ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
California School for the Deaf-Riverside · RiversidePublic

California School for the Deaf-Riverside: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

California School for the Deaf-Riverside posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 4.5pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

3044 Horace Street, 92506 (opens in new tab)·California School for the Deaf-Riverside·Riverside·Grades TK-12·350 students·42% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 248-7700·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope1039
% Exceeded0%21%
% Met+2%43%
Growth
Absence26.9%17.9%
Suspension1.0%1.6%
Scope Score
10
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #5,704 statewide

California School for the Deaf-Riverside scores 10 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 1st percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “2% proficient” and call it done. California School for the Deaf-Riverside deserves a closer read. The school sits in Riverside, where two in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 1st percentile since 2019.

ELARed(Maintained)MathRed(Maintained)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 2% meet the standard today, versus 7% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 30%0%0%
Grade 40%11%0%7%0%
Grade 511%6%5%6%9%
Grade 612%5%0%
Grade 79%5%5%
Grade 80%0%8%5%
Grade 110%5%27%16%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 37%0%0%
Grade 46%11%6%7%0%
Grade 511%0%0%6%0%
Grade 66%5%11%
Grade 70%5%5%
Grade 80%8%0%0%
Grade 110%7%5%

The 5 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
0.0%
State 21.3%
21.3pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
1.5%
State 42.7%
41.1pp below state avg
Chronic absenteeism
26.9%
State 17.9%
9.0pp above state avg
Suspension rate
1.0%
State 1.6%
0.6pp below state avg
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)
+4.5pp
State -2.9pp
No same-cohort record for this school, so growth is left out of its Scope Score altogether and the other measures carry more of the weight. The number here is this year's grade 3 against this year's grade 5 — different children, not a cohort followed over time. Compared against the state's own grade gap, which is the only fair reading of it.

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model — it follows individual children in grades 4 through 8 and compares each one against a prediction from their own prior scores. On that measure this school sits well below the middle of California elementary schools in reading and math together. We show it; we don't score it.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −34 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 1st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.1st pctile · −34 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −15 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 11th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.11th pctile · −15 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At California School for the Deaf-Riverside in Riverside, 4.7% of disabilities students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 4.7% district-wide and 17.0% statewide. California School for the Deaf-Riverside outperforms its district average for disabilities students by 0.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Disabilities students (3.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (5.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.1 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 129 students tested.

All students at this school: 4% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 4%, district —, state 43%4%
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 4%, district 4%, state 15%4% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 6%, district 6%, state 32%6% · +3 vs school
MaleMale: this school 4%, district 4%, state 42%4% · +0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 0%, district 0%, state 44%0% · −4 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 0%, district 0%, state 56%0% · −4 vs school

6 of 12 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only84 studentsEnglish Only, reading: −33 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 84 students.−33 pts · −36 vs typical
Students with disabilities84 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: −34 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 84 students.−34 pts · −26 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students52 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −32 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 52 students.−32 pts · −33 vs typical
Low-income students32 studentsLow-income students, reading: −36 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 32 students.−36 pts · −36 vs typical
Math
English Only83 studentsEnglish Only, math: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 83 students.−15 pts · −16 vs typical
Students with disabilities83 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −15 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 83 students.−15 pts · −10 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students51 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −21 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 51 students.−21 pts · −20 vs typical
Low-income students31 studentsLow-income students, math: −30 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 31 students.−30 pts · −29 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 1 more group is reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 26.9%, district 26.9%, state 17.9%26.9% · +9.0pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 1.0%, district —, state 1.6%1.0% · −0.6pp vs state

Grades 7–8 students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (34.4% vs 22.7%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the upper grades.

Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–622.7%
Grades 7–834.4%
Grades 9–1234.3%
TK/K29.0%

Where the path goes

California School for the Deaf-Riverside serves grades TK-12 — students can complete their entire TK-12 education here, with no school-to-school transitions.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 5:1, district 5:15:1
Teaching staff68 teachers
Avg. experience13.6 years
Fully credentialed54%
First-year teachers6%
Intern / emergency permit1.4%

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic63.4%
District 63.4% · CA 56.1%
White26.3%
District 26.3% · CA 19.9%
Other5.7%
District 5.7% · CA 9.0%
Black3.4%
District 3.4% · CA 4.8%
Asian1.1%
District 1.1% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 42.0% (22pp below CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$121K · CA $85K
Median home value$670K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+41% · CA 35%
ZIP population45,086
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 2% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is California School for the Deaf-Riverside a good elementary school?

California School for the Deaf-Riverside has a Scope Score of 10 out of 100, placing it in the 1st percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #5,704 statewide. 0.0% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 21.3 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are California School for the Deaf-Riverside's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 1.5% of students at California School for the Deaf-Riverside met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 0.0% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 1.5% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 0.0% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 102 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does California School for the Deaf-Riverside rank in California?

California School for the Deaf-Riverside ranks #5,704 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 1st percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), grade-level growth (Grade 3 to grade 5 growth), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at California School for the Deaf-Riverside?

26.9% of students at California School for the Deaf-Riverside are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 1.0%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does California School for the Deaf-Riverside compare to other schools in Riverside?

California School for the Deaf-Riverside scores 10/100 (1st percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 350 students. Use the schools in Riverside page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does California School for the Deaf-Riverside serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At California School for the Deaf-Riverside in Riverside, 4.7% of disabilities students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 4.7% district-wide and 17.0% statewide. California School for the Deaf-Riverside outperforms its district average for disabilities students by 0.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Disabilities students (3.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (5.1% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 3.1 percentage points for hispanic students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 129 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
0.0%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 30th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
1.5%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 20th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
26.9%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 35th pctile
▲ 0.5pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
1.0%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 55th pctile
▼ 0.2pp lower vs 2024
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students) · not scored
+4.5pp
↑ vs CA -2.9pp
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3180%0%6%94%0%−43
Grade 4220%0%5%95%0%−45
Grade 5110%9%9%82%9%−39
Grade 6180%0%17%83%0%−46
Grade 7210%5%10%86%5%−43
Grade 8200%5%5%90%5%−41
Grade 11195%11%16%68%16%−33
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3180%0%6%94%0%−45
Grade 4220%0%9%91%0%−41
Grade 5110%0%9%91%0%−35
Grade 6180%11%22%67%11%−23
Grade 7200%5%5%90%5%−29
Grade 8200%0%10%90%0%−32
Grade 11195%0%11%84%5%−18

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide510%2%55%43%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Students with Disabilities1294.7%+0−12
Hispanic/Latino395.1%+0−34
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
California School for the Deaf-Riverside ←100.0%1.5%+4.5pp1.0%
Riverside Virtual2.1 mi4921.0%48.4%+7.1pp0.2%
Magnolia Elementary1.5 mi4821.8%48.4%−2.2pp2.1%
Castle View Elementary2.1 mi4320.0%49.0%+1.4pp1.3%
California average3921.3%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019101#54582.8%7.1%21.6%5.8%
2022111#56582.7%5.6%41.5%5.2%-0.4pp
2023133#55281.3%2.7%32.4%0.9%
2024132#56240.0%4.3%26.4%1.2%+6.3pp
2025101#57040.0%1.5%26.9%1.0%+4.5pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female23.1%34.9%+11.8pp
Male29.0%24.7%-4.3pp
Black/African American21.7%38.5%+16.8pp
Hispanic/Latino30.9%32.5%+1.6pp
Two or More Races7.1%
Students with Disabilities26.3%29.5%+3.2pp
English Learners25.6%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged29.8%39.7%+9.9pp
All Students26.3%29.5%+3.2pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−3484Minimal−1583Moderate
English Only−3384not categorised−1583not categorised
Students with Disabilities−3484Minimal−1583Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−3252Minimal−2151Minimal
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−3632Minimal−3031Minimal
White−3929Minimal−329Average

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/california-school-for-the-deaf-riverside-0834"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="California School for the Deaf-Riverside — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction