ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
La Sierra High · VisaliaCharter

La Sierra High: This school runs ahead of the state average. The bar itself is the harder conversation.

La Sierra posts 38% meeting the standard against 36% statewide — ahead of most, with real headroom above the bar.

1735 East Houston Avenue, 93292 (opens in new tab)·Tulare County Office of Education·Visalia·Grades 7-12·191 students·63% low-income·Charter·2024–25 CAASPP·(559) 733-6963·Website
Charter school — publicly funded, independently operated, open enrollment via lottery. Learn more
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope4347
% Exceeded10%16%
% Met+38%36%
Grad rate100.0%86.6%
College readiness0.0%33.9%
Absence21.7%30.2%
Suspension7.7%3.6%
Scope Score
43
🌱 Building Momentum · Developing
ranked #1,323 statewide · #3 of 4 in Tulare County Office of Education

La Sierra High scores 43 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 39th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “38% proficient” and call it done. La Sierra deserves a closer read. The school sits in Visalia, where three in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

As a charter, La Sierra enrolls by application rather than address. That changes how you get in, but it doesn't change the score.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 2,160 high schools statewide

Climbed from the 28th to the 39th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 200 high schools.

ELAOrange(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Increased Significantly)

The pandemic drop is behind this school: 38% of students meet the standard today, above the 9% who did in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 78%8%9%17%19%
Grade 811%6%13%6%21%
Grade 1118%21%22%30%65%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 75%8%3%8%24%
Grade 87%0%5%3%18%
Grade 110%0%0%4%10%

The story this school is actually telling

Proficient by 11th grade
38%
State 36%
Graduate
100%
State 87%
Pass an AP exam
0%
State 34%

Of 100 students here: 38 are proficient by 11th grade → 100 graduate → 0 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.

The 6 things our score weighs

Graduation rate
100.0%
State 86.6%
13.4pp above state avg
Exceeded standard
10.0%
State 15.8%
5.8pp below state avg
College readiness
0.0%
State 33.9%
AP course or exam readiness below state avg
Met or exceeded
37.5%
State 35.7%
1.8pp above state avg
Chronic absenteeism
21.7%
State 30.2%
8.5pp below state avg
Suspension rate
7.7%
State 3.6%
4.1pp above state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits about at the middle of California high schools in reading, and the 87th in math. We show it; we don't score it.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −13 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 12th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.12th pctile · −13 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: +16 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 87th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.87th pctile · +16 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California high school lands at −3 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −13 and +5 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask how the school challenges kids who clear the standard early. The gap between meeting and exceeding is where pacing shows.

  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At La Sierra High in Visalia, 11.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Sierra High trails its district average for low-income students by 19.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 45 students tested.

All students at this school: 25% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 25%, district —, state 36%25%
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 24%, district 26%, state 32%24% · −1 vs school
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 11%, district 25%, state 32%11% · −14 vs school
MaleMale: this school 23%, district 34%, state 42%23% · −2 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 10%, district 41%, state 44%10% · −15 vs school

7 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California high school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Hispanic or Latino students48 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −11 scale-score points versus expectation, against −3 for the same group at a typical California high school, 48 students.−11 pts · −8 vs typical
Low-income students41 studentsLow-income students, reading: −18 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California high school, 41 students.−18 pts · −13 vs typical
Math
Hispanic or Latino students48 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: +18 scale-score points versus expectation, against −13 for the same group at a typical California high school, 48 students.+18 pts · +31 vs typical
Low-income students41 studentsLow-income students, math: +12 scale-score points versus expectation, against −15 for the same group at a typical California high school, 41 students.+12 pts · +27 vs typical
this school typical California high school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 21.7%, district 12.0%, state 30.2%21.7% · −8.5pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 7.7%, district —, state 3.6%7.7% · +4.1pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 7–814.1%
Grades 9–1214.4%

Where the path goes

The path below is estimated from nearby schools in the same district — scores shown for each next step.

Estimated K-12 Path
High
La Sierra High
43
This school

Estimated K-12 path based on district and proximity. Actual attendance zones may differ. Contact your school district for official feeder information.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 17:1, district 18:117:1
Teaching staff14 teachers
Avg. experience11.9 years
Fully credentialed72%
Intern / emergency permit2.7%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$55,104 – $132,890
Principal salaryUp to $188,354
Superintendent salary$345,000

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

Course Breadth
CTE pathway completers2 students

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $113,325, CA average $14,491$113,325 · spent at this school
Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction34%
Instruction support25%
Student services19%
Administration10%
Buildings & maintenance5%
Other8%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$97,094 per pupil
2019$93,270 per pupil
2018$82,128 per pupil
2017$44,912 per pupil
2016$52,208 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic88.5%
District 62.5% · CA 56.1%
White5.2%
District 29.8% · CA 19.9%
Other3.7%
District 5.1% · CA 9.0%
Black2.6%
District 1.1% · CA 4.8%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 62.8% (1pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$83K · CA $85K
Median home value$366K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+19% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,780
Median age33 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 191 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).

On the state's science test (CAST), 15% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is La Sierra High a good high school?

La Sierra High has a Scope Score of 43 out of 100, placing it in the 39th percentile of California high schools and ranked #1,323 statewide. 10.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 5.8 percentage points below the California average of 15.8%. The Scope Score weights 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate (25%), exceeded standard (22%), college/career readiness (20%), met or exceeded (proficient) (18%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are La Sierra High's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 37.5% of students at La Sierra High met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 10.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 27.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 10.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 40 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does La Sierra High rank in California?

La Sierra High ranks #1,323 among California high schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 39th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at La Sierra High?

21.7% of students at La Sierra High are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), which is better than the California average of 30.2%. The suspension rate is 7.7%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does La Sierra High compare to other schools in Visalia?

La Sierra High scores 43/100 (39th percentile) among California high schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 191 students. Use the schools in Visalia page or the map view to compare all high schools nearby.

How does La Sierra High serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At La Sierra High in Visalia, 11.1% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 30.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. La Sierra High trails its district average for low-income students by 19.2 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (11.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (31.4% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 24.2 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 45 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Graduation rate · 25%
100.0%
↑ vs CA 86.6% · 64th pctile
Exceeded standard · 22%
10.0%
↓ vs CA 15.8% · 44th pctile
College readiness · 20%
0.0%
↓ vs CA 33.9% · 31th pctile
Met or exceeded · 18%
37.5%
↑ vs CA 35.7% · 51th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
21.7%
↑ vs CA 30.2% · 57th pctile
▼ 2.3pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
7.7%
↓ vs CA 3.6% · 32th pctile
▼ 5.4pp lower vs 2024
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 7210%19%5%76%19%−29
Grade 8383%18%34%45%21%−25
Grade 112020%45%20%15%65%+16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 72114%10%14%62%24%−10
Grade 8380%18%29%53%18%−14
Grade 11200%10%10%80%10%−14

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide593%12%75%10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged4511.1%−19−27
Hispanic/Latino7031.4%−2−7
03Nearest high schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
La Sierra High ←4310.0%37.5%7.7%
Redwood High1.8 mi6628.3%57.5%1.5%
Golden West High1.2 mi5010.3%32.5%5.5%
Mt. Whitney High2 mi4711.6%34.2%5.9%
California average4715.8%35.7%3.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
Graduation Rate
100.0%
AP Exam Prepared
Not offered
This school may not offer AP courses
A-G Completion
9.5%
A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility
College-Going Rate
54.1%
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20193328#14831.8%8.9%20.2%17.0%
20223224#15870.0%10.3%31.0%17.2%
20233325#16181.2%11.0%26.0%18.8%
20243629#15204.3%17.4%24.0%13.1%
20254339#132310.0%37.5%21.7%7.7%
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 27 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female16.3%15.2%-1.1pp
Male17.4%13.6%-3.8pp
Hispanic/Latino14.9%14.7%-0.2pp
Students with Disabilities22.5%28.0%+5.5pp
English Learners13.6%14.6%+1.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged17.0%16.6%-0.4pp
All Students16.9%14.3%-2.6pp
09Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshotstructural, dated — newest published; biennial
MeasureThis school
AP offerednot offered
AP course countnot reported
AP enrollmentnot reported
IB participationnot offered
Dual enrollmentnot offered
Algebra I in grade 8not reported
Calculus sections0
Physics sections1
Chemistry sections0
Total enrollment (CRDC)214

Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.

10College destinationsclass of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate
DestinationCompleters% (derived)
University of California00.0%
California State University00.0%
California community college2054.0%
In-state private00.0%
Out-of-state, 4-year00.0%
Out-of-state, 2-year00.0%
Not enrolled1745.9%

37 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 54% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · a missing cell is CDE suppression, never a fabricated zero · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.

11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−1353Moderate+1653Accelerated
Hispanic or Latino−1148Moderate+1848Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−1841Moderate+1241Accelerated
English Only−2429not categorised+1329not categorised
English Learner+122Average+1921Accelerated
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)−1113Moderate+1013Accelerated
English Learners Only+312not categorised+2812not categorised

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/la-sierra-high-0327"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="La Sierra High — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=2,160 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · CRDC 2020-21 (biennial; next expected 2021-22) · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction