School district · San Diego County

Ramona City Unified schools

Ramona City Unified’s 6 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 68th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). They sit in three of the four bands: Solid, Developing and Needs Support.

Elementary · 6 schools

from 1st to 68th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • James Dukes Elementary: 68th percentile, Solid
  • Ramona Community Montessori: 67th percentile, Solid
  • Barnett Elementary: 30th percentile, Developing
  • Hanson Elementary: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • Mt. Woodson Elementary: 8th percentile, Needs Support
  • Ramona Elementary: 1st percentile, Needs Support
3Needs Support
1Developing
2Solid
0Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 2 schools

from 22nd to 68th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Mountain Valley Academy: 68th percentile, Solid
  • Olive Peirce Middle: 22nd percentile, Needs Support
1Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

High · 1 school

at 57th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Ramona High: 57th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
0Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

  • 1 school not ranked statewide

Schools around Ramona City Unified

10 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Ramona City Unified score highest?

James Dukes Elementary is highest, at the 68th percentile.

That’s higher than 68 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Ramona City Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Show the other 3 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in Ramona City Unified had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Ramona City Unified score highest?

Mountain Valley Academy is highest, at the 68th percentile.

That’s higher than 68 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Ramona City Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

High schools

Where does the high school we score in Ramona City Unified stand?

Ramona High is at the 57th percentile.

That’s higher than 57 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). It’s the only public high school we score in Ramona City Unified.

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

1 high school not ranked statewide

The district

Where does Ramona City Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Ramona City Unified spent $17,499 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Ramona City Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction60%
  • Instruction support10%
  • Student services11%
  • Administration10%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$86.7 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 27 funded actions in 5 goals. That’s 93% of its $93.3 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 231 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 71% of the money; their titles are below. The plan itself puts 81% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

8 of the plan’s 27 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading under $0.1 million
  • Math under $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $5.7 million
  • English learners $0.5 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Interventions and support for special education students$4.4 million
  • Tiered interventions to address Chronic Absenteeism$807,902
  • Implement the EL Master Plan to ensure all EL students receive appropriate support$377,861
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $9.6 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $9.6 million and estimates it spent $9.5 million, $0.1 million (1%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

What changed

The total is $3.3 million (4%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Interventions and support for special education students, which went from $1.4 million to $4.4 million.

Largest cuts

  • Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG)−⁠$1.1 million
  • Actively recruit, hire and retain high quality staff (certificated and classified)−⁠$981,023
  • Support the basic student needs of food and transportation by providing Food and Nutrition Services and Transportation Services−⁠$716,111

Largest increases

  • Interventions and support for special education students+⁠$3.0 million
  • Basic Service: Well Maintained Facilities+⁠$2.0 million
  • Before and After School Care Program+⁠$331,012

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Expanded Learning Opportunity Program (ELOP)$1.8 million

Ask: What did Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG) pay for, and what changes now that the 2026–27 plan gives it $1.1 million less?

What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 244%40%down 4 pts
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goals 1 and 231%28%down 3 pts
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 223 in 10022 in 1001 fewer in 100
Suspended at least onceGoal 23.1%4.0%up 0.9 pts

Goal 5 tracks named schools and Goals 3 and 4 track other measures, so they aren’t shown here.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Actively recruit, hire and retain high quality staff (certificated and classified) · $50,253,589
  • Support the basic student needs of food and transportation by providing Food and Nutrition Services and Transportation Services · $5,842,383
  • Basic Service: Well Maintained Facilities · $5,105,448
The full plan5 goals, 64 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($86.7 million).

Where does the money go?

71% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G2
G4

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals
  • small actions drawn together

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Students will be prepared for college, career and intelligent, responsible citizenry as they experience high…$61.5 million71% of action budgets

“Students will be prepared for college, career and intelligent, responsible citizenry as they experience high quality, locally controlled, standards-based teaching and learning” p. 16 ↗

8 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $61.1 million (+⁠$438,777)

Largest funded actions

  1. Actively recruit, hire and retain high quality staff (certificated and classified)$50.3 millionaction 1.1 · p. 160 ↗
  2. Interventions and support for special education students$4.4 millionaction 1.6 · p. 160 ↗
  3. Broad Course of Study and standards-aligned materials to ensure students are prepared for College and Career$2.9 millionaction 1.3 · p. 160 ↗
  4. Provide support and progress monitor the implementation of standards and performance standards and respond to outcomes$2.3 millionaction 1.4 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $1.8 million is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Provide supplemental, programs and services for unduplicated students$0.9 millionaction 1.7 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

3 more funded actions in this goal

  • Implement the EL Master Plan to ensure all EL students receive appropriate support · action 1.5 · p. 160 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG) · action 1.8 · p. 161 ↗$0.2 million
  • Staff (certificated and classified) are assigned, fully credentialed and professionally developed for the students they are supporting, including SWD, EL, FY and HOM · action 1.2 · p. 160 ↗$0.2 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Interventions and support for special education students+⁠$3.0 million$1.4 million → $4.4 million · p. 160 ↗
  2. Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG)−⁠$1.1 million$1.3 million → $0.2 million · p. 161 ↗
  3. Actively recruit, hire and retain high quality staff (certificated and classified)−⁠$1.0 million$51.2 million → $50.3 million · p. 160 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Broad Course of Study and standards-aligned materials to ensure students are prepared for College and Career · $3.2 million → $2.9 million · p. 160 ↗−⁠$0.4 million
  • Provide support and progress monitor the implementation of standards and performance standards and respond to outcomes · $2.2 million → $2.3 million · p. 160 ↗+⁠$0.1 million
  • Provide supplemental, programs and services for unduplicated students · $863,090 → $878,594 · p. 160 ↗+⁠$15,504
  • Implement the EL Master Plan to ensure all EL students receive appropriate support · $396,083 → $377,861 · p. 160 ↗−⁠$18,222
  • Staff (certificated and classified) are assigned, fully credentialed and professionally developed for the students they are supporting, including SWD, EL, FY and HOM · $455,223 → $168,691 · p. 160 ↗−⁠$286,532

How the plan measures it · 20 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 16 ↗.

Goal 2Students will benefit from positive and supportive learning environments$14.7 million17% of action budgets

7 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $15.3 million (−⁠$681,388) · p. 80 ↗

Largest funded actions

  1. Support the basic student needs of food and transportation by providing Food and Nutrition Services and Transportation Services$5.8 millionaction 2.3 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $2.5 million is state funding counted toward those services
  2. Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Support for at-risk students$3.2 millionaction 2.6 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $3.1 million is state funding counted toward those services
  3. Before and After School Care Program$2.8 millionaction 2.7 · p. 161 ↗
  4. Provide supportive, inclusive, safe, and engaging school environments$1.6 millionaction 2.2 · p. 161 ↗
  5. Tiered interventions to address Chronic Absenteeism$0.8 millionaction 2.1 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $765,966 is state funding counted toward those services

2 more funded actions in this goal

  • New strategies to address problem behaviors and bullying · action 2.5 · p. 161 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.3 million
  • Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG) · action 2.8 · p. 161 ↗$0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Support the basic student needs of food and transportation by providing Food and Nutrition Services and Transportation Services−⁠$0.7 million$6.6 million → $5.8 million · p. 161 ↗
  2. Before and After School Care Program+⁠$0.3 million$2.4 million → $2.8 million · p. 161 ↗
  3. Provide supportive, inclusive, safe, and engaging school environments−⁠$0.3 million$1.9 million → $1.6 million · p. 161 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Support for at-risk students · $3.4 million → $3.2 million · p. 161 ↗−⁠$0.2 million
  • Tiered interventions to address Chronic Absenteeism · $735,237 → $807,902 · p. 161 ↗+⁠$72,665
  • New strategies to address problem behaviors and bullying · $234,818 → $263,148 · p. 161 ↗+⁠$28,330
  • Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG) · $31,920 → $124,866 · p. 161 ↗+⁠$92,946

How the plan measures it · 26 measures · 1 quoted

  • Number of staff, district- wide, that are trained in de-escalation strategies [March 1st of current school year] p. 89 ↗
    Baseline
    104 staff district-wide are currently ProAct Certified
    Target for year 3
    185 staff district- wide with a ProAct or other comprable certification

25 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Students will benefit from school environments where meaningful family collaboration and community engagement…$276,082under 1% of action budgets

“Students will benefit from school environments where meaningful family collaboration and community engagement are encouraged” p. 112 ↗

3 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $277,874 (−⁠$1,792)

Largest funded actions

  1. Improve communication with families through consistent sharing of information$131,050action 3.1 · p. 161 ↗
  2. Increased and strategic connections with families of low income and EL families$122,672action 3.4 · p. 162 ↗
  3. Provide parents/ guardians resources and workshops to help them navigate the school system and provide parenting support$22,360action 3.3 · p. 162 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Improve communication with families through consistent sharing of information−⁠$2,393$133,443 → $131,050 · p. 161 ↗
  2. Provide parents/ guardians resources and workshops to help them navigate the school system and provide parenting support+⁠$981$21,379 → $22,360 · p. 162 ↗
  3. Increased and strategic connections with families of low income and EL families−⁠$380$123,052 → $122,672 · p. 162 ↗

How the plan measures it · 7 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 112 ↗.

Goal 4Students will be educated in school facilities that are safe, clean, well-maintained, and supportive of…$10.1 million12% of action budgets

“Students will be educated in school facilities that are safe, clean, well-maintained, and supportive of healthy learning environments” p. 130 ↗

5 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $6.6 million (+⁠$3.6 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Basic Service: Well Maintained Facilities$5.1 millionaction 4.1 · p. 162 ↗
  2. Basic Service: Clean Facilities$2.6 millionaction 4.2 · p. 162 ↗
  3. Expanded Learning Opportunity Program (ELOP)$1.8 millionaction 4.5 · p. 162 ↗
  4. Basic Service: Safe Facilities$0.6 millionaction 4.3 · p. 162 ↗
  5. Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG)$0.1 millionaction 4.4 · p. 162 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Basic Service: Well Maintained Facilities+⁠$2.0 million$3.1 million → $5.1 million · p. 162 ↗
  2. Basic Service: Clean Facilities−⁠$0.4 million$3.0 million → $2.6 million · p. 162 ↗
  3. Basic Service: Safe Facilities+⁠$131,500$447,500 → $579,000 · p. 162 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Expanded Learning Opportunity Program (ELOP) · $1.8 million · p. 162 ↗new or renamed
  • Learning Recovery Emergency Block Grant (LREBG) · $100,000 → $100,000 · p. 162 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 5 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 130 ↗.

Goal 5 · Equity Multiplier Focus GoalBy June 30, 2027, students at Montecito High School and Future Bound Independent Study will increase…$124,357under 1% of action budgets

“By June 30, 2027, students at Montecito High School and Future Bound Independent Study will increase achievement on the College & Career Readiness Indicator for all students including the socioeconomically disadvantaged student group” p. 139 ↗

4 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $124,154 (+⁠$203)

Largest funded actions

  1. Increase both academic and mental health support services$77,356action 5.2 · p. 162 ↗
  2. Academic Intervention Supports for Learning for increased achievement on CAASPP ELA and Math$15,667action 5.1 · p. 162 ↗
  3. Increase CTE And College and Career Readiness$15,667action 5.3 · p. 162 ↗
  4. Professional Learning and Coaching to improve outcomes for all students$15,667action 5.4 · p. 162 ↗

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Increase CTE And College and Career Readiness−⁠$40,366$56,033 → $15,667 · p. 162 ↗
  2. Increase both academic and mental health support services+⁠$32,017$45,339 → $77,356 · p. 162 ↗
  3. Academic Intervention Supports for Learning for increased achievement on CAASPP ELA and Math+⁠$4,276$11,391 → $15,667 · p. 162 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Professional Learning and Coaching to improve outcomes for all students · $11,391 → $15,667 · p. 162 ↗+⁠$4,276

How the plan measures it · 6 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 139 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 4,949 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 49%2. White: 43%3. Two or more races: 6%4. Black or African American: <1%5. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%6. Asian: <1%7. Filipino: <1%8. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino49%
  2. White43%
  3. Two or more races6%
  4. Black or African American<1%
  5. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  6. Asian<1%
  7. Filipino<1%
  8. Pacific Islander<1%
  9. Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

61%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 3,007 of 4,945 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

The state is giving Ramona City Unified extra help in 2026, the second year after it qualified on the 2025 Dashboard.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 38% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (192 of 500 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

1 school getting state support, 2025–26

Hanson Elementary (Targeted support)

This list covers the district’s own schools; each charter school’s page shows its record. Federal designation under the Every Student Succeeds Act, 2025–26.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗ · School support (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (1)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Ramona City Unified rank highest?

Elementary: James Dukes Elementary, 68th percentile (Solid). Middle: Mountain Valley Academy, 68th percentile (Solid). High: Ramona High, 57th percentile (Solid). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Ramona City Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Ramona City Unified good?

Ramona City Unified’s 6 public elementary schools run from the 1st to the 68th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 2 Solid, 1 Developing and 3 Needs Support. Ramona City Unified’s 2 public middle schools run from the 22nd to the 68th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Solid and 1 Needs Support. Ramona City Unified has one public high school we score, Ramona High, at the 57th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Ramona City Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Ramona City Unified had 18 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Ramona City Unified spend per student?

Ramona City Unified spent $17,499 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 60 cents of every Ramona City Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Ramona City Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $86.7 million into 27 funded actions in 5 goals, 93% of its $93.3 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $61.5 million, 71% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Ramona City Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.