School district · Ventura County

Oak Park Unified schools

Oak Park Unified’s 3 public elementary schools run from the 91st to the 96th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Elementary · 3 schools

from 91st to 96th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Brookside Elementary: 96th percentile, Strong
  • Red Oak Elementary: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Oak Hills Elementary: 91st percentile, Strong
0Needs Support
0Developing
0Solid
3Strong

One dot per school.

Middle and high school pictures

Middle · 2 schools

from 74th to 95th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Medea Creek Middle: 95th percentile, Strong
  • Oak Park Independent: 74th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
1Solid
1Strong

High · 2 schools

from 43rd to 98th · among 1,498 California high schools we score · spring 2025 tests

  • Oak Park High: 98th percentile, Strong
  • Oak Park Independent: 43rd percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
0Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level. 1 of the 6 ranked schools teaches two levels, so it appears in more than one picture.

  • 6 ranked schools

Schools around Oak Park Unified

6 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in Oak Park Unified score highest?

Brookside Elementary is highest, at the 96th percentile.

That’s higher than 96 in 100 of the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Oak Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Context

The average elementary school in Oak Park Unified had 5 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in Oak Park Unified score highest?

Medea Creek Middle is highest, at the 95th percentile.

That’s higher than 95 in 100 of the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in Oak Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

High schools

Which high schools in Oak Park Unified score highest?

Oak Park High is highest, at the 98th percentile.

That’s higher than 98 in 100 of the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests).

Highest in Oak Park Unified

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

The district

Where does Oak Park Unified’s money go, and what does it plan?

Oak Park Unified spent $14,418 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

The typical California district spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Oak Park Unified dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction63%
  • Instruction support8%
  • Student services9%
  • Administration10%
  • Buildings & maintenance8%
  • Other2%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$6.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 35 funded actions in 3 goals. That’s 10% of its $65.0 million general fund budget. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 126 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

Three actions take 62% of the money. The plan itself puts 91% of it toward staff.

  • Campus Cleanliness and Safety $2.5 million
  • CTE Pathways $796,179
  • Comprehensive Mental Health Support $700,382
  • 32 other actions
Reading, math and catch-up help

7 of the plan’s 35 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Math $80,446
  • Catch-up help $722,163
  • English learners $151,146

Largest of these

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)$579,995
  • Summer Remediation Programs$133,298
  • English Language Development (ELD) Instructional Assistants (IAs)$118,388
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth), what changed and what its goals measure
For high-need students

It plans $1.7 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth. For 2025–26, it planned $1.8 million and estimates it spent $1.7 million, $0.1 million (5%) less than planned (our arithmetic).

Ask: Why did estimated spending on these services come in $0.1 million under the 2025–26 plan, and where does that money go in 2026–27?

What changed

The total is $283,396 (5%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is CTE Pathways, which went from $661,449 to $796,179.

Largest cuts

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)−⁠$43,105
  • Professional Development to Support Students with Disabilities−⁠$42,509
  • Educational Technology Skills−⁠$23,190

Largest increases

  • CTE Pathways+⁠$134,730
  • Standards Aligned Instructional Materials+⁠$47,664
  • Summer Remediation Programs+⁠$18,155

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Campus Cleanliness and Safety$2.5 million
  • Additional OPHS Assistant Principal Position$73,803
  • Extracurricular and Enrichment Activities$17,475
What its goals measure

Read these state results for the district’s own schools as context for the goals they measure; results alone can’t show what the plan caused.

What its goals measure: state results, 2024–25 and 2025–26
Measure2024–252025–26Change
English, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Enhancing Academic Achievement for All Students80%79%down 1 pt
Math, every tested grade: Proficient or Advanced in 2025–26, met or exceeded in 2024–25Goal 1 · Enhancing Academic Achievement for All Students73%72%down 1 pt
Chronically absentCounted across all the district’s students, not averaged by schoolGoal 27 in 1007 in 100no change
Suspended at least onceGoal 21.1%0.9%down 0.2 pts

Goal 3 isn’t shown because it tracks other measures.

Figures from CDE’s state test, chronic absence and suspension files. Test figures cover every grade the district tests (California tests grades 3–8 and 11), so they differ from a profile’s rated grades. We combined the district’s schools ourselves, weighted by students and leaving out charter schools. Chronically absent means a student missed 10% or more of school days.

The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Campus Cleanliness and Safety · $2,493,730
  • CTE Pathways · $796,179
  • Comprehensive Mental Health Support · $700,382
The full plan3 goals, 35 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($6.4 million).

Where does the money go?

63% to Goal 3, Developing Global Citizens Prepared for Sustainable Futures. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1Enhancing Academic Achievement for All Students$1.1 million18% of action budgets

“Increase academic achievement for all student groups, with a particular focus on narrowing achievement gaps and ensuring equitable outcomes” p. 15 ↗

14 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.2 million (−⁠$84,521)

Largest funded actions

  1. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)$579,995action 1.1 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Summer Remediation Programs$133,298action 1.15 · p. 83 ↗
  3. English Language Development (ELD) Instructional Assistants (IAs)$118,388action 1.6 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. TK-12 Mathematics Program Enhancement$80,446action 1.10 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services · of which $74,851 is state funding counted toward those services
  5. Categorical Programs Support$60,024action 1.4 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

9 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional Development to Support Students with Disabilities · action 1.8 · p. 83 ↗$45,491
  • Homework Support 6-12 · action 1.3 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$38,463
  • Long Term English Learner (LTELs) Support · action 1.7 · p. 83 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$18,758
  • GATE and Advanced Placement (AP) Course Access · action 1.9 · p. 83 ↗$18,391
  • English Language Development (ELD) Monitoring and Instructional Planning Software · action 1.5 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$14,000
  • Meaningful and High Leverage Professional Development (PD) for TK- 12 Staff · action 1.11 · p. 83 ↗$12,277
  • Update Elementary Report Cards · action 1.12 · p. 83 ↗$9,360
  • Tutoring for 6-12 Students · action 1.2 · p. 82 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$8,870
  • Phonemic Awareness Professional Development · action 1.13 · p. 83 ↗$7,078

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS)−⁠$43,105$623,100 → $579,995 · p. 82 ↗
  2. Professional Development to Support Students with Disabilities−⁠$42,509$88,000 → $45,491 · p. 83 ↗
  3. Summer Remediation Programs+⁠$18,155$115,143 → $133,298 · p. 83 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • English Language Development (ELD) Instructional Assistants (IAs) · $117,066 → $118,388 · p. 82 ↗+⁠$1,322
  • TK-12 Mathematics Program Enhancement · $94,490 → $80,446 · p. 83 ↗−⁠$14,044
  • Categorical Programs Support · $57,821 → $60,024 · p. 82 ↗+⁠$2,203
  • Homework Support 6-12 · $32,376 → $38,463 · p. 82 ↗+⁠$6,087
  • Long Term English Learner (LTELs) Support · $18,070 → $18,758 · p. 83 ↗+⁠$688
  • GATE and Advanced Placement (AP) Course Access · $19,166 → $18,391 · p. 83 ↗−⁠$775
  • English Language Development (ELD) Monitoring and Instructional Planning Software · $15,250 → $14,000 · p. 82 ↗−⁠$1,250
  • Meaningful and High Leverage Professional Development (PD) for TK- 12 Staff · $12,277 · p. 83 ↗new or renamed
  • Update Elementary Report Cards · $10,689 → $9,360 · p. 83 ↗−⁠$1,329
  • Tutoring for 6-12 Students · $21,087 → $8,870 · p. 82 ↗−⁠$12,217
  • Phonemic Awareness Professional Development · $9,102 → $7,078 · p. 83 ↗−⁠$2,024

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 15 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 15 ↗.

Goal 2Foster a Holistic Learning Environment for Student Success: Enhance student wellness, safety, and school…$1.2 million19% of action budgets

“Foster a Holistic Learning Environment for Student Success: Enhance student wellness, safety, and school culture and climate to create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that promotes personal growth for all students” p. 41 ↗

9 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $1.2 million (+⁠$5,590)

Largest funded actions

  1. Comprehensive Mental Health Support$700,382action 2.5 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Access to the Arts$230,660action 2.12 · p. 85 ↗
  3. Provide a District Nurse to Support Overall Student Wellness$126,892action 2.8 · p. 84 ↗
  4. Additional OPHS Assistant Principal Position$73,803action 2.13 · p. 85 ↗
  5. Continue Position of Director of Student Support and School Safety$55,268action 2.7 · p. 84 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

4 more funded actions in this goal

  • Extracurricular and Enrichment Activities · action 2.11 · p. 85 ↗$17,475
  • Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS) Programs for All School Sites · action 2.1 · p. 83 ↗$14,531
  • Engage Educational Partners · action 2.3 · p. 84 ↗$1,500
  • Student Engagement in Shared Decision Making · action 2.6 · p. 84 ↗$1,000

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Comprehensive Mental Health Support−⁠$20,144$720,526 → $700,382 · p. 84 ↗
  2. Access to the Arts+⁠$14,174$216,486 → $230,660 · p. 85 ↗
  3. Positive Behavior Interventions and Support (PBIS) Programs for All School Sites+⁠$9,031$5,500 → $14,531 · p. 83 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Provide a District Nurse to Support Overall Student Wellness · $125,050 → $126,892 · p. 84 ↗+⁠$1,842
  • Additional OPHS Assistant Principal Position · $73,803 · p. 85 ↗new or renamed
  • Continue Position of Director of Student Support and School Safety · $54,770 → $55,268 · p. 84 ↗+⁠$498
  • Extracurricular and Enrichment Activities · $17,475 · p. 85 ↗new or renamed
  • Engage Educational Partners · $1,500 → $1,500 · p. 84 ↗unchanged
  • Student Engagement in Shared Decision Making · $1,000 → $1,000 · p. 84 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 9 measures · 1 quoted

  • School Attendance Rate (CALPADS) (State A- Pupil Engagement) p. 48 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 All students- 95.2% …
    Target for year 3
    2025-26 All students- 97% …

8 more measures in the plan’s table.

Goal 3Developing Global Citizens Prepared for Sustainable Futures$4.0 million63% of action budgets

“Equip students with the knowledge, skills, and dispositions to become globally aware, environmentally conscious citizens capable of adapting to changing landscapes, while ensuring college and career readiness” p. 58 ↗

12 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.7 million (+⁠$362,327)

Largest funded actions

  1. Campus Cleanliness and Safety$2.5 millionaction 3.5 · p. 85 ↗
  2. CTE Pathways$0.8 millionaction 3.11 · p. 86 ↗
  3. Standards Aligned Instructional Materials$0.4 millionaction 3.14 · p. 86 ↗
  4. TK-12 STEM Program Enhancement$0.2 millionaction 3.12 · p. 86 ↗
  5. Career Technical Education (CTE) Program Support$0.1 millionaction 3.13 · p. 86 ↗

7 more funded actions in this goal

  • Educational Technology Skills · action 3.15 · p. 86 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Nature-Based Field Trips · action 3.6 · p. 85 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Career Exploration for Middle and High School Students · action 3.17 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Expand Dual Enrollment, Honors and AP Opportunities · action 3.1 · p. 85 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Professional Development in College and Career Readiness and Civic Engagement · action 3.10 · p. 85 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Waste Audit · action 3.7 · p. 85 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Closing the Digital Divide · action 3.16 · p. 86 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. CTE Pathways+⁠$134,730$661,449 → $796,179 · p. 86 ↗
  2. Standards Aligned Instructional Materials+⁠$47,664$315,000 → $362,664 · p. 86 ↗
  3. Educational Technology Skills−⁠$23,190$62,116 → $38,926 · p. 86 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Campus Cleanliness and Safety · $2.5 million · p. 85 ↗new or renamed
  • TK-12 STEM Program Enhancement · $191,493 → $193,718 · p. 86 ↗+⁠$2,225
  • Career Technical Education (CTE) Program Support · $73,114 → $73,803 · p. 86 ↗+⁠$689
  • Nature-Based Field Trips · $35,372 → $35,770 · p. 85 ↗+⁠$398
  • Career Exploration for Middle and High School Students · $8,591 → $26,579 · p. 86 ↗+⁠$17,988
  • Expand Dual Enrollment, Honors and AP Opportunities · $6,000 → $9,240 · p. 85 ↗+⁠$3,240
  • Professional Development in College and Career Readiness and Civic Engagement · $8,530 → $6,530 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$2,000
  • Waste Audit · $8,181 → $2,333 · p. 85 ↗−⁠$5,848
  • Closing the Digital Divide · $2,000 → $2,000 · p. 86 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 11 measures · 1 quoted

  • Number of CTE completers- Q SIS (State C- Pupil Achievement) p. 62 ↗
    Baseline
    2022-23 Total CTE completers- 34 …
    Target for year 3
    2025-26 Total CTE completers- 60 …

10 more measures in the plan’s table.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 4,437 students
1. White: 53%2. Asian: 24%3. Hispanic or Latino: 11%4. Two or more races: 8%5. Filipino: 2%6. Black or African American: 1%7. Pacific Islander: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. White53%
  2. Asian24%
  3. Hispanic or Latino11%
  4. Two or more races8%
  5. Filipino2%
  6. Black or African American1%
  7. Pacific Islander<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Not reported0%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools. Rounded labels may not total 100%; segments use the original shares.

Free or reduced-price meals

12%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 547 of 4,437 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

Oak Park Unified isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 56% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (43 of 77 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in Oak Park Unified rank highest?

Elementary: Brookside Elementary, 96th percentile (Strong). Middle: Medea Creek Middle, 95th percentile (Strong). High: Oak Park High, 98th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the Oak Park Unified district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in Oak Park Unified good?

Oak Park Unified’s 3 public elementary schools run from the 91st to the 96th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 3 Strong. Oak Park Unified’s 2 public middle schools run from the 74th to the 95th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 1 Solid. Oak Park Unified’s 2 public high schools run from the 43rd to the 98th percentile among the 1,498 California high schools we score (spring 2025 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 1 Developing. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in Oak Park Unified compare with California?

The average elementary school in Oak Park Unified had 5 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does Oak Park Unified spend per student?

Oak Park Unified spent $14,418 per student in the 2024–25 school year. The typical California district spent $20,491. About 63 cents of every Oak Park Unified dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in Oak Park Unified’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $6.4 million into 35 funded actions in 3 goals, 10% of its $65.0 million general fund budget. Its largest goal holds $4.0 million, 63% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP): spring 2026 for elementary and middle schools, spring 2025 for high schools, and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by Oak Park Unified, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26 elementary and middle school; 2024–25 high school

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.