Teacher salary schedule$62,055 – $132,536
Principal salary$175,716 – $175,716
Superintendent salary$372,911

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent · FY 2016–17

It spends $79,566 per student, more than the California average.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

$1,360 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $79,566, CA average $14,491$79,566 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,360 per student
This schoolDistrictCalifornia
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction 36%Instruction support 27%Student services 17%Administration 17%Buildings & maintenance 3%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year
district detail, 2016–2017 — the newest published
2017$75,731 per pupil
2016$70,347 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Who is enrolled

Two-thirds of students here qualify for free or reduced lunch, versus three in five statewide.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

Worth knowing

At 1,860 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 3% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Hispanic or Latino60.8% · district 69.3% · CA 56.1%
White14.5% · district 13.4% · CA 19.9%
Asian2.7% · district 1.3% · CA 10.2%
Black13.4% · district 9.9% · CA 4.8%
Other8.6% · district 6.0% · CA 9.0%
GenderFemale 26.2% · Male 73.8% · Non-binary 0.1%
Free or reduced lunch74.8% · CA 64%
Nearby schools
State growth model · CDE growth model 2024–25

California's own growth model places it near the 3rd percentile of elementary schools.

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California elementary schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.

— pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

California's growth model, ranked against the schools it scores
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −24 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 2nd percentile of 7,519 reported schools.2nd pctile · −24 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −22 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 4th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.4th pctile · −22 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field
Every number · For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Everything California reports about this school, shown without a rank — grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, climate, and the nearest schools.

01Score factors (not combined)the dimensions a Scope Score would weigh, shown against California · 2024–25
Score factors
FactorSchoolStateWeight
Exceeded standard0.0%21.4%42%
Met or exceeded0.6%42.7%23%
Chronic absenteeism50.5%17.9%5%
Suspension rate3.0%1.6%5%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)0.0%18.0%5%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)+0.0pp-2.9ppnot scored
Exceeded standard
vs CA 21.4%
Met or exceeded
vs CA 42.7%
Chronic absenteeism
vs CA 17.9%
Suspension rate
vs CA 1.6%
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
vs CA 18.0%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ShowHide table 02 — By grade & subgroup
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET+
Grade 3230%0%0%100%0%
Grade 4270%4%4%93%4%
Grade 5130%0%8%92%0%
Grade 6170%0%6%94%0%
Grade 7270%4%11%85%4%
Grade 8240%13%0%88%13%
Grade 11250%8%12%80%8%
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET+
Grade 3230%0%4%96%0%
Grade 4270%0%7%93%0%
Grade 5130%0%0%100%0%
Grade 6170%0%6%94%0%
Grade 7270%0%7%93%0%
Grade 8240%0%8%92%0%
Grade 11250%0%4%96%0%

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide613%0%36%61%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged1136.2%——
Students with Disabilities1554.5%——
Hispanic/Latino442.3%——
03Nearest elementary schoolsnearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
San Bernardino County Special Education ←—0.0%0.6%+0.0pp—3.0%
Ballington Academy for the Arts and Sciences - San2.8 mi17.9%42.8%+58.5pp—0.3%
Victoria Elementary2.3 mi15.3%36.8%+15.3pp—0.7%
Hardy Brown College Prep2.5 mi14.3%41.1%+9.4pp—7.0%
California average—21.4%42.7%−2.9pp—1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
ShowHide table 04 — More measures
YearExcMet+AbsentSusp
20191.6%4.1%43.3%8.6%
20221.1%2.2%64.2%5.6%
20230.0%1.9%56.1%5.8%
20240.0%2.2%48.4%5.6%
20250.0%0.6%50.5%3.0%
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID)
What we can't show
  • — No Scope Score, performance band, archetype, or state rank publishes for this school — enrollment here is assigned, not chosen, so a comparative rank would mean something different than it does for a neighborhood school. See the Enrollment Axiom at /methodology#peer-class.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
ShowHide table 05 — Climate by student group
Group20192025
Female55.2%61.5%
Male45.5%57.2%
Asian28.2%27.8%
Black/African American51.7%59.5%
Filipino25.0%53.3%
Hispanic/Latino49.6%60.2%
American Indian/Alaska Native64.7%58.3%
Two or More Races51.3%55.3%
White44.3%57.6%
Students with Disabilities48.3%58.3%
English Learners48.5%58.8%
Foster Youth44.3%52.4%
Homeless32.1%58.4%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged49.1%60.1%
All Students48.3%58.3%
06California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
ShowHide table 06 — California growth model, by student group
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−2474Minimal−2274Minimal
Students with Disabilities−2474Minimal−2374Minimal
English Only−2466not categorised−2066not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−2360Minimal−2060Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−3237Minimal−2237Minimal
White−713Moderate−2613Minimal
Black or African American−3611Minimal−1711Moderate

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-09-18

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction