ExploreMapCompareBlogSign in
Whittier Elementary · HemetPublic

Whittier Elementary: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.

Whittier posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.

400 West Whittier Avenue, 92543 (opens in new tab)·Hemet Unified·Hemet·Grades TK-5·816 students·93% low-income·2024–25 CAASPP·(951) 765-1650·Website
2019–2025 trend · CDE CAASPP
This schoolCA avg
Scope2239
% Exceeded6%21%
% Met+20%43%
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)Above avg · p60Average · p50
Absence36.7%17.9%
Suspension3.2%1.6%
Scope Score
22
🌱 Building Momentum · Needs Support
ranked #4,965 statewide · #14 of 17 in Hemet Unified

Whittier Elementary scores 22 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 14th percentile of 5,721 California elementary schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).

Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →

🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.

Most rating sites would stop at “20% proficient” and call it done. Whittier deserves a closer read. The school sits in Hemet, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.

Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.

The seven-year arc

Percentile among 5,721 elementary schools statewide

Climbed from the 3rd to the 14th percentile since 2019 — past roughly 400 elementary schools.

ELAYellow(Increased Significantly)MathYellow(Increased)

Proficiency here is back to its pre-pandemic level — 20% meet the standard, about where the school stood in 2019.

ELA — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 330%14%20%18%25%
Grade 425%13%11%22%23%
Grade 520%21%21%17%31%
Math — % met or exceeded, by grade
Grade20192022202320242025
Grade 320%6%16%21%22%
Grade 414%11%8%14%8%
Grade 59%5%8%8%12%

The story this school is actually telling

The school, grade by grade

ELA · CAASPP 2024–25

Different students, same year — each bar is one grade's proficiency mix.

12%
12%
76%
Grade 3 · 24% proficient
18%
77%
Grade 4 · 23% proficient
8%
23%
69%
Grade 5 · 31% proficient

The 6 things our score weighs

Exceeded standard
6.5%
State 21.4%
14.9pp below state avg
Met or exceeded
20.2%
State 42.7%
22.5pp below state avg
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5)
Above avg
State average
The school's returning cohort — mostly, not exactly, the same kids two years on — gained 77 scale-score points across the span. Almost every school gains points, so we rank the gain against every other California school in this level.
Chronic absenteeism
36.7%
State 17.9%
18.8pp above state avg
Suspension rate
3.2%
State 1.6%
1.6pp above state avg
EL proficiency (ELPAC)
5.4%
State 18.0%
12.6pp below state avg

California's own answer to the same question

Context — never part of the Scope Score

California runs its own growth model, following individual children in grades 4 through 8 rather than comparing school-wide averages the way we do — and its two subjects part company here. It puts this school around the 41st percentile of California elementary schools in reading and the 15th in math; ours, which blends the subjects, lands around the 60th. A gap that size between reading and math in one building is worth asking about directly — one year of data can't tell you whether it is the teaching, the cohort, or noise.

Both measures, ranked against every California school
Our growth measuresame cohort, G3→G5SchoolScope growth measure: 60th percentile among California elementary schools.60th pctile
State model · readingmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, reading: −1 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 41st percentile of 7,519 reported schools.41st pctile · −1 pts
State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8California growth model, math: −13 scale-score points versus the state's expectation, 15th percentile of 7,518 reported schools.15th pctile · −13 pts
this school| the tick is the middle of the California field

pts vs expected is scale-score points above or below what California's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores. It is not a percentage and not a percent of anything. A typical California elementary school lands at +2 in reading, and the middle half of them fall between −5 and +9 — the spread is wide, so read the rank, not the sign. CDE blends two consecutive years into each published figure, so adjacent years share input data and no year-over-year trend can honestly be drawn from them. It covers grades 4-8 only, and it is not part of the Scope Score — we assessed it and left it out: it tracks school demographics roughly three times as strongly as our own growth measure does, and one published year is not enough to test how stable it is.

Worth a school visit

Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.

  • Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
  • Ask what typically leads to a suspension, and what happens before it gets there.
  • Ask what changes between grade 3 and grade 5 here, and who teaches the older kids.
  • Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
  • Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
  • Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.

How every group of students does here

At Whittier Elementary in Hemet, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Whittier Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (13.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 370 students tested.

All students at this school: 20% met or exceeded
All StudentsAll Students: this school 20%, district —, state 43%20%
Socioeconomically DisadvantagedSocioeconomically Disadvantaged: this school 20%, district 24%, state 32%20% · −0 vs school
Hispanic/LatinoHispanic/Latino: this school 22%, district 24%, state 32%22% · +2 vs school
MaleMale: this school 20%, district 26%, state 42%20% · −0 vs school
FemaleFemale: this school 21%, district 27%, state 44%21% · +0 vs school
Students with DisabilitiesStudents with Disabilities: this school 7%, district 6%, state 15%7% · −13 vs school
English LearnersEnglish Learners: this school 1%, district 4%, state 11%1% · −20 vs school
Black/African AmericanBlack/African American: this school 13%, district 19%, state 26%13% · −7 vs school
WhiteWhite: this school 19%, district 36%, state 56%19% · −2 vs school

8 of 17 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.

this school district, same group California, same group
Subgroup growth by grade

Change in proficiency from the lowest tested grade — which groups gain ground the longer they stay. Groups with fewer than 10 tested students per grade are not shown.

Low-income student ELA proficiency rises by 6.3pp from grade 3 to grade 5 at this school. District average: +3.5pp.

The state's growth model, by student group

California follows these children individually and predicts each one's score from their own prior year. Each row is read against the same group at a typical California elementary school — not against zero, and not against this school's all-students figure, because the state's expectation already differs by group.

Reading
Low-income students229 studentsLow-income students, reading: −1 scale-score points versus expectation, against 0 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 229 students.−1 pts · −1 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students176 studentsHispanic or Latino students, reading: −2 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 176 students.−2 pts · −3 vs typical
English Only160 studentsEnglish Only, reading: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against +3 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 160 students.0 pts · −3 vs typical
English Learner62 studentsEnglish Learner, reading: −6 scale-score points versus expectation, against −2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 62 students.−6 pts · −4 vs typical
Students with disabilities54 studentsStudents with disabilities, reading: 0 scale-score points versus expectation, against −8 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 54 students.0 pts · +8 vs typical
Math
Low-income students227 studentsLow-income students, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 227 students.−13 pts · −12 vs typical
Hispanic or Latino students174 studentsHispanic or Latino students, math: −10 scale-score points versus expectation, against −1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 174 students.−10 pts · −9 vs typical
English Only160 studentsEnglish Only, math: −13 scale-score points versus expectation, against +1 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 160 students.−13 pts · −14 vs typical
English Learner61 studentsEnglish Learner, math: −9 scale-score points versus expectation, against +2 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 61 students.−9 pts · −11 vs typical
Students with disabilities53 studentsStudents with disabilities, math: −14 scale-score points versus expectation, against −5 for the same group at a typical California elementary school, 53 students.−14 pts · −9 vs typical
this school typical California elementary school, same group| the centre tick is 0 = as predicted

— 4 more groups are reported here with between 11 and 29 students. We hold those back on purpose: at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own, and a quarter of such groups land past the state's top or bottom cut point by chance alone. They are listed with their student counts in the data appendix. — A group not listed at all had fewer than 11 students with a growth score, so California published nothing for it here. That is a privacy protection, not a judgment about those students. — Context only. None of this enters the Scope Score.

Showing up, and staying in class

Chronic absenteeismChronic absenteeism: this school 36.7%, district 30.5%, state 17.9%36.7% · +18.8pp vs state
Suspension rateSuspension rate: this school 3.2%, district —, state 1.6%3.2% · +1.6pp vs state
Chronic absenteeism by grade band
Grades 4–634.2%
TK/K49.2%

Where the path goes

The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.

K-12 Feeder Path

Feeder patterns derived from NCES attendance boundary data. Boundaries are approximate and may have changed — verify with your school district for current assignments.

West Valley HighScope 44direct feeder

The road from this school ends at West Valley High, which sent 16 graduates to UC campuses last fall and teaches 4 AP subjects. Those numbers describe past cohorts — a child starting here today would reach West Valley High around 2035, and 10 years is a long time for a school to hold still, and by the state's 2023 count 56% of West Valley High's graduates enrolled in college somewhere, UC or not.

16 UC ENROLLEES (FALL 2025) · 4 AP SUBJECTS TAUGHT full record on West Valley High's page
Source: UC & College Board

The people teaching here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Student : teacherStudent to teacher ratio: this school 25:1, district 22:125:1
PrincipalAdam Kramer
Teaching staff34 teachers
Avg. experience13.1 years
Fully credentialed86%
First-year teachers9%
Salary Schedule
Teacher salary schedule$49,867 – $136,225
Principal salary$159,200 – $184,030
Superintendent salary$388,334

Pay is set by the district, not the school.

What gets spent here

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Per-pupil spendingPer-pupil spending: $18,689, CA average $14,491$18,689 · spent at this school
Federal share$436 per student

$436 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.

District current expense · FY 2024–25$20,822 per student

The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.

Where the district's dollars go · FY 2024–25 · CDE SACS
Instruction56%
Instruction support13%
Student services12%
Administration8%
Buildings & maintenance10%
Other1%

District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.

district detail, 2016–2020 — the newest published
2020$15,161 per pupil
2019$14,782 per pupil
2018$14,843 per pupil
2017$16,755 per pupil
2016$14,742 per pupil

Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →

The neighborhood it serves

Context — never part of the Scope Score
Hispanic71.1%
District 69.7% · CA 56.1%
Black12.0%
District 7.8% · CA 4.8%
White9.7%
District 15.7% · CA 19.9%
Other6.7%
District 6.0% · CA 9.0%
Asian0.5%
District 0.8% · CA 10.2%
Low IncomeFree/reduced lunch eligible 92.5% (29pp above CA avg)
Neighborhood — American Community Survey
Median income$49K · CA $85K
Median home value$279K · CA $659K
Bachelor's degree+13% · CA 35%
ZIP population39,937
Median age40 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level

Worth Knowing

At 816 students, this school is well above the typical California elementary school (≈480).

Transitional kindergarten is offered here — confirmed by actual Census Day enrollment, not just the listed grade span.

On the state's science test (CAST), 9% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 and once in high school, and it never enters the Scope Score.

Frequently asked questions

Is Whittier Elementary a good elementary school?

Whittier Elementary has a Scope Score of 22 out of 100, placing it in the 14th percentile of California elementary schools and ranked #4,965 statewide. 6.5% of students exceeded the state standard on the 2025 CAASPP assessment, which is 14.9 percentage points below the California average of 21.4%. The Scope Score weights 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard (42%), met or exceeded (proficient) (23%), grade 3-to-5 growth (20%), chronic absenteeism (5%), suspension rate (5%), and ELPAC English Learner proficiency (5%). Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Whittier Elementary's CAASPP test scores?

On the 2025 CAASPP Smarter Balanced Assessment, 20.2% of students at Whittier Elementary met or exceeded the state standard in ELA and Math combined, and 6.5% exceeded it. The gap between those numbers matters: 13.8% of students are at the proficiency floor, while 6.5% pushed past it. Most rating sites report only the combined "proficient" number. SchoolScope surfaces the exceeded-vs-met split because it reveals whether a school's curriculum challenges students beyond minimum proficiency or paces toward it. 791 student-subject combinations were assessed.

How does Whittier Elementary rank in California?

Whittier Elementary ranks #4,965 among California elementary schools by Scope Score, placing it in the 14th percentile. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), same-cohort growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Is Whittier Elementary getting better or worse?

SchoolScope follows the same cohort of students across grades rather than comparing two different grades in the same year. At Whittier Elementary that cohort is 2023 G3 → 2025 G5, measured in SBAC scale-score points. Its gain ranks above avg among California elementary schools — roughly the 60th percentile, ahead of the typical school at this level. Read the ranking, not the raw point gain: scale scores rise with age, so nearly every school posts a positive number and only the relative position tells you anything. Growth is weighted at 20% in the elementary Scope Score because it is the least demographically confounded signal available — it tracks change over time rather than the level students arrived at. See full methodology.

What is the attendance and school culture like at Whittier Elementary?

36.7% of students at Whittier Elementary are chronically absent (missing 10% or more of school days), compared to the California average of 17.9%. The suspension rate is 3.2%. SchoolScope includes these culture metrics in the Scope Score because they reflect day-to-day school experience in ways test scores alone cannot.

How does Whittier Elementary compare to other schools in Hemet?

Whittier Elementary scores 22/100 (14th percentile) among California elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same metrics side by side: exceeded rate, proficiency, growth trajectory, and school culture indicators. The school serves 816 students. Use the schools in Hemet page or the map view to compare all elementary schools nearby.

How does Whittier Elementary serve low-income and underrepresented students?

At Whittier Elementary in Hemet, 26.3% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.9% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Whittier Elementary trails its district average for low-income students by 5.6 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (13.6% Math proficient); Hispanic students (28.0% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 25.4 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 370 students tested. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

What middle school does Whittier Elementary feed into?

By attendance boundary, Whittier Elementary is zoned to Diamond Valley Middle. Diamond Valley Middle has a Scope Score of 24 out of 100. Boundaries come from the U.S. Department of Education's School Attendance Boundary Survey, a 2015-16 collection and the most recent national one — they are approximate and may since have changed. A boundary is also not a placement guarantee: magnet, charter, open-enrollment and inter-district transfer options mean students from one school often continue to several different ones. Confirm your address with the district before making an enrollment or housing decision. Data source: NCES School Attendance Boundary Survey, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Your other options

Private alternatives nearby

Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.


For the data nerds

Every number on this page

Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and nearest schools.

01Score factorsWeighted composite · 2024–25
Exceeded standard · 42%
6.5%
↓ vs CA 21.4% · 35th pctile
Met or exceeded · 23%
20.2%
↓ vs CA 42.7% · 33th pctile
Growth (2023 G3 → 2025 G5) · 20%
Above avg
↑ vs CA average · 60th pctile
Chronic absenteeism · 5%
36.7%
↓ vs CA 17.9% · 19th pctile
▲ 0.9pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate · 5%
3.2%
↓ vs CA 1.6% · 37th pctile
▼ 2.7pp lower vs 2024
EL proficiency (ELPAC) · 5%
5.4%
↓ vs CA 18.0% · 33th pctile
02By grade & subgroupCAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students
ELATestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 312912%12%23%52%25%−18
Grade 41305%18%25%52%23%−22
Grade 51378%23%10%58%31%−16
MathTestedEXCMETNEARNOTMET++/CA
Grade 31298%15%28%50%22%−23
Grade 41291%7%34%58%8%−34
Grade 51374%7%22%66%12%−23

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, no valid result was published, or the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Science (CAST)TestedEXCMETNEARNOT
Schoolwide1371%8%53%38%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELATestedMET+vs districtvs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged37026.3%−6−12
Hispanic/Latino29028.0%−4−11
Students with Disabilities818.6%+2−8
03Nearest elementary schoolssorted by Scope Score · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = one school's returning cohort tracked across grades (mostly, not exactly, the same kids), in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights
SchoolDistScopeEXCMET+Grade gapCohort growthSusp
Whittier Elementary ←226.5%20.2%−2.1pp+77 pts3.2%
Cawston Elementary2.7 mi3015.2%33.7%−13.7pp3.2%
Academy of Innovation1 mi2810.3%31.2%−17.4pp0.2%
Hemet Dual Language Academy2.3 mi2813.0%35.3%−12.2pp0.9%
California average3921.4%42.7%−2.9pp1.6%
04More measurescontext · not all part of the Scope Score
YearScopePctileRankExcMet+AbsentSuspGrade gap
2019153#53214.0%19.4%21.5%3.3%-10.3pp
2022122#56362.3%11.8%54.5%3.6%+3.0pp
2023122#55792.9%14.2%48.4%3.9%-3.9pp
20242314#49595.1%16.7%35.8%5.9%-7.2pp
20252214#49656.5%20.2%36.7%3.2%-2.1pp
Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.
NO STATEWIDE TESTING 2020–21 (COVID) · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD
What we can't show
  • — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 12 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
05Climate by student groupchronic absenteeism · 2019 vs 2025 — the two years CDE publishes at subgroup level
Group20192025Δ
Female17.3%37.6%+20.3pp
Male26.3%37.2%+10.9pp
Black/African American30.1%52.7%+22.6pp
Hispanic/Latino18.8%35.4%+16.6pp
Two or More Races38.3%37.0%-1.3pp
Students with Disabilities34.1%37.8%+3.7pp
English Learners17.0%30.6%+13.6pp
Foster Youth21.4%31.6%+10.2pp
Homeless40.4%70.3%+29.9pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged22.1%38.4%+16.3pp
All Students21.9%37.4%+15.5pp
11California growth model, by student group2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored
GroupReadingnCDE bandMathnCDE band
All Students−1243Average−13241Moderate
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged−1229Average−13227Moderate
Hispanic or Latino−2176Average−10174Moderate
English Only0160not categorised−13160not categorised
English Learner−662Moderate−961Moderate
Students with Disabilities054Average−1453Moderate
English Learners Only−1547not categorised−1846not categorised
Black or African American−526Average−1526Moderate
White+1021Accelerated−2321Minimal
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only+1715not categorised+1915not categorised
Two or More Races+813Accelerated−1413Moderate

Whole scale-score points above or below what CDE's model predicted for these same children from their own prior-year scores — not a percentage, not a percentile. Statewide a typical school lands near +1 with a spread of about 13 points either side, so read a figure against its group's own typical value, not against zero. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a growth score — published by CDE, held back from the narrative sections above because at that size the figure swings about 17 points on its own. “Not categorised” is CDE assigning no band — English Only, Recently Reclassified, and English Learners Only receive a value and no band, for every school in the state. It is not a missing number. Most figures blend two consecutive years, so adjacent published years share input data and no trend line can honestly be drawn across them. A group absent from this table had fewer than 11 students with a growth score and was never published. Grades 4-8 only. None of this enters the Scope Score — it is more strongly correlated with school demographics than our own growth measure, and one published year is not enough to test its reliability.

Embed this scorecard
<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/whittier-elementary-2148"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Whittier Elementary — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded ("proficient") · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2022 · Data updated 2026-07-03methodology · data updates · CSV · report issue

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction