Alternative school · Stone Corral Elementary

Crescent Valley Public Charter II

Q: Is Crescent Valley Public Charter II a good high school?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile (Developing) of California alternative high schools. Its Scope Score is 14 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. In 2024–25, 27% of the class graduated in four years (74 of 274); across California’s alternative high schools, 35%. The Scope Score combines 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate, exceeded standard, college/career readiness, met or exceeded the standard, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

Q: What are Crescent Valley Public Charter II's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 26% of students tested in grade 11 met or exceeded the English standard and 14% the math standard; 5% and 6% exceeded it. For the same grades, the class's combined rate was 33% and 11% met or exceeded, 9% and 5% exceeded. 207 students were tested in English and 210 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; the class rate combines its schools' grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

Q: How does Crescent Valley Public Charter II rank among California alternative schools?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile of 98 California alternative high schools (Developing, 2025; within-class comparison). Crescent Valley Public Charter II ranks #71 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This is a within-class rank, not a statewide rank. How peer classes work. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

Q: What do attendance and suspension records show for Crescent Valley Public Charter II?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 50.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 612 chronically absent of 1,221 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.0%; 0 unduplicated suspended students of 1,301 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 48.9%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.2%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

Q: How does Crescent Valley Public Charter II compare to other schools in Visalia?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile (Developing) of California alternative high schools. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 852 students. Use the schools in Visalia page or the map view to compare nearby high schools.

Q: What do reported student-group results show at Crescent Valley Public Charter II?

At Crescent Valley Public Charter II in Visalia, 23.1% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grade 11, compared to 48.7% statewide for those same grades. Other subgroups: low-income students (13.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (25.2% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 25.6 percentage points: English learners in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Visalia · K–12 · 852 students (2024–25)

How to read this →

Compared only with other alternative schools: higher than 27 of the 97 other scored California alternative high schools.

27thpercentileDeveloping

The dots are California’s 98 scored alternative high schools, placed by Scope Score on spring 2025 tests. How it’s built ›

Scope Score

14 / 100

Weighted composite · 2025
Not a grade or a test result.

See this school’s score factors ↓

Crescent Valley Public Charter IIhigher than 27 of the 97 other schools

California’s alternative high schools · 1 dot each

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Crescent Valley Public Charter IIhigher than 27 of the 97 other schools

California’s alternative high schools · 1 dot each

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

Crescent Valley Public Charter IIhigher than 27 of the 97 other schools

California’s alternative high schools · 1 dot each

Needs Support25 in 100Developing25 in 100Solid25 in 100Strong25 in 100

In 2024–25, 27% of the class graduated in four years (74 of 274); across California’s alternative high schools, 35%. Source

Source: CDE four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), 2024–25
Students: students in the four-year graduation cohort: 274
Comparison: Alternative high schools: graduates divided by students in the four-year cohort across 124 public schools’ rows (our combination, not CDE’s published state rate; 8,818 of 25,083).

How to enroll

Compare

Compare schools

Choose up to four high schools.

Find another school

Type at least two characters to search.

Save

Academic achievement

Beyond a single score: who exceeds, meets or is still approaching the standard.

Learning

How are students doing in English and math?

Exceeded standardMet standardBelow standard

English

grade 11Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 5%
Met standard: 21%
Below standard: 74%

26% met or exceeded · 207 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	Alternative schools
Exceeded	5%	9%
Met	21%	24%
Nearly met	40%	29%
Not met	34%	38%

Below standard combines nearly met and not met. The full track represents all students tested. Share of students tested. Data source: California Department of Education, spring 2025. Reference combines schools in the same enrollment class.

Math

grade 11Spring 2025

All students tested

Exceeded standard: 6%
Met standard: 8%
Below standard: 86%

14% met or exceeded · 210 tested

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	Alternative schools
Exceeded	6%	5%
Met	8%	6%
Nearly met	18%	14%
Not met	68%	75%

What these tests tell you · what to ask

Grade 11 tests are one part of the picture. Graduation, preparation and college destinations answer different questions below.

Ask: How do you help students strengthen their skills while keeping graduation and post-school plans on track?

Closest to standing out

Open a finding for the evidence

In grade 11, 26% met or exceeded the standard in English, against 33% at other alternative high schools.grade 11 · spring 2025

26%English · met or exceeded the standard

Source: CDE CAASPP Smarter Balanced results, spring 2025
Students: all students tested in grade 11
Comparison: Alternative high schools: the grade 11 results of 112 alternative schools combined, weighted by students tested (our calculation; 12,384 in English tested).

Comparisons & progress

Put today’s results in context, then follow the longer view.

Same grades, same year

How does this school compare?

English

grade 11Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school26%

Alternative schools33%

Tested: 207 here · 12,384 in Alternative schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	Alternative schools
Exceeded	5%	9%
Met	21%	24%
Nearly met	40%	29%
Not met	34%	38%

Math

grade 11Spring 2025

All students tested

How it compares · met or exceeded

Same grades · spring 2025 · 0–100%

This school14%

Alternative schools11%

Tested: 210 here · 12,310 in Alternative schools.

Explore the results & sources

Level	Here	Alternative schools
Exceeded	6%	5%
Met	8%	6%
Nearly met	18%	14%
Not met	68%	75%

Life at school

Explore the available evidence about the school day and opportunities.

After graduation

Do students finish prepared, and where do they go?

Preparation · separate measures and cohorts

Graduated in four years

27%

California alternative schools: 35%

2024–25 · 74 of 274 students in the four-year cohort

Source and definition

California Department of Education, adjusted cohort graduation records. Comparison is SchoolScope’s combination of graduates and cohort counts across the reference schools, not CDE’s published state rate.

College / career Prepared

2024–25 · Students in the CDE College/Career Indicator cohort

Source and definition

California Department of Education, College/Career Indicator overall Prepared. Prepared is CDE’s overall classification, not AP participation or a college admission rate.

Completed UC/CSU courses

2024–25 · High-school graduates completing A–G

Source and definition

California Department of Education, A–G completion records. Course completion is separate from college enrollment.

Destinations · class of 2023

Where graduates went

42% enrolled in college within 12 months · 115 high-school completers

University of California0 · 0%
California State University1 · 1%
California community college46 · 40%
In-state private0 · 0%
Out-of-state, 4-year1 · 1%
Out-of-state, 2-year0 · 0%
Not enrolled67 · 58%

Source: CDE college-going records, class of 2023. Shares are our arithmetic: count ÷ completers. A dash is unavailable, not zero. “Not enrolled” does not describe employment, military service or other routes.

Courses and opportunities

What could my child study here?

Courses, access and preparation

AP course or exam pathway qualifiers: 0 of 16 Prepared students · 0.0%
2024–25
Source and what this counts
CDE CCI, all students · 276 eligible students. Cohort includes the current four-year graduation cohort and only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Qualifies through two AP exams scored 3+, two AP courses completed with C− or better, or a qualifying combination in different subjects. Share among Prepared students, not all exam takers or course authorizations. Zero qualifiers does not establish whether AP is offered.
Career pathway: CCI CTE+ qualifiers: 3 students
2024–25
Source and what this counts
CDE CCI: completed a CTE pathway with C− or better in its capstone plus an additional criterion. Not all CTE completers or a list of courses offered.
Dual enrollment (historical): 9 students · offered
2020-21
Source and what this counts
Federal Civil Rights Data Collection historical snapshot, not confirmation of current availability.

Ask before choosing courses

Which courses will run when my child attends, what prerequisites apply, and how do students get support entering advanced or career pathways?

What’s it like

Attendance and discipline

50 in 100students chronically absent, 2024–25

43in 100 at the average California alternative high school

612 of 1,221 students missed 10% or more of school days.

This school50 in 100

at the average California alternative high school43 in 100

0of 1,301 students were suspended at least once, 2024–25

1.0%at the average California alternative high school

Reviews & community voices

Parents’ experience · the school as a workplace

Parent voices

Parent reviews are not available on this profile yet.

Ask current families about communication, belonging and support when a child needs help.

Teacher & staff voices

School-level teacher and staff feedback is not available on this profile yet.

Ask about staff continuity, collaboration and support across the school.

Bring these questions on a visit →

Every learner

Who attends, and how outcomes differ across student groups.

Kids like mine

How each student group did

Met or exceeded · grade 11 · spring 2025. Compare each group with the same group in the same grades.

HereAlternative schoolsEach track: 0–100%

Low-income

169 English · 172 math tested

English23% / 30%

Math13% / 10%

White

119 tested per subject

English25% / 39%

Math13% / 15%

Hispanic or Latino

59 English · 62 math tested

English19% / 30%

Math11% / 9%

All group results, district comparisons and sources

Met or exceeded the standardgrade 11 · spring 2025

Group and subject	Here	vs Alternative schools
Low-income · 169 tested in English, 172 in math
English	23%	−730%
Math	13%	+310%
White · 119 tested
English	25%	−1439%
Math	13%	−215%
Hispanic or Latino · 59 tested in English, 62 in math
English	19%	−1130%
Math	11%	+29%

Each gap is to the same group, grades and subject at other alternative high schools. None is green: no group that is behind at California’s alternative high schools does 10 or more points better here than the same group at California’s alternative high schools.

Asian students, English learners and students with disabilities: fewer than 30 tested here. No published rate here for Black or African American, Filipino, American Indian or Alaska Native, Pacific Islander, homeless and military-family students, students of two or more races and foster youth. That can reflect privacy rules or small numbers; it isn’t evidence of a gap. This table covers groups by income, race or ethnicity, language and disability; girls and boys aren’t split out.

White students did worse than the same group at California’s alternative high schools in English.

Read the student-group results as sentences

Who goes here

Students and staff

Student mix

2024–25 · eligible enrollment

Incomplete category detail

White47%
Hispanic or Latino40%
Asian5%
Two or more races4%
Black or African American2%
American Indian or Alaska Native<1%
Filipino—
Pacific Islander—
Not reported—
Unallocated share<1%

Dashed remainder = 100% minus available shares, not a separate student group. Missing categories remain unavailable. Shares use eligible enrollment in the CDE chronic-absence file.

Full student mix, comparisons & sources

Eligible enrollment, 2024–25	Here
White	47%
Hispanic or Latino	40%
Asian	5%
Two or more races	4%
Black or African American	2%
American Indian or Alaska Native	<1%
Filipino	—
Pacific Islander	—
Not reported	—

Data source: California Department of Education chronic-absence file, 2024–25. Shares use eligible enrollment; unavailable categories are shown as a dash.

About 9 in 10 students qualified for free or reduced-price meals in 2024–25 (87%, 743 of 852). California: 63%.

Teachers, 2024–25

Teachers36

Average experience13 years

First-year teachers0%

24% of teaching positions with proper credential and placement · 2021–22

CDE SARC report 2024–25. The published rate is 23.84%: 4.5 properly credentialed teaching-position FTE out of 19 total position FTE. This measures positions, not individual teachers.

Questions & evidence

Turn the data into useful questions. Trace every result back to its record.

Getting in

Ask Crescent Valley Public Charter II how it admits students.

Charter schools set their own enrollment steps and dates.

crescentvalley2.org

Location and visiting

Get directions ↗

116 East Main Street, Visalia 92391

Directory location · Explore nearby schools on the map. Confirm address eligibility and visit arrangements with the school.

Before you apply

Confirm this school’s current process directly.

Eligibility and entry grades: Which grades are accepting applications, and who is eligible?
Application and lottery: What are the deadlines, enrollment priorities, and lottery or waitlist steps?
The daily logistics: What transportation and before- or after-school options are available?

Questions

Questions to ask

A short list for your school visit.

Most students in grade 11 haven’t yet met the state’s standards in English and math. What extra help do they get, and how do you know it’s working?
Which courses and career pathways are running this year, and who can enroll?
How do counselors help students plan for college, training or work?
What support is available when a student falls behind on graduation requirements?

Call (559) 316-0295 to ask about a visit.

Other options

Schools to explore

Nearby means close to this campus. It does not establish an attendance boundary or a similar student population.

Nearby high schoolsStatewide percentile

Redwood High0.6 mi79thStrong
Mt. Whitney High0.8 mi26thDeveloping
University Preparatory High1.4 mi · Charter school. Check how it admits students.96thStrong

Each percentile compares a school with California schools at its own level.

Explore nearby schools on the map →

Common questions

Is Crescent Valley Public Charter II a good high school?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile (Developing) of California alternative high schools. Its Scope Score is 14 of 100: it places the school among them; it isn’t a grade. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. In 2024–25, 27% of the class graduated in four years (74 of 274); across California’s alternative high schools, 35%. The Scope Score combines 7 dimensions for high schools: graduation rate, exceeded standard, college/career readiness, met or exceeded the standard, chronic absenteeism, suspension rate, and ELPAC English Learner proficiency. See the current formula and weights. Data source: California Department of Education CAASPP 2025, analyzed by SchoolScope.

What are Crescent Valley Public Charter II's CAASPP test scores?

In spring 2025, 26% of students tested in grade 11 met or exceeded the English standard and 14% the math standard; 5% and 6% exceeded it. For the same grades, the class's combined rate was 33% and 11% met or exceeded, 9% and 5% exceeded. 207 students were tested in English and 210 in math (CDE CAASPP 2024–25; the class rate combines its schools' grade rows, weighted by students tested, our calculation).

How does Crescent Valley Public Charter II rank among California alternative schools?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile of 98 California alternative high schools (Developing, 2025; within-class comparison). Crescent Valley Public Charter II ranks #71 by Scope Score in that comparison pool. This is a within-class rank, not a statewide rank. How peer classes work. This ranking is based on a weighted composite of 2025 CAASPP test performance (exceeded and met rates), chronic absenteeism, and suspension rate. Unlike single-number ratings, the Scope Score shows what drives the ranking so parents can decide what matters most to their family. See full methodology.

What do attendance and suspension records show for Crescent Valley Public Charter II?

CDE chronic absence 2024–25: 50.1% of eligible students missed 10% or more of the days they were expected to attend; 612 chronically absent of 1,221 eligible students. CDE suspension 2024–25: 0.0%; 0 unduplicated suspended students of 1,301 cumulative enrollment. Separately, SchoolScope's adjusted chronic-absence scoring input is 48.9%. SchoolScope's adjusted suspension scoring input is 0.2%. These are model inputs, not CDE's reported rates. These figures cannot establish safety or everyday experience. How the Scope Score is built.

How does Crescent Valley Public Charter II compare to other schools in Visalia?

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is in the 27th percentile (Developing) of California alternative high schools. This is a rank inside that group, not a statewide one: SchoolScope compares alternative schools with one another rather than with California's comprehensive campuses, so it cannot be read against a statewide figure. Why these schools are ranked separately. To compare with nearby schools, SchoolScope shows the same measures side by side: the share of students who met or exceeded the standard, the share who exceeded it, growth, chronic absence and suspensions. The school serves 852 students. Use the schools in Visalia page or the map view to compare nearby high schools.

What do reported student-group results show at Crescent Valley Public Charter II?

At Crescent Valley Public Charter II in Visalia, 23.1% of low-income students (CDE’s “socioeconomically disadvantaged” group) met or exceeded the ELA standard in 2025 for reported grade 11, compared to 48.7% statewide for those same grades. Other subgroups: low-income students (13.4% met or exceeded the Math standard); White students (25.2% met or exceeded the ELA standard). The widest gap between a student group’s met-or-exceeded rate and the school-wide rate is 25.6 percentage points: English learners in ELA. Data source: California Department of Education, CAASPP 2024-25. 170 ELA grade test records. SchoolScope shows disaggregated test scores by demographic subgroup so you can see how a school performs for your child's specific group — not just the school-wide average. Subgroup data is context, not part of the Scope Score: we don't penalize schools for who they serve. See our equity approach.

Source records

Explore the data

Available score factors, grade-level results, student-group measures, and nearby-school context, with source details.

Downloads, sources & methodology

Download CSV Report a data issue Methodology Data updates CDE CAASPP research files

Crescent Valley Public Charter II is ranked #71 of California alternative high schools.

Score factorsInspect source values, comparisons and score weights.Weighted composite · 2024–25

Score factors
Factor	School	State	Weight
Graduation rate	27.0%	92.9%	25%
Exceeded standard	5.5%	20.3%	22%
CCI overall Prepared	5.8%	51.7%	20%
Met or exceeded	19.7%	43.8%	18%
Chronic absenteeism	48.9%	22.7%	5%
Suspension rate	0.2%	3.3%	5%

Graduation rate: ↓ vs CA 92.9% · index 0 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
Exceeded standard: ↓ vs CA 20.3% · index 38 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
CCI overall Prepared: ↓ vs CA 51.7% · index 26 on SchoolScope's high-school calibration scale; the state rate above is CDE's statewide student rate, not this school-model index
Met or exceeded: ↓ vs CA 43.8% · index 38 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint
Chronic absenteeism: ↓ vs CA 22.7% · index 35 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▲ 6.8pp higher vs 2024
Suspension rate: ↑ vs CA 3.3% · index 65 · 50 = CA high-school midpoint · ▼ 0.1pp lower vs 2024

Any absence or suspension percentage shown here is a SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring input, not a raw CDE-reported school rate. The State column averages these inputs across scored comprehensive California schools at this level.

By grade & subgroupLook beyond the school average, by grade and student group.CAASPP 2024–25 · % of tested students

These 2024–25 results use Standard Met (Level 3) and Standard Exceeded (Level 4); “Met or exceeded” combines both. California's 2025–26 student reports rename those levels Proficient and Advanced. The later results are not included in this 2024–25 record. California's level descriptions.

ELA · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
ELA	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 11	207	5%	21%	40%	34%	26%	−23

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 11 ELA equal-school mean: 48.6%; n=2080 reporting schools

Math · 2024–25 results by grade

CDE CAASPP 2025
Math	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT	MET+	+/CA
Grade 11	210	6%	8%	18%	68%	14%	−10

California comparison: each reporting school contributes equally; schools with fewer than 15 tested in this grade and subject are excluded.

State grade 11 Math equal-school mean: 23.7%; n=2074 reporting schools

We show the grade rows CDE publishes for this school. A missing grade or dash can mean the school does not serve that grade, that we hold no valid result for it, or that the tested group was too small to report. It does not mean zero.

Earlier years · grade and subject

Year · grade · subject	Students with scores	Met+
2024 · Grade 11 · ELA	163	28.8%
2024 · Grade 11 · Math	166	3.6%
2023 · Grade 11 · ELA	164	23.2%
2023 · Grade 11 · Math	164	2.4%
2022 · Grade 11 · ELA	143	23.8%
2022 · Grade 11 · Math	143	0.0%
2019 · Grade 11 · ELA	121	19.8%
2019 · Grade 11 · Math	123	0.8%

Current 2024–25 grade results appear above. These earlier school-level rows are stored CDE records; original historical files still need independent re-verification. “Students with scores” is the rate denominator for that grade, subject and year. A missing result is not zero or a matched cohort.

Science (CAST)	Tested	EXC	MET	NEAR	NOT
Schoolwide	13	0%	15%	77%	8%

CAST is tested in grades 5 and 8, then once in grade 10, 11, or 12. This row is the school's all-student aggregate. Not part of the Scope Score.

Subgroup · ELA	Tested	MET+	vs district	vs CA
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	170	23.1%	—	−26
White	119	25.2%	—	−42
Hispanic/Latino	60	18.6%	—	−30

Nearest high schoolsInspect the nearby-school comparison and its enrollment context.Nearby schools · distance and enrollment context

nearest by distance

School	Dist	Scope · percentile · band	EXC	MET+	Susp
Crescent Valley Public Charter II ←	—	1427th percentile · Developing · within class · 2025	5.5%	19.7%	0.2%
Redwood High	0.6 mi	6879th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	28.3%	57.5%	1.5%
Mt. Whitney High	0.8 mi	4826th percentile · Developing · statewide · 2025	11.6%	34.2%	5.9%
University Preparatory High	1.4 mi	8596th percentile · Strong · statewide · 2025	50.0%	81.1%	1.7%
California average	—	57School average · no percentile	20.3%	43.8%	3.3%

Susp = SchoolScope model-adjusted suspension input, not the raw CDE-reported school rate.

More measuresRead additional measures and dated historical records.context · not all part of the Scope Score

Additional workforce records

Properly assigned intern credential holders0.0%

CDE 2024–25 SARC, Teacher Preparation and Placement table; measured school year 2021–22. Share of reported school teaching-position full-time equivalents assigned to properly assigned intern credential holders. A reported 0.0% is shown; unavailable rates are omitted. This is a position share, not a count of current teachers or of emergency permits.

District salary records

Teacher salary schedule$39,789 – $78,291

Superintendent salary$98,373

CDE 2024–25 Form J-90, Table 1. These are district-wide reported amounts, not this school's staff salaries. Teacher figures are the district minimum and maximum schedule; principal figures are separate average annual salaries by school level, not career steps. Superintendent salary is the district's reported annual amount. Zero-valued source salary fields are treated as unavailable and omitted.

2025 Scope Score · CDE overall Prepared model · CCI 2025: 14/100. Earlier scores are shown under the legacy model. The score models differ, so their results do not form one trend.

Measure	Source record
This school · CCI overall Prepared	CDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) · all students in the current four-year graduation cohort, plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. Overall CCI Prepared rate 5.8% · numerator 16 students classified Prepared · denominator 276 CCI students.
California · CCI overall Prepared	CDE statewide CCI cohort · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) · overall Prepared rate 51.7% · numerator 257,567 students classified Prepared · denominator 497,814 CCI students.

AP pathway among CCI Prepared studentsCDE College/Career Indicator · CCI source year 2025 · student group ALL (all students) ·AP pathway rate 0.0% · AP-pathway numerator 0 · denominator 16 (CCI Prepared students).This measure uses Prepared students as its denominator, not the whole CCI cohort; it is not an AP exam-taking rate or a count of AP courses offered. That cohort includes all students in the current four-year graduation cohort plus only Prepared fifth-year graduates from the prior cohort. In 2025 the pathway accepts two qualifying AP exams, two qualifying AP courses, or a combination of one of each in different subjects.

CDE's overall Prepared rate is this version's 20% high-school college-readiness score factor. The school rate is 16 of 276 CCI students, not the AP-only pathway or A–G completion rate. The California figure is CDE's statewide CCI student cohort, not an average of SchoolScope's comparable high schools or the SchoolScope school-rank pool.

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model
Assessment year	Scope Score	Percentile	Rank	Comparison group
2019	9/100	7	#102	California alternative high schools · 110 schools
2022	11/100	11	#94	California alternative high schools · 106 schools
2023	13/100	21	#85	California alternative high schools · 108 schools
2024	12/100	20	#88	California alternative high schools · 111 schools

These are retrospective calculations using earlier test results and current school levels and comparison classes. Each year's rank and percentile use that year's measured school group. They do not form a trend across different score models.

The legacy high-school model uses 2024–25 graduation records. Its readiness input uses the 2025 AP pathway share among Prepared students when available; otherwise it uses 2024–25 A-G completion. A reported zero remains zero. These inputs do not describe graduation or readiness in the earlier assessment years. The newer 2025 model instead uses CDE's overall Prepared rate.

Historical ELPAC inputs are absent from these calculations. Missing factor weights are redistributed proportionally among available factors. Adjusted climate values are SchoolScope scoring inputs, distinct from the state’s reported rates.

CDE reported all-students (TA) school rates for 2024 and 2025; the change is 2025 minus 2024 in percentage points.

Year-over-year school rates
Chronic absenteeism2024 · 43.0% → 2025 · 50.1% · +7.1pp
Suspension rate2024 · 0.0% → 2025 · 0.0% · +0.0pp

ELA and Math by test year · all tested grades

Year · subject	Students with scores	Exc	Met+
2025 · ELA	207	4.8%	25.6%
2025 · Math	210	6.2%	13.8%
2024 · ELA	163	4.3%	28.8%
2024 · Math	166	1.2%	3.6%
2023 · ELA	164	4.9%	23.2%
2023 · Math	164	1.2%	2.4%
2022 · ELA	143	4.2%	23.8%
2022 · Math	143	0.0%	0.0%
2019 · ELA	121	0.8%	19.8%
2019 · Math	123	0.0%	0.8%

Each year names its school year end (2025 = 2024–25). “Students with scores” is the subject-specific rate denominator; ELA and Math counts must not be added. Earlier years are stored SchoolScope CDE records whose original files still need independent re-verification; a dash is unavailable, not zero.

Graduation Rate

27.0%

AP pathway among Prepared

0.0%

2025 CDE CCI cohort · AP courses, exams, or both; share of students already Prepared, not course offerings

A-G Completion

2.7%

A-G are the 15 courses (across 7 subjects) required for UC/CSU eligibility

College-Going Rate

41.7%

These source periods and populations differ: graduation uses an adjusted cohort, while A-G completion and college-going use separately reported groups. The rates are shown individually, without a shared performance tier.

Year	Exc	Met+	Absent	Susp
2019	0.4%	10.3%	35.6%	0.6%
2022	2.1%	11.9%	48.9%	0.4%
2023	3.0%	12.8%	31.4%	0.4%
2024	2.8%	16.2%	42.1%	0.4%
2025	5.5%	19.7%	48.9%	0.2%

The Absent and Susp columns are SchoolScope model-adjusted scoring inputs, rather than raw CDE-reported school rates.

NO 2020 OR 2021 RECORDS IN THIS SCHOOLSCOPE SERIES

What we can't show

— This school's rank and percentile are computed against California alternative high schools, not California's comprehensive campuses — see the Enrollment Axiom at /methodology#peer-class.
— Scored here as a high school — other grade spans appear in the data appendix.
— Students classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged here trail the state average for their group by 26 points in ELA in grade 11 — worth asking how the school is closing that gap.

Climate by student groupCompare attendance and discipline records by student group.chronic absenteeism · 2018–19 vs 2024–25 school years

Group	2018–19	2024–25	Δ
Female	—	45.9%	—
Male	—	54.0%	—
Asian	—	32.2%	—
Black/African American	—	54.2%	—
Hispanic/Latino	—	57.9%	—
Two or More Races	—	52.8%	—
White	—	44.8%	—
Students with Disabilities	—	52.3%	—
English Learners	—	51.4%	—
Foster Youth	—	57.7%	—
Homeless	—	73.6%	—
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged	—	50.3%	—
All Students	—	50.1%	—
American Indian/Alaska Native	—	36.4%	—

Separate dots mark the reported school years; no line or intervening-year result is implied. Source: CDE school-level chronic absenteeism by student group.

Advanced coursework — 2020-21 federal civil-rights snapshotInspect the dated federal advanced-coursework snapshot.dated historical snapshot

Measure	This school
AP offered	not offered
AP course count	not reported
AP enrollment	not reported
IB participation	not offered
Dual enrollment	offered · 9 enrolled
Algebra I in grade 8	not reported
Calculus sections	0
Physics sections	0
Chemistry sections	0
Total enrollment (CRDC)	557

Shown, never scored — no entry to any composite. NULL/reserve codes render "not reported," never a fabricated zero. The equity block above this table (§4) is the per-subgroup view of this same collection.

College destinationsRead the completion cohort and its reported college destinations.class of 2023 · CDE 12-mo College-Going Rate

Destination	Completers	% (derived)
University of California	0	0.0%
California State University	1	0.9%
California community college	46	40.0%
In-state private	0	0.0%
Out-of-state, 4-year	1	0.9%
Out-of-state, 2-year	0	0.0%
Not enrolled	67	58.3%

115 completers, class of 2023 · state-reported college-going rate 42% · % column is computed by SchoolScope (count ÷ completers), not a CDE-native rate · an unavailable or suppressed cell is marked as missing; a reported zero remains distinct · source: CDE 12-mo CGR, 2023 cohort (the newest published), National Student Clearinghouse match — a different, older vintage than the fall 2025 UC admissions rows in tables 06-07 above.

Funding source detailFollow funding records at their school or district source grain.CDE ESSA school · CDE SACS district · NCES F-33 district; each row labels its fiscal year and measure

Per-pupil spending

District · current expense$15,169 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · fall district membership: 130 pupils

California · selected district mean$14,491 per pupil

NCES F-33 · FY 2020–21 (2021) · SchoolScope’s unweighted mean across 818 selected California district finance records

District current expense · FY 2024–25$28,351 per ADA

CDE SACS Current Expense of Education · district fiscal year ending 2025 · average daily attendance denominator

ShowHide how the California mean was selected

SchoolScope starts with its selected California finance records, not every NCES California district. For FY 2020–21, it calculates an unweighted mean of NCES F-33 current expense per pupil. District records contribute once, regardless of enrollment. The calculation keeps records with positive per-pupil current expense, enrollment over 100, CCD agency type 1, and a recorded district name; it excludes names ending in County Office of Education, Department of Education, or Superintendent of Schools. This is a SchoolScope calculation, not a state-published spending average.

Selected General Fund operating costs · FY 2024–25 · SchoolScope calculation

Instruction 58%Instruction support 11%Student services 13%Administration 8%Buildings & maintenance 10%

SchoolScope groups district-level CDE SACS UserGL actuals from Fund 01, using operating objects 1000–5999 and excluding retiree benefits, food and community services, facilities acquisition, other outgo, and nonagency goals. These shares use that filtered total; they do not exactly break down CDE's official current expense per ADA above. The school-level ESSA figure uses a separate source.

ShowHide the district's spending year by year

NCES F-33 district fiscal-year history, 2017–2021; latest district record shown: 2021

2021$15,169 per pupil

2020$12,326 per pupil

2019$13,062 per pupil

2018$15,989 per pupil

2017$13,013 per pupil

09ZIP-area community recordACS 2020–2024 · ZCTA 92391

ShowHide table 09 — ZIP-area community record

American Community Survey 5-year estimates · 2020–2024 · ZIP Code Tabulation Area 92391
Measure	Estimate
Median household income	$81,789
Bachelor's degree or higher (adults 25+)	16.81%
ZCTA population	2,254
Median age	34.6 years

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2020–2024 5-year estimates. Median household income covers the past 12 months and is reported in 2024 inflation-adjusted dollars. Bachelor's degree or higher uses adults age 25 and over as its population. A dash is unavailable, not zero; a reported zero remains zero. ZIP/ZCTA context does not establish the school's attendance area or describe its enrolled students. These figures are not part of the Scope Score.

Embed this scorecard

<iframe
  src="https://schoolscope.co/embed/school/crescent-valley-public-charter-ii-6507"
  width="100%" height="210" loading="lazy"
  style="border:0;border-radius:12px"
  title="Crescent Valley Public Charter II — SchoolScope scorecard">
</iframe>

Free to embed with the credit link. Data updates automatically.

EXC = exceeded standard · MET+ = met or exceeded the standard · Source: CA Dept. of Education · CAASPP 2024–25 · n=1,500 high schools · Vintages: climate subgroups 2019+2025 · district finance per its label · ACS 2024 · CRDC 2020-21 historical snapshot · CDE 12-mo CGR 2023 cohort, National Student Clearinghouse match · Data updated 2026-09-27

SchoolScope scores and verdicts are our reading of public California Department of Education data, not an official rating. How we analyze · Request a correction

Crescent Valley Public Charter II

Compare schools

How are students doing in English and math?

English

Math

How does this school compare?

English

Math

Do students finish prepared, and where do they go?

Graduated in four years

College / career Prepared

Completed UC/CSU courses

Where graduates went

What could my child study here?

Courses, access and preparation

Attendance and discipline

Parent voices

Teacher & staff voices

How each student group did

Low-income

White

Hispanic or Latino

Students and staff

Student mix

Ask Crescent Valley Public Charter II how it admits students.

Location and visiting

Before you apply

Questions to ask

Schools to explore

Common questions

Explore the data

Additional workforce records

Earlier assessment years · legacy Scope Score model

Per-pupil spending

Help us make SchoolScope more useful