Olympic Continuation High: The scores are below where anyone wants them. Here's what they don't tell you.
Olympic Continuation posts low test scores — and test scores are one lens among several. If this is your zoned school, the numbers below are where to start a conversation, not where to end one.
| Scope | % Exceeded | % Met+ | Grad rate | College readiness | Absence | Suspension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This school | 17 | 1% | 11% | 67.0% | 0.0% | 77.4% | 5.6% |
| CA average · High School | 44 | 16% | 36% | 87.6% | 35.4% | 30.2% | 3.6% |
Olympic Continuation High scores 17 of 100 on SchoolScope's Scope Score — the 6th percentile of 2,160 California high schools (CDE CAASPP 2025).
Measures test performance, attendance, and climate — not arts, community, or your kid. How we score →
🌱 Building Momentum — This label means the data doesn't clearly sort the school one way or the other — ask what the school is proud of, and what it's working on.
Most rating sites would stop at “11% proficient” and call it done. Olympic Continuation deserves a closer read. The school sits in Concord, where four in five students qualify for free or reduced lunch — and reading the numbers without that context misreads the school.
Test scores are one lens, and at this school they're a rough one right now. The sections below show the fuller picture — including the parts that are working.
The seven-year arc
Has stayed near the 6th percentile since 2019.
The pandemic drop is behind this school: 11% of students meet the standard today, above the 5% who did in 2019.
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 10% | 4% | 2% | 4% | 16% |
| Grade | 2019 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 5% |
The story this school is actually telling
Of 100 students here: 11 are proficient by 11th grade → 67 graduate → 0 pass an AP exam. The gaps between those bars are the questions to ask.
The 7 things our score weighs
Ask what changed in the last two years, and what the school is asking families for. Growth shows up in these numbers a year or two after it shows up in classrooms.
- Ask how the school follows up when a student starts missing days — chronic absence often starts outside the classroom, not inside it.
- Ask what share of students complete the full college-prep course sequence, and who gets steered into it.
- Ask whether the tour can step into a working classroom — watch how the teacher handles a student who's stuck.
- Ask to tour while school's in session, and notice how hallways and transitions feel — culture shows up between classes, not just in them.
- Ask how the school communicates with families when a child starts to struggle.
- Ask what a typical day looks like for a new student in the first few weeks.
How every group of students does here
At Olympic Continuation High in Concord, 14.9% of low-income students met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025, compared to 31.7% district-wide and 38.2% statewide. Olympic Continuation High trails its district average for low-income students by 16.8 percentage points in ELA. Other subgroups: Low-Income students (4.7% Math proficient); Hispanic students (12.5% ELA proficient). The largest proficiency gap is 15.6 percentage points for english learner students. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 67 students tested.
9 of 16 student groups here are too small to report — a privacy protection, not a gap.
Showing up, and staying in class
Where the path goes
The path below follows attendance boundaries — scores shown for each next step.
Estimated path based on proximity within the same district. Contact your school district for official feeder information.
The people teaching here
Pay is set by the district, not the school.
What gets spent here
These measure different things: this figure is spending attributed to this campus, while district-wide figures also include central administration, districtwide programs, and the state's pension contributions made on the district's behalf — costs that never get assigned to a single school. The district number runs higher at nearly every school, not just this one.
$1,345 per student arrives as federal Title funding — a measure of concentrated need, not school quality.
The district's current expense of education per student, from CDE's annual SACS filing — the freshest district spending figure the state publishes.
District-level, from the district's own SACS general-ledger filing — school-by-school breakdowns aren't published by the state.
Source: NCES F-33 · Full district breakdown →
The neighborhood it serves
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-year estimates (2024) · ZIP-level
At 240 students, this school is much smaller than the typical California high school (≈1450).
On the state's science test (CAST), 1% met or exceeded the standard — science is tested in grades 5 and 8 but never enters the Scope Score.
Frequently asked questions
Is Olympic Continuation High a good high school?
What are Olympic Continuation High's CAASPP test scores?
How does Olympic Continuation High rank in California?
What is the attendance and school culture like at Olympic Continuation High?
How does Olympic Continuation High compare to other schools in Concord?
How does Olympic Continuation High serve low-income and underrepresented students?
Your other options
Nearby High Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 43
Nearby Elementary Schools
3 within ~3 mi · avg 56
Nearby Middle Schools
2 within ~3 mi · avg 43
Private alternatives nearby
Private schools within ~10 miles. These schools do not participate in state testing and cannot be scored or ranked.
A low score doesn't tell the whole story. Read: Your School Scored Low — Here's What That Actually Means
Every number on this page
Score factors, grade-level breakdowns, subgroup proficiency, and peer comparisons.
| ELA | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 77 | 1% | 14% | 17% | 68% | 16% | −32 |
| Math | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT | MET+ | +/CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 11 | 74 | 0% | 5% | 8% | 86% | 5% | −18 |
| Science (CAST) | Tested | EXC | MET | NEAR | NOT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5/8/11 | 88 | 0% | 1% | 67% | 32% |
CAST is tested in grades 5, 8, and once in high school — not annually. Not part of the Scope Score.
| Subgroup · ELA | Tested | MET+ | vs district | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 67 | 14.9% | −17 | −23 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 56 | 12.5% | −19 | −26 |
| English Learners | 24 | 0.0% | −5 | −10 |
| School | Dist | Scope | EXC | MET+ | Growth | Susp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympic Continuation High ← | — | 17 | 0.7% | 10.5% | — | 5.6% |
| Concord High | 2.2 mi | 49 | 10.3% | 30.1% | — | 2.8% |
| Mt. Diablo High | 0.5 mi | 37 | 7.2% | 25.3% | — | 7.9% |
| California average | — | 44 | 15.8% | 35.7% | — | 3.6% |
| Year | Scope | Pctile | Rank | Exc | Met+ | Absent | Susp | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 15 | 6 | #1924 | 0.0% | 5.1% | 77.6% | 11.5% | — |
| 2022 | 14 | 5 | #1997 | 1.3% | 1.9% | 80.3% | 7.2% | — |
| 2023 | 13 | 4 | #2057 | 0.0% | 0.8% | 79.1% | 9.0% | — |
| 2024 | 14 | 5 | #2041 | 0.0% | 2.9% | 73.6% | 6.7% | — |
| 2025 | 17 | 6 | #2036 | 0.7% | 10.5% | 77.4% | 5.6% | — |
- — Low-income students here trail the state average for their group by 23 points in ELA — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.
| Group | 2019 | 2025 | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 86.3% | 91.3% | +5.0pp |
| Male | 88.8% | 82.8% | -6.0pp |
| Black/African American | 87.5% | 95.5% | +8.0pp |
| Hispanic/Latino | 89.4% | 85.6% | -3.8pp |
| Two or More Races | 87.5% | 84.6% | -2.9pp |
| Students with Disabilities | 90.9% | 90.0% | -0.9pp |
| English Learners | 88.0% | 81.5% | -6.5pp |
| Foster Youth | 78.6% | — | — |
| Homeless | 100.0% | 80.8% | -19.2pp |
| Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | 88.8% | 86.6% | -2.2pp |
| All Students | 87.8% | 86.5% | -1.3pp |
SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our interpretation of public California Department of Education data — independent analysis, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction