Charter school · Shiloh Elementary

Shiloh Charter

Modesto · TK–8 · 163 students (2024–25)

31stpercentileDeveloping

The dots are California’s 5,721 scored public elementary schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

29 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Shiloh Charterhigher than 31 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Shiloh Charterhigher than 31 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Shiloh Charterhigher than 31 of the 100 California dots

California’s public elementary schools · 1 dot = 1 in 100

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Near California in English, well below in math: 43% and 26% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. Source

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grades 3–5: 58
Comparison: California: CDE’s statewide grade 3, 4 and 5 rows combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 1,232,086 in English and 1,241,652 in math tested).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four elementary schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Get an email when Shiloh Charter’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

One email when new scores post for this school. Nothing else.

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

Are children building strong foundations?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 10%
Met standard: 33%
Below standard: 57%

43% met or exceeded · 58 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	10%	24%
Met	33%	22%
Nearly met	26%	21%
Not met	31%	33%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. State comparison combines the same grades, weighted by students tested.

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 10%
Met standard: 16%
Below standard: 74%

26% met or exceeded · 58 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	10%	21%
Met	16%	20%
Nearly met	45%	25%
Not met	29%	34%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Reading and math results for the tested grades. These do not measure the experience in kindergarten or the early grades.

Ask: How do you help children who need more support in reading or math, and those ready for more challenge?

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school43%

California46%

Tested: 58 here · 1,232,086 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	10%	24%
Met	33%	22%
Nearly met	26%	21%
Not met	31%	33%

Math

grades 3–5Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school26%

California41%

Tested: 58 here · 1,241,652 in California.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	California
Exceeded	10%	21%
Met	16%	20%
Nearly met	45%	25%
Not met	29%	34%

Progress over time

Are students making progress?

English

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201946%342 tested

→

202543%58 tested

Shiloh Charter

California, same grades50% → 46%2019 → 2025 · 1,332,547 → 1,232,086 tested

Math

Met or exceeded · grades 3–5 · all students tested

201941%345 tested

→

202526%58 tested

Shiloh Charter

California, same grades44% → 41%2019 → 2025 · 1,338,625 → 1,241,652 tested

A comparison of two years, not individual student growth. Each year is a different group of students.

Explore every year, the trend charts & underlying data

English met or exceeded, grades 3–5

Shiloh CharterCalifornia

0%50%100%20192022202543%46%

Math met or exceeded, grades 3–5

Shiloh CharterCalifornia

0%50%100%20192022202526%41%

Breaks in the lines mark years without comparable results.

English went from 46% in 2019 to 43% in 2025. Math went from 41% in 2019 to 26% in 2025. Each year is a different group of students.

Annual values & tested counts

English · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	Shiloh Charter	California
2019	46% 342 tested	50% 1,332,547 tested
2022	41% 345 tested	45% 1,260,830 tested
2023	40% 55 tested	44% 1,247,801 tested
2024	32% 56 tested	45% 1,235,509 tested
2025	43% 58 tested	46% 1,232,086 tested

Math · met or exceeded · grades 3–5
Year	Shiloh Charter	California
2019	41% 345 tested	44% 1,338,625 tested
2022	51% 342 tested	38% 1,265,943 tested
2023	38% 55 tested	40% 1,256,519 tested
2024	37% 56 tested	41% 1,249,262 tested
2025	26% 58 tested	41% 1,241,652 tested

The state’s growth measure97 students · grades 4–8 · 2025

English−1ptsCDE category: Average

Math+13ptsCDE category: Accelerated

Points above or below what the state expected from the same students’ earlier scores.

Ask: Math is lower than in 2019 here (41% to 26%) and across California (44% to 41%). How does the school check what’s working in math?

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

14 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

18in 100 at the average California elementary school

24 of 168 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school14 in 100

at the average California elementary school18 in 100

0.6%of students were suspended at least once (1 of 169), 2024–25

1.6%at the average California elementary school

Attendance by grade

Chronically absent, 2024–25	Per 100 students	Students
TK and kindergarten	16	4 of 25
Grades 1–3	15	6 of 39
Grades 4–6	10	6 of 60
Grades 7–8	18	8 of 44

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grades 3–8 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereCaliforniaEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

81 tested per subject

English40% / 36%

Math40% / 27%

Hispanic or Latino

59 tested per subject · grades 3 and 5–8

English37% / 37%

Math41% / 26%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrades 3–8 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Shiloh Elementary	vs California
Low-income · 81 tested
English	40%	040%	+436%
Math	40%	040%	+1327%
Hispanic or Latino · 59 tested · grades 3 and 5–8 only
English	37%	037%	037%
Math	41%	041%	+1526%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject: in Shiloh Elementary, and across California. ■ Green: a group that is behind statewide does much better here, by 10 points or more and more than twice the margin of error.

White students: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Asian, Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races, English learners, students with disabilities and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

How each student group did

Read the student-group results as sentences

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

Hispanic or Latino55%
White39%
Asian—
Black or African American—
Filipino—
Two or more races—
American Indian or Alaska Native—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Unallocated share5%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
Hispanic or Latino	55%
White	39%
Asian	—
Black or African American	—
Filipino	—
Two or more races	—
American Indian or Alaska Native	—
Pacific Islander	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

2 in 3 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (66%, 108 of 163). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers11

Average experience10 years

First-year teachers0%

100% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 100.00%: 8.4 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 8.4 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

Getting in

Ask Shiloh Charter how it admits students.

Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

shiloh.k12.ca.us

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

6633 Paradise Road, Modesto 95358

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Before you apply

Confirm this school’s current process directly.

Eligibility and entry grades: Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
Application and lottery: What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?
The daily logistics: What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

Math is lower than in 2019 here (41% to 26%) and across California (44% to 41%). How does the school check what’s working in math?
How do you teach early reading and check each child’s progress?
What does extra support or enrichment look like during the school day?
What are the school-day hours and after-school care options?

Call (209) 522-2261 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Similar student populations

Same school level, matched by enrollment and eligibility for free or reduced-price meals. This describes two aspects of the student population, not overall school fit.

Similar elementary schools2025 statewide percentile

Princeton ElementaryPrinceton Joint Unified · 83 enrolled · 66.3% meal eligibility10thNeeds Support
Blue Oak CharterChico Unified · 219 enrolled · 66.2% meal eligibility33rdDeveloping
Buchanan Street ElementaryLos Angeles Unified · 278 enrolled · 66.2% meal eligibility53rdSolid
Bonita ElementaryNewman-Crows Landing Unified · 134 enrolled · 66.4% meal eligibility52ndSolid
Valley Vista ElementaryPetaluma City Elementary · 155 enrolled · 66.5% meal eligibility3rdNeeds Support
Tahoe ElementarySacramento City Unified · 319 enrolled · 66.5% meal eligibility30thDeveloping

How these schools are matched

CDE meal-eligibility record, 2024–25. Matches use 58.3–74.3% meal eligibility and 82–326 enrolled students, at the same level and in the comprehensive public-school class. Ordered by population match, not academic results. They may be elsewhere in the state.

Common questions

Is Shiloh Charter a good elementary school?

Shiloh Charter is in the 31st percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. Its Scope Score is 29 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. In spring 2025, on California's state tests (CAASPP), Shiloh Charter was near California in English, well below in math: 43% and 26% met or exceeded the standard in grades 3–5, against 46% and 41% statewide. The Scope Score combines 6 dimensions for elementary schools: exceeded standard, met or exceeded the standard, grade 3-to-5 growth, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Shiloh Charter's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 43% of students tested in grades 3–5 met or exceeded the English standard and 26% the math standard; 10% and 10% exceeded it. For the same grades, California's rate was 46% and 41% met or exceeded, 24% and 21% exceeded. 58 students were tested in English and 58 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; California's rate combines CDE's statewide grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Shiloh Charter rank in California?

Shiloh Charter is in the 31st percentile of 5,721 California comprehensive elementary schools (Developing, 2025). Shiloh Charter ranks #3,920 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Shiloh Charter?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 14.3% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 24 chronically absent of 168 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.6%; 1 unduplicated suspended students of 169 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 15.1%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.8%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Shiloh Charter compare to other schools in Modesto?

Shiloh Charter is in the 31st percentile (Developing) of California’s regular public and charter elementary schools. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 163 students. Use the schools in Modesto page or the map view to compare nearby elementary schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Shiloh Charter?

At Shiloh Charter in Modesto, 39.5% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, compared to 39.5% district-wide for those same grades and 36.4% statewide for those same grades. Shiloh Charter’s rate for low-income students matches its district average in ELA. Other subgroups: low-income students (39.5% met or exceeded the Math standard); Hispanic students (37.3% met or exceeded the ELA standard). Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 81 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Shiloh Charter is ranked #3,920 statewide.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Exceeded standard	9.9%	21.4%	42%
Met or exceeded	34.4%	42.7%	23%
Chronic absenteeism	15.1%	17.9%	5%
Suspension rate	0.8%	1.6%	5%
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students)	+9.5pp	-2.9pp	not scored

Exceeded standard: ↓ vs CA 21.4% · index 39 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Met or exceeded: ↓ vs CA 42.7% · index 44 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism: ↑ vs CA 17.9% · index 55 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · ▲ 1.8pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 1.6% · index 57 · 50 = CA elementary-school midpoint · → no change vs 2024
Grade gap (G3→G5, different students): ↑ vs CA -2.9pp

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	17	6%	29%	12%	53%	35%	−8
Grade 4	23	17%	26%	43%	13%	43%	−1
Grade 5	18	6%	44%	17%	33%	50%	+2
Grade 6	16	13%	19%	19%	50%	31%	−15
Grade 7	20	25%	25%	40%	10%	50%	+2
Grade 8	21	5%	33%	48%	14%	38%	−8

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 ELA equal-school mean: 43.1%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 ELA equal-school mean: 44.6%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 ELA equal-school mean: 47.7%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 6 ELA equal-school mean: 46.1%; n=4084 reporting schools

State grade 7 ELA equal-school mean: 47.6%; n=2631 reporting schools

State grade 8 ELA equal-school mean: 46.2%; n=2658 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 3	17	12%	12%	29%	47%	24%	−22
Grade 4	23	13%	13%	57%	17%	26%	−15
Grade 5	18	6%	22%	44%	28%	28%	−7
Grade 6	16	31%	38%	25%	6%	69%	+34
Grade 7	20	30%	25%	25%	20%	55%	+21
Grade 8	21	24%	10%	48%	19%	33%	+1

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 3 Math equal-school mean: 45.4%; n=5714 reporting schools

State grade 4 Math equal-school mean: 41.3%; n=5721 reporting schools

State grade 5 Math equal-school mean: 35.0%; n=5724 reporting schools

State grade 6 Math equal-school mean: 34.5%; n=4086 reporting schools

State grade 7 Math equal-school mean: 33.7%; n=2630 reporting schools

State grade 8 Math equal-school mean: 32.1%; n=2658 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 3 · ELA	20	30.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · ELA	18	27.8%
2024 · Grade 5 · ELA	18	38.9%
2024 · Grade 6 · ELA	17	64.7%
2024 · Grade 7 · ELA	21	47.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · ELA	18	38.9%
2024 · Grade 3 · Math	20	35.0%
2024 · Grade 4 · Math	18	33.3%
2024 · Grade 5 · Math	18	44.4%
2024 · Grade 6 · Math	17	82.3%
2024 · Grade 7 · Math	21	47.6%
2024 · Grade 8 · Math	18	33.3%
2023 · Grade 3 · ELA	17	29.4%
2023 · Grade 4 · ELA	18	33.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · ELA	20	55.0%
2023 · Grade 6 · ELA	22	27.3%
2023 · Grade 7 · ELA	17	47.1%
2023 · Grade 8 · ELA	20	40.0%
2023 · Grade 3 · Math	17	29.4%
2023 · Grade 4 · Math	18	33.3%
2023 · Grade 5 · Math	20	50.0%
2023 · Grade 6 · Math	22	40.9%
2023 · Grade 7 · Math	17	58.8%
2023 · Grade 8 · Math	20	20.0%
2022 · Grade 3 · ELA	115	36.8%
2022 · Grade 4 · ELA	115	47.4%
2022 · Grade 5 · ELA	115	40.0%
2022 · Grade 6 · ELA	115	22.2%
2022 · Grade 7 · ELA	115	42.9%
2022 · Grade 8 · ELA	115	55.6%
2022 · Grade 3 · Math	114	57.9%
2022 · Grade 4 · Math	114	63.2%
2022 · Grade 5 · Math	114	31.6%
2022 · Grade 6 · Math	114	44.4%
2022 · Grade 7 · Math	114	33.3%
2022 · Grade 8 · Math	114	50.0%
2019 · Grade 3 · ELA	114	50.0%
2019 · Grade 4 · ELA	114	27.3%
2019 · Grade 5 · ELA	114	60.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · ELA	114	35.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · ELA	114	50.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · ELA	114	—
2019 · Grade 3 · Math	115	50.0%
2019 · Grade 4 · Math	115	39.1%
2019 · Grade 5 · Math	115	35.0%
2019 · Grade 6 · Math	115	55.0%
2019 · Grade 7 · Math	115	45.0%
2019 · Grade 8 · Math	115	—

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	39	3%	15%	72%	10%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	81	39.5%	+0	+3
Hispanic/Latino	59	37.3%	+0	−0

Nearest elementary schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance · Grade gap = grade 3 vs grade 5, this year, different students; Cohort growth = school-level grade groups from different years, not matched children, in scale-score points — that's the measurement the Scope Score weights

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Grade gap	Cohort growth	Susp
Shiloh Charter ←	—	2931st percentile · Developing · statewide · 2025	9.9%	34.4%	+9.5pp	—	0.8%
California average	—	39School average · no percentile	21.4%	42.7%	−2.9pp	—	1.6%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records

Teacher salary schedule$61,594 – $107,573

Superintendent salary$164,224

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	39/100	56	#2381	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,484 schools
2022	43/100	67	#1845	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,704 schools
2023	34/100	52	#2712	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,696 schools
2024	32/100	38	#3509	California comprehensive elementary schools · 5,711 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 11.6% → 2025 · 14.3% · +2.7pp
Suspension rate2024 · 0.6% → 2025 · 0.6% · +0.0pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	115	12.2%	41.7%
2025 · Math	115	19.1%	38.3%
2024 · ELA	112	14.3%	41.1%
2024 · Math	112	17.9%	45.5%
2023 · ELA	114	10.5%	38.6%
2023 · Math	114	14.9%	38.6%
2022 · ELA	115	13.9%	40.9%
2022 · Math	114	21.1%	46.5%
2019 · ELA	114	13.2%	44.7%
2019 · Math	115	18.3%	43.5%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Year	Scope	Pctile	Rank	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp	Grade gap
2019	—	—	—	18.7%	43.6%	2.1%	0.3%	-2.5pp
2022	—	—	—	22.7%	46.1%	20.1%	1.3%	-11.6pp
2023	—	—	—	14.0%	38.4%	14.5%	1.5%	+23.1pp
2024	—	—	—	10.8%	34.9%	13.3%	0.8%	+9.2pp
2025	29	31	#3920	9.9%	34.4%	15.1%	0.8%	+9.5pp

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

Grade gap = this year's grade 3 vs grade 5 result, two different sets of students, not a trend for any one child — it is not the measurement the Scope Score's growth dimension uses. See §01 above and /methodology#verdicts for the school's actual scored (cohort) growth.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES · SCORE AND PERCENTILE ARE RELATIVE TO EACH YEAR'S FIELD

What we can't show

— Scored here as an elementary school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	0.0%	9.5%	+9.5pp
Male	0.0%	19.0%	+19.0pp
Hispanic/Latino	0.0%	14.0%	+14.0pp
White	0.0%	13.6%	+13.6pp
English Learners	0.0%	15.7%	+15.7pp
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	0.0%	20.0%	+20.0pp
All Students	0.0%	14.3%	+14.3pp
Students with Disabilities	—	16.7%	—

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

California growth model, by student groupInspect CDE growth-model records and group sample sizes.2025 · scale-score points vs the state's prediction · shown, never scored

Group	ELA	n	CDE band	Math	n	CDE band
All Students	−1	97	Average	+13	97	Accelerated
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	−1	69	Average	+17	69	Accelerated
English Only	−1	60	not categorised	+2	60	not categorised
Hispanic or Latino	+2	53	Average	+25	53	Exceptional
White	−1	40	Average	+2	40	Average
English Learner	+1	37	Average	+34	37	Exceptional
English Learners Only	0	22	not categorised	+38	22	not categorised
Recently Reclassified Fluent-English Proficient Only	+4	15	not categorised	+30	15	not categorised
Students with Disabilities	+9	13	Accelerated	+20	13	Exceptional
Long-Term English Learner (grades 6-8 only)	+14	12	Accelerated	+38	12	Exceptional

CDE reports scale-score points versus its growth-model prediction — not a percentage or percentile. The table keeps the group records SchoolScope imported for this school, including rows below our narrative display threshold. Muted rows have fewer than 30 students with a valid growth score. SchoolScope uses that threshold for the shorter narrative view; the reported values stay visible here. “Not categorised” means this imported CDE row has a growth value without a performance category. Long-Term English Learner counts cover grades 6-8 only (CDE), so that row is not comparable to the All Students row. CDE labels at least one imported estimate here WEIGHTED; that describes its aggregation method, not a year-over-year trend. A group absent from this table has no imported record shown here. Its absence alone does not establish its size or performance. CDE growth covers grades 4–8. SchoolScope does not use these CDE figures in its Scope Score.

Growth source detailSeparate historical trends, cohort comparisons and matched growth.CDE matched-student model and school-grade cohort record · distinct measures

California growth model · reported-school field

State model · ELAmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

97 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,519 reported ELA ALL school records in its retained school inventory

41st pctile · −1 pts

State model · mathmatched students, grades 4-8

Source and benchmark

CDE California growth model · 2025 Dashboard

Weighted school estimate; assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25

ALL students, grades 4–8

97 students

estimate WEIGHTED

SchoolScope midrank among 7,518 reported MATH ALL school records in its retained school inventory

82nd pctile · +13 pts

this school| center tick: 50th percentile in SchoolScope's retained-school field, calculated separately for ELA and Math

Source notes. CDE reports scale-score points versus its prediction for matched students, never a percentage. Among SchoolScope's retained California elementary school records, the median ELA estimate is +2 and the middle half fall between −5 and +9 scale-score points — the spread is wide, so read its position among reported schools, not the sign. CDE's 2025 Dashboard weighted school estimate uses assessments from 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25; adjacent reporting editions should not be read as independent annual changes. The CDE measure covers grades 4–8 and is not part of the Scope Score.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$12,385 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 182 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

School-level federal expenditures$1,147 per pupil

CDE ESSA · school-attributed per-pupil record · FY 2024–25 (2025) · source denominator: 163

District current expense · FY 2024–25$19,033 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

These figures are not directly comparable: school ESSA attributed spending and NCES district current expense use different measures and populations. Their fiscal years are labeled above.

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 70%Instruction support 12%Student services 4%Administration 7%Buildings & maintenance 7%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$12,385 per pupil

2020$10,840 per pupil

2019$11,754 per pupil

2018$10,663 per pupil

2017$9,557 per pupil

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 95358

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 95358
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$76,924
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	14.51%
ZCTA population	30,469
Median age	32.0 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/shiloh-charter-1558"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Shiloh Charter — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=5,721 elementary schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Shiloh Charter

Compare schools

Get an email when Shiloh Charter’s 2025⁠–⁠26 results land

Are children building strong foundations?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

Are students making progress?

English

Math

Annual values & tested counts

Attendance and discipline

Parent voices

Teacher & staff voices

How each student group did

Low-income

Hispanic or Latino

Students and staff

Student mix

Ask Shiloh Charter how it admits students.

Location and visiting

Before you apply

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Similar student populations

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful