Edison Elementary: More than half of kids exceed the standard. But the zoned next school scores lower.
Edison holds its own. Scores drop at the schools it feeds into. Ask where its graduates actually enrol, and whether families stay on the zoned path.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Growth | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 80 | 50% | 81% | -10.8 | 12.1% | 0.1% |
| CA average · Elementary School | 45 | 21% | 43% | -2.9 | 17.9% | 1.6% |
Edison Elementary scores 80 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 97th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
⭐ High Ceiling — Ask what happens for a kid who shows up behind — a high ceiling for the top can sit right next to thin support at the bottom, and the score alone won't show you which.
Most rating sites would stop at “81% proficient” and call it done. Edison deserves a closer read. The school sits in Santa Monica, where one in three students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Edison's low-income kids hit 76.4% proficiency in ELA — a number the same group reaches at 38.2% statewide. If you're trying to read past zip-code-driven test scores, that's the signal worth weighing.
The seven-year arc
Has held the 97th-percentile line every tested year since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 81% of students meet the standard today, above the 65% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 66% | 59% | 59% | 77% | 91% |
| Grade 4 | 69% | 83% | 74% | 68% | 88% |
| Grade 5 | 80% | 72% | 86% | 77% | 76% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 57% | 73% | 70% | 82% | 81% |
| Grade 4 | 55% | 74% | 58% | 58% | 79% |
| Grade 5 | 63% | 61% | 78% | 71% | 74% |
The story this school is actually telling
of students scored in the top band on the state test. The California average is 21.3%.
the zoned path continues to John Adams Middle, which scores 27 points lower — the data can't say why.
The school, grade by grade
ELA · CAASPP 2024–25Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.
The honest read: the share exceeding falls 12.1pp across grades; the floor slips 14.1pp. The state average rises 4.5pp over the same span. A school visit and conversation with teachers will tell you more than this number.
Edison's most underrated number
76.4% of low-income students met the ELA standard — versus 38.2% for the same group statewide. That's the strongest kind of signal a school can post: it holds across income lines.
The 6 things our score weighs
Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask how teachers track each child's growth over the year, not just where the class lands on test day.
- Ask whether extra support — tutoring, counseling, small groups — reaches kids across income lines, not just the students already ahead.
- Ask which schools families here actually choose next — the zoned path is only the default.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
How every group of students does here
At Edison Elementary in Santa Monica, 76.4% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 53.4% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Edison Elementary outperforms its district average for low-income students by 23.0 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (61.1% Math proficient); Hispanic students (80.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 7.0 percentage points for low-income students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 72 students tested.
Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.
Low-income student ELA proficiency falls by 18.5pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +10.2pp.
Showing up, and staying in class
TK/K students miss school at roughly one and a half times the rate of Grades 4–6 students (16.8% vs 11.0%). Chronic absence here concentrates in the earliest grades — worth asking how the school works with new families on attendance.
Where the path goes
The zoned path continues to John Adams Middle, which scores 27 points lower than this school — worth weighing alongside everything above. Families here often look at charter or magnet options for middle school.
Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.
On the state's science test (CAST), 57% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Edison Elementary a good elementary school?
What are Edison Elementary's CAASPP test scores?
How does Edison Elementary rank in California?
Is Edison Elementary getting better or worse?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Edison Elementary?
How does Edison Elementary compare to other schools in Santa Monica?
How does Edison Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 81
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53 | 55% | 36% | 8% | 2% | 91% | +47 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 61% | 27% | 4% | 9% | 88% | +43 |
| Grade 5 | 68 | 43% | 34% | 21% | 3% | 76% | +29 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 3 | 53 | 55% | 26% | 17% | 2% | 81% | +35 |
| Grade 4 | 56 | 41% | 38% | 18% | 4% | 79% | +37 |
| Grade 5 | 68 | 49% | 25% | 22% | 4% | 74% | +38 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 68 | 29% | 28% | 43% | 0% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 72 | 76.4% | +23 | +38 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 120 | 80.0% | +22 | +41 |
| White | 53 | 94.3% | +13 | +33 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edison Elementary ← | — | 80 | 50.4% | 81.3% | −10.8 | 0.1% |
| Franklin Elementary | 1.6 mi | 83 | 57.7% | 83.5% | +3.7 | 0.3% |
| Clover Avenue Elementary | 2.3 mi | 81 | 65.6% | 86.3% | −3.9 | 0.5% |
| Mar Vista Elementary | 1.8 mi | 77 | 55.0% | 83.1% | −1.1 | 0.1% |
| California average | — | 45 | 21.3% | 42.7% | −2.9 | 1.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 71 | 91 | #491 | 42.0% | 65.2% | 4.1% | 0.0% | +10.1pp |
| 2022 | 67 | 92 | #440 | 43.8% | 70.2% | 25.6% | 0.0% | -0.0pp |
| 2023 | 76 | 96 | #230 | 40.4% | 70.8% | 15.5% | 0.0% | +17.7pp |
| 2024 | 75 | 95 | #285 | 47.5% | 72.2% | 11.1% | 0.1% | -5.4pp |
| 2025 | 80 | 97 | #150 | 50.4% | 81.3% | 12.1% | 0.1% | -10.8pp |
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3.7% | 9.8% | +6.1pp |
| Male | 4.1% | 13.8% | +9.7pp |
| Asian | 0.0% | — | — |
| Black/African American | 0.0% | — | — |
| Hispanic/Latino | 4.7% | 13.3% | +8.6pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 3.8% | 18.1% | +14.3pp |
| English Learners | 4.2% | 12.8% | +8.6pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 3.6% | 17.1% | +13.5pp |
| All Students | 3.9% | 11.6% | +7.7pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction