ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary · Lake IsabellaPublic

Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Woodrow W. Wallace posts low test scores — and grade 5 tests above grade 3 here this year, by 6.3pp. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2239
% Exceeded4%21%
% Met+18%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avg · p59Average · p50
Absence37.1%17.9%
Suspension0.6%1.6%
Scope Score
22
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #4,910 statewide

Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary scores 22 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 15th percentile of 5,744 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “18% proficient” and call it done. Woodrow W. Wallace deserves a closer read. The school sits in Lake Isabella, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,744 elementary schools statewide

Has stayed near the 15th percentile since 2019.

ELAYellow(Increased)MathRed(Maintained)

This school hasn't fully recovered from the pandemic: 18% meet the standard today, versus 29% in 2019 — a gap worth asking about on a visit.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%11%17%12%18%
Grade 444%28%15%20%27%
Grade 537%25%37%32%32%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 318%13%17%18%9%
Grade 429%21%15%13%14%
Grade 517%9%14%14%7%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
83%
Grade 3 · 17% proficient
20%
73%
Grade 4 · 27% proficient
27%
68%
Grade 5 · 32% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
3.8%
State 21.3%
17.5pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
17.8%
State 42.7%
24.9pp below state avg
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
Above avg
State average
The same students gained 77 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
37.1%
State 17.9%
19.2pp above state avg
Suspension rate
0.6%
State 1.6%
1.0pp below state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
16.7%
State 18.0%
1.3pp below state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 67th percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 5th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 59th. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measuresame cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 59th percentile among California elementary schools.59th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: +6 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 67th percentile of 7,519 reported schools.67th pctile · +6 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −21 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 5th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.5th pctile · −21 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
  • Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.

How every group of students does here

At Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary in Lake Isabella, 24.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (7.8% Math proficient); White students (29.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 153 students tested.

All students at this school: 18% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 18%, district —, state 43%18%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 16%, district 20%, state 32%16% · −2 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 20%, district 24%, state 56%20% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 11%, district 18%, state 42%11% · −7 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 26%, district 27%, state 44%26% · +8 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 16%, district 20%, state 32%16% · −2 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 5%, district 2%, state 15%5% · −13 vs school

9 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 19.9pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +18.2pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
English Only100 studentsEnglish Only, reading: +6 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 100 students.+6 pts · +3 vs typical
Low-income students92 studentsLow-income students, reading: +8 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 92 students.+8 pts · +8 vs typical
White70 studentsWhite, reading: +9 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 70 students.+9 pts · +4 vs typical
Math
English Only100 studentsEnglish Only, math: −23 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 100 students.−23 pts · −24 vs typical
Low-income students92 studentsLow-income students, math: −19 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 92 students.−19 pts · −18 vs typical
White70 studentsWhite, math: −22 scale-score points versus expectation, against +5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 70 students.−22 pts · −27 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 2 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 37.1%, district 32.4%, state 17.9%37.1% · +19.2pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 0.6%, district —, state 1.6%0.6% · −1.0pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–636.8%
TK/K47.9%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path
Elementary
Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary
22/100
This school
High School
No feeder data available for this level

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 22:1, district 21:122:1
Teaching staff27 teachers
Avg. experience13.1 years
Fully credentialed80%
First-year teachers4%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$53,494 – $100,162
Principal salaryFrom $137,349
Superintendent salary$183,762

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $23,648, CA average $14,491$23,648 · spent at this school
Federal share$1,186 per student

$1,186 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$25,876 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction48%
Instruction support8%
Student services23%
Administration9%
Buildings & maintenance11%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,815 per pupil
2019$15,133 per pupil
2018$14,255 per pupil
2017$12,920 per pupil
2016$12,096 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
White67.2%
District 68.2% · CA 19.9%
Hispanic24.6%
District 24.7% · CA 56.1%
Other4.6%
District 4.8% · CA 9.0%
Black3.1%
District 1.7% · CA 4.8%
Asian0.5%
District 0.5% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 87.4% (24pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$31K · CA $85K
Median home value$221K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+11% · CA 35%
ZIP population5,981
Median age39 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 21% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary a good elementary school?

Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary has a Scope Score of 22 out of 100, placing it in the 15th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,910 statewide. 3.8% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 17.5 percentage points below the California average of 21.3%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 17.8% of students at Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 3.8% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 14.0% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 3.8% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 348 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary rank in California?

Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary ranks #4,910 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 15th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks above avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 59th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary?

37.1% of students at Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 0.6%, indicating a low-discipline-incident environment. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary compare to other schools in Lake Isabella?

Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary scores 22/100 (15th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 390 students. Use the schools in Lake Isabella page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary in Lake Isabella, 24.2% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 27.3% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 3.1 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (7.8% Math proficient); White students (29.9% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 16.5 percentage points for disabilities students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 153 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Your other options


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
3.8%
↓ vs CA 21.3% · 33th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
17.8%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 31th pctile
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) · 20%
Above avg
↑ vs CA average · 59th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
37.1%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 19th pctile
▼ 2.3pp lower vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
0.6%
↑ vs CA 1.6% · 59th pctile
▼ 1.2pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
16.7%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 49th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3575%12%25%58%18%−26
Grade 4557%20%15%58%27%−17
Grade 5625%27%26%42%32%−15
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 3572%7%30%61%9%−37
Grade 4564%11%20%66%14%−27
Grade 5610%7%21%72%7%−28

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide617%15%52%26%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged15324.2%−3−14
White11729.9%−2−32
Hispanic/Latino3218.7%−6−20
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = the same students tracked across grades, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary ←223.8%17.8%+6.3pp+77 pts0.6%
California average3921.3%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
20192011#49118.7%29.1%28.4%2.8%+3.0pp
2022156#53964.5%17.8%60.6%3.2%+5.1pp
2023179#52124.6%19.2%46.2%1.9%+8.2pp
20242620#45723.9%18.0%39.4%1.8%+7.8pp
20252215#49103.8%17.8%37.1%0.6%+6.3pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 14 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female27.8%36.6%+8.8pp
Male31.1%40.6%+9.5pp
Hispanic/Latino27.8%52.4%+24.6pp
American Indian/Alaska Native47.4%
Students with Disabilities51.1%52.0%+0.9pp
English Learners9.1%38.5%+29.4pp
Foster Youth58.3%
Homeless30.0%70.0%+40.0pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged33.2%40.3%+7.1pp
All Students29.6%38.8%+9.2pp
Black/African American25.0%
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students+6106Accelerated−21106Minimal
English Only+6100not categorised−23100not categorised
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged+892Accelerated−1992Moderate
White+970Accelerated−2270Minimal
Hispanic or Latino−628Moderate−2928Minimal
Students with Disabilities−228Average−2028Moderate

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/woodrow-w-wallace-elementary-9658"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Woodrow W. Wallace Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,744 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction