School district · Los Angeles County

East Whittier City Elementary schools

East Whittier City Elementary runs schools through 8th grade. Its 10 public elementary schools run from the 28th to the 90th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). High school is run by another district; confirm the school for your address with the district.

Elementary · 10 schools

from 28th to 90th · among 5,726 California elementary schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Murphy Ranch Elementary: 90th percentile, Strong
  • Ocean View Elementary: 81st percentile, Strong
  • Ceres Elementary: 79th percentile, Strong
  • Leffingwell Elementary: 77th percentile, Strong
  • Evergreen Elementary: 60th percentile, Solid
  • Mulberry Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • Orchard Dale Elementary: 55th percentile, Solid
  • La Colima Elementary: 53rd percentile, Solid
  • Scott Avenue Elementary: 51st percentile, Solid
  • Laurel Elementary: 28th percentile, Developing
0Needs Support
1Developing
5Solid
4Strong

Middle · 3 schools

from 65th to 78th · among 2,529 California middle schools we score · spring 2026 tests

  • Granada Middle: 78th percentile, Strong
  • Hillview Middle: 73rd percentile, Solid
  • East Whittier Middle: 65th percentile, Solid
0Needs Support
0Developing
2Solid
1Strong

One dot per school. Each stage is placed only among California schools at its own level.

Schools around the East Whittier City Elementary district

13 listed public schools with mapped locations.

Open full map →

Loading school locations…

Percentile among California schools at the same level

  • Strong75th+
  • Solid50–74th
  • Developing25–49th
  • Needs Supportbelow 25th
  • Not scored

The school lists on this page are also available without the map.

Elementary schools

Which elementary schools in the East Whittier City Elementary district score highest?

Murphy Ranch Elementary is highest, at the 90th percentile.

That’s higher than 90 in 100 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the East Whittier City Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level. What patterns mean

Show the other 7 elementary schools
Context

The average elementary school in the East Whittier City Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once.

Middle schools

Which middle schools in the East Whittier City Elementary district score highest?

Granada Middle is highest, at the 78th percentile.

That’s higher than 78 in 100 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests).

Highest in the East Whittier City Elementary district

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Context

The average middle school in the East Whittier City Elementary district had 13 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100.

The district

Where does East Whittier City Elementary’s money go, and what does it plan?

The East Whittier City Elementary district spent $19,801 per student in the 2024–25 school year.

That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 68 cents of every East Whittier City Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction.

Spending by function

Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from the district’s annual financial report (SACS) to the California Department of Education. District-wide: it includes central administration and costs never assigned to one campus.

Share by function, 2024–25

  • Instruction68%
  • Instruction support8%
  • Student services7%
  • Administration8%
  • Buildings & maintenance9%

Shares of the same spending total, by the report’s spending categories, rounded so they add up to 100. Names are simplified from the report’s own categories.

What the district plans

$21.4 million

planned in its 2026–27 plan for 63 funded actions in 3 goals. These are planned amounts; the district reports what it spent in a later plan.

The plan in short

Source: the district’s yearly spending plan (Local Control and Accountability Plan, or LCAP, 144 pages), as posted to the California School Dashboard.

Where the money goes

The money is spread out. No action gets more than 13%, and the three largest, Class Size Reduction, School Counseling Services and Instructional Coaches, take 33% between them. The plan itself puts 91% of it toward staff.

Reading, math and catch-up help

16 of the plan’s 63 funded actions name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners in their titles.

Actions whose titles name reading, math, catch-up help or English learners
  • Reading $0.3 million
  • Math under $0.1 million
  • Catch-up help $2.3 million
  • English learners $0.8 million

An action naming two of these appears under both.

Largest of these

  • Elementary Intervention Specialists$1.7 million
  • Intervention Instructional Assistants-Bilingual (Support Intervention Specialists)$280,000
  • Multi-tiered System of Support (MTSS) Coordinator$220,000
For high-need students (English learners, low-income students and foster youth) and what changed
For high-need students

It plans $16.4 million in extra services for English learners, low-income students and foster youth.

What changed

The total is $3.8 million (21%) higher than in the 2025–26 plan. The biggest change in dollars is Instructional Coaches, which went from $530,000 to $2.1 million.

Largest cuts

  • Class Size Reduction−⁠$874,881
  • Teacher and Administrator Retention (Induction and Support)−⁠$60,000
  • Intervention Instructional Assistants-Bilingual (Support Intervention Specialists)−⁠$58,922

Largest increases

  • Instructional Coaches+⁠$1.6 million
  • Software “Illuminate Education”+⁠$290,000
  • Differentiated Assistance Support for Unduplicated Students+⁠$167,000

New in the 2026–27 plan

  • Full Day Kindergarten Program Support$1.9 million
  • Elementary Intervention Specialists$1.7 million
  • Social Workers (LREBG)$270,000
The plan’s own titles and amounts
  • Class Size Reduction · $2,713,310
  • School Counseling Services · $2,275,500
  • Instructional Coaches · $2,133,750
The full plan3 goals, 4 measures and where the money goes

We calculate each action’s share of the plan by dividing its planned amount by the total of the plan’s funded actions ($21.4 million).

Where does the money go?

55% to Goal 1. Each box is one action, sized by its planned dollars and coloured by its change since last year’s plan. Tap a box to open its goal.

G1
G2
G3

Change since the 2025–26 plan, same title

  • fell 25% or more
  • fell 10–25%
  • fell 2–10%
  • within 2%
  • grew 2–10%
  • grew 10–25%
  • grew 25% or more
  • new or renamed title
  • not compared: unconfirmed, or repeated across goals

Every goal, in the plan’s order

Goal 1The East Whittier City School District will provide optimal conditions for students, staff, and the community…$11.9 million55% of action budgets

“The East Whittier City School District will provide optimal conditions for students, staff, and the community to ensure students are prepared for high school by providing safe and well-maintained facilities, an education that fosters technology and innovation, and well-rounded program including world languages, the arts, and career technical skills” p. 16 ↗

28 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $10.2 million (+⁠$1.6 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Class Size Reduction$2.7 millionaction 1.1 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Full-Day Transitional Kindergarten Program Support$2.0 millionaction 1.16 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  3. Full Day Kindergarten Program Support$1.9 millionaction 1.26 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Custodial Support$1.8 millionaction 1.4 · p. 87 ↗
  5. Broad Course of Study Elementary School$0.6 millionaction 1.15 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

23 more funded actions in this goal

  • Professional Development-Teacher Training Days · action 1.20 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.5 million
  • Educational Technology and Replacement · action 1.2 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • District Technology Support · action 1.19 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.4 million
  • Professional Development-Classified Training Days · action 1.18 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Multi-tiered System of Support (MTSS) Coordinator · action 1.27 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Differentiated Assistance Support for Unduplicated Students · action 1.11 · p. 88 ↗$0.2 million
  • Professional Development in English Language Arts · action 1.9 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • Supplemental Instructional Technology Software and Programs · action 1.6 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Instructional: Professional Development, Conferences, and Consultants · action 1.25 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Instructional Leadership Team Planning and Collaboration · action 1.13 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Teacher Curriculum Committees · action 1.22 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support Committee and Professional Development · action 1.17 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Transitional Kindergarten Supplemental Instructional Materials and Program Support · action 1.28 · p. 91 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Middle School On-Site Technology Aides · action 1.5 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • GATE STEM Learning Experiences · action 1.14 · p. 89 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Teacher and Administrator Retention (Induction and Support) · action 1.3 · p. 87 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Dual Language Immersion Program Support · action 1.10 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Supplemental Instruction and Intervention Resources (ELA) · action 1.24 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Middle School Grading Committee · action 1.23 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • New Teacher Academy · action 1.12 · p. 89 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Supplemental Math Instruction and Intervention Materials · action 1.8 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Supplemental Science Instruction and Intervention Materials · action 1.7 · p. 88 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Technology Lead Stipends · action 1.21 · p. 90 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Class Size Reduction−⁠$0.9 million$3.6 million → $2.7 million · p. 87 ↗
  2. Differentiated Assistance Support for Unduplicated Students+⁠$167,000$50,000 → $217,000 · p. 88 ↗
  3. Teacher and Administrator Retention (Induction and Support)−⁠$60,000$100,000 → $40,000 · p. 87 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Full-Day Transitional Kindergarten Program Support · $2.0 million · p. 89 ↗not compared
  • Full Day Kindergarten Program Support · $1.9 million · p. 90 ↗new or renamed
  • Custodial Support · $1.8 million → $1.8 million · p. 87 ↗unchanged
  • Broad Course of Study Elementary School · $530,000 → $563,750 · p. 89 ↗+⁠$33,750
  • Professional Development-Teacher Training Days · $480,000 · p. 90 ↗not compared
  • Educational Technology and Replacement · $400,000 → $450,000 · p. 87 ↗+⁠$50,000
  • District Technology Support · $340,000 → $369,000 · p. 89 ↗+⁠$29,000
  • Professional Development-Classified Training Days · $250,000 · p. 89 ↗not compared
  • Multi-tiered System of Support (MTSS) Coordinator · $220,000 · p. 90 ↗new or renamed
  • Professional Development in English Language Arts · $175,000 → $185,000 · p. 88 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • Supplemental Instructional Technology Software and Programs · $140,000 → $110,000 · p. 88 ↗−⁠$30,000
  • Instructional: Professional Development, Conferences, and Consultants · $100,000 · p. 90 ↗new or renamed
  • Instructional Leadership Team Planning and Collaboration · $60,846 → $80,000 · p. 89 ↗+⁠$19,154
  • Teacher Curriculum Committees · $100,000 → $80,000 · p. 90 ↗−⁠$20,000
  • Multi-Tiered System of Support Committee and Professional Development · $70,000 · p. 89 ↗not compared
  • Transitional Kindergarten Supplemental Instructional Materials and Program Support · $50,000 · p. 91 ↗new or renamed
  • Middle School On-Site Technology Aides · $45,000 → $46,125 · p. 88 ↗+⁠$1,125
  • GATE STEM Learning Experiences · $15,000 → $46,000 · p. 89 ↗+⁠$31,000
  • Dual Language Immersion Program Support · $40,000 · p. 88 ↗new or renamed
  • Supplemental Instruction and Intervention Resources (ELA) · $40,000 · p. 90 ↗not compared
  • Middle School Grading Committee · $2,000 → $36,000 · p. 90 ↗+⁠$34,000
  • New Teacher Academy · $20,000 → $35,000 · p. 89 ↗+⁠$15,000
  • Supplemental Math Instruction and Intervention Materials · $5,000 → $22,000 · p. 88 ↗+⁠$17,000
  • Supplemental Science Instruction and Intervention Materials · $30,000 → $8,000 · p. 88 ↗−⁠$22,000
  • Technology Lead Stipends · $5,000 · p. 90 ↗not compared

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 3 measures

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 16 ↗.

Goal 2The East Whittier City School District will provide a world-class education that prepares every student for…$5.0 million23% of action budgets

“The East Whittier City School District will provide a world-class education that prepares every student for success in high school and beyond as measured by exceeding state and county averages on standardized tests and demonstrating growth on local measures” p. 33 ↗

16 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.5 million (+⁠$1.5 million)

Largest funded actions

  1. Instructional Coaches$2.1 millionaction 2.1 · p. 91 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. Elementary Intervention Specialists$1.7 millionaction 2.2 · p. 91 ↗
  3. Software “Illuminate Education”$0.4 millionaction 2.10 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  4. Intervention Instructional Assistants-Bilingual (Support Intervention Specialists)$0.3 millionaction 2.3 · p. 91 ↗
  5. Supplemental Support for Instructional Programs$0.2 millionaction 2.4 · p. 91 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

11 more funded actions in this goal

  • Supplemental English Language Development (ELD) Resources · action 2.7 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • Dual Language Immersion Instructional Assistants · action 2.11 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • English Learner District Liaison · action 2.14 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • LTEL and EL Supplemental Programs and Support · action 2.16 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • READ 180 Intervention Program-Licenses · action 2.5 · p. 91 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • English Learner Lead Stipends · action 2.15 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Reflection Meetings-Middle School · action 2.6 · p. 91 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Coherency Costs for Professional Development · action 2.12 · p. 92 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Special Education and General Education Collaboration and professional development (Teachers and Administrators) · action 2.13 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million
  • Reading Diagnostic Resources · action 2.9 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million
  • ELPAC Exam Administration · action 2.8 · p. 92 ↗under $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. Instructional Coaches+⁠$1.6 million$0.5 million → $2.1 million · p. 91 ↗
  2. Software “Illuminate Education”+⁠$290,000$60,000 → $350,000 · p. 92 ↗
  3. Intervention Instructional Assistants-Bilingual (Support Intervention Specialists)−⁠$58,922$338,922 → $280,000 · p. 91 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Elementary Intervention Specialists · $1.7 million · p. 91 ↗new or renamed
  • Supplemental Support for Instructional Programs · $200,000 → $205,000 · p. 91 ↗+⁠$5,000
  • Supplemental English Language Development (ELD) Resources · $90,000 → $60,000 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$30,000
  • Dual Language Immersion Instructional Assistants · $100,000 → $60,000 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$40,000
  • English Learner District Liaison · $50,000 → $46,125 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$3,875
  • LTEL and EL Supplemental Programs and Support · $40,000 · p. 93 ↗new or renamed
  • READ 180 Intervention Program-Licenses · $35,000 → $35,000 · p. 91 ↗unchanged
  • English Learner Lead Stipends · $30,000 → $30,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged
  • Reflection Meetings-Middle School · $30,000 → $20,000 · p. 91 ↗−⁠$10,000
  • Coherency Costs for Professional Development · $10,000 → $20,000 · p. 92 ↗+⁠$10,000
  • Special Education and General Education Collaboration and professional development (Teachers and Administrators) · $15,000 → $15,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged
  • Reading Diagnostic Resources · $40,000 → $10,000 · p. 92 ↗−⁠$30,000
  • ELPAC Exam Administration · $5,000 → $5,000 · p. 92 ↗unchanged

A reworded title counts as new.

We couldn’t read this goal’s measures from the plan. They start near page 33. p. 33 ↗

Goal 3The East Whittier City School District will create warm, welcoming, and supportive environments for students…$4.5 million21% of action budgets

“The East Whittier City School District will create warm, welcoming, and supportive environments for students, staff, and community to ensure we are meeting the academic and social-emotional needs of our community” p. 47 ↗

19 funded actions · 2025–26 plan: $3.9 million (+⁠$654,900)

Largest funded actions

  1. School Counseling Services$2.3 millionaction 3.5 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  2. School Psychologist Support (LREBG)$0.7 millionaction 3.16 · p. 95 ↗
  3. Social Workers (LREBG)$0.3 millionaction 3.19 · p. 95 ↗
  4. Campus Climate and Safety Monitors$0.2 millionaction 3.18 · p. 95 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services
  5. Student Services Coordinator$0.2 millionaction 3.17 · p. 95 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services

14 more funded actions in this goal

  • Parent and Community Liaisons (Bilingual) · action 3.1 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • District PBIS Social Worker · action 3.15 · p. 95 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.2 million
  • PBIS Leadership Team Planning and Collaboration · action 3.9 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • College and Career Readiness Programs · action 3.13 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need services$0.1 million
  • PBIS Student Incentives · action 3.10 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Student Academic Events · action 3.12 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • District Parent Liaison · action 3.2 · p. 93 ↗under $0.1 million
  • School Connectedness Initiative (During School) · action 3.14 · p. 95 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Parent Engagement Events and Programs · action 3.3 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Social-Emotional Instructional Programs · action 3.7 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • PBIS Professional Development · action 3.8 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Translation Services · action 3.4 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • Stipends for School Social Worker Interns · action 3.6 · p. 93 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million
  • PBIS Digital Token System · action 3.11 · p. 94 ↗ · marked as contributing to high-need servicesunder $0.1 million

Changes from last year’s plan, same title

  1. School Counseling Services+⁠$0.1 million$2.2 million → $2.3 million · p. 93 ↗
  2. School Psychologist Support (LREBG)+⁠$85,000$600,000 → $685,000 · p. 95 ↗
  3. College and Career Readiness Programs−⁠$50,000$130,000 → $80,000 · p. 94 ↗

Every other line in this goal, against last year’s plan

  • Social Workers (LREBG) · $270,000 · p. 95 ↗new or renamed
  • Campus Climate and Safety Monitors · $235,000 · p. 95 ↗new or renamed
  • Student Services Coordinator · $225,000 · p. 95 ↗new or renamed
  • Parent and Community Liaisons (Bilingual) · $240,000 → $194,750 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$45,250
  • District PBIS Social Worker · $185,000 → $190,650 · p. 95 ↗+⁠$5,650
  • PBIS Leadership Team Planning and Collaboration · $60,000 → $80,000 · p. 94 ↗+⁠$20,000
  • PBIS Student Incentives · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 94 ↗unchanged
  • Student Academic Events · $50,000 → $50,000 · p. 94 ↗unchanged
  • District Parent Liaison · $46,000 → $45,000 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$1,000
  • School Connectedness Initiative (During School) · $20,000 → $45,000 · p. 95 ↗+⁠$25,000
  • Parent Engagement Events and Programs · $45,000 → $40,000 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$5,000
  • Social-Emotional Instructional Programs · $55,000 → $25,000 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$30,000
  • PBIS Professional Development · $25,000 → $25,000 · p. 94 ↗unchanged
  • Translation Services · $25,000 → $10,000 · p. 93 ↗−⁠$15,000
  • Stipends for School Social Worker Interns · $10,000 → $10,000 · p. 93 ↗unchanged
  • PBIS Digital Token System · $20,000 → $10,000 · p. 94 ↗−⁠$10,000

A reworded title counts as new.

How the plan measures it · 1 measure

None of these has an all-students line we can quote; the plan’s table lists them from p. 47 ↗.

All amounts are planned. We read them from the PDF and added up each goal’s actions ourselves. Page links open the plan at that page.

Who goes to the district’s schools
Who attends

Student mix

2024–25 · October enrollment count, 7,524 students
1. Hispanic or Latino: 84%2. White: 9%3. Asian: 2%4. Two or more races: 2%5. Filipino: 1%6. Not reported: 1%7. Black or African American: <1%8. American Indian or Alaska Native: <1%9. Pacific Islander: <1%Student mix2024–25
  1. Hispanic or Latino84%
  2. White9%
  3. Asian2%
  4. Two or more races2%
  5. Filipino1%
  6. Not reported1%
  7. Black or African American<1%
  8. American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
  9. Pacific Islander<1%
Shares use the district's own October enrollment counts from the CDE, including its charter schools.

Free or reduced-price meals

65%

Across California, 63% of students qualify.

2024–25 · 4,817 of 7,442 students qualify, summed from the CDE’s meal counts for every school it lists under the district, charters included. It comes from a different CDE file than the student mix, so the two totals differ.

The district’s state records

Is the state giving the district extra help?

East Whittier City Elementary isn’t getting extra state help in 2026, only the standard support every district gets.

How English learners moved up on the state’s English test

From spring 2025 to spring 2026, 54% of the district’s English learners moved up at least one level on the state’s English test (ELPAC), or stayed at the top (243 of 452 students). California: 47%. It counts students moving up the test’s levels, so a student can count here before becoming fluent.

Sources: District help (CDE) ↗ · English learner progress (CDE) ↗. State results from the 2026 California School Dashboard.

Which places nearby can you look at next?

Cities in the district

More places (5)

Districts nearby

Common questions

Which public schools in the East Whittier City Elementary district rank highest?

Elementary: Murphy Ranch Elementary, 90th percentile (Strong). Middle: Granada Middle, 78th percentile (Strong). Each percentile is among the California schools at the same level we score. A rank doesn’t decide fit or whether a child can enroll.

Does living in the East Whittier City Elementary district decide which school my child attends?

Not by itself. Attendance boundaries, programs, transfers and space all matter. Confirm the school for your address, grade and program with the district.
More questions (5)

Are the public schools in the East Whittier City Elementary district good?

East Whittier City Elementary’s 10 public elementary schools run from the 28th to the 90th percentile among the 5,726 California elementary schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 4 Strong, 5 Solid and 1 Developing. East Whittier City Elementary’s 3 public middle schools run from the 65th to the 78th percentile among the 2,529 California middle schools we score (spring 2026 tests). By band: 1 Strong and 2 Solid. A percentile compares a school with California public schools at the same level that we score. How we score schools.

How does chronic absence in the East Whittier City Elementary district compare with California?

The average elementary school in the East Whittier City Elementary district had 11 in 100 students chronically absent (missed 10% or more of school days) in 2025–26; the average California elementary school we score had 17 in 100. Both are averages of school rates, each school counted once. The average middle school in the East Whittier City Elementary district had 13 in 100 students chronically absent in 2025–26; the average California middle school we score had 18 in 100. These are averages of school rates: each school counts once, whatever its size.

How much does the East Whittier City Elementary district spend per student?

The East Whittier City Elementary district spent $19,801 per student in the 2024–25 school year. That’s close to the typical California district, which spent $20,491. About 68 cents of every East Whittier City Elementary dollar went to classroom instruction. Day-to-day spending per student in average daily attendance, from its annual financial report to the California Department of Education. The district’s spending, by function.

What is in the East Whittier City Elementary district’s 2026–27 spending plan?

The district’s 2026–27 spending plan puts $21.4 million into 63 funded actions in 3 goals. Its largest goal holds $11.9 million, 55% of the action budgets. The 2026–27 plan, goal by goal.

Where do these results come from?

California’s state tests (CAASPP) from spring 2026 and chronic-absence rates for 2025–26, published by the California Department of Education. Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s calculations. How we score schools.

Sources and methodology

This page lists the public schools governed and funded by the East Whittier City Elementary district, with the district’s spending and state accountability records.

Data source: California Department of Education · CAASPP 2025–26

Percentiles, bands and Scope Scores are SchoolScope’s own calculations from these state files.

Download these schools (CSV)Free to use under CC BY 4.0 with attribution.