Public school · Mountain View Whisman

Crittenden Middle — Rating & test scores

1701 Rock Street, Mountain View · 616 students · Grades 6–8

How to enroll
Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four middle schools.

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Sign in to save this school

Campus map · © OpenStreetMap

Drawn from OpenStreetMap. Volunteers map it, so a new building may be missing. Buildings with no mapped height are drawn one storey high.

A picture of the campus, not an attendance boundary or a rating.

Schools maintain a closed campus policy. For students’ safety, visitors may enter a campus only with the school’s official permission; this drawing implies no permission to enter.

Scope Score 85

StrongScope Score · 88th percentile. Higher than 88 in 100 of the 2,529 California public middle schools we score.

75 is the typical California school. 100 is the best result in the state. How the score is built

Well above California in English (reading and writing) and math, grades 6–8, spring 2026: 65% and 56% scored Proficient or Advanced, against 49% and 37%.

Source for this line
Source
California’s state tests (CAASPP), California Department of Education, spring 2026
Students
all students tested in grades 6–8: 617 in English, 623 in math
Comparison
California: CDE’s grade 6, 7 and 8 rows for the whole state combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,254,039 in English and 1,254,800 in math tested).

Overview

Is Crittenden a good middle school?

Strong. Crittenden is higher than most California middle schools on test results, progress in both subjects and attendance.

Test results, spring 2026

English, Proficient or Advanced8265%
Math, Proficient or Advanced8556%
English, Advanced9137%
Math, Advanced8940%

Progress in a year, 2025

English65+5 pts
Math81+12 pts

Showing up, 2025–26

Attendance6313 in 100
Crittenden’s place among California middle schools, out of 100Mountain View Whisman’s other middle schoolBar colour, from the lowest quarter of schools to the highest

One more thing to know

On spring 2025 tests, students in grades 6–8 scored higher than California students who had the same scores the year before, in English (+5 pts) and math (+12 pts). The state calls both results Accelerated. 6.1% of students (40 of 659) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school.

Each bar is Crittenden’s place among 2,529 California public middle schools we score. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, updated October 15, 2026.

How to read these bars, and their sources

A place counts the schools out of 100 with a lower figure. The dashed line is the middle. Test results are from spring 2026, grades 6–8. Progress is the state’s measure of how the same students’ scores changed against the score it expected, 2025. Attendance counts students who missed 10% or more of school days; fewer is better, so a higher place means fewer such students.

Sentence 1
CDE growth model, 2025. Students with scores in both years in grades 6–8: 542. Points are scale-score points against the state’s expected score for each student; the category is CDE’s, quoted as published. It describes results, not causes.
Sentence 2
CDE suspension file, 2025–26. All students enrolled during the year (CDE’s cumulative enrollment): 659. District and California figures are averages of school rates (2 Mountain View Whisman schools; 2,529 scored California middle schools), our calculation.

In its own words

What does Crittenden say about itself?

We haven’t read Crittenden’s website yet. Until we do, the school’s own site is the best place to hear it in its own words.

Open crittenden.mvwsd.org (opens in a new tab)

Progress

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Yes, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 5 points higher in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Accelerated. In math, they scored 12 points higher, which the state calls Accelerated.

English

+5

points higher than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Hispanic or Latino2110 points
Low-income1670 points
White136+7 points
English learners132−3 points
Asian95+11 points

Math

+12

points higher than California students who had the same score a year earlier. The state calls it Accelerated, the fourth of its five growth levels.

By student group · students counted

Hispanic or Latino211−3 points
Low-income167+2 points
White136+23 points
English learners132+7 points
Asian95+29 points

Grades 6–8, 2025, 542 students with scores in both years. It describes results, not causes. Source: California Department of Education, growth model.

How the state’s growth measure works

The state calls this comparison an expected score. It sets one for each student from that student’s own score the year before.

California uses each student’s English and math scores from the year before to set an expected score, based on how students with similar earlier scores did across the state. Zero would mean students here scored as expected. In English they scored 5 points above that expected score, and in math 12 points above it. Unlike the growth in our Scope Score, it follows the same students from one year to the next.

The state sorts every school’s growth result into five growth levels, from Minimal to Exceptional.

Here, as at most schools, the state’s figure blends the two most recent years, so it moves more slowly than one year’s scores.

Our Scope Score measures growth another way. It compares the latest grade 8 scores here with the school’s grade 6 scores two years earlier (partly different children), then places that change among California schools at the same level. The state’s measure counts only students who took California’s test the year before, so the two can point different ways.

SchoolScope middle standardized cohort gain: approximately 78th percentile on a calibrated reference scale, not an empirical school rank. This score compares school-level grade groups across English and math, not matched students in California's separate growth model.

Nearby

How does it compare with schools nearby?

6 of the 7 middle schools nearby have a higher Scope Score than Crittenden. Each school is compared with every California middle school.

Scope Score

8 middle schools within 4.0 miles, highest score first. Under each name is how the school takes students.

  1. Georgina P. BlachLos Altos Elementary · by addressScope Score 10099th
  2. Ardis G. EganLos Altos Elementary · by addressScope Score 10099th
  3. Jane Lathrop StanfordPalo Alto Unified · by addressScope Score 9498th
  4. Ellen FletcherPalo Alto Unified · by addressScope Score 9296th
  5. Frank S. Greene Jr.Palo Alto Unified · by addressScope Score 9196th
  6. Isaac Newton GrahamNeighborhood school · by addressScope Score 8690th
  7. CrittendenScope Score 8588th
  8. ColumbiaSunnyvale · by addressScope Score 7864th
Mountain View WhismanA neighborhood school in another district

A neighborhood school in another district takes students who live in its area. Ask that district about a transfer.

Scope Score from California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Distance is a straight line from this campus and is not an attendance boundary. See these schools on the map

Scores and family income

Further right, more students are from low-income families. Higher up, more students scored Proficient or Advanced in English.

50%75%0%25%50%75%100%

4 of 8 schools are named on the chart. Point at a dot or tap it to read any school.

English results: California Department of Education state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, grades 6–8. Low-income is the share of students who qualified for free or reduced-price meals, 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes.

Schools like it

How does Crittenden compare with schools like it?

Crittenden’s Scope Score is 85. 197 California middle schools, counting Crittenden, have a similar share of students from low-income families. Their typical score is 83. Crittenden’s result is higher than 121 of them.

The five schools with the highest results of the 197

  1. Students from low-income families: 28%

    Scope Score 99Strong · 99th percentile

  2. Students from low-income families: 28%

    Scope Score 98Strong · 99th percentile

  3. Students from low-income families: 18%

    Scope Score 96Strong · 99th percentile

  4. Students from low-income families: 28%

    Scope Score 95Strong · 98th percentile

  5. Students from low-income families: 23%

    Scope Score 94Strong · 98th percentile

197 California public middle schools where 18% to 30% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. The chart compares results, not causes. Our calculation from California Department of Education records, spring 2026.

How the group is chosen

The group is every California public middle school we score where 18% to 30% of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25. That is within 6 points of Crittenden’s share. The count includes Crittenden. Typical means the median: half are higher and half are lower. Schools differ in more than family income, and no score is changed for it. Our calculation from California Department of Education records: state tests (CAASPP), spring 2026, and school meal eligibility, 2024–25.

Over time

Have results changed?

Results in both subjects were similar to 2025. English stayed at 65% and math went from 55% to 56%.

Share at the state’s top two test levels, 2017 to 2026

Grades 6–8. Point at a year, tap it or use the arrow keys to read its figures.

English

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202665%63%65%CrittendenCrittenden64%Mountain View WhismanDistrict49%CaliforniaCalifornia

Math

No comparable testsNo tests25%50%75%2017201820192022202320242025202661%55%58%Mountain View WhismanDistrict56%CrittendenCrittenden37%CaliforniaCalifornia

The lines break where a year has no comparable state test results. Each spring tests a different group of students. Mountain View Whisman’s line combines its 2 middle schools we score (our calculation). Faint lines are its other school. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Each year’s results

The top two levels were called Met or Exceeded before 2026 and are called Proficient or Advanced now. Mountain View Whisman’s figure weights each school by the students it tested.

English, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringCrittendenMountain View WhismanCaliforniaTested here
201763%65%48%643
201860%64%49%672
201966%68%50%686
202265%64%47%520
202363%60%46%519
202462%60%46%571
202565%63%49%607
202665%64%49%617
Math, grades 6–8: share at the top two levels
SpringCrittendenMountain View WhismanCaliforniaTested here
201755%61%37%646
201855%61%37%674
201956%59%38%691
202250%54%31%527
202351%53%32%528
202452%55%33%587
202555%56%36%616
202656%58%37%623

Tests

How did students here do on state tests?

Well above California in both subjects.

English

65%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

18172837
Mountain View Whisman64%California49%

Math

56%

scored Proficient or Advanced.

25191640
Mountain View Whisman58%California37%
MinimalDeveloping levelProficientAdvanced

In grades 6–8, spring 2026, 65% scored Proficient or Advanced in English and 56% in math, against 49% and 37% across California.

The state published these results on October 15, 2026. What changed across California. Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined. From spring 2026, the state calls its top two levels “Proficient or Advanced” (formerly “Met or Exceeded”). Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Results for each grade, spring 2026

What each level means: California's level descriptions.

English

English, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced63%68%65%
Advanced32%40%39%
Proficient31%28%26%
Developing level21%13%17%
Minimal16%19%18%
Tested207201209
California48%51%49%
Difference+15+17+16

California is CDE’s statewide English row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Math

Math, grades 6–8: share of students tested, spring 2026
MeasureGrade 6Grade 7Grade 8
Proficient or Advanced50%60%59%
Advanced35%45%41%
Proficient15%15%18%
Developing level22%14%20%
Minimal28%26%21%
Tested209204210
California37%38%36%
Difference+13+22+23

California is CDE’s statewide math row for each grade, counting every student tested there; the comparisons in the chapters combine these rows for their grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

A grade the school doesn't teach has no row. “Suppressed” marks a result CDE blanks because fewer than 11 students tested (CDE’s reporting rule); “none tested” marks a grade CDE lists with no students tested; “not on file” marks a result missing from the records we hold. None of them means zero.

All four test levels, with the number of students tested
Share of students tested at each level, spring 2026. The state’s test levels Advanced, Proficient, the Developing level (formerly Nearly met) and Minimal.
StudentsAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimalTested
English, grades 6–8 · This school37%28%17%18%617
English, grades 6–8 · California19%30%23%28%1,254,039
English, grades 6–8 · Mountain View Whisman37%27%17%19%1,405
Math, grades 6–8 · This school40%16%19%25%623
Math, grades 6–8 · California21%16%23%40%1,254,800
Math, grades 6–8 · Mountain View Whisman44%14%17%25%1,416

Spring 2026, grades 6–8 combined: 617 tested in English, 623 tested in math. California combines the state’s results for the same grades, weighted by students tested (our calculation).

Who goes here

Who goes here?

Hispanic or Latino students are the largest group here, at 37% of students. 82 of 647 students missed 10% or more of school days.

Missing school, 2025–26

13in 100

students were chronically absent. That means they missed 10% or more of school days (82 of 647 students).

At the average Mountain View Whisman middle school: 12 in 100. At the average California middle school: 18 in 100.

Suspensions: 6.1% of students were suspended at least once (40 of 659). Average California middle school 3.7%.

Students, 2024–25

616

students in grades 6–8.

Hispanic or Latino 37%White 25%Asian 19%Two or more races 13%Filipino 3%Black or African American 2%

Family income

24%

of students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25, 146 of 616. California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

36

teachers, with 12 years of experience on average.

3% were in their first year.

89% of teaching positions had the right credential, 2021–22.

English learners

67%

of English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top, spring 2025 to spring 2026 (45 of 67 students).

Mountain View Whisman: 51%. California: 47%.

It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent. Sources: California Department of Education and the California School Dashboard. Each tile names its year.

Missing school, by grade
Grade 6
10 in 100 students in grade 6 were chronically absent (22 of 215).
Grades 7–8
14 in 100 students in grades 7–8 were chronically absent (60 of 432).
Full student mix, 2025–26
StudentsHere
Hispanic or Latino37%
White25%
Asian19%
Two or more races13%
Filipino3%
Black or African American2%
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Where these figures come from

Attendance and suspensions: California Department of Education, 2025–26. Student mix: the students the state’s attendance file counts, 2025–26; a dash means our records hold no count. English learner progress: California School Dashboard, 2026 . Student count: California Department of Education enrollment, 2024–25. Teachers: California Department of Education staffing files, 2024–25.

Teaching credentials: California’s School Accountability Report Card, 2024–25, measured in 2021–22: 29.4 of 32.9 full-time teaching positions. It counts positions, not individual teachers.

Student groups

How do kids like mine do here?

Seven student groups at Crittenden have test results. Each bar compares one group with the same group across California.

This schoolThe same group, California
  • Two or more races87 tested90%California 62%
  • Asian116 tested88%California 75%
  • White149 tested78%California 62%
  • Hispanic or Latino230 tested40%California 39%
  • Low-income181 tested33%California 39%
  • Students with disabilities70 tested17%California 14%
  • English learners69 tested9%California 7%

Share who scored Proficient or Advanced, grades 6–8 English, spring 2026. Each group is compared with the same group in the same grades. Source: California Department of Education, state tests (CAASPP).

Every group’s results, with the district

Low-income is the state’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group.

Proficient or Advancedgrades 6–8 · spring 2026
Group and subjectHerevs Mountain View Whismanvs California
Low-income · 181 tested in English, 182 in math
English33%+429%−639%
Math26%+323%026%
Hispanic or Latino · 230 tested in English, 231 in math
English40%+634%+139%
Math28%+325%+325%
White · 149 tested
English78%−381%+1662%
Math70%−575%+2050%
Asian · 116 tested in English, 119 in math
English88%−189%+1375%
Math82%−587%+1171%
Two or more races · 87 tested in English, 89 in math
English90%+387%+2862%
Math80%−383%+3050%
English learners · 69 tested in English, 75 in math
English9%+36%+27%
Math11%+29%+47%
Students with disabilities · 70 tested
English17%−219%+314%
Math13%−619%+310%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Mountain View Whisman, and across California. No group that is behind across California does 10 or more points better here.

Homeless and military-family students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander students and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

Family and staff answers

What would families and staff tell you?

Families can answer a short set of questions about Crittenden. These are not star ratings or reviews.

  1. Family answers show once 20 families have answered.Until then this page shows how many have answered.
  2. The questions are about the school, never a person.No question asks about a named teacher or staff member.
  3. Answers are never part of the Scope Score.They sit beside the state’s records and do not change a school’s score.

Families

No family answers yet

0 of 20 needed before answers show

  • Does the school tell you how your child is doing, in a way you understand, before report cards arrive?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely
  • When you contact the school with a question, do you hear back within two school days?Usually · Sometimes · Rarely · Haven’t contacted them
  • Can you get school information in the language you read best?Yes · Mostly · No
  • And 4 more questions.

Answer the family questionsResponder en españolHow family answers work

Staff

Staff can’t answer for this school yet

We don’t check staff emails for Mountain View Whisman yet. Tell us your district’s email domain and we’ll work on adding it.

Ask us to add your district

Money

Where does the money go?

$24,400 for each student in 2024–25. California’s middle schools spent $19,269 for each student. Mountain View Whisman’s plan for 2026–27 covers $14 million.

$24,400

for each student at this school, 2024–25
Spent at the school
$23,401
The school’s share of district office costs
$999
Of the total, from federal funds
$295
  • Crittenden$24,400
  • Mountain View Whisman middle schools$25,117
  • California middle schools$19,269

The district and California figures combine their middle schools, weighted by enrollment (our calculation, 1,241 California schools). Spending does not show how well money is used. Source: California Department of Education, per-school spending report, 2024–25. Funding records ↓

Mountain View Whisman’s yearly plan

$14million

in the district’s plan for 2026–27

$5million

planned for services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth

This is the district’s plan. It is not this school’s own budget. The plan has 6 goals. The district’s page lists each one. The plan covers $14 million of $130 million in total budgeted spending. Source: Mountain View Whisman Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), 2026–27. Read the district’s plan →

The neighborhood

What is the area around Crittenden like?

These figures are for everyone who lives in ZIP code 94043. They are not figures for the families at Crittenden.

Typical household income in a year

$203,298

Typical means half are higher and half are lower. The ZIP code is the school’s address, not its attendance area. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024, ZIP code area 94043.

Typical home value
$1,641,100
People who live in this ZIP code
33,176
Typical age
36.1 years
Adults 25 and older with a four-year college degree
71%

Questions to ask

What should I ask, and when?

Bring these 6 questions to Crittenden. Confirm anything about applying with the school itself.

On a tour

  1. What does the school try before a suspension, and who talks with the family?6.1% suspended at least once, 2025–26 (40 of 659 students); average California middle school: 3.7%
  2. What extra help do low-income students get, and how do you know it’s working?26% of low-income students scored Proficient or Advanced in math, grades 6–8, spring 2026 (182 students tested); the same group across California: 26%
  3. Which math courses can students take, and how are placements decided?
  4. Which electives and high-school transition supports are available?

At the office

  1. What time does the day start and end, and is any day shorter?
  2. Is there care before or after school, and what does it cost?

Getting in

What comes after Crittenden, and how do I get in?

Ask Mountain View Whisman which school serves your address.

  1. Elementary
    Scope Score 76Solid · 52nd percentile · 2026Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)
  2. Middle · this school
    Crittenden Middle
    Grades 6–8Scope Score 85Strong · 88th percentile
  3. High
    Link not recorded
    Ask the district about this stage.

These links come from past records and from distance. Confirm your child’s school with the district. Each school’s standing compares it with California schools at its own level. Explore schools on the map

All recorded links and nearby alternatives

Elementary links

  • Theuerkauf Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 76 · Solid · 52nd percentile · elementary · 2026

    100% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Monta Loma Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 80 · Solid · 71st percentile · elementary · 2026

    99% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Stevenson Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 94 · Strong · 97th percentile · elementary · 2026

    79% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Gabriela Mistral Elementary

    Its zone mostly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 78 · Solid · 63rd percentile · elementary · 2026

    79% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Edith Landels Elementary

    Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 89 · Strong · 92nd percentile · elementary · 2026

    48% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

  • Amy Imai Elementary

    Its zone partly overlaps this school’s zone on a historical federal map (2015–16)

    Scope Score 95 · Strong · 98th percentile · elementary · 2026

    14% historical overlap of origin attendance-zone area · not a share of students

Links do not guarantee placement. Charter, magnet, transfer and other admission routes can differ. Each school’s percentile compares it with California schools at its own level (continuation and alternative schools only with their own kind); the stages are not one ranking. Older zone links come from the federal School Attendance Boundary Survey (NCES SABS).

Where it is

Where is Crittenden?

Address
1701 Rock Street, Mountain View 94043Get directions (opens Google Maps in a new tab)
Administrator
Julie ThompsonAs the state’s school directory lists it, last updated July 23, 2024.

A school’s place on the map is its address in the state directory. It does not show which homes the school serves. See nearby schools on the map

Short answers to 6 common questions

How do I get in?

Ask Mountain View Whisman which school serves your address. See the details ↓

Is Crittenden a good middle school?

Crittenden Middle has a Scope Score of 85. It scored higher than 88 in 100 of California’s 2,529 scored public middle schools (Strong, 88th percentile, spring 2026). See the details ↓

How often do students miss school or get suspended?

In 2025–26, 13 in 100 students missed 10% or more of school days, against 12 in 100 at the average Mountain View Whisman middle school. 6.1% of students (40 of 659) were suspended at least once in 2025–26, against 3.7% at the average California middle school. See the details ↓

Did students here score higher than students who started at the same place?

Yes, in both subjects. In 2025, students here in grades 6–8 scored 5 points higher in English than California students who had the same score the year before. The state calls that Accelerated. In math, they scored 12 points higher, which the state calls Accelerated.

  • Included in this measure: 542 students

See the details ↓

How do kids like mine do here?

In spring 2026, 33% of low-income students in grades 6–8 at Crittenden Middle in Mountain View scored Proficient or Advanced in English, against 39% for the same group across California. See the details ↓

What should I ask on a visit?

The questions drawn from this page are under Questions to ask, ready to copy. See the details ↓

The full record

Source records

This page is built from 12 sets of records from public data sources. Every figure keeps its source, grades, year and count.

Data updated

October 15, 2026

Record sets on this page
12
Sources
California Department of EducationU.S. Census Bureau
State test years
2017–2026

Results

Students

Money and staff

Place, downloads and method

Score factorssource values, index and weights · 2025–26 · ranked #290 of 2,529 California middle schools we score
Score factors, 2025–26
FactorSchoolIndexWeight
Advancedaverage of English and math39%7342%
Proficient or Advancedaverage of English and math61%6723%
8th graders in 2026 against 6th graders in 2024 (partly different children)+56 scale-score pts6120%
Chronically absent13 in 100575%
Suspension rate6.1% (40 of 659)415%
English learners: top level33%655%

Index is where the school's value sits among the California middle schools we score, from 0 to 100, where 50 is their average; it is not a percentile. School values are from 2025–26. Chronic absence and suspension are CDE's all-students school rates; the score uses an adjusted version of each that pulls small schools toward the average, so their index can sit nearer 50 than the rate suggests. Growth is the change between the school's earlier and later grade-level groups, in scale-score points; it does not follow the same students.

Scope Score by year2018–19 to 2025–26 · each year’s inputs, and the score for each year we could verify

Scope Score

School yearScope ScorePercentileRankComparison group
2025–268588#290California middle schools · 2,529 schools · current formula

2018–19, 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24 and 2024–25 have records on file but no Scope Score we could verify against that year’s source files, so no score is shown for them.

School yearChronic absenceSuspensionGrade gap (points)
2018–197 in 1002.6% (19 of 731)0
2021–22not on filenot on file−3
2022–23not on filenot on file+14
2023–2413 in 1006.3% (39 of 622)+3
2024–2513 in 1004.9% (32 of 655)+5
2025–2613 in 1006.1% (40 of 659)+6

Chronic absence and suspension are CDE’s all-students school rates for each year.

Grade gap: the same year’s grade 6 and grade 8 results, side by side. They are different children, so the gap describes one year, not any child’s progress. The Scope Score’s growth measure is a different comparison, shown in Score factors above (how it’s built).
No 2019–20 or 2020–21 records in this SchoolScope series
Every tested year2017–2026 · rates, tested counts, and each grade

English and math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subjectStudents with scoresTop levelTop two levels
2026 · English61737%65%
2026 · Math62340%56%
2025 · English60736%65%
2025 · Math61640%55%
2024 · English57131%62%
2024 · Math58737%52%
2023 · English51930%63%
2023 · Math52832%51%
2022 · English52027%65%
2022 · Math52730%50%
2019 · English68630%66%
2019 · Math69138%56%
2018 · English67226%60%
2018 · Math67438%55%
2017 · English64326%63%
2017 · Math64634%55%

Each year names its school year end (2026 = 2025–26). “Students with scores” counts each subject on its own, so don’t add the English and math counts together. A dash is unavailable, not zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subjectStudents with scoresMet or exceeded
2025 · Grade 6 · English19364%
2025 · Grade 7 · English20665%
2025 · Grade 8 · English20866%
2025 · Grade 6 · Math19851%
2025 · Grade 7 · Math20754%
2025 · Grade 8 · Math21159%
2024 · Grade 6 · English20263%
2024 · Grade 7 · English19062%
2024 · Grade 8 · English17961%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math21049%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math19352%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math18456%
2023 · Grade 6 · English17558%
2023 · Grade 7 · English16564%
2023 · Grade 8 · English17968%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math17941%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math16953%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math18059%
2022 · Grade 6 · English17164%
2022 · Grade 7 · English16772%
2022 · Grade 8 · English18258%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math17445%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math16861%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math18546%
2019 · Grade 6 · English23967%
2019 · Grade 7 · English22570%
2019 · Grade 8 · English22259%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math24151%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math22759%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math22358%
2018 · Grade 6 · English22559%
2018 · Grade 7 · English23166%
2018 · Grade 8 · English21656%
2018 · Grade 6 · Math22658%
2018 · Grade 7 · Math23261%
2018 · Grade 8 · Math21647%
2017 · Grade 6 · English22263%
2017 · Grade 7 · English21263%
2017 · Grade 8 · English20965%
2017 · Grade 6 · Math22356%
2017 · Grade 7 · Math21354%
2017 · Grade 8 · Math21056%

Current 2025–26 grade results are under Academic achievement, in Results for each grade. “Students with scores” counts the students tested in that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero, and each year’s row is a different group of children.

Science (CAST)schoolwide · spring 2026
Science (CAST)TestedAdvancedProficientDeveloping levelMinimal
Schoolwide21034%24%30%11%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Student groups: test resultsEnglish · spring 2026 · against the same group in the district and California
Group · EnglishTestedProficient or Advancedvs districtvs California
Low-income18133%+4−6
Hispanic or Latino23040%+6+1
White14978%−3+16
Student groups: the state’s growth measureCalifornia School Dashboard 2025 · points above or below what the state expected · shown, not part of the score
GroupEnglishnCDE categoryMathnCDE category
All students+5542Accelerated+12542Accelerated
English-only students+9268not categorized+10268not categorized
Hispanic or Latino0211Average−3211Average
Low-income0167Average+2167Average
White+7136Accelerated+23136Exceptional
English learners−3132Average+7132Accelerated
Asian+1195Accelerated+2995Exceptional
Recently reclassified as fluent in English+990not categorized+1290not categorized
Students with disabilities−677Moderate−977Moderate
Two or more races+1470Accelerated+1970Accelerated
English learners only−2642not categorized−642not categorized
Long-term English learners (grades 6–8 only)−1129Moderate+229Average
Filipino+1220Accelerated+720Accelerated
Homeless−2012Moderate−1612Moderate

CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorized” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-term English learner counts cover grades 6–8 only (CDE’s rule), so that row is not comparable to the All students row. At least one estimate here is a CDE weighted estimate; that describes how CDE combines years, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth recordsthe state’s student-by-student measure, and grade 8 against the same school’s grade 6 two years earlier, partly different children · two different measures

Grade 8 in 2026 against grade 6 in 2024 · English

English · 2024 · Grade 6
38%
exceeded standard · 63% met or exceeded
CDE CAASPP 2024 · 202 English test records with scores
English · 2026 · Grade 8
39%
Advanced · 65% Proficient or Advanced
CDE CAASPP 2026 · 209 English test records with scores

Minimum rounded subject-mean records with scores at the endpoints: 206 (school-grade cohort proxy).

These paired percentages describe English results for grade groups at this school in two years. The groups are not matched students. SchoolScope's scored growth measure uses a different school-level scale-score proxy across English and math; California's matched-student model is a separate measure.

California growth model · points vs expected

State model · English+5 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

542 students

CDE growth category: Accelerated

California growth model, English: +5 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's −2-point median for California middle school records.

State model · math+12 pts vs expected

matched students, grades 6–8

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

All students, grades 6–8

542 students

CDE growth category: Accelerated

California growth model, math: +12 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, CDE category Accelerated, against SchoolScope's −3-point median for California middle school records.

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points against the state’s expected score for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California middle school records, the median English estimate is −2 and the middle half fall between −10 and +5 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read the figure against it, not its sign alone. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8; here that is grades 6–8, and it is not part of the Scope Score.

Attendance and suspensionsState records · this school and each student group · 2018–19 and 2025–26

CDE’s all-students school rates for 2024–25 and 2025–26; the change is the difference between the two rates as printed.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024–25 · 13 in 100 → 2025–26 · 13 in 100 · 0 in 100
Suspension rate2024–25 · 4.9% (32 of 655) → 2025–26 · 6.1% (40 of 659) · +1.2 percentage points
Group2018–192025–26Change
Female8 in 10014 in 100+6 in 100
Male6 in 10011 in 100+5 in 100
Asian0 of 623 in 100—
Black or African American1 of 212 of 14—
Filipino0 of 362 of 17—
Hispanic or Latino10 in 10018 in 100+8 in 100
Two or more races3 of 6610 of 87—
White6 in 10011 in 100+5 in 100
Students with disabilities14 of 9720 of 86—
English learners9 of 9918 of 83—
Homeless4 of 184 of 31—
Low-income11 in 10017 in 100+6 in 100
All students7 in 10013 in 100+6 in 100

Two reported school years only; no intervening-year result is implied. Where fewer than 100 students were counted, the cell shows the count and no change is printed. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Fundingschool and district spending, from state and federal finance records · each row names its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$18,061 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 4,753 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$287 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 616

Central federal expenditures attributed here$8 per pupil

CDE ESSA · central expenditures attributed to this school · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 616

District current expense · FY 2024–25$27,113 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

How the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–⁠25 · SchoolScope calculation
Instruction 64%Instruction support 12%Student services 6%Administration 11%Buildings & maintenance 7%
The arithmetic behind these shares · FY 2024–25
GroupDollarsShare, to two decimalsPrinted
Instruction$76,814,85463.87%64%
Instruction support$14,564,36612.11%12%
Student services$6,809,3765.66%6%
Administration$12,806,25110.65%11%
Buildings & maintenance$8,968,0787.46%7%
Total$120,261,947100.00%100%

These shares are our arithmetic: each group’s dollars divided by the $120,261,947 total of the groups shown, rounded to whole percents by largest remainder so they add up to 100. Dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest dollar, so they can differ from the total by a dollar. SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–⁠2021; latest district record shown: 2021
2021$18,061 per pupil
2020$16,881 per pupil
2019$16,350 per pupil
2018$14,946 per pupil
2017$13,809 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

Staffing recordsstate teacher credential-and-placement and district salary records · each for its own year

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders3.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

The surrounding ZIP codeCensus Bureau survey, 2020–2024 · ZIP 94043 · not the school’s students
American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP 94043 area
MeasureEstimate
Median household income$203,298
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)71%
ZIP-area population33,176
Median age36.1 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP-area figures do not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score. See all schools in ZIP code 94043 →

Downloads, embed and methodologyCSV · embed code · sources · corrections

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/crittenden-middle-9472"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Crittenden Middle — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

Data sources: public data sources, including the California Department of Education · state tests (CAASPP) 2025–26 · Scope Score from 2025–26 results, compared across 2,529 middle schools · attendance and suspensions by student group from 2018–19 and 2025–26 · district finance for the year each row names · Census survey (ACS) 2020–2024 · Data updated October 15, 2026